Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Recovering Exact Vibrational Energies Within a Phase Space Electronic Structure Framework

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Phase-space electronic states can be corrected to give exact molecular energies.

desk verdict New first-order perturbative correction makes phase-space electronic structure systematically improvable; the 'exact' wording overstates a formal asymptotic scheme, but the core construction is sound and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08230 v1 pith:CRL65QPO submitted 2025-06-09 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

Xinchun Wu , Xuezhi Bian , Jonathan Rawlinson , Robert G. Littlejohn , Joseph E. Subotnik This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords phasespaceelectronicstructureBorn-OppenheimerWigner-WeyltransformvibrationalenergiesperturbationtheorynonadiabaticcouplingquantumchemistryWeyl
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper makes the case that phase-space electronic structure theory, where electronic states are parameterized by both nuclear position and nuclear momentum, is not an ad hoc procedure. The authors show that, starting from the eigenvectors of any phase-space electronic Hamiltonian, one can construct a nearby unitary transformation order by order in ℏ so that the transformed Hamiltonian has the same eigenvalues as the full coupled nuclear-electronic Hamiltonian. The first-order correction is a single matrix element, ℏB00, which can be evaluated without computing the first-order eigenvector corrections. In a one-dimensional hydrogen-bond model, adding this correction improves vibrational energies by roughly an order of magnitude over zeroth-order phase-space results and by much more over standard Born-Oppenheimer results. The formal result is perturbative and is expected to be accurate when the ground electronic state is well separated from excited states.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Wigner-Weyl transform and its star product, which allows a quantum operator to be represented by a function of phase-space variables (R,P) while preserving the full quantum structure through an ℏ expansion. On top of this, the paper uses a perturbative unitary transformation: it starts with the phase-space diagonalizing matrix L_W, adds an ℏ-dependent correction L_W^(1), and enforces both unitarity and block-diagonality order by order. The key simplification is that the first-order correction to the energy can be evaluated directly from the matrix element B00, without explicitly constructing L_W^(1), because the diagonal part of the commutator term vanishes. This machinery converts a potentially ad hoc phase-space electronic Hamiltonian into one with a well-defined perturbative route to exact eigenvalues.

What would settle it

Compute the first-order corrected energy with Eq. 110 on a model where the ground and excited electronic states become nearly degenerate, and compare with exact diagonalization; if the correction diverges or fails to approach the exact eigenvalue as the nuclear basis is enlarged, the formal claim of recovering exact energies breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that phase-space electronic eigenstates can serve as a rigorous zeroth-order starting point for exact quantum nuclear-electronic calculations. Concretely, the paper constructs a formal operator J_W = L_W + ℏL_W^(1) + ... such that $W^{{-1}}$(J_W^† * H_W * J_W) is diagonal in the electronic subspace and reproduces the exact eigenvalues of the full Hamiltonian. The paper shows that this is possible by enforcing unitarity of J_W order by order in ℏ and then choosing the remaining freedom to make the transformed Hamiltonian block-diagonal. The first-order diagonal matrix element is (H_FPS^(1)W)_00 = ℏB00, given by Eq. 110, which depends only on the zeroth-order phase-space eigenvectors and their derivatives. The paper demonstrates numerically that this correction substantially improves vibrational energies, and it argues that the construction removes the previous objection that phase-space approaches lack a systematic way to approach the exact answer.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative expansion in ℏ is valid, meaning the off-diagonal couplings divided by electronic energy gaps are small enough for the series to converge or behave asymptotically.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase-space electronic structure methods can now be systematically improved beyond the zeroth-order Weyl-transformed surface.
  • Vibrational energies computed from phase-space surfaces can be corrected toward exact coupled nuclear-electronic results by adding the first-order term ℏB00.
  • The formalism works for any choice of the phase-space operator Γ, so it justifies a family of phase-space Hamiltonians rather than a single preferred one.
  • The improvement is especially significant outside the harmonic limit, where anharmonic couplings play a larger role.
  • The perturbative series provides a practical route to non-Born-Oppenheimer corrections without treating the full nonadiabatic problem explicitly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A similar unitary-reconstruction scheme could be applied to extract exact electronic momentum or current density from phase-space eigenstates, not just vibrational energies.
  • The first-order correction may be combined with machine-learned phase-space surfaces to avoid explicit derivatives with respect to R and P, making the correction practical for larger molecules.
  • The requirement of well-separated electronic states points toward the need for a quasi-degenerate or resummed version of this perturbation theory for conical intersections and strongly multiconfigurational systems.
  • The harmonic-limit finding suggests that the corrected phase-space method is most valuable precisely when anharmonicity is strong; one could test this on a library of small molecules with known anharmonic spectra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Wigner–Weyl/Moyal perturbative framework for correcting phase-space electronic Hamiltonian eigenstates so as to converge toward the exact eigenvalues of a coupled nuclear-electronic Hamiltonian. The authors first review the Born–Oppenheimer and Littlejohn–Flynn expansions, then construct a unitary transformation J_W = L_W + ℏ L_W^(1) + ... that diagonalizes the full Hamiltonian order by order in ℏ, deriving a first-order energy correction ℏB00 (Eq. 110) and a truncated second-order term (Eq. 111). The formalism is tested on a one-dimensional hydrogen-bond model, with numerical results showing that the first-order correction improves vibrational energy gaps by roughly an order of magnitude relative to zeroth-order phase-space and Born–Oppenheimer results. The central algebraic derivation is explicit and does not involve fitting of final energies, but the claimed exactness rests on an order-by-order expansion whose convergence is not established, and the numerical validation is limited to a single well-separated model with a partially implemented second-order term.

