Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Universal Magnetoresistance Scaling in Layered Pd-based Multiband Metals Beyond Compensated Semimetal Regime

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that large magnetoresistance in carrier-rich, multiband Pd-based metals follows a universal power-law scaling in residual resistivity ratio, with exponent about 1.2–1.3 and a symmetry-dependent prefactor.

desk verdict Useful dataset and a plausible empirical scaling, but the symmetry-dependent prefactor claim is shakier than the paper lets on. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06700 v1 pith:CQ4TEX7U submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Kenjiro Okawa , Takao Sasagawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords magnetoresistanceKohler'sruleresidualresistivityratiomultibandmetalmobilityscalingnoncentrosymmetricPdBiTe2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Large magnetoresistance is usually associated with compensated semimetals with near-perfect electron-hole balance. This paper argues that a different, simpler mechanism controls magnetoresistance in four carrier-rich, multiband Pd-based metals (PdTe2, PdPb2, β-PdBi2, and noncentrosymmetric α-PdBi): once crystals are clean enough, the magnetoresistance ratio collapses onto a single power-law scaling in the residual resistivity ratio, $MR = B \times RRR^{b}$ with $b \approx 1.2$–$1.3$, and the same exponent governs the field dependence. High-RRR crystals obey Kohler's rule, implying one effective scattering time despite complex Fermi surfaces. The symmetry of the crystal does not change the scaling exponent; it only changes the prefactor, with centrosymmetric compounds outperforming noncentrosymmetric α-PdBi at equal RRR. If correct, this establishes a mobility-controlled regime of large magnetoresistance beyond the compensated-semimetal picture and makes sample purity a quantitative predictor of magnetoresponse.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of power-law scalings $MR = A H^{a}$ and $MR = B \times RRR^{b}$ with a shared exponent $a \approx b \approx 1.2$–$1.3$, together with Kohler's rule, the statement that $MR$ is a universal function of $H/\rho^{*}$ when a single scattering time controls transport. The paper uses the semiclassical interpolation $MR \sim (\mu_{\mathrm{ave}} H)^{2}/[1 + (\Delta N/N)^{2}(\mu_{\mathrm{ave}} H)^{2}]$ to show how imperfect carrier compensation and a spread of band mobilities turn the ideal quadratic dependence into a sub-quadratic power law. The residual resistivity ratio plays the role of an experimental proxy for the average mobility $\mu_{\mathrm{ave}}$, so Eq. (2) becomes a mobility scaling law, and the separation of centrosymmetric and noncentrosymmetric compounds into two curves with the same exponent but different prefactors is what carries the symmetry argument.

