Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.11420 v3 pith:CNWMIQRV submitted 2020-01-30 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords lambdaredshiftsanisotropichighsigmastressdarkdeviations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Recent analyses of the Planck data and quasars at high redshifts have suggested possible deviations from the flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter model ($\Lambda$CDM), where $\Lambda$ is the cosmological constant. Here we use machine learning methods to investigate any possible deviations from $\Lambda$CDM at both low and high redshifts by using the latest cosmological data. Specifically, we apply the Genetic Algorithms to explore the nature of dark energy (DE) in a model independent fashion by reconstructing its equation of state $w(z)$, the growth index of matter density perturbations $\gamma(z)$, the linear DE anisotropic stress $\eta_\textrm{DE}(z)$ and the adiabatic sound speed $c_\textrm{s,DE}^2(z)$ of DE perturbations. We find a $\sim2\sigma$ deviation of $w(z)$ from -1 at high redshifts, the adiabatic sound speed is negative at the $\sim2.5\sigma$ level at $z=0.1$ and a $\sim2\sigma$ deviation of the anisotropic stress from unity at low redshifts and $\sim4 \sigma$ at high redshifts. These results hint towards either the presence of an non-adiabatic component in the DE sound speed or the presence of DE anisotropic stress, thus hinting at possible deviations from the $\Lambda$CDM model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparative analysis of the NANOgrav Hellings-Downs as a window into new physics

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using NANOGrav 15-year data, four modified Hellings-Downs models are compared; spin-2 ultralight dark matter and massive gravity match the standard prediction, while weak, non-definitive evidence favors a non-Gaussian...

  2. Bayesian and Machine-Learning Analyses of Nonminimal $f(Q)$ Gravity and $H_0$ Tension

    gr-qc 2025-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A nonminimal f(Q) gravity model fitted to CC, DESI BAO and three supernova samples gives H0 ≈ 68 km/s/Mpc, similar to ΛCDM, and is disfavored by BIC.

Pith tools