Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Superconductivity in Spin-Orbit coupled SU(8) Dirac Fermions on Honeycomb lattice

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-orbit-coupled $j=3/2$ electrons on the honeycomb lattice admit exactly 12 symmetry-distinct superconducting orders, five of them nodal, including non-unitary singlets and finite-momentum pair-density-wave triplets.

desk verdict Useful classification with a load-bearing gap: the triplet count presumes 3D irreps that D6h cannot have, and the paper never identifies the group generated by its symmetry matrices. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04945 v1 pith:CRXES2K6 submitted 2025-05-08 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-conhep-th

Ankush Chaubey , Basudeb Mondal , Vijay B. Shenoy , Subhro Bhattacharjee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-conhep-th
keywords SU(8)Diracsemimetalj=3/2electronsspin-orbitcouplingunconventionalsuperconductivitynon-unitarypairingpairdensitywavenodalhoneycomblattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to enumerate every superconducting instability that can arise directly from the spin-orbit-coupled SU(8) Dirac semimetal on the honeycomb lattice, the low-energy fixed point that strong spin-orbit coupling produces in $j=3/2$ electrons at quarter filling. By classifying all 72 charge-$2e$ fermion bilinears under the microscopic lattice and time-reversal symmetries, it finds exactly 12 distinct superconductors: four singlets, two doublets, and six triplets. Seven of these are fully gapped and five are symmetry-protected nodal, with several singlets being non-unitary and all triplets carrying finite momentum as pair-density waves. The catalogue matters because it turns the SU(8) Dirac semimetal into a controlled setting for unconventional superconductivity in candidate materials such as the metallic halides $\mathrm{MX}_3$ ($\mathrm{M}=\mathrm{Zr},\mathrm{Hf}$; $\mathrm{X}=\mathrm{Cl},\mathrm{Br}$), and because it predicts direction-dependent multi-gap spectra that can be tuned from gapped to nodal by rotating the order parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 16-component Dirac spinor $\chi$ of the SU(8) Dirac semimetal, with four SU(4) flavours and two chiral (valley–band) sectors, and its Nambu extension to 32 components. In the Majorana representation the free theory has a manifest SO(16) symmetry whose 136 mass bilinears split into 64 normal (particle–hole) and 72 superconducting (particle–particle) masses; the superconducting ones are classified by decomposing the flavour sector ($6\oplus 10$ of U(4)) and the chiral sector ($A_{1g}\oplus T_{2g}$) under lattice symmetries and reassembling them into irreps. This machinery turns the question 'what superconductors can occur?' into a finite group-theory enumeration, and it also reveals which irreps are adiabatically connected to the same physical phase.

What would settle it

Look for the four Dirac points and their flavour degeneracy in a candidate material: angle-resolved photoemission or quantum oscillations on $\mathrm{MX}_3$ showing that the nodes are not at $\Gamma$ and the three $M$ points, or that the $j=3/2$ quartet is split even at the Dirac points, would falsify the underlying model and with it the 12-order enumeration. A positive test would be detection of zero-field finite-momentum pairing (pair-density-wave order) in a triplet channel, or of the predicted collapse of the smaller gap at isolated points of the order-parameter manifold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is the full symmetry-resolved catalogue of superconducting orders proximate to the SU(8) Dirac semimetal: 72 pairing bilinears, organized as real and imaginary parts of 36 amplitudes, reduce under the microscopic symmetries (translations, $C_2'$, $C_3$, $S_6$, inversion, dihedral reflection, and time reversal) to 12 inequivalent superconductors—two $A_{1g}$ singlets, one $A_{1u}$ and one $A_{2u}$ singlet, one gapped $E_u$ and one nodal $E_g$ doublet, and six triplets ($T_{1g}^I$, $T_{1g}^{II}$, $T_{1g}^{III}$, $T_{2g}$, $T_{1u}$, $T_{2u}$). Seven are gapped and five are nodal. Because spin and real space are locked by spin-orbit coupling, most of these orders are non-unitary even in the singlet channel, and the Cooper-pair wave functions carry total angular momentum $J_T=0,1,2,3$ with direction-dependent spin structure; the triplets pair at finite momentum and hence break translation symmetry as pair-density waves. The paper also shows that several formally distinct irreps are adiabatically connected and represent the same superconductor, so the physical list is shorter than the irrep list.