Significance. If the formal expansion is understood as an asymptotic series that can be controlled in favorable regimes, this is a useful and conceptually important contribution: it provides a systematic way to improve phase-space electronic structure calculations and partially answers the criticism that such Hamiltonians are ad hoc. The derivation is independent of the specific form of Γ, which is a genuine strength, and the first-order energy correction has a simple closed form. The numerical results demonstrate a practically meaningful improvement over both Born-Oppenheimer and zeroth-order phase-space approaches. However, the significance is tempered by the absence of convergence or error estimates, the use of a single model with a well-separated ground state, and the fact that the reported second-order results do not implement the full second-order theory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1–3.1.2, Eq. (91) and Eq. (107)] The central claim that the construction recovers exact eigenvalues is supported only order by order in ℏ. The unitarity condition (Eq. 94) and block-diagonality condition (Eq. 104) fix the perturbative generators, but no convergence, summability, or error bound is provided for the infinite series in Eq. 91, whose first-order generator contains the energy-gap denominators (Λ_k^PS - Λ_j^PS) in Eq. 107. The acknowledgment in Sec. 6 that the expansion is perturbative and requires a well-separated ground electronic state means that the phrase "recover exact quantum eigenvalues" is stronger than what is demonstrated. Please either add a remainder estimate or a rigorous statement of the asymptotic nature of the series, or temper the title/abstract wording accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (111)] The numerical E^(2)_PS2 results are based on a "very naive" second-order correction that keeps only (L† Γ² L / 2M)_00 and drops all other terms of Eq. 108, including all terms involving L^(1)_W. Consequently, the observed accuracy and µ-scaling of E^(2)_PS2 in Figs. 2, 7, 10, and 11 do not validate the full second-order theory. Please either implement the complete second-order correction or present E^(2)_PS2 solely as an ad hoc benchmark and base the numerical case for the perturbative framework on the first-order results.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (120)–(123), Table 3] The Gaussian width σ appearing in the Γ operator (Eq. 123) is never specified. Since all phase-space calculations use this operator, the numerical results in Figs. 1–11 cannot be reproduced without knowing σ. Please report the value used and, ideally, examine the sensitivity of the first-order correction to σ.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figs. 2 and 11] The legends in Figs. 2 and 11 contain garbled labels such as "ΔE(0) ̃S1" and "ΔE(2) ̃S2"; these should be corrected to the notation used in Table 2.
  2. [Eq. (103)] There is a typo in Eq. (103): "muts" should be "must".
  3. [References] Refs. 43 and 45 appear to be the same paper (Marinica, Gaigeot, and Borgis) and should be merged.
  4. [Sec. 4.1] Please state the basis size or grid parameters used for the exact diagonalization reference, and add a data/code availability statement, so that the numerical results can be independently reproduced.
  5. [Notation, Sec. 3] The boldface notation for nuclear operators is not consistently rendered in the typeset equations; for example, Eq. (85) mixes P as an operator and as a phase-space variable. Please ensure consistent formatting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the first-order PS correction is computed from the Hamiltonian itself, and the formal result is independent of the cited Gamma form; self-citations are context, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained and non-circular. Starting from a phase space electronic Hamiltonian H^PS_W (Eq. 85), the authors construct a unitary J_W by enforcing unitarity (Eq. 94) and diagonality (Eqs. 98-104) order by order. The first-order energy correction, Eq. 110, is evaluated directly from the zeroth-order eigenvectors L_W and the operators defining H^PS_W and Gamma; no eigenvalue of the full Hamiltonian is used as input. The formal calculation is explicitly independent of the specific form of Gamma ('all formal work below will not depend on the particular form of Gamma'), so the citations of Refs. 15 and 16 for Gamma are not load-bearing. The numerical model is an external benchmark (Borgis/Gross Hamiltonian), and the PS results are compared against exact diagonalization rather than fitted to it. The main weaknesses are rigor gaps, not circularity: the series in Eq. 91 is only enforced order by order, with denominators in Eq. 107 that vanish for near-degenerate electronic states, and the authors concede in Sec. 6 that Eq. 91 is 'only expected to be accurate in the limit that the ground electronic state is reasonably well separated from the higher electronic states.' Likewise, the missing sigma value in Eq. 123 is a reproducibility omission, not evidence of a fitting loop. These considerations place the paper in the 0-2 'no significant circularity' band; the score of 2 reflects the presence of numerous self-citations in the motivation and model setup, but these are not load-bearing, so the derivation itself is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The formal derivation is largely independent of the specific Gamma operator, so the main added value is the perturbation machinery rather than new physical entities. The only free parameter introduced in the numerical implementation is the width sigma, which is not reported.

