Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 59 references

Sequential Topological Superconductivity in a Square Lattice with Chiral Charge Density Waves

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a square-lattice superconductor, a real bond modulation plus a time-reversal-breaking chiral flux drives two successive topological phase transitions, ending in Chern numbers +2 and −2.

desk verdict Clean model study with a genuinely new C=±2 mechanism, but the factor-of-two mismatch in the stated analytic boundary and the tiny bulk gaps in the C=-2 phase need attention before I'd take the experimental claim seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21525 v1 pith:CO23XP2H submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhong-Xian Jin , Junkang Huang , Yu-Xuan Li , Tao Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords topologicalsuperconductivityChernnumberchiralfluxphasechargebondordersquarelatticethermalHallconductivityMajoranaedgemodesdensitywave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a square-lattice superconductor can be made topological not by either charge order alone, but only by their combination. When a real bond modulation (CBO) and an imaginary, time-reversal-breaking hopping modulation (CFP) coexist with uniform s-wave pairing, increasing the CFP strength drives the system through two topological phase transitions: from trivial to Chern number C=+2, then to C=−2. The first transition is a quadratic band touching at Γ whose critical flux is exactly sqrt(Δ²+μ²/4), independent of CBO strength; the second comes from Dirac cones along X–M. If correct, this makes the square lattice a clean, frustration-free host for chiral topological superconductivity, with chiral Majorana edge modes and quantized thermal Hall plateaus as observable signatures.

What carries the argument

The engine is the 2×2 CDW pattern of Eq. (3) and Fig. 1: ξij=±1 on inter-/intra-cell bonds (CBO, a 2D analog of the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger modulation) and ηij=±1 along loop-current arrows (CFP, imaginary hopping). With uniform s-wave pairing Δ, the Bogoliubov–de Gennes Hamiltonian is in class D. The argument rides on the symmetry operator P=σx sx τ0: at Γ it commutes with the zeroth-order Hamiltonian but anticommutes with the linear k·p velocities, so the first-order effective Hamiltonian vanishes and the gap closes quadratically, forcing ΔC=±2. Along X–M that constraint is lifted, so linear Dirac cones govern the second transition. The persistent degeneracy at M means the second and third ban

What would settle it

Run a self-consistent mean-field calculation in which the pairing amplitude and the CBO/CFP order parameters are all determined by the same interaction, and check whether any region of parameter space has all three nonzero and falls inside the predicted C=+2 and C=−2 regions; alternatively, measure thermal Hall conductivity in a candidate square-lattice material with coexisting bond order and loop currents and look for the predicted plateau at κ0 or 2κ0.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a square-lattice s-wave superconductor endowed with a composite 2×2 charge density wave — a real bond modulation (CBO) plus an imaginary hopping modulation (CFP) that breaks time-reversal symmetry — hosts two topologically nontrivial superconducting phases with Chern numbers C=+2 and C=−2. The paper maps the phase diagram in chemical potential, CBO strength, and CFP strength, and shows the two transitions are controlled by distinct symmetries: at Γ a P-protected quadratic band touching yields ΔC=±2 and a phase boundary independent of λCBO, while along X–M eight Dirac cones (four inequivalent) yield the second transition. It verifies the bulk–edge correspondence by v