Load-bearing premise

The enumeration stands or falls on the low-energy description of the honeycomb $j=3/2$ model as an SU(8) Dirac semimetal with four flavours and four Dirac points (one at $\Gamma$, three at $M$); if the real band structure or the action of lattice symmetries on the Dirac spinors differs from Ref. [19], the list of superconductors and their nodal or gapped status changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 12-order catalogue completes the phase diagram of the SU(8) Dirac semimetal when combined with the 24 normal phases from the companion work, so future strong-coupling studies can place superconducting and density-wave orders on one global map.
  • In most of these superconductors the quasiparticle spectrum has two or more gaps whose magnitudes depend on the orientation of the order parameter in its manifold; rotating the order parameter can therefore drive a gapped superconductor into a nodal one without any additional tuning parameter.
  • The triplet orders are finite-momentum pair-density waves that break translation symmetry even in zero magnetic field, with order-parameter manifolds $(S^1\times CP^2)/\mathbb{Z}_2$ (reducing to $(S^1\times S^2)/\mathbb{Z}_2$ on the time-reversal-invariant subspace); their vortices are classified by $\pi_1$ of these manifolds.
  • For candidate $\mathrm{MX}_3$ materials, the classification predicts observable multi-gap features, possible inversion-odd Leggett modes in the $A_{1g}$ singlet, and gapless Dirac nodes in the $A_{1u}$, $A_{2u}$, $E_g$, $T_{1g}^{III}$, and $T_{2g}$ channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the SU(8) symmetry is only approximate in real materials, the 12 orders still provide the correct basis set: weak flavour-symmetry-breaking perturbations will select among these channels rather than create new ones, so the catalogue is a natural starting point for realistic pairing calculations.
  • The SO(16) unification of normal and superconducting masses implies that transitions between a superconducting order and a nearby density-wave order may be describable by a single large-symmetry order parameter; the paper does not pursue this consequence.
  • A testable extension is to compute leading pairing eigenvalues from microscopic four-fermion interactions in the $\mathrm{MX}_3$ model to see which of the 12 channels is energetically selected; the present work supplies the symmetry-allowed menu, not the energy ranking.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the SC classification is a derivation from the assumed SU(8) Dirac model; the sole self-citation supplies the starting Hamiltonian and symmetry implementation, not the predicted target.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the enumeration of 72 superconducting bilinears and their organization into 12 symmetry-distinct SCs (4 singlets, 2 doublets, 6 triplets), with gapped/nodal and unitary/non-unitary labels. These claims are obtained by an algebraic construction: all antisymmetric 16x16 pairing matrices X = Σβτγσδ consistent with the fermionic antisymmetry constraint (Eq. 24) are counted, decomposed under U(4) (Eqs. 41-49), then under the lattice-symmetry representation taken from Ref. [19] (Tables VII-IX). The nodal/gapped character is then checked by explicit diagonalization of the BdG Hamiltonians (e.g., Eqs. 61, 91-92, 99, 118). No parameter is fitted to a subset of the results and then renamed as a prediction; the paper predicts no material-specific Tc or gap magnitude. The only self-citation with load-bearing content is Ref. [19], which supplies the low-energy SU(8) Dirac Hamiltonian (Eq. 7) and the explicit 16x16 symmetry matrices Ω_S (Eq. 33). That prior result is an input premise of the classification, not an output of this paper; the SC classification is conditional on it, so using it is cumulative science rather than circularity. Even if the D6h point group of the honeycomb lattice has no three-dimensional irreps and the 'six triplets' count therefore needs a larger explicitly identified group (a correctness concern raised by the skeptic), that would be a mathematical-validity issue, not a reduction of the derived claim to its own inputs. Accordingly, no step satisfies the requirement of exhibiting Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; the paper merits a low non-circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The classification relies on the SU(8) Dirac model from the authors' prior work, the standard mass-term anti-commutation constraint, the mean-field decoupling of four-fermion interactions, and an adiabatic-connectivity criterion for identifying distinct phases. No parameters are fitted to data; pairing amplitudes are treated as order parameters.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The low-energy theory of j=3/2 electrons on the honeycomb lattice with the indirect hopping model is the SU(8) Dirac semimetal of Eq. 7 with the stated symmetry implementation.
    Taken from Ref. [19] by two of the present authors; the SC classification is built entirely on this model, including the Dirac-point structure and the flavour or chiral decomposition.
  • standard math All possible superconducting orders that can gap the Dirac fermions are represented by pairing matrices that anti-commute with the Dirac kinetic term and satisfy the antisymmetry constraint of Eq. 24.
    This is the standard mass-term classification for Dirac fermions, used in graphene and related systems; it excludes pairing channels that do not anti-commute with the kinetic term.
  • domain assumption Distinct superconducting phases are identified up to adiabatic deformations that keep the spectral gap open and do not break additional microscopic symmetries.
    This criterion is used to merge the three Eu doublets and the two T1u and T2u triplets into single phases; it is a common but non-trivial convention for classifying phases.
  • standard math The mean-field decoupling of the short-range four-fermion interaction (Eq. 16) is valid for studying proximate SC orders.
    Standard BCS-type mean-field treatment for interacting Dirac fermions; the paper does not go beyond mean field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconductivity in Spin-Orbit coupled SU(8) Dirac Fermions on Honeycomb lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CRXES2K6

