Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Revisiting IPA-based Cross-lingual Text-to-speech

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.07187 v2 pith:CP75ZZJA submitted 2021-10-14 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

Revisiting IPA-based Cross-lingual Text-to-speech

classification cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS
keywords cross-lingualbeendatasetipa-basedperformancespeakerspeakerstext-to-speech
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) has been widely used in cross-lingual text-to-speech (TTS) to achieve cross-lingual voice cloning (CL VC). However, IPA itself has been understudied in cross-lingual TTS. In this paper, we report some empirical findings of building a cross-lingual TTS model using IPA as inputs. Experiments show that the way to process the IPA and suprasegmental sequence has a negligible impact on the CL VC performance. Furthermore, we find that using a dataset including one speaker per language to build an IPA-based TTS system would fail CL VC since the language-unique IPA and tone/stress symbols could leak the speaker information. In addition, we experiment with different combinations of speakers in the training dataset to further investigate the effect of the number of speakers on the CL VC performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.