Load-bearing premise

The paper fixes the s-wave pairing amplitude and the CDW pattern by hand and never checks whether the orders would actually coexist self-consistently; if the charge order suppresses or expels superconductivity, or if CBO and CFP do not share the same unit cell and phase relation, the predicted Chern phases may not exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The square lattice, previously thought immune to CFP-induced topology, becomes a platform for topological superconductivity once CBO and CFP coexist.
  • The first phase boundary is fixed analytically at λCFP = sqrt(Δ²+μ²/4) and is independent of λCBO, so this specific transition is a robust quantitative prediction.
  • Each nontrivial phase supports |C| chiral Majorana edge modes, directly visible in the strip-geometry spectra.
  • The thermal Hall conductivity at low temperature is quantized to C·κ0, so a plateau at κ0 or 2κ0 is a direct readout of the Chern number.
  • ARPES and STM can see the coexistence: a zero-energy DOS peak from CBO, a V-shaped DOS from CFP, and peak splitting when both are strong.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the C=−2 phase's tiny gap (≈0.005t) is generic rather than a parameter accident, the thermal Hall plateau for that phase may be practically unobservable unless pairing or band structure is engineered to widen it.
  • The mechanism likely generalizes: on any bipartite lattice whose imaginary flux vanishes at a symmetry point where a real bond order splits bands, the same composite-band Chern sequence could appear.
  • A self-consistent treatment in which Δ, λCBO, and λCFP all emerge from the same interaction would test whether the predicted Chern regions survive; the paper fixes them by hand.
  • Materials with coexisting bond order and loop currents, such as certain kagome superconductors, might exhibit a similar sequence, though the square-lattice version is cleaner to test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies a square-lattice BdG Hamiltonian with uniform s-wave pairing coexisting with a 2x2 charge bond order (CBO) and chiral flux phase (CFP). It reports two topological superconducting phases with Chern numbers C=+2 and C=-2, separated by two phase transitions: a C=0 to C=+2 transition via quadratic band touching at Γ, and a C=+2 to C=-2 transition via Dirac cones along X-M. The authors compute band-resolved Chern numbers, edge spectra under partial open boundary conditions, and the thermal Hall conductivity, which at low T is quantized as κxy = Cκ0. The mechanism is attributed to normal-state band reconstruction from the combined real and imaginary hopping modulations.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the paper establishes a minimal square-lattice model in which the coexistence of real and imaginary bond modulations produces sequential Chern-number transitions in a superconductor, with chiral Majorana edge modes and quantized thermal Hall conductance as observable signatures. The central results are not obtained by fitting: Chern numbers and phase boundaries are computed directly from the stated Hamiltonian, and the thermal Hall plateaus follow from the standard identity κxy = Cκ0. The k·p symmetry argument explaining the λCBO-independence of the first transition is elegant. However, the manuscript provides no self-consistency check for the assumed coexistence of rigid CDW order and superconductivity, and the analytical boundary for the first transition appears inconsistent with the numerical phase diagram. The reported bulk gaps for the C=-2 phase are extremely small, which undermines the proposed experimental fingerprint. No code or data is provided to aid reproducibility.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III (analytical solution at Γ) and Appendix A] The text claims the C=0→C=2 boundary is given by λCFP = sqrt(Δ² + μ²/4), independent of λCBO. This closed-form expression is not derived in Appendix A; the appendix only shows that the first-order effective Hamiltonian vanishes, not that this specific condition holds. Moreover, the formula disagrees with the numerics: for μ=2 and Δ=0.2 it gives λCFP≈1.02, while Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 5(a) place the transition at λCFP≈0.5025 (point A). Since the horizontal boundary in Fig. 2(b) is only shown for λCBO=0.2, this discrepancy needs to be resolved. Either derive the correct boundary condition or remove the unsubstantiated analytical expression.
  2. [Sec. II (Eqs. 3-4) and Sec. III (Fig. 3d)] The C=-2 phase is obtained with Δ fixed at 0.2 while λCFP is varied. The paper itself notes that CFP suppresses superconducting pairing and reports gaps of only 0.005t and 0.009t at λCFP=2.8 and 3.0. A self-consistent treatment in which Δ depends on the CDW order could drive Δ to zero before the C=2→C=-2 boundary, eliminating that phase. The assumption that the rigid 2x2 CBO+CFP pattern coexists with uniform s-wave pairing across the entire parameter range is not energetically justified. The authors should at least estimate the mean-field free-energy competition or show that the conclusions survive for a range of Δ values that includes possible self-consistent values.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. III (Fig. 3d)] The abstract calls the quantized thermal Hall plateaus a 'clear experimental fingerprint'. This is contradicted by the text's own statement that the extremely small gaps for λCFP=2.8 and 3.0 'suppress the quantized plateau even at very low temperatures.' For the C=-2 phase, the proposed fingerprint is therefore not clear in any experimentally accessible temperature window. Please temper the claim or identify a parameter regime with a larger bulk gap.
  4. [Sec. III (first paragraph on CFP-only case) and Abstract] The statement that 'CFP alone does not induce topology' is not demonstrated. The paper only shows that at λCBO=0 the gap closes at the would-be transition point and does not reopen; no phase diagram or Chern-number computation is presented for λCBO=0 across the (μ,λCFP) plane. Since CFP breaks time-reversal symmetry, the BdG bands could in principle acquire a nonzero Chern number without a transition at λCBO=0. This claim should be supported explicitly or qualified.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] Typos: 'sufficient' should be 'sufficient'; 'effective' appears with non-ASCII ligature. Also, 'kagome' is inconsistently capitalized (e.g., 'Kagome' vs 'kagome').
  2. [Ref. [32]] Reference [32] is cited as a pnictide example ('Na2Ti2Pn2O'), but the listed reference concerns the Kitaev material Na2Co2TeO6. This appears to be the wrong reference.
  3. [Sec. III and Appendix A] The symmetry operator P is defined only in Appendix A (Eq. A8) but is used in the main text before it is introduced. Move the definition to Sec. II or add a forward reference.
  4. [Eq. (5)] The notation ⟨αα'⟩ for the bond sum is not defined. Clarify that the sum is over bonds between sublattice sites within the enlarged 2x2 unit cell and specify the position vectors rα.
  5. [Fig. 3] In Fig. 3(c), the inset resolving the edge modes should indicate the relevant kx range and the line colors corresponding to the two edges. The caption should also state the value of Ny used for the strip.
  6. [Sec. III (Composite band)] The concept of a 'composite band' is introduced when discussing Figs. 2(c) and 2(d) but is not defined in Sec. II. Please define it explicitly, e.g., as a set of bands that remain degenerate at high-symmetry points and must be treated together for the Chern-number assignment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Chern numbers and phase boundaries are direct outputs of the stated BdG Hamiltonian; thermal Hall plateaus follow from the standard identity; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The model Hamiltonian is fully specified in Eqs. (2)-(5) and all topological quantities are computed from it without fitting. The phase boundaries are derived from explicit gap-closing analysis, with the first boundary given analytically as λ_CFP = sqrt(Δ^2+μ^2/4). The Chern numbers are obtained from the BdG eigenstates, and κ_xy follows from Eq. (7). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The CFP-alone result is demonstrated within the paper (Appendix A), not merely cited. Refs. 44-47 are background on prior square-lattice and kagome studies; they do not supply the load-bearing argument. The paper itself flags the small gap in the C=-2 phase and the assumed coexistence, but that is an assumption about the physical model, not circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation is an exactly solvable mean-field model; all parameters are chosen inputs, not fitted. The central assumptions are the rigid coexistence of the 2×2 CBO+CFP pattern and uniform s-wave pairing; the most fragile input is the fixed pairing amplitude.