@misc{pith2026250504945,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconductivity in Spin-Orbit coupled SU(8) Dirac Fermions on Honeycomb lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CRXES2K6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04945}
}
abstract

We study superconducting (SC) phases that are naturally proximate to a spin-orbit coupled SU(8) Dirac semi-metal on a honeycomb lattice. This system, which offers enhanced low-energy symmetries, presents an interesting platform for realizing unconventional superconductivity in j=3/2 electrons. In particular, we find 72 superconducting charge-$2e$ fermion bilinears which, under classification of microscopic symmetries, lead to 12 different SCs -- four singlets, two doublets, and six triplets -- 7 of them are gapped and 5 are symmetry-protected nodal SCs. The strong spin-orbit coupling leads to locking of the spin of the Cooper pairs with real-space direction -- as is evident from the structure of the Cooper pair wave-functions -- leading to unusual non-unitary superconductors (even singlets), and with finite momentum pairing (for the triplets). This results, in many cases, in the magnitude of multiple pairing gaps being intricately dependent on the direction of the SC order-parameter. The present classification of SCs along with normal phases (Phys. Rev. B 108, 245106 (2023)) provides the complete list of naturally occurring phases in the vicinity of such a SU(8) Dirac semi-metal. This study allows for understanding the global phase diagram of such systems, stimulating further experimental work on candidate materials such as metallic halides (MX$_3$ with M=Zr, Hf, and X=Cl, Br). Further, it provides the starting point for the exploration of unconventional phase transitions in such systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04945 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Lattice transformation: Here, the honeycomb lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Honeycomb lattice with a particular realization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spectrum for the non-unitary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic of the pairing in global basis for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dispersion for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic figure for the pairing amplitude of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Gapless Doublet Spectrum (for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Schematics of the pairing for the two components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Schematics of the pairing for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Schematic of NNN pairing for the bilinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) Spectrum for gapless triplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Schematic diagram for parameter space of Triplets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (a) Spectrum for gapless Triplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (a) Schematic for the NNN pairing for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Schematics of the pairing for the two components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multiple Dirac Spin-Orbital Liquids in SU(4) Heisenberg Antiferromagnets on the Honeycomb Lattice

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SU(4) Heisenberg antiferromagnets on the honeycomb lattice realize multiple inequivalent U(1) Dirac spin-orbital liquids, distinguished by their microscopic symmetry implementation and by measurable dynamical structur...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Mondal, V

    B. Mondal, V. B. Shenoy, and S. Bhattacharjee, Emer- gent su(8) dirac semimetal and proximate phases of spin- orbit coupled fermions on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245106 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    22) for singlet-I (Eq

    AI 1g Singlet Diagonalising the mean field Hamiltonian (Eq. 22) for singlet-I (Eq. 57) provides two bands with gapped dis- persion for the Bogoliubov quasi-particles of the form E±(kx,ky, ∆AI 1g) =± q k2x +k2y +|∆AI 1g|2, (61) where, as usual, 2|∆AI 1g| is the gap in the spectrum. Each band is 16-fold degenerate. This single gap is a direct outcome of the...

    work page

  3. [2]

    54 and the corresponding pair- ing matrix is given in Eq

    AII 1g Singlet The AII 1g singlet originates from the direct product of T2g lattice triplets in both the flavour and valley-subband sectors, as outlined in Eq. 54 and the corresponding pair- ing matrix is given in Eq. 58. Due to the non-unitary pairing (Eq. 60), the spectrum (Fig. 3) has a double gap structure, which can be checked by diagonalising the me...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Comparing the lattice Hamiltonians in Eqs