What would settle it

Measure the Hall mobility directly on the same crystals used for the scaling and check whether $\mu_{\mathrm{ave}}$ is proportional to RRR across all four compounds; if it is not, $MR = B \times RRR^{b}$ is an empirical correlation rather than a mobility scaling law.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that magnetoresistance in clean, carrier-rich, multiband metals can be governed by a single effective carrier mobility even when the Fermi surface consists of many electron and hole pockets. For the four Pd-based compounds studied, the magnetoresistance ratio measured at fixed field and temperature follows $MR = B \times RRR^{b}$, with exponents $b \approx 1.30 \pm 0.17$ for centrosymmetric β-PdBi2, PdTe2, and PdPb2 and $b \approx 1.18 \pm 0.11$ for noncentrosymmetric α-PdBi. The field dependence has the same sub-quadratic exponent, $a \approx 1.2$–$1.3$, and high-RRR crystals show a collapse of all temperature-dependent curves onto one Kohler plot, evidence for an effective single scattering time. The intermediate exponent is attributed to imperfect carrier compensation combined with a distribution of mobilities, captured by the interpolation formula $MR \sim (\mu_{\mathrm{ave}} H)^{2}/[1 + (\Delta N/N)^{2}(\mu_{\mathrm{ave}} H)^{2}]$. The paper's comparison at equal RRR isolates the role of inversion symmetry: α-PdBi reaches 1500% at 2 K and 7 T because of its record RRR ≈ 660, yet its MR is smaller than the centrosymmetric compounds at the same RRR, which the paper interprets as extra spin-orbit-induced scattering channels in the noncentrosymmetric system.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the residual resistivity ratio is a faithful proxy for the carrier mobility entering the magnetoresistance formulas, so that RRR differences between compounds reflect band-structure-dependent effective mass rather than material-specific impurity levels.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In clean multiband metals, RRR can be used as a quantitative predictor of low-field magnetoresistance through $MR = B \times RRR^{b}$, without invoking carrier compensation.
  • A field exponent near 1.2–1.3 becomes a diagnostic for imperfect compensation with a spread of mobilities, separating this regime from the quadratic response of ideal two-band compensated semimetals and from linear-MR mechanisms.
  • Kohler scaling can survive a complex multiband Fermi surface in the clean limit, so a breakdown of Kohler's rule in a multiband metal may signal insufficient purity rather than intrinsic multiband physics.
  • Comparing materials at equal RRR isolates the role of crystal symmetry: the larger centrosymmetric prefactor implies that breaking inversion symmetry costs mobility through spin-orbit-split scattering channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not directly measure the mobility distribution, so Hall and quantum-oscillation measurements on the same crystals would be a natural next test of whether the exponent tracks the compensation ratio $\Delta N/N$.
  • If the same exponent appears in other clean layered multiband metals, RRR could become a screening metric for high-field magnetotransport that does not require detailed band-structure calculation.
  • The equal-RRR comparison implies a sharp, testable extrapolation: growing centrosymmetric PdTe2 or PdPb2 with RRR near 660 should yield MR several times larger than α-PdBi, a prediction the paper does not state explicitly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a magnetotransport study of four layered Pd-based metals (PdTe2, PdPb2, β-PdBi2, and α-PdBi), including an α-PdBi crystal with RRR≈660. The central empirical claims are: (i) MR follows a sub-quadratic power law in field, MR=A H^a with a≈1.2–1.3; (ii) MR at 2 K and 7 T follows a power law in RRR with a compatible exponent, separately for centrosymmetric and noncentrosymmetric compounds; (iii) high-RRR crystals satisfy Kohler scaling; and (iv) the centrosymmetric/noncentrosymmetric families differ only through the prefactor, which the authors attribute to extra scattering channels from spin-orbit-induced band splitting. The theoretical rationalization in Section V invokes an asserted two-band-type expression, Eq. (3), and uses RRR as a proxy for mobility.

Significance. The empirical portion is potentially valuable: it extends large-MR phenomenology beyond compensated semimetals, introduces a record-quality α-PdBi crystal, and provides a nontrivial internal consistency check in the agreement between field and RRR exponents. The Kohler collapse for high-RRR crystals, if quantified, would support an effective single-scattering-time description in a multiband metal. However, the two load-bearing interpretive steps are not yet established: Eq. (3) is asserted rather than derived, and the mapping between RRR and carrier mobility across different compounds is not supported by the data presented. Because these steps support the symmetry-based (CS vs NCS) conclusion, the manuscript requires revision before the universal-scaling interpretation can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V, Eq. (3)] The expression MR ∼ (μ_ave H)^2 / [1 + (ΔN/N)^2 (μ_ave H)^2] is introduced without derivation, and it contains no variable representing the mobility distribution that the text invokes in the same paragraph. Since Eq. (3) is the only theoretical justification for the intermediate exponent in Eq. (4), please derive it from a specified multiband or two-band model, or replace it with a direct numerical evaluation; otherwise the claim that the observed exponent n≈1.2–1.3 is explained by imperfect compensation and mobility spread is unquantified and cannot be checked.
  2. [Section V, paragraph on RRR] The identification of RRR with μ_ave across compounds is not justified. In a simple Drude picture, RRR ∝ ρ_300 n μ_ave (up to geometric factors), so Eq. (5) requires that n and ρ_300 be approximately constant among PdTe2, PdPb2, β-PdBi2, and α-PdBi. The manuscript itself states that inter-compound RRR differences are set by effective mass and band dispersion rather than impurity content (Section III and Section V), which makes this assumption non-trivial. Without Hall carrier densities and room-temperature resistivities for each compound, the equal-RRR comparison in Fig. 5 cannot separate the proposed SOC-induced scattering-channel effect from differences in carrier density, band mass, or compensation. Please supply the missing transport parameters or reframe the CS/NCS prefactor conclusion as a correlation.
  3. [Section IV.D, Fig. 5] The robustness of the universal RRR exponent is not demonstrated. The centrosymmetric fit uses one crystal each of β-PdBi2, PdTe2, and PdPb2 (three points for a two-parameter fit), while the noncentrosymmetric fit uses only α-PdBi crystals; the quoted errors (b_CS=1.30±0.17, b_NCS=1.18±0.11) overlap, and no goodness-of-fit or confidence intervals are given. The claim that the scaling exponent is common across material families therefore rests on wide overlapping error bars rather than on a statistically meaningful test. Please add more crystals per compound or use a fitting procedure that pools data with stated uncertainties.
  4. [Section IV.C, Figs. 4(e)-(h)] The Kohler-scaling claim is based on visual collapse of log-scale plots. Because this is central evidence for the single-scattering-time interpretation, please provide a quantitative collapse metric (e.g., residuals from a common curve or a normalized scatter measure) and state the temperature and field ranges over which the collapse holds. This is particularly important because β-PdBi2 is presented as a breakdown case and the high-RRR panels use different axis ranges.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section I, third paragraph] The phrase 'electronic structuret' should be 'electronic structures'.
  2. [Section IV.B, Fig. 3(b)] The panels display the fitted parameters A and a without explicit error bars, and the units of A are not stated; please add them.
  3. [Figure 5] The caption says symbol colors correspond to each material, but the figure does not identify which color or symbol corresponds to which compound; please add a legend or explicit labels.
  4. [Section V, second paragraph] The quantity ΔN/N is described only as the 'degree of imbalance' between electron and hole carriers; please define it in terms of the carrier densities n_e and n_h.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: MR and RRR are independently measured, and the scaling law is an empirical fit with a non-tautological exponent.