free parameters (4)
  • Δ (s-wave pairing amplitude) = 0.2
    Chosen by hand in Sec. II; the BdG gap, phase boundaries, and the existence of the C=±2 phases depend on it. No self-consistent pairing equation or material input.
  • λCBO (CBO strength) = scanned (e.g., 0.2 in Fig. 2a)
    Model parameter varied to map phase diagram; central to the coexistence mechanism.
  • λCFP (CFP strength) = scanned (e.g., 0.4-3.0)
    Model parameter varied; drives the sequential transitions.
  • μ (chemical potential) = scanned (e.g., 0.2-2)
    Model parameter; particle-hole symmetry says sign reversal flips the Chern number.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The BdG Hamiltonian is in class D of the Altland-Zirnbauer classification; the Chern number is the topological invariant for 2D class-D systems with broken TRS.
    Invoked in Sec. II (after Eq. 5) to justify using the Chern number and chiral Majorana edge modes.
  • standard math Bulk-edge correspondence: a 2D class-D phase with Chern number C supports |C| chiral Majorana edge modes in a cylinder geometry.
    Used in Sec. III to identify the number of edge-mode pairs in Figs. 3(b)-(c).
  • standard math A gap-closing at a quadratic band touching changes the Chern number by ±2, and each linear Dirac cone by ±1.
    Used to assign ΔC = ±2 for the Γ transition and ΔC = ±4 for the X-M transition in Sec. III.
  • ad hoc to paper A rigid 2x2 CBO+CFP modulation pattern (Eq. 3, Fig. 1) coexists with uniform s-wave pairing amplitude Δ=0.2 (Eqs. 3-4) across the scanned parameter range.
    This is the model premise; no self-consistency condition or material-specific energetics guarantees this state is the ground state. Weakest assumption in the report.
  • domain assumption All gap-closing states at Γ share the same eigenvalue of P = σx sx τ0, so the first-order k·p terms vanish inside the zero-energy subspace.
    Stated as 'numerically verified' in Sec. III/Appendix A; without shipped code we treat it as an unproved input to the analytic boundary and quadratic-touching explanation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sequential Topological Superconductivity in a Square Lattice with Chiral Charge Density Waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CO23XP2H

@misc{pith2026260721525,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sequential Topological Superconductivity in a Square Lattice with Chiral Charge Density Waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CO23XP2H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21525}
}
abstract