    Are the two A1g superconductors distinct ? Given that both the A1g SCs discussed above belong to the same Irrep, it is useful to understand the sense in which they represent distinct SCs, if at all. Comparing the lattice Hamiltonians in Eqs. 62 and 67, it is clear that they respectively correspond to on-site s−wave and extended (NNN) s-wave SCs for the j ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Each of the mass com- ponents represents a pairing between the Γ-point states andMi point states, denoting a finite momentum pairing corresponding to the KMi wave-vectors of the BZ

    T2 Non-unitary Gapless Triplet Superconductor This non-unitary superconductor breaks all the lattice symmetries, with mass components: T2 1 1√ 2 M2112 + − 1√ 2 M2222 2 − 1√ 2 M2102 + − 1√ 2 M2132 3 − 1√ 2 M2012 + − 1√ 2 M2312 There is a four-fold degenerate Dirac cone quasi- particle band at the Γ point, and a four-fold degener- ate gapped quasi-particle ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    T1 Non-unitary Gapless Triplet Superconductor All lattice symmetries are broken in this superconduct- ing phase, which carries a distinct three-dimensional rep- resentation (compared to the triplet discussed in the pre- vious section) of the symmetry group of the system. The mass components are: T1 1 1√ 2 M2112 + 1√ 2 M2222 2 − 1√ 2 M2102 + 1√ 2 M2132 3 −...

    work page

  7. [6]

    are anti-symmetric and given by |Φa⟩ =1 2|JT = 2,mT = 0⟩ + r 3 8|JT = 2,mT = 2⟩ − r 3 8|JT = 2,mT =−2⟩, (78) |Φb⟩ =|JT = 2,mT = 0⟩, (79) |Φc⟩ =− 1 2|JT = 2,mT = 0⟩ + r 3 8|JT = 2,mT = 2⟩ − r 3 8|JT = 2,mT =−2⟩, (80) for A1u and |Φa⟩ = √ 3 2 |JT = 2,mT = 0⟩ + r 1 8|JT = 2,mT = 2⟩, − r 1 8|JT = 2,mT =−2⟩ (81) |Φb⟩ = 1√ 2 (|JT = 2,mT = 2⟩−| JT = 2,mT =−2⟩), ...

    work page

  8. [7]

    EI u Doublet We rewrite the mass matrix (Eq. 35) as mEI u(d) = ∆E1 u dEI u 1 mEI u 1 +dEI u 2 mEI u 2 =|∆EI u| d· mEI u, (88) where d = ei˜ϕ cosθ, sinθ ei˜γ (89) is a two-component complex vector and|∆EI u| is the mag- nitude of the pairing. Checking for unitarity, we have h ∆EI u· mEI u i · h ∆EI u· mEI u i† = |∆EI u|2 Σ0τ0σ0 + i 2 sin(2θ) sin(˜γ) h mE1 ...

    work page

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    is a 3-component complex vec- tor that spans the order parameter manifold ( S1× CP 2)/Z2 [40, 41] via (dx 1,dx 2,dx

  2. [9]

    (106) where, ˜ϕ is the superconducting phase and θ, ˜γ1 and ˜γ2 specify the direction in the triplet space

    =ei˜ϕ(cosθ,ei˜γ1 sinθ cosϕ,ei˜γ2 sinθ sinϕ). (106) where, ˜ϕ is the superconducting phase and θ, ˜γ1 and ˜γ2 specify the direction in the triplet space. Note that the TRI sub-manifold is given by ˜γ1 = ˜γ2 = 0 or θ = 0,π whence the order parameter manifold reduces to ( S1× S2)...

  3. [10]

    On the other hand, on the TRB man- ifold, there are two gaps (as can be obtained by diagonal- izing Eq

    TI 1g Triplet A general mass term for this triplet is written as, mTI 1g(d) =|∆TI 1g| dI 1m TI 1g 1 +dI 2m TI 1g 2 +dI 3m TI 1g 3 = ∆TI 1g· mTI 1g, (107) such that the unitarity condition leads to h ∆TI 1g· mTI 1g i · h ∆TI 1g· mTI 1g i† =|∆TI 1g|2× Σ0τ0σ0 + 1 2 dI× dI∗ · mTI ...

