Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ColorSwap: A Color and Word Order Dataset for Multimodal Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04492 v2 pith:CQFYCV3C submitted 2024-02-07 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords datasetcolorswapmodelsalthoughcolorexampleexamplesfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces the ColorSwap dataset, designed to assess and improve the proficiency of multimodal models in matching objects with their colors. The dataset is comprised of 2,000 unique image-caption pairs, grouped into 1,000 examples. Each example includes a caption-image pair, along with a ``color-swapped'' pair. We follow the Winoground schema: the two captions in an example have the same words, but the color words have been rearranged to modify different objects. The dataset was created through a novel blend of automated caption and image generation with humans in the loop. We evaluate image-text matching (ITM) and visual language models (VLMs) and find that even the latest ones are still not robust at this task. GPT-4V and LLaVA score 72% and 42% on our main VLM metric, although they may improve with more advanced prompting techniques. On the main ITM metric, contrastive models such as CLIP and SigLIP perform close to chance (at 12% and 30%, respectively), although the non-contrastive BLIP ITM model is stronger (87%). We also find that finetuning on fewer than 2,000 examples yields significant performance gains on this out-of-distribution word-order understanding task. The dataset is here: https://github.com/Top34051/colorswap and here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/colorswap.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Good CREPE needs more than just Sugar: Investigating Biases in Compositional Vision-Language Benchmarks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Blind text-only likelihood models match or exceed CLIP on many compositionality benchmarks because positives and negatives differ systematically in length, plausibility, or image style.

Pith tools