full rationale

The central scaling relation MR = B × RRR^b (Eq. 2) is an empirical fit to two independently measured quantities: the magnetoresistance ratio and the residual resistivity ratio. Neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, and the observed exponent b ≈ 1.2–1.3 is not forced by the definitions. The extension to MR ∝ (RRR × H)^n (Eq. 5) relies on the stated physical assumption that RRR is approximately proportional to carrier mobility; this is a proxy assumption, not a definitional identity, and it is the source of the legitimate scientific concern about whether RRR tracks mobility across different compounds. Equation (3) is presented as an approximation and is not quantitatively derived or fitted, so it does not reduce the empirical claim to its inputs. The self-citations to the authors' earlier WTe2 and InBi work are used as contrasting examples of the quadratic compensated-semimetal case, not as load-bearing justification for the present scaling claim. Kohler-rule collapse is an independent empirical test using the measured zero-field resistivity at each temperature. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical scaling depends on a small set of fitted exponents and prefactors, plus two domain assumptions: RRR as a mobility proxy and the semiclassical two-band formula used for interpretation. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • a (field exponent in MR = A H^a) = about 1.26 for RRR=660 alpha-PdBi; approximately 1.2 to 1.3 for other high-RRR compounds
    Fit to the MR versus field curves at fixed temperature; it is the central exponent claimed to be universal.
  • A (prefactor in MR = A H^a) = not quoted numerically
    Fit prefactor absorbing material and sample-dependent magnitude of MR.
  • b_CS (RRR exponent for centrosymmetric compounds) = 1.30 +/- 0.17
    Fit to MR at 2 K and 7 T versus RRR for PdTe2, PdPb2, and beta-PdBi2.
  • b_NCS (RRR exponent for noncentrosymmetric compounds) = 1.18 +/- 0.11
    Fit to MR versus RRR for alpha-PdBi crystals only, so it is a single-compound exponent, not a class-level universal.
  • B (prefactor in MR = B RRR^b) = not quoted numerically; B_CS > B_NCS
    Fit prefactor separating centrosymmetric from noncentrosymmetric response at equal RRR.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Semiclassical Boltzmann transport and Kohler's rule apply with a single effective scattering time.
    Invoked in Section IV.C to interpret the collapse of MR curves onto H/rho* as evidence for one scattering time scale.
  • domain assumption RRR is approximately proportional to the average carrier mobility.
    Used in Section V to translate MR versus RRR into MR versus mobility, which is the basis for the universal scaling interpretation.
  • ad hoc to paper The approximate formula MR ~ (mu H)^2 / (1 + (Delta N/N)^2 (mu H)^2) describes the crossover from quadratic to linear behavior.
    Presented in Eq. (3) of Section V without derivation or quantitative fit; used to rationalize the observed intermediate exponent 1 < n < 2.
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE DFT with spin-orbit coupling correctly captures the qualitative Fermi surface topology of the four compounds.
    Invoked in Section III to support the multiband, high-carrier-density picture and the qualitative statements about effective masses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Magnetoresistance Scaling in Layered Pd-based Multiband Metals Beyond Compensated Semimetal Regime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CQ4TEX7U