  4. [11]

    TII 1g triplet The analysis of this triplet (spectrum and unitarity condition) is very similar to TI 1g discussed above, leading 18 FIG. 11. Schematic of NNN pairing for the bilinearm TII 1g 1 (Eq

  5. [12]

    Bhattacharjee and K

    S. Bhattacharjee and K. Sengupta, Tunneling conduc- tance of graphene nis junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 217001 (2006)

    2006

  6. [13]

    TIII 1g triplet Finally, we turn to the TIII 1g triplet that arises from the direct product of the flavour and valley sub-band triplets (Eq. 54). This results in a nodal PDW SC with excitation spectrum given in Fig. 12(a). The structure of the Bogoliubov spectrum is best un- d...

    2021

  7. [14]

    linearly

    is obtained by performing a unitary transformation on the Dirac spinors in the local basis, χ (Eq. 11), χg =Uglobal χ. (A1) where Uglobal is a 16× 16 unitary matrix whose explicit form is given in Ref. [19] and χg is the spinor in the global basis, i.e., χg = (χgΓ,χgM1,χgM2,χg...

  8. [15]

    While this phase is analogous to the AI 1g phase in the system with j = 3/2 discussed in the main text (see sec

    A1 Unitary Singlet Superconductor This phase breaks theσd symmetry, with a mass term AI 1 1 (1)M2002 This fully gapped superconductor has 8-fold- degenerate Bogoliubov quasi-particle bands and corresponds to the regular s-wave SC for j = 1 /2 electrons. While this phase is ana...

  9. [16]

    The Bogoliubov bands break up into 2-fold degenerate bands around the Γ point and 6-fold degenerate bands around the M points

    AII 1 Non-unitary Double-Gapped Singlet Superconductor This double gapped superconductor breaks the σd symmetry with a mass term 27 AII 1 1 1√ 3 M2032 + 1√ 3 M2302 + 1√ 3 M2332 The pairing matrix is non-unitary. The Bogoliubov bands break up into 2-fold degenerate bands around...

  10. [17]

    E Non-unitary Gapless Doublet Superconductor This superconducting phase breaks C3 andσd symme- tries. The doublet mass components are E 1 1√ 2 M2032 + − 1√ 2 M2332 2 1√ 6 M2032 + − q 2 3 M2302 + 1√ 6 M2332 This nodal superconductor has a quasi-particle band (doubly degenerate)...

  11. [18]

    M. G. Yamada, M. Oshikawa, and G. Jackeli, Emergent SU(4) symmetry in α−zrcl3 and crystalline spin-orbital liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097201 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Boyack, H

    R. Boyack, H. Yerzhakov, and J. Maciejko, Quantum phase transitions in dirac fermion systems, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics 230, 979 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    N. B. Kopnin and E. B. Sonin, Bcs superconductivity of dirac electrons in graphene layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246808 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Uchoa, G

    B. Uchoa, G. G. Cabrera, and A. H. Castro Neto, Nodal liquid and s-wave superconductivity in transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 71, 184509 (2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    A. H. Castro Neto, Charge density wave, superconduc- tivity, and anomalous metallic behavior in 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4382 (2001)

    2001

  16. [24]

    bcs super- conductivity of dirac electrons in graphene layers

    B. Uchoa and A. H. C. Neto, Comment on “bcs super- conductivity of dirac electrons in graphene layers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 109701 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    I. F. Herbut, Interactions and phase transitions on 28 graphene’s honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146401 (2006)

    2006

  18. [26]

    Roy and I

    B. Roy and I. F. Herbut, Unconventional superconduc- tivity on honeycomb lattice: Theory of kekule order pa- rameter, Phys. Rev. B 82, 035429 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity (Courier Corporation, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity (Courier Corporation, 2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    R. A. Wilson, A discrete model for gell-mann matrices (2024), arXiv:2401.13000 [math.GR]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Specular andreev reflection in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 067007 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Bhattacharjee, M

    S. Bhattacharjee, M. Maiti, and K. Sengupta, Theory of tunneling conductance of graphene normal metal- insulator-superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 76, 184514 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Ozaki and K

    M.-a. Ozaki and K. Machida, Superconducting classes of heavy-fermion materials, Phys. Rev. B 39, 4145 (1989)