free parameters (1)
  • sigma (Gaussian width in Gamma operator) = not reported
    Defines theta1 and theta2 in Eq. 123; no numerical value is given, yet all PS calculations depend on it. Without sigma the numerical results cannot be reproduced.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Wigner-Weyl transform maps operators to phase space symbols with Moyal star product; the star product expansion in hbar is valid.
    Used throughout Secs. 2.1 and 3 to derive expansions; standard in semiclassical analysis.
  • domain assumption The electronic ground state is non-degenerate and well separated from excited states so denominators Lambda_kk - Lambda_jj in Eq. 107 do not vanish and perturbation theory is valid.
    Required for Eq. 106 and the perturbative series; acknowledged in Sec. 6 as a limitation.
  • domain assumption The particular phase space electronic Hamiltonian H_PS(R,P) (Eqs. 85-89) is a physically reasonable zeroth order; its eigenvectors are smooth in R and P.
    The entire method starts from diagonalizing H_PS; if eigenvectors are not smooth, derivatives in B00 are problematic.
  • ad hoc to paper The choice of Gamma (Eqs. 120-123) from prior work is adequate; no uniqueness principle selects it.
    Authors state there is no unique phase space electronic Hamiltonian; the numerics commit to one Gamma and a width sigma.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recovering Exact Vibrational Energies Within a Phase Space Electronic Structure Framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CRL65QPO

@misc{pith2026250608230,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recovering Exact Vibrational Energies Within a Phase Space Electronic Structure Framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CRL65QPO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08230}
}
read the original abstract