@misc{pith2026260806700,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Magnetoresistance Scaling in Layered Pd-based Multiband Metals Beyond Compensated Semimetal Regime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CQ4TEX7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06700}
}
read the original abstract

We systematically investigated the magnetoresistance ratio (MR) of single-crystalline, nonmagnetic layered Pd-based metals, including centrosymmetric PdTe2, PdPb2, and beta-PdBi2 and noncentrosymmetric alpha-PdBi. Our study identifies a distinct class of large MR in multiband, high-carrier-density systems. Unlike well-studied extremely large MR materials, such as Dirac and Weyl semimetals described by simple compensated-carrier models, these compounds possess complex Fermi surfaces, as validated by our first-principles calculations. Nevertheless, they exhibit a remarkably simple MR scaling governed by carrier mobility, manifested in systematic dependencies on magnetic field, temperature, and the residual resistivity ratio (RRR). The validity of Kohler's rule in high-RRR crystals indicates that MR is governed by a single effective scattering time, even in these multiband systems. The field and RRR dependences of MR follow an intermediate power-law behavior between linear and quadratic, attributable to imperfect carrier compensation and a distribution of carrier mobilities. Among the studied compounds, alpha-PdBi exhibits the largest MR, reaching 1500% (2 K, 7 T), owing to its exceptionally high RRR (approximately 660). However, when compared on an equal-RRR basis, its MR is smaller than that of its centrosymmetric counterparts. This trend suggests that additional scattering channels arising from spin-orbit-induced band splitting in noncentrosymmetric systems reduce the effective carrier mobility. Our results establish a new class of large MR in clean multiband metals where complex electronic structures give rise to emergent single-parameter scaling, highlighting the interplay between disorder, mobility, and symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06700 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Crystal structure and electronic structures of Pd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Magnetotransport properties of Pd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows the field dependence of the MR at 5 K for α-PdBi crystals with various RRR values. The magnitude of the MR decreases dramatically with de￾creasing RRR, from ∼ 1500% for RRR = 660 to ∼ 110% for RRR = 98. These results clearly demonstrate that the MR in α-PdBi is strongly governed by sample qual￾ity. The field dependence of the MR can be well described 0 2 4 6 8 0 500 1000 1500 0 200 400 600 a 0 50 100 150 n… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetoresistance and scaling analysis of Pd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Unified scaling Relationship between magnetoresis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. B. Pippard,Magnetoresistance in Metals(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    Niu and W

    R. Niu and W. K. Zhu, Materials and possible mecha- nisms of extremely large magnetoresistance: A review, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter34, 113001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Hu and T

    J. Hu and T. F. Rosenbaum, Classical and quantum routes to linear magnetoresistance, Nat. Mater.7, 697 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    M. M. Parish and P. B. Littlewood, Non-saturating mag- netoresistance in heavily disordered semiconductors, Na- ture426, 162 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    A. A. Abrikosov, Quantum magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. B58, 2788 (1998)

    1998

  6. [6]

    M. N. Ali, J. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q. D. Gib- son, L. M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Large, non- saturating magnetoresistance in WTe 2, Nature514, 205 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    M. N. Ali, L. Schoop, J. Xiong, S. Flynn, Q. Gibson, M. Hirschberger, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Correla- tion of crystal quality and extreme magnetoresistance of WTe2, EPL110, 67002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Shekhar, A

    C. Shekhar, A. K. Nayak, Y. Sun, M. Schmidt, M. Nick- las, I. Leermakers, U. Zeitler, Y. Skourski, J. Wosnitza, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Schnelle, H. Borrmann, Y. Grin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological weyl semimetal candidate NbP, Nat. Phys.11, 645 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    I. A. Leahy, Y.-P. Lin, P. E. Siegfried, A. C. Treglia, J. C. W. Song, R. M. Nandkishore, and M. Lee, Non- saturating large magnetoresistance in semimetals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 10570 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Okazaki and T