    1989

  24. [32]

    Huang, B

    C. Huang, B. T. Zhou, H. Zhang, B. Yang, R. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Wan, K. Huang, Z. Liao, E. Zhang, et al. , Proximity-induced surface superconductivity in dirac semimetal cd3as2, Nature communications10, 2217 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Santos, T

    L. Santos, T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Super- conductivity on the surface of topological insulators and in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric materials, Phys. Rev. B 81, 184502 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Kobayashi and M

    S. Kobayashi and M. Sato, Topological superconductivity in dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 187001 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    L. Zhao, H. Deng, I. Korzhovska, M. Begliarbekov, Z. Chen, E. Andrade, E. Rosenthal, A. Pasupathy, V. Oganesyan, and L. Krusin-Elbaum, Emergent surface superconductivity in the topological insulator sb2te3, Na- ture communications 6, 8279 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    S. Ryu, C. Mudry, C.-Y. Hou, and C. Chamon, Masses in graphenelike two-dimensional electronic systems: Topo- logical defects in order parameters and their fractional exchange statistics, Phys. Rev. B 80, 205319 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Himeda, T

    A. Himeda, T. Kato, and M. Ogata, Stripe states with spatially oscillating d-wave superconductivity in the two- dimensional t−t ′ −J model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117001 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, E.-A. Kim, S. A. Kivelson, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, and S. C. Zhang, Dy- namical layer decoupling in a stripe-ordered high- Tc su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127003 (2007)

    2007

  31. [39]

    P. R. Wallace, The band theory of graphite, Phys. Rev. 71, 622 (1947)

    1947

  32. [40]

    H. Kim, K. Wang, Y. Nakajima, R. Hu, S. Ziemak, P. Syers, L. Wang, H. Hodovanets, J. D. Denlinger, P. M. Brydon, et al., Beyond triplet: Unconventional supercon- ductivity in a spin-3/2 topological semimetal, Science ad- vances 4, eaao4513 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Anderson, Structure of” triplet” superconducting en- ergy gaps, Physical Review B 30, 4000 (1984)

    P. Anderson, Structure of” triplet” superconducting en- ergy gaps, Physical Review B 30, 4000 (1984)

    1984

  34. [42]

    Ramires, Nonunitary superconductivity in complex quantum materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 34, 304001 (2022)

    A. Ramires, Nonunitary superconductivity in complex quantum materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 34, 304001 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Pfleiderer, Superconducting phases of f-electron com- pounds, Rev

    C. Pfleiderer, Superconducting phases of f-electron com- pounds, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1551 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    Joynt and L

    R. Joynt and L. Taillefer, The superconducting phases of upt3, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 235 (2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    multipole

    T. Nomoto, K. Hattori, and H. Ikeda, Classification of “multipole” superconductivity in multiorbital systems and its implications, Phys. Rev. B 94, 174513 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of un- conventional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 239 (1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    Volovik and L

    G. Volovik and L. Gor’kov, Superconducting classes in heavy-fermion systems, in Ten Years of Superconductiv- ity: 1980–1990 (Springer, 1985) pp. 144–155

    1980

  40. [48]

    Yarzhemsky and E

    V. Yarzhemsky and E. Murav’Ev, Space group approach to the wavefunction of a cooper pair, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 4, 3525 (1992)

    1992

  41. [49]

    E. I. Blount, Symmetry properties of triplet supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B 32, 2935 (1985)

    1985

  42. [50]

    Hatsugai and S

    Y. Hatsugai and S. Ryu, Topological quantum phase transitions in superconductivity on lattices, Phys. Rev. B 65, 212510 (2002)

    2002

  43. [51]

    Leggett, Number-phase fluctuations in two-band su- perconductors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 36, 901 (1966)

    A. Leggett, Number-phase fluctuations in two-band su- perconductors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 36, 901 (1966)

    1966

  44. [52]

    Nanda, K

    A. Nanda, K. Dhochak, and S. Bhattacharjee, Phases and quantum phase transitions in an anisotropic ferro- magnetic kitaev-heisenberg-Γ magnet, Physical Review B 102, 10.1103/physrevb.102.235124 (2020)

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    Zhou, Spin correlation and discrete symmetry in spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys

    F. Zhou, Spin correlation and discrete symmetry in spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 080401 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Ueda, Topological aspects in spinor bose–einstein con- densates, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 122401 (2014)

