Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Displacement-field tuning in a single twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2 device switches moiré physics between K-valley and Γ-valley bands, producing contrasting correlated phases.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2, an electric field selects either K- or Γ-valley moiré bands, giving contrasting weak-insulator versus Pomeranchuk-like behavior at ν=1 and 1/3.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection A credible new-platform claim with a compelling K/Γ contrast, but the central valley assignment and the Pomeranchuk label rest on evidence deferred to the SM and on R(T) alone. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18212 v1 pith:CN4R2ZK2 submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.mes-hall

Contrasting Gamma- and K-Valley Moir\'e Physics in Twisted Monolayer/Bilayer WSe₂

Jackson Kuklin , Ning Mao , Milan Mandigo-Stoba , Edgar Elias , Tianci Song , Connor Engel , Pola Pietrzkowski , Kenji Watanabe
show 4 more authors
Takashi Taniguchi Daniel Rhodes Yang Zhang Qianhui Shi
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords moiré materialsvalley selectivityorbital characterPomeranchuk effectMott transitiongeneralized Wigner crystaltwisted WSe2displacement-field tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that a single twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2 device can be tuned by displacement field so that holes populate either the K valley or the Γ valley of the valence band. Because these valleys have different orbital character—Γ bands are heavier, more layer-hybridized, and weakly spin-orbit coupled, while K bands are layer-polarized with strong Ising spin-orbit coupling—the same moiré lattice produces different correlated states in each regime. At filling ν=1, the K-valley state is a weak insulator interpreted as an antiferromagnet near a van Hove singularity, whereas the Γ-valley state shows a Pomeranchuk effect interpreted as proximity to a Mott transition. At ν=1/3, the K valley hosts a robust generalized Wigner crystal, while the Γ valley sits near the crystallization boundary with localization strengthened by temperature or magnetic field. The paper's claim matters because it makes the orbital/valley degree of freedom a practical tuning knob and places the Γ valley close to several quantum phase boundaries where unusual phases may emerge.

Core claim

In a twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2 stack with an ABB' interface and a twist angle near 3.4°, the lack of C2 symmetry produces a triangular moiré potential, and an applied displacement field shifts the layer-polarized K bands relative to the less-responsive Γ bands. The paper identifies distinct displacement-field regimes where carriers occupy either Γ-derived or K-derived moiré bands, and shows that these regimes host qualitatively different correlated phases. At ν=1, the K-valley state develops weak insulating behavior below about 10 K, consistent with an antiferromagnetic state near a van Hove singularity; the Γ-valley state instead shows resistance that rises as temperature drops and the

What carries the argument

The central object is the valley-selective moiré band: Γ-derived bands (dominated by d_z2 and chalcogen p_z orbitals, heavier effective mass, strong interlayer hybridization, weak spin-orbit coupling) versus K-derived bands (d_x2-y2 ± i d_xy orbitals, layer-polarized, strong Ising spin-orbit coupling). The displacement field D shifts the populations of these valleys, selecting which band forms the triangular moiré lattice. The argument is carried by a triangular-lattice Hubbard model with valley-dependent interaction parameters: Γ has U/t ≈ 8, close to the Mott transition, producing a Pomeranchuk effect; K has intermediate coupling and forms a weak insulator only near the van Hove singularit

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the low-displacement transport regime really reflects holes in a Γ-derived moiré band and the higher-displacement regime reflects K-derived bands; if that valley assignment is wrong, the central contrast collapses into ordinary displacement-field band modifications.

