pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20798 · v1 · pith:CT4SNJZJnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Phenomenology of heavy-flavour jet angularities at hadron colliders

Andrea Ghira , Lorenzo Mai , Simone Marzani , Daniel Reichelt , Steffen Schumann , Leon St\"ocker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords jet angularitiesb-jetsheavy-flavour jetsSoftDrop groomingresummed predictionsmass effectsnon-perturbative correctionsZ+jet events
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resummed predictions for b-jet angularities include consistent mass effects and non-perturbative corrections in Z+jet events.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes resummed and matched predictions for jet angularities in hadronic Z+jet events initiated by b-quarks. Calculations treat finite b-quark mass effects at both fixed-order and resummed levels, and add non-perturbative corrections through parton-to-hadron transfer matrices taken from dedicated Sherpa Monte Carlo runs. Results are presented both with and without SoftDrop grooming, and b-jet distributions are compared to those from light-flavour jets to isolate the size of mass effects. A sympathetic reader would care because these predictions supply a concrete baseline for testing QCD dynamics in heavy-flavour jets at current and future hadron colliders.

Core claim

We compute resummed and matched predictions for jet angularities in hadronic Z+jet events, where the jet is initiated by a b-quark. The analysis is performed both with and without grooming the candidate jets using the SoftDrop algorithm. Mass effects are consistently included at both fixed-order and resummed levels. Our theoretical predictions also incorporate non-perturbative corrections from the underlying event and hadronization, implemented through parton-to-hadron transfer matrices extracted from dedicated Monte Carlo simulations with Sherpa. Finally, we compare results for b-jets with the ones from light-flavour jets, in order to quantify the impact of finite-mass effects.

What carries the argument

Resummed and matched perturbative calculation for jet angularities with consistent finite b-quark mass effects at fixed-order and resummed levels, augmented by parton-to-hadron transfer matrices for non-perturbative corrections.

If this is right

  • Provides matched predictions for both groomed and ungroomed b-jet angularities that can be compared directly to collider data.
  • Quantifies the numerical size of finite-mass corrections by explicit comparison to light-flavour jet results.
  • Supplies a consistent framework that treats mass effects at both fixed-order and resummed accuracy.
  • Incorporates underlying-event and hadronization effects via Monte Carlo-derived transfer matrices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same transfer-matrix approach could be applied to charm-initiated jets if dedicated Sherpa samples are generated.
  • These predictions may reduce theory uncertainties when angularity observables are used in b-jet tagging or heavy-flavour jet substructure analyses at the LHC.
  • Extension to other angularity exponents or to different grooming parameters would test the robustness of the mass-effect treatment.

Load-bearing premise

The parton-to-hadron transfer matrices extracted from Sherpa Monte Carlo simulations accurately capture the non-perturbative corrections for b-jets without introducing uncontrolled biases when applied to the resummed perturbative calculation.

What would settle it

A statistically significant mismatch between the predicted angularity distributions for b-jets and LHC measurements in Z+jet events that exceeds the combined theoretical and experimental uncertainties.

read the original abstract

We compute resummed and matched predictions for jet angularities in hadronic Z+jet events, where the jet is initiated by a b-quark. The analysis is performed both with and without grooming the candidate jets using the SoftDrop algorithm. Mass effects are consistently included at both fixed-order and resummed levels. Our theoretical predictions also incorporate non-perturbative corrections from the underlying event and hadronization, implemented through parton-to-hadron transfer matrices extracted from dedicated Monte Carlo simulations with Sherpa. Finally, we compare results for b-jets with the ones from light-flavour jets, in order to quantify the impact of finite-mass effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper computes resummed and matched predictions for jet angularities in hadronic Z+jet events with b-quark initiated jets, both with and without SoftDrop grooming. Mass effects are included consistently at fixed-order and resummed levels. Non-perturbative corrections from underlying event and hadronization are added via parton-to-hadron transfer matrices extracted from dedicated Sherpa Monte Carlo simulations. Results for b-jets are compared to light-flavour jets to quantify finite-mass effects.