    M. Ueda, Topological aspects in spinor bose–einstein con- densates, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 122401 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Mukerjee, C

    S. Mukerjee, C. Xu, and J. E. Moore, Topological defects and the superfluid transition of the s = 1 spinor con- densate in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120406 (2006)

    2006

  48. [58]

    D. F. Agterberg, J. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radz- ihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Wang, The physics of pair-density waves: cuprate superconductors and be- yond, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 231 (2020)

    2020

  49. [59]

    W.S.Massey, The quotient space of the complex projec- tive plane under conjugation is a 4-sphere, Geom Dedi- cata 2, 371–374 (1973)

    1973

  50. [60]

    N.H.Kuiper, The quotient space of cp(2) by complex conjugation is the 4-sphere, Math. Ann. 208, 175–177 (1974)

    1974

  51. [61]

    Gupta, B

    M. Gupta, B. Mondal, S. Bhattacharjee, and T. Saha Dasgupta, Ab initio insights on the fermi- ology of d1 transition metals on the honeycomb lattice: Hierarchy of hopping pathways and spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043219 (2023)

    2023

  52. [62]

    I. F. Herbut and S. Mandal, so(8) unification and the large-n theory of superconductor-insulator transition of two-dimensional dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108, L161108 (2023)

    2023

  53. [63]

    J. J. Cuozzo, W. Yu, P. Davids, T. M. Nenoff, D. B. Soh, W. Pan, and E. Rossi, Leggett modes in a dirac semimetal, Nature Physics 20, 1118 (2024)

    2024

  54. [64]

    Chamon, C.-Y

    C. Chamon, C.-Y. Hou, C. Mudry, S. Ryu, and L. San- 29 tos, Masses and majorana fermions in graphene, Physica Scripta 2012, 014013 (2012)

    2012

  55. [65]

    This relativeπ-phase is therefore a di- rect outcome of the symmetry implementation

    studied in Section VII A 1 resulting in breaking of in- version symmetry. This relativeπ-phase is therefore a di- rect outcome of the symmetry implementation. One can therefore conceive of fluctuations in relative phase that would correspond to an inversion-odd Leggett mode [3...

  56. [66]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 1383 (2012)

    2012

  57. [67]

    P. M. R. Brydon, L. Wang, M. Weinert, and D. F. Agter- berg, Pairing of j = 3/2 fermions in half-heusler super- conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 177001 (2016)

    2016

  58. [68]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classi- fication of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  59. [69]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconduc- tors, in AIP conference proceedings, Vol. 1134 (American Institute of Physics, 2009) pp. 10–21

    2009

  60. [70]

    70 (the other twelve eigenvalues are non-zero equal and hence give rise to 12 fold degenerate gapped excita- tions) and is evident from Fig

    Thus, both the SCs have a double gap structure, with one of the gaps being exactly zero corresponding to four zero eigenvalues of the matrix on the right-hand-side of Eq. 70 (the other twelve eigenvalues are non-zero equal and hence give rise to 12 fold degenerate gapped excit...

  61. [71]

    Hatsugai, S

    Y. Hatsugai, S. Ryu, and M. Kohmoto, Superconductiv- ity and abelian chiral anomalies, Phys. Rev. B70, 054502 (2004)

    2004

  62. [72]

    Sato and S

    M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, Topological phases of noncen- trosymmetric superconductors: Edge states, majorana fermions, and non-abelian statistics, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094504 (2009)

    2009

  63. [73]

    Cornfeld, M

    E. Cornfeld, M. S. Rudner, and E. Berg, Spin-polarized superconductivity: Order parameter topology, current dissipation, and multiple-period josephson effect, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013051 (2021)

    2021

  64. [74]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications 15, 1801 (2024)

    2024

  65. [75]

    Grover and T

    T. Grover and T. Senthil, Topological spin hall states, charged skyrmions, and superconductivity in two di- mensions, Physical Review Letters 100, 10.1103/phys- revlett.100.156804 (2008)

    2008 doi

  66. [102]

    component of (TII 1g ) in global basis (Eq. 113). Here dot- ted (Solid) line represents pairing in the flavour sector with Pairing matrix Σ1(−Σ1). Pairing amplitudes oscillate at mo- menta corresponding to the M2 point in the BZ(Fig. 2).Pair- ings for the two other components ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.