What would settle it

Measure the entropy or spin susceptibility in the low-displacement 'Γ-valley' regime at ν=1: the Pomeranchuk interpretation requires the higher-temperature state to carry excess entropy from local moments, so a magnetocaloric measurement showing no entropy excess—or a spin susceptibility inconsistent with Heisenberg-like moments—would falsify the Mott-proximity claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the same device provides two different Hubbard-model realizations—an Ising-like K-valley system and a Heisenberg-like Γ-valley system—at the same twist angle, distinguished only by displacement field.
  • The Γ-valley ν=1 state, with U/t ≈ 8 and |t2/t1| ≈ 0.15, sits in a parameter region where triangular-lattice Hubbard models are theoretically predicted to host chiral spin liquids; the paper suggests entropy measurements could test this.
  • At ν=1/3, the Γ-valley Pomeranchuk effect implies the state lies near the generalized-Wigner-crystal melting boundary, so temperature or magnetic field drives further localization—an unusual reverse-melting signature.
  • The K-valley weak insulator is stabilized only near the van Hove singularity, matching twisted bilayer WSe2 behavior and implying that moving away from that filling or band structure should restore metallic behavior.
  • Magnetic-field response cleanly separates the regimes: Γ states become more insulating at high field due to the larger susceptibility of local moments, while the K-valley insulator is suppressed by about 4 T with quantum oscillations emerging.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that continuously sweeping displacement field between the Γ and K regimes could drive a single moiré system through a crossover between Heisenberg-like and Ising-like spin physics, possibly revealing interaction-driven transitions between the corresponding phases.
  • If Γ-valley moiré bands are generically closer to Mott and crystallization boundaries, other twisted TMD heterostructures engineered to bring Γ to the band edge may exhibit similar Pomeranchuk physics without requiring large displacement fields.
  • The near-boundary Γ states suggest that small changes in twist angle, dielectric environment, or strain—all of which shift U/t—could push the Γ valley across the Mott or crystallization transition; a device series varying twist angle would test this prediction.
  • The Pomeranchuk interpretation implies a measurable entropy excess in the localized Γ state, so entropy-sensitive probes such as magnetocaloric measurements at the resistance turnover could distinguish the proposed mechanism from ordinary band-filling effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports transport measurements on a twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2 device and argues that a displacement field D switches the populated moiré band between the K and Γ valleys of WSe2. On this basis it claims contrasting correlated phases in the same device: at ν=1, a weak K-valley insulator versus a Γ-valley state with a pronounced Pomeranchuk effect; at ν=1/3, a robust K-valley generalized Wigner crystal versus a Γ-valley state near the crystallization boundary that again shows a Pomeranchuk-like response. The Γ-valley behavior is interpreted with a triangular-lattice Hubbard model with U/t1≈8, |t2/t1|≈0.15, and J≈7 K, motivating speculation about proximity to a Mott transition and possibly a spin liquid. The transport data are presented as color maps in D and ν and as temperature and magnetic-field traces. Key assignments and parameters are deferred to the Supplemental Material, which is not included in the posted version.