    S. Okazaki and T. Sasagawa, Extremely large magnetore- sistance and quantum oscillations in ultra-high-quality single crystals of the weyl semimetal WTe 2, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, L051202 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    F. C. Chen, H. Y. Lv, X. Luo, W. J. Lu, Q. L. Pei, G. T. Lin, Y. Y. Han, X. B. Zhu, W. H. Song, and Y. P. Sun, Extremely large magnetoresistance in the type-ii weyl semimetal MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B94, 235154 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Rhodes, R

    D. Rhodes, R. Sch¨ onemann, N. Aryal, Q. Zhou, Q. R. Zhang, E. Kampert, Y.-C. Chiu, Y. Lai, Y. Shimura, G. T. McCandless, J. Y. Chan, D. W. Paley, J. Lee, A. D. Finke, J. P. C. Ruff, S. Das, E. Manousakis, and L. Bal- icas, Bulk fermi surface of the weyl type-ii semimetallic c...

    2017

  5. [13]

    W. Gao, X. Zhu, F. Zheng, M. Wu, J. Zhang, C. Xi, P. Zhang, Y. Zhang, N. Hao, W. Ning, and M. Tian, A possible candidate for triply degenerate point fermions in trigonal layered PtBi 2, Phys. Rev. B98, 121108 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    B. Wu, V. Barrena, H. Suderow, and I. Guillam’on, Huge linear magnetoresistance due to open orbits inγ-PtBi 2, Phys. Rev. Research2, 022042 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    L. Xing, R. Chapai, R. Nepal, and R. Jin, Topological behavior and zeeman splitting in trigonal PtBi 2−x single crystals, npj Quantum Mater.5, 10 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Funada, A

    K. Funada, A. Yamakage, N. Yamashita, and H. Kageyama, Spin-orbit-coupling-induced type-i/type- ii dirac nodal-line metal in nonsymmorphic CaSb 2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 044711 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Oudah, J

    M. Oudah, J. Bannies, D. A. Bonn, and M. C. Aron- son, Superconductivity and quantum oscillations in sin- gle crystals of the compensated semimetal CaSb 2, Phys. Rev. B105, 184504 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    M. D. Watson, T. Yamashita, S. Kasahara, W. Knafo, M. Nardone, J. B´ eard, F. Hardy, A. McCollam, A. Narayanan, S. F. Blake, T. Wolf, A. A. Haghighirad, C. Meingast, A. J. Schofield, H. v. L¨ ohneysen, Y. Mat- suda, A. I. Coldea, and T. Shibauchi, Dichotomy between the hole an...

    2015

  11. [19]

    X. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Wei, Q. Hou, N. Zhou, Y. Zhang, and Z. Shi, Strong correlation betweenH-linear magne- toresistance and strange metal in the FeSe superconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. B111, L100501 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    H. Lin, Y. Li, Q. Deng, J. Xing, J. Liu, X. Zhu, H. Yang, and H.-H. Wen, Multiband superconductivity and large anisotropy in FeS crystals, Phys. Rev. B93, 144512 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Y. Sun, T. Taen, T. Yamada, S. Pyon, T. Nishizaki, Z. Shi, and T. Tamegai, Multiband effects and possi- ble dirac fermions in Fe 1+yTe0.6Se0.4, Phys. Rev. B89, 144512 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    S. Li, H. Yang, and D. Fang, Strong coupling supercon- ductivity and prominent superconducting fluctuations in the new superconductor Bi4O4S3, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.56, 2019 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    J. Xing, S. Li, X. Ding, H. Yang, and H.-H. Wen, Super- conductivity appears in the vicinity of semiconducting- like behavior in CeO1−xFxBiS2, Phys. Rev. B86, 214518 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    G. Mu, H. Huang, and H.-H. Wen, Multiband effect in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Mg 12−δIr19B16 revealed by hall effect and magnetoresistance measure- ments, Phys. Rev. B82, 052501 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Sundar, S

    S. Sundar, S. J. Salem-Sugui, M. K. Chattopadhyay, S. B. Roy, L. S. Sharath Chandra, L. F. Cohen, and L. Ghivelder, Study of Nb0.18Re0.82 non-centrosymmetric superconductor in the normal and superconducting states, Supercond. Sci. Technol.32, 055003 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    J. J. Gao, J. G. Si, X. Luo, J. Yan, Z. Z. Jiang, W. Wang, Y. Y. Han, P. Tong, W. H. Song, X. B. Zhu, Q. J. Li, W. J. Lu, and Y. P. Sun, Origin of the large magnetoresis- tance in the candidate chiral superconductor 4H b-TaS2, Phys. Rev. B102, 075138 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Joshi, A