Significance. If the transfer-matrix approach is shown to be consistent with the analytic mass treatment, the work would supply useful phenomenological predictions for heavy-flavour jet substructure at the LHC, enabling direct quantification of mass effects in angularity observables. The consistent inclusion of mass effects at both perturbative levels is a clear methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (final paragraph)] Abstract (final paragraph) and corresponding methods section on non-perturbative corrections: the central claim that finite-mass effects can be quantified via b-jet versus light-jet differences relies on the transfer matrices accurately representing non-perturbative effects without introducing biases from Sherpa's parton-level mass treatment or shower ordering. No validation, error budget, or consistency check with the analytic resummation is described; this is load-bearing because any mismatch would directly affect the reported mass-effect differences.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract does not specify the angularity parameter values, the jet radius, or the collider energy; adding these would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the major comment and have revised the manuscript to address the concerns regarding the validation of the non-perturbative corrections.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract (final paragraph) and corresponding methods section on non-perturbative corrections: the central claim that finite-mass effects can be quantified via b-jet versus light-jet differences relies on the transfer matrices accurately representing non-perturbative effects without introducing biases from Sherpa's parton-level mass treatment or shower ordering. No validation, error budget, or consistency check with the analytic resummation is described; this is load-bearing because any mismatch would directly affect the reported mass-effect differences.

    Authors: We agree that providing additional validation and an error budget for the transfer-matrix approach is important to support our claims. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the methods section to include a detailed description of how the transfer matrices were extracted from Sherpa simulations, including the specific settings used for parton shower and hadronization. We have added comparisons of the transfer matrices obtained with different shower orderings and parameter variations to provide an estimate of the associated uncertainties. Furthermore, we include a consistency check at the parton level by comparing the analytic resummed predictions for light-flavour jets with those from the Sherpa parton shower before applying the transfer matrices. While a complete analytic consistency check incorporating the full mass-dependent resummation is not straightforward given the Monte Carlo nature of the corrections, these additions address the potential biases and strengthen the reliability of the b-jet versus light-jet differences. The abstract has been updated to mention these validations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation computes resummed and matched predictions for jet angularities with consistent mass effects at fixed-order and resummed levels, then applies non-perturbative corrections via parton-to-hadron transfer matrices extracted from external Sherpa Monte Carlo simulations. This structure relies on independent external tools and simulations rather than any self-referential fitting, self-definition of observables, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its own inputs by construction. The b-jet versus light-flavour comparison follows directly from the perturbative mass treatment without circular reduction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger cannot be populated with specific free parameters, axioms or invented entities from the paper; typical resummation papers of this type would involve perturbative scales and matching parameters whose values are not visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5645 in / 1288 out tokens · 24792 ms · 2026-06-26T16:28:29.036552+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 52 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Marzani, G

    S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and M. Spannowsky,Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology, vol. 958. Springer, 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    Britzger, K

    D. Britzger, K. Rabbertz, D. Savoiu, G. Sieber, and M. Wobisch,Determination of the strong coupling constant using inclusive jet cross section data from multiple experiments,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 1 68, [arXiv:1712.00480]. [3]CMSCollaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al.,Measurement of the Ratio of the Inclusive 3-Jet Cross Section to the Inclusive 2-Jet C...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Bailey, T

    S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne,Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021), no. 4 341, [arXiv:2012.04684]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Abdul Khalek et al.,Phenomenology of NNLO jet production at the LHC and its impact on parton distributions,Eur

    R. Abdul Khalek et al.,Phenomenology of NNLO jet production at the LHC and its impact on parton distributions,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 8 797, [arXiv:2005.11327]. – 42 –

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne,The Impact of LHC Jet Data on the MMHT PDF Fit at NNLO,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 3 248, [arXiv:1711.05757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Pumplin, J