Significance. If correct, this work is a substantial advance: it would demonstrate, in a single device, that the orbital character of the populated valley controls the nature of correlated insulating states, and it would provide a new platform for Γ-valley moiré physics with nearly SU(2)-symmetric spins and stronger localization than K-valley systems. The measured phase boundaries in D and ν are clear, and the temperature and magnetic-field traces are internally consistent. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions about entropy and about the existence of a spin-liquid-like regime near the Γ-valley Mott transition. However, the two most load-bearing elements—the identity of the valley in each D regime and the values of U/t1 and t2/t1—are not derivable from the main-text transport data and are only referenced to the Supplemental Material. The Pomeranchuk label in particular rests on resistance-temperature behavior alone, without thermodynamic entropy evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1(c)–(d); text after 'The identification of different regimes...'] The valley assignment is the load-bearing step of the paper. The claim that the low-D regime is the Γ-valley moiré band and that |D|>~0.1 V/nm accesses the K valley is supported only by a schematic and one sentence referring to first-principles calculations and quantum oscillations in the Supplemental Material. The SM is not present in the posted version, so the reader cannot verify that the low-D correlated states are actually Γ-valley states. If the assignment is wrong, the central 'K versus Γ contrast' collapses into a single-band displacement-field effect. The valley assignment must be supported in the main text or by an accessible SM: at minimum a calculated band-alignment plot as a function of D and a quantum-oscillation trace identifying the Fermi-surface pocket in each regime.
  2. [Fig. 2(d)–(f); section 'The different behaviors in the K and Γ valley...'] The term 'Pomeranchuk effect' is used as a definitive interpretation of a non-monotonic R(T): resistance rises with decreasing T and then drops sharply below about 7 K. No thermodynamic entropy measurement (e.g., compressibility, heat capacity, or thermoelectric response) is presented. A resistance maximum is also compatible with an ordinary insulator-to-metal crossover, percolation, or temperature-driven valley repopulation. Given that the abstract and conclusions rest on this label, the authors should either provide entropy-sensitive data or explicitly phrase the claim as 'transport signatures consistent with a Pomeranchuk-like scenario' and discuss alternative explanations. As written, the evidence is disproportionate to the claim.
  3. [Fig. 3(a)–(b); subsection 'Next, we turn to the correlated states at fractional moiré fillings'] The Γ-valley ν=1/3 state is described as 'not clearly manifested' in the R versus D trace and only 'distinguished' in the R versus ν inset. Yet it is subsequently assigned a Pomeranchuk effect and placed 'near the crystallization boundary.' The feature is weak relative to the K-valley GWC peaks, and no quantitative measure (peak resistance relative to background, thermal activation gap, or comparison with a non-interacting reference) is provided. The claim that the Γ-valley ν=1/3 state exhibits the same entropy-driven effect as ν=1 needs more than a small maximum in R(T). Without quantitative support, the ν=1/3 contrast is not established.
  4. [Section 'The different behaviors...'; values U/t1≈8, |t2/t1|≈0.15, J=4t1^2/U≈7 K] The placement of the Γ valley near the Mott transition and the spin-liquid speculation rely entirely on parameter values that are deferred to the Supplemental Material. These numbers are not extracted from the transport data shown; they come from band-structure models described only by a citation. Because the main text uses these parameters to distinguish K and Γ behavior and to motivate the quantum spin liquid possibility, the authors must include the underlying calculation (or at least a table with the extracted U, t1, t2 and the method) in the paper. Without this, the central consistency argument is not verifiable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Page 1, bottom] The floating line 'As arXiv:2607.18212v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 20 Jul 2026' appears to be a running header artifact; it should be removed.
  2. [Fig. 2(d) caption] The legend refers to 'colored triangles in (a)', but Fig. 2(a) is a schematic drawing; the triangles marking D values likely belong in panel (b). Please correct the cross-reference.
  3. [Reference [6]] Ref. [6] is incomplete: 'Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect .' has no journal/volume/year information.
  4. [Section 'Next, we turn...'] Typo: 'Coloumb' should be 'Coulomb'.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] Minor grammatical issues: 'identify the Γ valley as a promising platform' should be 'identifies' in the abstract; the phrase 'with localization enhanced by increasing temperature or magnetic field' should be rephrased for clarity.
  6. [Fig. 3(a) inset] The inset uses D = −10 mV/nm. Please specify that this D is in the Γ-valley regime and provide the peak resistance relative to the background, since the inset is the only direct evidence for the Γ-valley ν=1/3 feature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Self-contained experimental/model analysis: no prediction reduces to a fit or to a self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: transport measurements at ν=1 and ν=1/3 -> assignment of features to K and Γ valleys -> interpretation via Hubbard/Pomeranchuk/GWC physics. No step is circular by construction. The valley assignment is not fitted to the resistance-temperature curves that are later interpreted; the text states it is supported by first-principles calculations and high-field quantum oscillations (deferred to the Supplemental Material). The interaction parameters 'U/t1 ≈8' and '|t2/t1| ≈0.15' are quoted as band-structure-derived estimates from the SM, not extracted from the R(T) data, so the 'close to Mott transition' and 'kinetic frustration' interpretation is not a rename of the observed Pomeranchuk-like behavior. The theoretical expectations for a Pomeranchuk effect near a Mott transition and for generalized Wigner crystals are cited from independent numerical/literature sources (e.g., refs 35-38, 42, 47, 56) and from external twisted-bilayer WSe2 observations. The only overlapping-author citation (ref 43) is used for the background statement that K-valley moiré hoppings are valley-contrasting and Ising-like; the central K/Γ contrast does not reduce to this citation, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The reliance on the SM for the decisive valley identification is a transparency/verifiability concern, but the manuscript does not define the valley labels in terms of the transport features it predicts, so it is not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on prior band-structure knowledge, triangular-lattice Hubbard modeling, and SM-based parameter estimates. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • U/t1 (Γ valley) = ≈8
    Estimated from first-principles calculations in the SM for the Γ moiré band at the measured twist angle; used to argue proximity to the Mott transition and to motivate spin-liquid speculation. Not directly measured in transport.
  • |t2/t1| (Γ valley) = ≈0.15
    Reported in SM; used to argue additional kinetic frustration beyond the nearest-neighbor triangular lattice, supporting the spin-liquid discussion. Not directly measured.
  • J = 4 t1^2/U = ≈7 K
    Derived from the Γ-band parameters; sets the exchange energy scale and underlies the spin-entropy/Pomeranchuk interpretation. Not measured independently.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The valence band edge of twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2 consists of K/K' and Γ valley moiré bands with distinct orbital characters, and a displacement field can switch the populated valley.
    Introduced in Fig. 1(c) and the text; supported by prior literature and deferred SM quantum-oscillation data. Central to interpreting D-dependent phases as valley-specific.
  • domain assumption The moiré potential in twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe2 is triangular rather than honeycomb due to the lack of C2 symmetry.
    Stated on p.2: 'the lack of C2 symmetry in the twisted monolayer/bilayer structure leads to a triangle rather than honeycomb moiré potential (see supplemental material).' Underlies the Hubbard-on-triangular-lattice modeling.
  • domain assumption At ν=1 both K and Γ valleys realize a Hubbard model on a triangular lattice, with different interaction-to-hopping ratios.
    Stated on p.2-3, citing refs [33,34]; used to connect transport to Mott physics.
  • domain assumption A Pomeranchuk effect — localization stabilized by increasing temperature because the localized state carries larger spin entropy — occurs near Mott transitions and Wigner-crystal melting.
    Invoked to interpret R(T) drops at low T in the Γ valley; based on refs [41,42,56].
  • domain assumption The triangular-lattice Hubbard model with U/t≈8 and |t2/t1|≈0.15 is close to a Mott transition and may host a chiral spin liquid.
    Used on p.4-5 with refs [42,44-51] to motivate the quantum-spin-liquid speculation.
  • domain assumption In a Chern-zero band, resistive states at fractional filling (ν=1/3, 1/4) are generalized Wigner crystals stabilized by long-range Coulomb interactions.
    Stated on p.5, citing refs [34,55]; used to interpret the fractional-filling data.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Contrasting $\Gamma$- and K-Valley Moir\'e Physics in Twisted Monolayer/Bilayer WSe$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CN4R2ZK2

