Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Accel-GCN: High-Performance GPU Accelerator Design for Graph Convolution Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11825 v1 pith:CJLDBSIO submitted 2023-08-22 cs.AR cs.LG

Accel-GCN: High-Performance GPU Accelerator Design for Graph Convolution Networks

classification cs.AR cs.LG
keywords memoryaccel-gcngcnsgraphstrategytimeswarpworkload
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) are pivotal in extracting latent information from graph data across various domains, yet their acceleration on mainstream GPUs is challenged by workload imbalance and memory access irregularity. To address these challenges, we present Accel-GCN, a GPU accelerator architecture for GCNs. The design of Accel-GCN encompasses: (i) a lightweight degree sorting stage to group nodes with similar degree; (ii) a block-level partition strategy that dynamically adjusts warp workload sizes, enhancing shared memory locality and workload balance, and reducing metadata overhead compared to designs like GNNAdvisor; (iii) a combined warp strategy that improves memory coalescing and computational parallelism in the column dimension of dense matrices. Utilizing these principles, we formulated a kernel for sparse matrix multiplication (SpMM) in GCNs that employs block-level partitioning and combined warp strategy. This approach augments performance and multi-level memory efficiency and optimizes memory bandwidth by exploiting memory coalescing and alignment. Evaluation of Accel-GCN across 18 benchmark graphs reveals that it outperforms cuSPARSE, GNNAdvisor, and graph-BLAST by factors of 1.17 times, 1.86 times, and 2.94 times respectively. The results underscore Accel-GCN as an effective solution for enhancing GCN computational efficiency.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.