    B. Joshi, A. Thamizhavel, and S. Ramakrishnan, Super- conductivity in noncentrosymmetric BiPd, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064518 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Okawa, M

    K. Okawa, M. Kanou, T. Katagiri, H. Kashiwaya, S. Kashiwaya, and T. Sasagawa, Crystal growth and physical properties of the noncentrosymmetric supercon- ductor PdBi, Phys. Procedia45, 101 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Matano, S

    K. Matano, S. Maeda, H. Sawaoka, Y. Muro, T. Tak- abatake, B. Joshi, S. Ramakrishnan, K. Kawashima, J. Akimitsu, and G.-q. Zheng, NMR and NQR studies on 10 non-centrosymmetric superconductors Re 7B3, LaBiPt, and BiPd, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.82, 084711 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Neupane, N

    M. Neupane, N. Alidoust, M. M. Hosen, J.-X. Zhu, K. Dimitri, S.-Y. Xu, N. Dhakal, R. Sankar, I. Belopolski, D. S. Sanchez, T.-R. Chang, H.-T. Jeng, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. Kaczorowski, F. Chou, M. Z. Hasan, and T. Durakiewicz, Observation of the spin-polar...

    2016

  23. [31]

    H. M. Benia, E. Rampi, C. Trainer, C. M. Yim, A. Mal- donado, D. C. Peets, A. St”ohr, U. Starke, K. Kern, A. Yaresko, G. Levy, A. Damascelli, C. R. Ast, A. P. Schnyder, and P. Wahl, Observation of dirac surface states in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor BiPd, Phys. Rev. B...

    2016

  24. [32]

    Thirupathaiah, S

    S. Thirupathaiah, S. Ghosh, R. Jha, E. D. L. Rienks, K. Dolui, V. V. Ravi Kishore, B. B”uchner, T. Das, V. P. S. Awana, D. D. Sarma, and J. Fink, Unusual dirac fermions on the surface of a noncentrosymmetricα-BiPd superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 177001 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Lohani, P

    H. Lohani, P. Mishra, A. Gupta, V. P. S. Awana, and B. R. Sekhar, Fermi surface and band structure of BiPd from ARPES studies, Physica C534, 13 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Pramanik, R

    A. Pramanik, R. P. Pandeya, D. V. Vyalikh, A. Gen- eralov, P. Moras, A. K. Kundu, P. M. Sheverdyaeva, C. Carbone, B. Joshi, A. Thamizhavel, S. Ramakrishnan, and K. Maiti, Dirac states in the noncentrosymmetric su- perconductor BiPd, Phys. Rev. B103, 155401 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    L. Jiao, J. L. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. F. Weng, Y. M. Shao, J. Y. Feng, X. Lu, B. Joshi, A. Thamizhavel, and H. Q. Yuan, Anisotropic superconductivity in noncentrosym- metric BiPd, Phys. Rev. B89, 060507 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Z. Sun, M. Enayat, A. Maldonado, C. Lithgow, E. Yel- land, D. C. Peets, A. Yaresko, A. P. Schnyder, and P. Wahl, Dirac surface states and nature of supercon- ductivity in noncentrosymmetric BiPd, Nat. Commun. 6, 6633 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    D. C. Peets, A. Maldonado, M. Enayat, Z. Sun, P. Wahl, and A. P. Schnyder, Upper critical field of the noncen- trosymmetric superconductor BiPd, Phys. Rev. B93, 174504 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    C. M. Yim, C. Trainer, A. Maldonado, B. Braunecker, A. Yaresko, D. C. Peets, and P. Wahl, Kinetic stabiliza- tion of 1D surface states near twin boundaries in noncen- trosymmetric BiPd, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 206401 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    A. S. Cameron, L. Lemberger, R. Riyat, A. T. Holmes, Y. S. Yerin, A. D. Hillier, B. Joshi, S. Ramakrishnan, J. Gavilano, C. D. Dewhurst, E. M. Forgan, and E. Black- burn, Unconventional gap structures and the intermedi- ate mixed state: A vortex lattice study of the noncen- tr...