The interplay between charge order and superconductivity offers a fertile ground for emergent quantum phases. Here we theoretically investigate a square-lattice superconductor coexisting with a composite charge density wave (CDW) consisting of a real bond modulation (charge bond order, CBO) and an imaginary hopping modulation (chiral flux phase, CFP) that breaks time-reversal symmetry. We uncover that, while CFP alone does not induce topology in square lattices, its coexistence with CBO drives the system into two topologically nontrivial superconducting phases with Chern numbers $C=+2$ and $C=-2$. The low-temperature thermal Hall conductivity $\kappa_{xy}$ exhibits quantized plateaus proportional to the Chern number, providing a clear experimental fingerprint. Our results establish the square lattice as a pristine platform for engineering topological superconductivity through the synergy of real and imaginary bond modulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21525 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The corresponding Hamiltonian is HCDW = λCBO X ⟨i,j⟩σ ξij c † iσcjσ+iλCFP X ⟨i,j⟩σ ηij c † iσcjσ+H.c., (3) where λCBO and λCFP are the CBO and CFP strengths, respectively. The spatial modulation factors ξij and ηij are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    S. A. Kivelson, I. P. Bindloss, E. Fradkin, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, A. Kapitulnik, and C. Howald, How to detect fluctuating stripes in the high-temperature super- 8 conductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1201 (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Collo- quium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Z. F. Weng, M. Smidman, L. Jiao, X. Lu, and H. Q. Yuan, Multiple quantum phase transitions and superconductiv- ity in ce-based heavy fermions, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 094503 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Kontani, R

    H. Kontani, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and S. Onari, Un- conventional density waves and superconductivities in fe-based superconductors and other strongly correlated electron systems, Adv. Phys. 70, 355 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    S. D. Wilson and B. R. Ortiz, A v3sb5 kagome supercon- ductors, Nature Reviews Materials 9, 420 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Ying, T. Wu, J. Cheng, J. Hu, and X. Chen, Recent progress in nickelate superconductors, Natl. Sci. Rev. 12, nwaf373 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Affleck and J

    I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Large-n limit of the heisenberg-hubbard model: Implications for high- T c su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3774 (1988)

    1988

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    T. C. Hsu, J. B. Marston, and I. Affleck, Two observable features of the staggered-flux phase at nonzero doping, Phys. Rev. B 43, 2866 (1991)

    1991

  2. [10]

    M. U. Ubbens and P. A. Lee, Flux phases in the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 46, 8434 (1992)

    1992

  3. [11]

    Nayak, Density-wave states of nonzero angular mo- mentum, Phys

    C. Nayak, Density-wave states of nonzero angular mo- mentum, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4880 (2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    Chakravarty, R

    S. Chakravarty, R. B. Laughlin, D. K. Morr, and C. Nayak, Hidden order in the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 63, 94503 (2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    Kaminski, S

    A. Kaminski, S. Rosenkranz, H. M. Fretwell, J. C. Cam- puzano, Z. Li, H. Raffy, W. G. Cullen, H. You, C. G. Olson, C. M. Varma, and H. Höchst, Spontaneous break- ing of time-reversal symmetry in the pseudogap state of a high- T c superconductor, Nature 416, 610 (2002)

    2002

  6. [14]

    H. A. Mook, Y. Sidis, B. Fauqué, V. Balédent, and P. Bourges, Observation of magnetic order in a super- conducting YBa 2Cu3O6.6 single crystal using polarized neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 78, 20506 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Y. Li, V. Balédent, N. Barišić, Y. Cho, B. Fauqué, Y. Sidis, G. Yu, X. Zhao, P. Bourges, and M. Greven, Unusual magnetic order in the pseudogap region of the superconductor HgBa 2CuO4+δ, Nature 455, 372 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Balédent, D

    V. Balédent, D. Haug, Y. Sidis, V. Hinkov, C. T. Lin, and P. Bourges, Evidence for competing magnetic instabilities in underdoped YBa 2Cu3O6+x, Phys. Rev. B 83, 104504 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Y. Li, V. Balédent, N. Barišić, Y. C. Cho, Y. Sidis, G. Yu, X. Zhao, P. Bourges, and M. Greven, Magnetic order in the pseudogap phase of HgBa 2CuO4+δ studied by spin- polarized neutron diffraction, Phys. Rev. B 84, 224508 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Mangin-Thro, Y

    L. Mangin-Thro, Y. Li, Y. Sidis, and P. Bourges, A- b anisotropy of the intra-unit-cell magnetic order in YBa2Cu3O6.6, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 97003 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    L. Zhao, D. H. Torchinsky, H. Chu, V. Ivanov, R. Lif- shitz, R. Flint, T. Qi, G. Cao, and D. Hsieh, Evidence of an odd-parity hidden order in a spin–orbit coupled correlated iridate, Nat. Phys. 12, 32 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Jeong, Y