In recent years, there has been a push to go beyond Born-Oppenheimer theory and build electronic states from a phase space perspective, i.e. parameterize electronic states by both nuclear position(R) and nuclear momentum(P). Previous empirical studies have demonstrated that such approaches can yield improved single-surface observables, including vibrational energies, electronic momenta, and vibrational circular dichroism spectra. That being said, unlike the case of BO theory, there is no unique phase space electronic Hamiltonian, nor any theory for using phase space eigenvectors (as opposed to BO eigenvectors) so as to recover exact quantum vibrational eigenvalues. As such, one might consider such phase space approaches ad hoc. To that end, here we show how to formally extract exact quantum energies from a coupled nuclear-electronic Hamiltonian using perturbation theory on top of a phase space electronic framework. Thus, while we cannot isolate an "optimal" phase space electronic Hamiltonian, this work does justify a phase space electronic structure approach by offering a rigorous framework for correcting the zeroth order phase space electronic states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08230 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Vibrational energy gap as a function of reduced mas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relative error of the vibrational energy gap as a fu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relative error of the vibrational energy gap as a fu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Zoom in of Fig. 3 for more readability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ground state energy as a function of reduced mass ()() [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative error of the ground state energy as a funct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative error of the ground state energy as a funct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ground state energy as a function of reduced mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Relative error of the ground state energy as a funct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Relative error of the ground state energy as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Relative error of vibrational energy gap as a func () [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conical Intersections and Electronic Momentum As Viewed From Phase Space Electronic Structure Theory

    physics.chem-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Phase-space electronic structure theory predicts a three-dimensional branching plane and stable electronic momentum states at the BeH2 conical intersection, explaining complex Hartree-Fock instabilities.

  2. The Phase-Space Way To Electronic Structure Theory and Subsequently Chemical Dynamics

    physics.chem-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes phase-space electronic structure theory, where electronic states depend on nuclear momentum as well as position, as a general successor to the Born-Oppenheimer picture.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Introduction to infrared and Raman spectroscopy; Elsevier, 2012

    Colthup, N. Introduction to infrared and Raman spectroscopy; Elsevier, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    C.; Keller, E

    Brandt, N. C.; Keller, E. L.; Frontiera, R. R. Ultrafast Surface-Enhanced Raman Probing of the Role of Hot Electrons in Plasmon-Driven Chemistry. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2016, 7, 3179--3185

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    o opolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift f \

    Heitler, W.; London, F. Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und hom \"o opolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik 1927, 44, 455--472

    work page 1927

  4. [4]

    Dynamical theory of crystal lattices; Oxford university press, 1996

    Born, M.; Huang, K. Dynamical theory of crystal lattices; Oxford university press, 1996

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Cederbaum, L. S. In Conical Intersections: Electronic Structure, Dynamics and Spectroscopy; Domcke, W., Yarkony, D. R., Koppel, H., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing Co.: New Jersey, 2004; pp 3--40

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Bernath, P. F. Spectra of atoms and molecules; Oxford university press, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Lefebvre-Brion, H.; Field, R. W. The spectra and dynamics of diatomic molecules: revised and enlarged edition; Elsevier, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    The effect of the breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation on the rotation-vibration Hamiltonian of a triatomic molecule

    Bunker, P.; Moss, R. The effect of the breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation on the rotation-vibration Hamiltonian of a triatomic molecule. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 1980, 80, 217--228

    work page 1980

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    R.; Jensen, P

    Bunker, P. R.; Jensen, P. Molecular symmetry and spectroscopy; NRC research press, 2006; Vol. 46853

    2006

  2. [10]

    Schwenke, D. W. Beyond the Potential Energy Surface: Ab initio Corrections to the Born- Oppenheimer Approximation for H2O. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2001, 105, 2352--2360

    2001

  3. [11]

    On the mass of atoms in molecules: Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation

    Scherrer, A.; Agostini, F.; Sebastiani, D.; Gross, E.; Vuilleumier, R. On the mass of atoms in molecules: Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Physical Review X 2017, 7, 031035

    2017

  4. [12]

    Adiabatic and diabatic representations for atom-molecule collisions: Treatment of the collinear arrangement

    Baer, M. Adiabatic and diabatic representations for atom-molecule collisions: Treatment of the collinear arrangement. Chemical Physics Letters 1975, 35, 112

    1975

  5. [13]

    A.; Truhlar, D

    Mead, C. A.; Truhlar, D. G. Conditions for the definition of a strictly diabatic electronic basis for molecular systems. Journal of Chemical Physics 1982, 77, 6090--6098

    1982

  6. [14]