    2025

  32. [40]

    Mondal, B

    M. Mondal, B. Joshi, S. Kumar, A. Kamlapure, S. C. Ganguli, A. Thamizhavel, S. S. Mandal, S. Ramakrish- nan, and P. Raychaudhuri, Andreev bound state and multiple energy gaps in the noncentrosymmetric super- conductor BiPd, Phys. Rev. B86, 094520 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Klotz, T

    J. Klotz, T. A. Butcher, T. F”orster, J. Hornung, I. Sheikin, P. Wisniewski, A. Jesche, J. Wosnitza, and D. Kaczorowski, Fermi surface investigation of the non- centrosymmetric superconductorα-PdBi, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235139 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    M. A. Khan, D. E. Graf, I. Vekhter, D. A. Browne, J. F. DiTusa, W. A. Phelan, and D. P. Young, Quantum oscil- lations and a nontrivial berry phase in the noncentrosym- metric topological superconductor candidate BiPd, Phys. Rev. B99, 020507 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Pramanik, R

    A. Pramanik, R. P. Pandeya, K. Ali, B. Joshi, I. Sarkar, P. Moras, P. M. Sheverdyaeva, A. K. Kundu, C. Carbone, A. Thamizhavel, S. Ramakrishnan, and K. Maiti, Depth- resolved core level spectroscopy of noncentrosymmetric solid BiPd, Phys. Rev. B101, 035426 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Yaresko, A

    A. Yaresko, A. P. Schnyder, H. M. Benia, C.-M. Yim, G. Levy, A. Damascelli, C. R. Ast, D. C. Peets, and P. Wahl, Correct brillouin zone and electronic structure of BiPd, Phys. Rev. B97, 075108 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Y. Imai, F. Nabeshima, T. Yoshinaka, K. Miyatani, R. Kondo, S. Komiya, I. Tsukada, and A. Maeda, Su- perconductivity at 5.4 K inβ-Bi 2Pd, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 113708 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Sakano, K

    M. Sakano, K. Okawa, M. Kanou, H. Sanjo, T. Okuda, T. Sasagawa, and K. Ishizaka, Topologically protected surface states in a centrosymmetric superconductorβ- PdBi2, Nat. Commun.6, 8595 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Iwaya, Y

    K. Iwaya, Y. Kohsaka, K. Okawa, T. Machida, M. S. Bahramy, T. Hanaguri, and T. Sasagawa, Full-gap su- perconductivity in spin-polarized surface states of topo- logical semimetalβ-PdBi 2, Nat. Commun.8, 976 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Powell, W

    L. Powell, W. Kuang, G. Hawkins-Pottier, R. Jalil, J. Birkbeck, Z. Jiang, M. Kim, Y. Zou, S. Komrakova, S. Haigh, I. Timokhin, G. Balakrishnan, A. K. Geim, N. Walet, A. Principi, and I. V. Grigorieva, Multi- phase superconductivity in PdBi 2, Nat. Commun.16, 291 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    A. Mine, T. Suzuki, Y. Zhong, S. Najafzadeh, K. Okawa, M. Sakano, K. Ishizaka, S. Shin, T. Sasagawa, and K. Okazaki, Direct observation of the surface supercon- ducting gap in the topological superconductor candidate β-PdBi2, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236002 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    F. Fei, X. Bo, R. Wang, B. Wu, J. Jiang, D. Fu, M. Gao, H. Zheng, Y. Chen, H. Bu, F. Song, X. Wan, B. Wang, and G. Wang, Nontrivial berry phase and type-ii dirac transport in the layered material PdTe 2, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041201 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    M. S. Bahramy, O. J. Clark, B.-J. Yang, J. Feng, L. Baw- den, J. M. Riley, I. Markovi’c, F. Mazzola, V. Sunko, D. Biswas, S. P. Cooil, M. Jorge, J. W. Wells, M. Lean- dersson, T. Balasubramanian, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, J. E. Rault, T. K. Kim, M. Hoesch, K. Okawa, M. Asakawa, T...

    2018

  44. [52]

    O. J. Clark, M. J. Neat, K. Okawa, L. Bawden, I. Markovi’c, F. Mazzola, J. Feng, V. Sunko, J. M. Ri- ley, W. Meevasana, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, T. K. Kim, M. Hoesch, T. Sasagawa, P. Wahl, M. S. Bahramy, and P. D. C. King, Fermiology and superconductivity of topo- logical surfac...

    2018

  45. [53]

    O. J. Clark, F. Mazzola, I. Markovi´ c, J. M. Riley, J. Feng, B.-J. Yang, K. Sumida, T. Okuda, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, T. K. Kim, K. Okawa, T. Sasagawa, M. S. Bahramy, and P. D. C. King, A general route to form topologically- protected surface and bulk dirac fermions along high...