@misc{pith2026260718212,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Contrasting $\Gamma$- and K-Valley Moir\'e Physics in Twisted Monolayer/Bilayer WSe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CN4R2ZK2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18212}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Electronic orbital character plays a central role in determining electronic correlations, spin-orbit coupling, dimensionality, and ultimately the quantum phases of condensed-matter systems. Two-dimensional moir\'e materials have emerged as highly tunable platforms for exploring correlated phenomena, but the role of orbital degrees of freedom remains largely unexplored. Here, we identify twisted monolayer/bilayer WSe$_2$ as a platform in which displacement-field tuning enables moir\'e physics to be realized in both the $K$ and $\Gamma$ valleys. The distinct orbital characters of these valleys give rise to contrasting correlated phases at moir\'e filling factors $\nu=1$ and $\nu=1/3$. At $\nu=1$, the $K$-valley state is a weak insulator, consistent with an antiferromagnetic state near a van Hove singularity in the intermediate-coupling regime, similar to that observed in twisted bilayer WSe$_2$. In contrast, the $\Gamma$-valley state exhibits a pronounced Pomeranchuk effect, consistent with proximity to a Mott transition. At $\nu=1/3$, the $K$ valley hosts a robust generalized Wigner crystal, whereas the $\Gamma$-valley state lies near the crystallization boundary and again exhibits a Pomeranchuk effect, with localization enhanced by increasing temperature or magnetic field. Our work highlights the importance of orbital character in defining quantum phases in moir\'e systems, and identify the $\Gamma$ valley as a promising platform for exploring correlated phenomena near quantum phase transitions, where competing phases and enhanced fluctuations may give rise to unconventional phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18212 by Connor Engel, Daniel Rhodes, Edgar Elias, Jackson Kuklin, Kenji Watanabe, Milan Mandigo-Stoba, Ning Mao, Pola Pietrzkowski, Qianhui Shi, Takashi Taniguchi, Tianci Song, Yang Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overview of the device and valley population. (a) Schematic illustration of the device structure with a moir´e interface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Contrasting correlated states in Γ and K valley at moir´e filling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Contrasting correlated states in Γ and K valley at moir´e filling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic phase diagram of the metal-to-Mott insu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Tokura, Y. & Nagaosa, N. Orbital Physics in Transition- Metal Oxides.Science288, 462–468 (2000)