    L.; Adamowicz, L

    Bubin, S.; Pavanello, M.; Tung, W.-C.; Sharkey, K. L.; Adamowicz, L. Born--Oppenheimer and non-Born--Oppenheimer, atomic and molecular calculations with explicitly correlated Gaussians. Chemical reviews 2013, 113, 36--79

    2013

  7. [15]

    Tao, Z.; Qiu, T.; Bian, X.; Duston, T.; Bradbury, N.; Subotnik, J. E. A Basis-free phase space electronic Hamiltonian that recovers beyond Born--Oppenheimer electronic momentum and current density. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2025, 162

    2025

  8. [16]

    G.; Subotnik, J

    Bian, X.; Khan, C.; Duston, T.; Rawlinson, J.; Littlejohn, R. G.; Subotnik, J. E. A Phase-Space View of Vibrational Energies without the Born–Oppenheimer Framework. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 0, 0, null, PMID: 40072941

  9. [17]

    G.; Subotnik, J

    Tao, Z.; Qiu, T.; Bhati, M.; Bian, X.; Duston, T.; Rawlinson, J.; Littlejohn, R. G.; Subotnik, J. E. Practical phase-space electronic Hamiltonians for ab initio dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160

    2024

  10. [18]

    Nafie, L. A. Adiabatic molecular properties beyond the Born--Oppenheimer approximation. Complete adiabatic wave functions and vibrationally induced electronic current density. The Journal of chemical physics 1983, 79, 4950--4957

    1983

  11. [19]

    Electronic currents and Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics

    Patchkovskii, S. Electronic currents and Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics 2012, 137, 084109

    2012

  12. [20]

    On the molecular electronic flux: Role of nonadiabaticity and violation of conservation

    Hanasaki, K.; Takatsuka, K. On the molecular electronic flux: Role of nonadiabaticity and violation of conservation. Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154

    2021

  13. [21]

    G.; Subotnik, J

    Qiu, T.; Bhati, M.; Tao, Z.; Bian, X.; Rawlinson, J.; Littlejohn, R. G.; Subotnik, J. E. A Simple One-Electron Expression for Electron Rotational Factors. 2024; J. Chem. Phys., in press

    2024

  14. [22]

    Representation and conservation of angular momentum in the Born--Oppenheimer theory of polyatomic molecules

    Littlejohn, R.; Rawlinson, J.; Subotnik, J. Representation and conservation of angular momentum in the Born--Oppenheimer theory of polyatomic molecules. Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 158, 104302

    2023

  15. [23]

    G.; Subotnik, J

    Bian, X.; Tao, Z.; Wu, Y.; Rawlinson, J.; Littlejohn, R. G.; Subotnik, J. E. Total angular momentum conservation in ab initio Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics. Physical Review B 2023, 108, L220304

    2023

  16. [24]

    G.; Pei, Z.; Shao, Y.; Subotnik, J

    Duston, T.; Tao, Z.; Bian, X.; Bhati, M.; Rawlinson, J.; Littlejohn, R. G.; Pei, Z.; Shao, Y.; Subotnik, J. E. A phase-space electronic Hamiltonian for vibrational circular dichroism. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20, 7904--7921

    2024

  17. [25]

    Tao, Z.; Duston, T.; Pei, Z.; Shao, Y.; Rawlinson, J.; Littlejohn, R.; Subotnik, J. E. An electronic phase-space Hamiltonian approach for electronic current density and vibrational circular dichroism. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 161

    2024

  18. [26]

    Stephens, P. J. Theory of vibrational circular dichroism. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1985, 89, 748--752

    1985

  19. [27]

    Emergent Newtonian dynamics and the geometric origin of mass

    D’Alessio, L.; Polkovnikov, A. Emergent Newtonian dynamics and the geometric origin of mass. Annals of Physics 2014, 345, 141--165

    2014

  20. [28]

    The Moving Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

    Barrera, B.; Arovas, D.; Chandran, A.; Polkovnikov, A. The Moving Born-Oppenheimer Approximation. arXiv:2502.17557

  21. [29]

    Bloch electrons in a magnetic field

    Blount, E. Bloch electrons in a magnetic field. Physical Review 1962, 126, 1636

    1962

  22. [30]

