REVIEW
Pitfalls in Determining the Electrical Bandwidth of Non-Ideal Nanomaterials for Photodetection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Pitfalls in Determining the Electrical Bandwidth of Non-Ideal Nanomaterials for Photodetection
read the original abstract
The electrical 3 dB bandwidth is regularly used as a measure for the response speed of a photodetector and is estimated via various approaches in literature, ranging from direct measurements to gauged values via approximations. Great care must be taken when comparing these 3 dB bandwidths, since approximations are only strictly valid for ideal circuits. This paper demonstrates that, for typical photodetectors based on new emerging nanostructured materials, namely quantum dots and transition metal dichalcogenides, the bandwidth can deviate up to 10^3 depending on the chosen approach for the bandwidth specification.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.