    J. Jeong, Y. Sidis, A. Louat, V. Brouet, and P. Bourges, Time-reversal symmetry breaking hidden order in Sr2(Ir,Rh)O4, Nat. Commun. 8, 15119 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Shumiya, M

    N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, B. R. Ortiz, H. Liu, Y. Shi, Q. Yin, H. Lei, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Guguchia, S. D. Wilson, and M. Z. Hasan, Intrinsic nature of chi- ral charge or...

    2021

  14. [22]

    Jiang, J.-X

    Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, M. M. Denner, N. Shumiya, B. R. Ortiz, G. Xu, Z. Guguchia, J. He, M. S. Hossain, X. Liu, J. Ruff, L. Kautzsch, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, I. Belopol- ski, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Thomale, T. Ne...

    2021

  15. [23]

    Wang, Y.-X

    Z. Wang, Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, Y. Li, G.-Y. Wang, H.-L. Huang, S. Shao, J. Liu, P. Zhu, N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, H. Liu, Y. Shi, J. Duan, X. Li, G. Chang, P. Dai, Z. Ye, G. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Zheng, J. Jia, M. Z. Hasan, and Y. Yao, Electronic nature of chiral charge order in ...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Mielke, D

    C. Mielke, D. Das, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, R. Gupta, Y.- X. Jiang, M. Medarde, X. Wu, H. C. Lei, J. Chang, P. Dai, Q. Si, H. Miao, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, Y. Shi, R. Khasanov, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superc...

    2022

  17. [25]

    X. Teng, L. Chen, F. Ye, E. Rosenberg, Z. Liu, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, J. S. Oh, M. Z. Hasan, K. J. Neubauer, B. Gao, Y. Xie, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, R. J. Birgeneau, J.-H. Chu, M. Yi, and P. Dai, Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome...

    2022

  18. [26]

    Yin, Y.-X

    J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, X. Teng, M. S. Hossain, S. Mar- danya, T.-R. Chang, Z. Ye, G. Xu, M. M. Denner, T. Neupert, B. Lienhard, H.-B. Deng, C. Setty, Q. Si, G. Chang, Z. Guguchia, B. Gao, N. Shumiya, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Yi, P. Dai, and M. Z. Hasan, Discover...

    2022

  19. [27]

    X. Teng, J. S. Oh, H. Tan, L. Chen, J. Huang, B. Gao, J.-X. Yin, J.-H. Chu, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, G. E. Granroth, B. Yan, R. J. Birgeneau, P. Dai, and M. Yi, Magnetism and charge density wave order in kagome FeGe, Nat. Phys. 19, 814 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    S. Han, L. Li, C. S. Tang, Q. Wang, L. Zhang, C. Diao, M. Zhao, S. Sun, L. Tian, M. B. H. Breese, C. Cai, M. V. Milosevic, Y. Qi, A. T. S. Wee, and X. Yin, Orbital ori- gin of magnetic moment enhancement induced by charge density wave in kagome FeGe (2024), arXiv:2407.01076 [c...

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    W. Wan, M. N. Gastiasoro, D. Muñoz-Segovia, P. Dreher, M. M. Ugeda, and F. De Juan, Near- commensuration from intertwined charge density waves in single-layer TiSe 2, Nano Lett. 26, 816 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Kim, K.-H

    H. Kim, K.-H. Jin, and H. W. Yeom, Electronically seam- less domain wall of chiral charge density wave in 1 T- TiSe2, Nano Lett. 24, 14323 (2024) . 9

    2024

  23. [31]

    M. Ren, F. Cheng, Y. Zhao, M. Gu, Q. Cheng, B. Yan, Q. Liu, X. Ma, Q. Xue, and C.-L. Song, Chiral charge density wave and backscattering-immune orbital texture in monolayer 1 T-TiTe2, Nano Lett. 23, 10081 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Gillig, X

    M. Gillig, X. Hong, C. Wellm, V. Kataev, W. Yao, Y. Li, B. Büchner, and C. Hess, Phononic-magnetic di- chotomy of the thermal hall effect in the kitaev material Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 43110 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Xu, Y.-Z