    G.; Flynn, W

    Littlejohn, R. G.; Flynn, W. G. Geometric phases and the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization of multicomponent wave fields. Physical review letters 1991, 66, 2839

    1991

  23. [31]

    G.; Flynn, W

    Littlejohn, R. G.; Flynn, W. G. Geometric phases in the asymptotic theory of coupled wave equations. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 44, 5239--5256

    1991

  24. [32]

    Diagonalizing the Born–Oppenheimer Hamiltonian via Moyal perturbation theory, nonadiabatic corrections, and translational degrees of freedom

    Littlejohn, R.; Rawlinson, J.; Subotnik, J. Diagonalizing the Born–Oppenheimer Hamiltonian via Moyal perturbation theory, nonadiabatic corrections, and translational degrees of freedom . Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160, 114103

    2024

  25. [33]

    Adiabatic perturbation theory in quantum dynamics; Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

    Teufel, S. Adiabatic perturbation theory in quantum dynamics; Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

    2003

  26. [34]

    Effective non-adiabatic Hamiltonians for the quantum nuclear motion over coupled electronic states

    M \'a tyus, E.; Teufel, S. Effective non-adiabatic Hamiltonians for the quantum nuclear motion over coupled electronic states. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 151

    2019

  27. [35]

    C.; Fang, J

    Martens, C. C.; Fang, J. Y. Semiclassical-limit molecular dynamics on multiple electronic surfaces. Journal of Chemical Physics 1997, 106, 4918--4930

    1997

  28. [36]

    Donoso, A.; Martens, C. C. Simulation of coherent nonadiabatic dynamics using classical trajectories. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 1998, 102, 4291--4300

    1998

  29. [37]

    Mixed quantum-classical dynamics

    Kapral, R.; Ciccotti, G. Mixed quantum-classical dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics 1999, 110, 8919--8929

    1999

  30. [38]

    In Energy Transfer Dynamics in Biomaterial Systems; Burghardt, I., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2009; p 383

    Grunwald, R.; Kelly, A.; Kapral, R. In Energy Transfer Dynamics in Biomaterial Systems; Burghardt, I., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2009; p 383

    2009

  31. [39]

    Quantum-classical description of environmental effects on electronic dynamics at conical intersections

    Kelly, A.; Kapral, R. Quantum-classical description of environmental effects on electronic dynamics at conical intersections. Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 133, 084502

    2010

  32. [40]

    Mixed quantum-classical surface hopping dynamics

    Nielsen, S.; Kapral, R.; Ciccotti, G. Mixed quantum-classical surface hopping dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics 2000, 112, 6543--6553

    2000

  33. [41]

    Consistent schemes for non-adiabatic dynamics derived from partial linearized density matrix propagation

    Huo, P.; Coker, D. Consistent schemes for non-adiabatic dynamics derived from partial linearized density matrix propagation. Journal of Chemical Physics 2012, 137, 22A535

    2012

  34. [42]

    Semiclassical Theory of Vibrational Energy Relaxation in the Condensed Phase

    Shi, Q.; Geva, E. Semiclassical Theory of Vibrational Energy Relaxation in the Condensed Phase. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2003, 107, 9059--9069

    2003

  35. [43]

    C.; Gaigeot, M.-P.; Borgis, D

    Marinica, D. C.; Gaigeot, M.-P.; Borgis, D. Generating approximate Wigner distributions using Gaussian phase packets propagation in imaginary time. Chemical physics letters 2006, 423, 390--394

    2006

  36. [44]

    F.; Chung, K

    Davis, B. F.; Chung, K. T. Mass-polarization effect and oscillator strengths for S, P, D states of helium. Physical Review A 1982, 25, 1328

    1982

  37. [45]

    o opolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik , author= Heitler, Walter and London, Fritz , journal= Zeitschrift f \

    Marinica, D. C.; Gaigeot, M.-P.; Borgis, D. Generating approximate Wigner distributions using Gaussian phase packets propagation in imaginary time. Chemical physics letters 2006, 423, 390--394, Publisher: Elsevier mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000024473415...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.