    2000

  2. [2]

    & Norman, M

    Botana, A. & Norman, M. Similarities and Differences between lanio2 and cacuo2 and implications for super- conductivity.Physical Review X10, 011024 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Y., Lee, K

    Wang, B. Y., Lee, K. & Goodge, B. H. Experimental Progress in Superconducting Nickelates.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics15, 305–324 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    R., Efetov, D

    Balents, L., Dean, C. R., Efetov, D. K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands.Nature Physics16, 725–733 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Semiconductor moir´ e materials. Nature Nanotechnology17, 686–695 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Cao, T., Fu, L., Ju, L., Xiao, D. & Xu, X. Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect

  7. [7]

    M.et al.Moir´ e heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator.Nature Physics 17, 155–163 (2021)

    Kennes, D. M.et al.Moir´ e heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator.Nature Physics 17, 155–163 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Lei, C., Mahon, P. T. & MacDonald, A. Moir´ e Band Theory for M-Valley Twisted Transition Metal Dichalco- genides.Physical Review Letters135, 196402 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Ab initiotight-binding Hamiltonian for transition metal dichalcogenides.Physical Review B92, 205108 (2015)

    Fang, S.et al. Ab initiotight-binding Hamiltonian for transition metal dichalcogenides.Physical Review B92, 205108 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    C.et al.Tunable Gamma K Valley Popu- lations in Hole Doped Trilayer WSe 2.Physical Review Letters120, 107703 (2018)

    Movva, H. C.et al.Tunable Gamma K Valley Popu- lations in Hole Doped Trilayer WSe 2.Physical Review Letters120, 107703 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    & Pollmann, J

    Voß, D., Kr¨ uger, P., Mazur, A. & Pollmann, J. Atomic and electronic structure of WSe 2 fromab initiotheory: Bulk crystal and thin film systems.Physical Review B 60, 14311–14317 (1999)

    1999

  12. [12]

    Olin, S., Jmukhadze, E., MacDonald, A. H. & Lee, W.- C. Ab initio study of the energy competition between gamma and K valleys in bilayer transition metal dichalco- genides.Physical Review B109, 165101 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Wei, L.et al.Valley charge-transfer insulator in twisted double bilayer WSe2.Nature Communications16, 1185 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    & MacDonald, A

    Wu, F., Lovorn, T., Tutuc, E., Martin, I. & MacDonald, A. Topological Insulators in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Homobilayers.Physical Review Letters 122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    C.et al.Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices.Nature579, 359–363 (2020)