    2019

  46. [54]

    M. V. Salis, Y. K. Huang, and A. de Visser, Heat capacity 11 of type-i superconductivity in the dirac semimetal PdTe2, Phys. Rev. B103, 104502 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    E. C. McFarlane, A. Sanna, M. J. Gilbert, J. A. Krieger, M. Date, G. Domaine, B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, P. C. Constantinou, A. Hartl, E. G. Della Valle, C. Pellegrini, V. N. Strocov, S. S. P. Parkin, and N. B. M. Schr”oter, Van hove singularities, super- conduct...

    2026

  48. [56]

    S. M. Pattalwar, R. N. Dixit, S. Y. Shete, and B. K. Basu, Low-temperature specific heat of PdPb 2, Phys. Rev. B 38, 7067 (1988)

    1988

  49. [57]

    Motla, A

    Arushi, K. Motla, A. Kataria, S. Sharma, J. Beare, M. Pula, M. Nugent, G. M. Luke, and R. P. Singh, Type- i superconductivity in single-crystal Pb 2Pd, Phys. Rev. B103, 184506 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    M. M. Sharma, N. K. Karn, P. Rani, R. N. Bhowmik, and V. P. S. Awana, Bulk superconductivity and non- trivial band topology analysis of Pb 2Pd, Supercond. Sci. Technol.35, 084010 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Mitra, K

    S. Mitra, K. Okawa, S. Kunniniyil Sudheesh, T. Sasagawa, J.-X. Zhu, and E. E. M. Chia, Prob- ing the superconducting gap symmetry ofα-PdBi 2: A penetration depth study, Phys. Rev. B95, 134519 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvas- nicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowski, F. Tran, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k: An Augmented Plane Wave Plus Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties(Technische Universit¨ at Wien, 2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    X. H. Chen, Y. S. Wang, Y. Y. Xue, R. L. Meng, Y. Q. Wang, and C. W. Chu, Correlation between the residual resistance ratio and magnetoresistance in MgB 2, Phys. Rev. B65, 024502 (2001)

    2001

  54. [62]

    Q. Li, B. T. Liu, Y. F. Hu, J. Chen, H. Gao, L. Shan, H. H. Wen, A. V. Pogrebnyakov, J. M. Redwing, and X. X. Xi, Large anisotropic normal-state magnetoresis- tance in clean MgB 2 thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 167003 (2006)

    2006

  55. [63]

    Okawa, M

    K. Okawa, M. Kanou, H. Namiki, and T. Sasagawa, Extremely large magnetoresistance induced by hidden three-dimensional dirac bands in nonmagnetic semimetal InBi, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 124201 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Kohler, Zur magnetischen widerstands¨ anderung reiner metalle, Ann

    M. Kohler, Zur magnetischen widerstands¨ anderung reiner metalle, Ann. Phys.424, 211 (1938)

    1938

  57. [65]

    Y. Feng, Y. Wang, T. F. Rosenbaum, P. B. Littlewood, and H. Chen, Fermi surface origin of the low-temperature magnetoresistance anomaly, Matter8, 102105 (2025)

    2025

  58. [66]

    J. Xu, F. Han, T.-T. Wang, L. R. Thoutam, S. E. Pate, M. Li, X. Zhang, Y.-L. Wang, R. Fotovat, U. Welp, X. Zhou, W.-K. Kwok, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, and Z.-L. Xiao, Extended kohler’s rule of magnetoresis- tance, Phys. Rev. X11, 041029 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    S. Pate, B. Chen, B. Shen, K. Li, X. Zhou, D. Y. Chung, R. Divan, M. G. Kanatzidis, U. Welp, W.-K. Kwok, and Z.-L. Xiao, Extended kohler’s rule of magnetoresistance in TaCo2Te2, Phys. Rev. B109, 035129 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Bagga, S

    S. Bagga, S. Gangwar, P. Kumar, A. Taraphder, and C. S. Yadav, Extended kohler’s scaling and isosbestic point in the charge density wave state of 1T-VSe 2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 195601 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    B. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Li, D. Hu, M. Huo, S. Wang, C. Xi, Z. Wang, H. Sun, M. Wang, and B. Shen, Unveiling the multiband metallic nature of the normal state in the nickelate La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B111, 054519 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.