    X.-W. Xu, Y.-Z. Li, Z.-F. Liu, and A.-X. Chen, Gen- eral bounded corner states in the two-dimensional su- schrieffer-heeger model with intracellular next-nearest- neighbor hopping, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063839 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    K.-X. Hu, Y. Yan, Z.-X. Zhang, S. Liu, S. Zhang, and H.-F. Wang, Boundary criticality of chern insulator in two-dimensional su-schrieffer-heeger model with next- nearest-neighbor hopping, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022211 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Y.-J. Gou, H. Wu, Q.-X. Li, J. Li, and J.-J. Zhu, Spin-orbit coupling engineered higher-order topology and flat bands in two-dimensional su-schrieffer-heeger mod- els, Phys. Rev. B 113, 155433 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    Ghosh, Quantum phases in a two-dimensional gener- alized interacting su-schrieffer-heeger model, Phys

    R. Ghosh, Quantum phases in a two-dimensional gener- alized interacting su-schrieffer-heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 113, 115149 (2026)

    2026

  29. [37]

    Xing, W.-T

    B. Xing, W.-T. Chiu, D. Poletti, R. T. Scalettar, and G. Batrouni, Quantum monte carlo simulations of the 2d su-schrieffer-heeger model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 017601 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, L. Kautzsch, P. M. Sarte, N. Ratcliff, J. Harter, J. P. C. Ruff, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Fermi surface mapping and the nature of charge-density-wave order in the kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. X 11, 41030 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    H. Luo, Q. Gao, H. Liu, Y. Gu, D. Wu, C. Yi, J. Jia, S. Wu, X. Luo, Y. Xu, L. Zhao, Q. Wang, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Zhu, Y. Shi, K. Jiang, J. Hu, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zhou, Electronic nature of charge density wave and electron-phonon coupling in kagome superconductor KV3Sb5, Nat. Comm...

    2022

  32. [40]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, J.-K. Kim, B. R. Ortiz, S. H. Ryu, J. Kim, J. Yoo, G. Sangiovanni, D. Di Sante, B.-G. Park, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, S. D. Wilson, J.-H. Park, and R. Comin, Twofold van hove sin- gularity and origin of charge order in topological kag...

    2022

  33. [41]

    Y. Fu, N. Zhao, Z. Chen, Q. Yin, Z. Tu, C. Gong, C. Xi, X. Zhu, Y. Sun, K. Liu, and H. Lei, Quantum trans- port evidence of topological band structures of kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 207002 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    J. Zeng, Q. Li, X. Yang, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Chiral-Flux-Phase-Based Topological Superconductivity in Kagome Systems with Mixed Edge Chiralities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 086601 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Z.-Q. Zhou, W. Wang, Z. Wang, and D.-X. Yao, Topolog- ical superconducting states and quasiparticle transport on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184506 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    X. Lin, J. Huang, and T. Zhou, Impact of charge density waves on superconductivity and topological properties in kagome superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134502 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    T. Zhou, Y. Gao, and Z. D. Wang, Detecting competing orders through the edge states in the heterostructures with high- Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104517 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Wang, Y.-X

    X. Wang, Y.-X. Li, and T. Zhou, Higher-order topological state induced by d-wave competing orders in high- Tc su- perconductor based heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205128 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Lao and T

    J. Lao and T. Zhou, Corner flat bands induced by d den- sity wave and partial corner state modification due to competition with d-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 111, 075169 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and su- perconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Mo, X.-J

    Y. Mo, X.-J. Wang, Z.-Y. Zhuang, and Z. Yan, Coex- istence of chiral majorana edge states and bogoliubov fermi surfaces in two-dimensional nonsymmorphic dirac semimetal/superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 111, L140504 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    T. Qin, Q. Niu, and J. Shi, Energy magnetization and the thermal hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 236601 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Yoshida, H

    H. Yoshida, H. Takeda, J. Yan, Y. Kanemori, B. R. Ortiz, Y. M. Oey, S. D. Wilson, M. Konczykowski, K. Ishihara, T. Shibauchi, and M. Yamashita, Observation of anoma- lous thermal hall effect in a kagome superconductor, Sci. Adv. 11, eadu2973 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  45. [53]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields, Phys. Rev. 97, 869 (1955)

    1955

  50. [58]

    Winkler, Spin–orbit coupling effects in two- dimensional electron and hole systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics 191 (2003)

    R. Winkler, Spin–orbit coupling effects in two- dimensional electron and hole systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics 191 (2003)

    2003

  51. [59]

    Bradlyn, J

    B. Bradlyn, J. Cano, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Beyond dirac and weyl fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in con- ventional crystals, Science 353, aaf5037 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.