    Regan, E. C.et al.Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices.Nature579, 359–363 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Tang, Y.et al.Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices.Nature579, 353–358 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Wang, L.et al.Correlated electronic phases in twisted bi- layer transition metal dichalcogenides.Nature Materials 19, 861–866 (2020)

    2020

  18. [19]

    Kang, K.et al.Double Quantum Spin Hall Phase in Moir´ e WSe2.Nano Letters24, 14901–14907 (2024)

    2024

  19. [20]

    Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

    Xia, Y.et al.Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe2. Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

    2025

  20. [21]

    Guo, Y.et al.Superconductivity in 5.0°twisted bilayer WSe2.Nature637, 839–845 (2025)

    2025

  21. [22]

    Xia, Y.et al.Bandwidth-tuned Mott transition and su- perconductivity in moir´ e WSe2.Nature1–7 (2026)

    2026

  22. [23]

    Cai, J.et al.Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2.Nature622, 63–68 (2023)

    2023

  23. [24]

    Zeng, Y.et al.Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2.Nature622, 69–73 (2023)

    2023

  24. [25]

    Park, H.et al.Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect.Nature622, 74–79 (2023)

    2023

  25. [26]

    Physical Review X13, 031037 (2023)

    Xu, F.et al.Observation of Integer and Fractional Quan- tum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayer mote2. Physical Review X13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  26. [27]

    URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/2605.21233

    Han, Z.et al.Stacking-order-dependent electronic prop- erties of MoTe2/WSe2 moir´ e bilayers (2026). URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/2605.21233. ArXiv:2605.21233 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [28]

    Xian, L.et al.Realization of nearly dispersionless bands with strong orbital anisotropy from destructive interfer- ence in twisted bilayer MoS2.Nature Communications 12(2021)

    2021

  28. [29]

    & MacDonald, A

    Angeli, M. & MacDonald, A. H. Gamma valley transi- tion metal dichalcogenide moire bands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(2021)

    2021

  29. [30]

    & Jian, C.-M

    Pan, H., Kim, E.-A. & Jian, C.-M. Realizing a tunable honeycomb lattice in ABBA-stacked twisted double bi- layer WSe2.Physical Review Research5(2023)

    2023

  30. [31]

    Ma, L.et al.Relativistic Mott transition in twisted WSe2 tetralayers.Nature Materials1–7 (2025)

    2025

  31. [32]

    A.et al.Tunable spin and valley excitations of correlated insulators in gamma-valley moire bands.Na- ture Materials22, 731–736 (2023)

    Foutty, B. A.et al.Tunable spin and valley excitations of correlated insulators in gamma-valley moire bands.Na- ture Materials22, 731–736 (2023)

    2023

  32. [33]

    & MacDonald, A

    Wu, F., Lovorn, T., Tutuc, E. & MacDonald, A. Hubbard Model Physics in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide moire Bands.Physical Review Letters121, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  33. [34]

    & Changlani, H

    Kumar, A., Lewandowski, C. & Changlani, H. J. Origin and stability of generalized Wigner crystallinity in tri- angular moir´ e systems.npj Quantum Materials10, 95 (2025)

    2025

  34. [35]

    Rozen, A.et al.Entropic evidence for a Pomeranchuk effect in magic-angle graphene.Nature592, 214–219 (2021)

    2021

  35. [36]

    Saito, Y.et al.Isospin Pomeranchuk effect in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature592, 220–224 (2021)

    2021

  36. [37]

    Zhang, M.et al.Tuning Quantum Phase Transitions at Half Filling in 3l mote2/wse2 moire Superlattices.Phys- ical Review X12, 041015 (2022)

    2022

  37. [38]

    Holleis, L.et al.Fluctuating magnetism and Pomer- anchuk effect in multilayer graphene.Nature640, 355– 360 (2025)

    2025

  38. [39]

    Xu, Y.et al.Correlated insulating states at fractional fill- ings of moir´ e superlattices.Nature587, 214–218 (2020)

    2020

  39. [40]

    J.et al.Quantum melting of generalized elec- tron crystal in twisted bilayer MoSe2.Nature Communi- cations16, 4058 (2025)

