Was that Sarcasm?: A Literature Survey on Sarcasm Detection

Harleen Kaur Bagga; Jasmine Bernard; Sahil Shaheen; Sarthak Arora

REVIEW

Was that Sarcasm?: A Literature Survey on Sarcasm Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00425 v1 pith:CPR26L37 submitted 2024-11-30 cs.CL

Was that Sarcasm?: A Literature Survey on Sarcasm Detection

Harleen Kaur Bagga , Jasmine Bernard , Sahil Shaheen , Sarthak Arora This is my paper

classification cs.CL

keywords sarcasmdetectioncomplexdifferentinterpretliteraturesurveyable

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

Sarcasm is hard to interpret as human beings. Being able to interpret sarcasm is often termed as a sign of intelligence, given the complex nature of sarcasm. Hence, this is a field of Natural Language Processing which is still complex for computers to decipher. This Literature Survey delves into different aspects of sarcasm detection, to create an understanding of the underlying problems faced during detection, approaches used to solve this problem, and different forms of available datasets for sarcasm detection.

Was that Sarcasm?: A Literature Survey on Sarcasm Detection

discussion (0)