    Zong, Q. J.et al.Quantum melting of generalized elec- tron crystal in twisted bilayer MoSe2.Nature Communi- cations16, 4058 (2025)

    2025

  40. [41]

    On the theory of liquid and solid He3

    Goldstein, L. On the theory of liquid and solid He3. Annals of Physics8, 390–434 (1959)

    1959

  41. [42]

    Wietek, A.et al.Mott Insulating States with Competing Orders in the Triangular Lattice Hubbard Model.Phys- ical Review X11, 041013 (2021). 7

    2021

  42. [43]

    Devakul, T., Cr´ epel, V., Zhang, Y. & Fu, L. Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers.Nature Communications12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  43. [44]

    Theory of a continuous Mott transition in two dimensions.Physical Review B78, 045109 (2008)

    Senthil, T. Theory of a continuous Mott transition in two dimensions.Physical Review B78, 045109 (2008)

    2008

  44. [45]

    Spin liquids in frustrated magnets.Nature 464, 199–208 (2010)

    Balents, L. Spin liquids in frustrated magnets.Nature 464, 199–208 (2010)

    2010

  45. [46]

    V., Gonz´ alez, I., Melko, R

    Mishmash, R. V., Gonz´ alez, I., Melko, R. G., Motrunich, O. I. & Fisher, M. P. A. Continuous Mott transition between a metal and a quantum spin liquid.Physical Review B91, 235140 (2015)

    2015

  46. [47]

    Szasz, A., Motruk, J., Zaletel, M. P. & Moore, J. E. Chi- ral Spin Liquid Phase of the Triangular Lattice Hubbard Model: A Density Matrix Renormalization Group Study. Physical Review X10, 021042 (2020)

    2020

  47. [48]

    & Poll- mann, F

    Drescher, M., Vanderstraeten, L., Moessner, R. & Poll- mann, F. Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in an s = 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromag- net on the triangular lattice.Physical Review B108, L220401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [49]

    F., Montorsi, A

    Tocchio, L. F., Montorsi, A. & Becca, F. Magnetic and spin-liquid phases in the frustrated t-t’ Hubbard model on the triangular lattice.Physical Review B102, 115150 (2020)

    2020

  49. [50]

    & White, S

    Zhu, Z. & White, S. R. Spin liquid phase of thes= 1 2 J1–J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice.Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

    2015

  50. [51]

    & Sheng, D

    Hu, W.-J., Gong, S.-S., Zhu, W. & Sheng, D. N. Com- peting spin-liquid states in the spin- 1 2 two-dimensional J1–J2 triangular Heisenberg model.Phys. Rev. B91, 075112 (2015)

    2015

  51. [52]

    URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19287

    Han, Z.et al.Quantum oscillations between ex- citonic and quantum spin Hall insulators in moir´ e WSe2 (2025). URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19287. ArXiv:2509.19287 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Bi, Z. & Fu, L. Excitonic density wave and spin-valley superfluid in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenide.Na- ture Communications12, 642 (2021)

    2021

  53. [54]

    & Millis, A

    Mu˜ noz-Segovia, D., Cr´ epel, V., Queiroz, R. & Millis, A. J. Twist-angle evolution of the intervalley-coherent antiferromagnet in twisted WSe$ 2$(2025). URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.11763. ArXiv:2503.11763 [cond- mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    & Kim, E.-A

    Matty, M. & Kim, E.-A. Melting of generalized Wigner crystals in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayer Moir´ e systems.Nature Communications13, 7098 (2022)

    2022

  55. [56]

    Phases intermediate between a two- dimensional electron liquid and Wigner crystal.Physical Review B70(2004)

    Spivak, B. Phases intermediate between a two- dimensional electron liquid and Wigner crystal.Physical Review B70(2004)

    2004

  56. [57]

    Sung, J.et al.An electronic microemulsion phase emerg- ing from a quantum crystal-to-liquid transition.Nature Physics21, 437–443 (2025)

    2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.