    J. Pumplin, J. Huston, H. L. Lai, P. M. Nadolsky, W.-K. Tung, and C. P. Yuan,Collider Inclusive Jet Data and the Gluon Distribution,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 014019, [arXiv:0904.2424]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    B. J. A. Watt, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne,The Effect of LHC Jet Data on MSTW PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2934, [arXiv:1311.5703]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    D. E. Soper and M. Spannowsky,Combining subjet algorithms to enhance ZH detection at the LHC,JHEP08(2010) 029, [arXiv:1005.0417]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    R. M. Godbole, D. J. Miller, K. A. Mohan, and C. D. White,Jet substructure and probes of CP violation in Vh production,JHEP04(2015) 103, [arXiv:1409.5449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    N. Chen, J. Li, Y. Liu, and Z. Liu,LHC searches for the CP-odd Higgs by the jet substructure analysis,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 7 075002, [arXiv:1410.4447]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Adams et al.,Towards an Understanding of the Correlations in Jet Substructure,Eur

    D. Adams et al.,Towards an Understanding of the Correlations in Jet Substructure,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 9 409, [arXiv:1504.00679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Dasgupta, A

    M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P. Salam,Towards an understanding of jet substructure,JHEP09(2013) 029, [arXiv:1307.0007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Dasgupta, A

    M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and A. Powling,Jet substructure with analytical methods,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013), no. 11 2623, [arXiv:1307.0013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler,Soft Drop,JHEP05(2014) 146, [arXiv:1402.2657]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and D. Neill,Factorization and Resummation for Groomed Multi-Prong Jet Shapes,JHEP02(2018) 144, [arXiv:1710.00014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and D. Neill,Analytic Boosted Boson Discrimination at the Large Hadron Collider,arXiv:1708.06760

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Baron, S

    J. Baron, S. Marzani, and V. Theeuwes,Soft-Drop Thrust,JHEP08(2018) 105, [arXiv:1803.04719]. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 056 (2019)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Baron, D

    J. Baron, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, N. Schwanemann, and V. Theeuwes,Soft-drop grooming for hadronic event shapes,JHEP07(2021) 142, [arXiv:2012.09574]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Marzani, L

    S. Marzani, L. Schunk, and G. Soyez,The jet mass distribution after Soft Drop,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 2 96, [arXiv:1712.05105]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Chien, O

    Y.-T. Chien, O. Fedkevych, D. Reichelt, and S. Schumann,Jet angularities in dijet production in proton-proton and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC,JHEP07(2024) 230, [arXiv:2404.04168]

    arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu, and F. Ringer,Soft drop groomed jet angularities at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B793(2019) 41–47, [arXiv:1811.06983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Dasgupta, B

    M. Dasgupta, B. K. El-Menoufi, and J. Helliwell,QCD resummation for groomed jet observables at NNLL+NLO,JHEP01(2023) 045, [arXiv:2211.03820]

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    C. Frye, A. J. Larkoski, M. D. Schwartz, and K. Yan,Factorization for groomed jet substructure beyond the next-to-leading logarithm,JHEP07(2016) 064, [arXiv:1603.09338]. – 43 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Kardos, A

    A. Kardos, A. J. Larkoski, and Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi,Groomed jet mass at high precision,Phys. Lett. B 809(2020) 135704, [arXiv:2002.00942]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Anderle, M

    D. Anderle, M. Dasgupta, B. K. El-Menoufi, J. Helliwell, and M. Guzzi,Groomed jet mass as a direct probe of collinear parton dynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 9 827, [arXiv:2007.10355]

    arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Caletti, O

    S. Caletti, O. Fedkevych, S. Marzani, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, G. Soyez, and V. Theeuwes, Jet angularities in Z+jet production at the LHC,JHEP07(2021) 076, [arXiv:2104.06920]

    arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    A. J. Larkoski, J. Thaler, and W. J. Waalewijn,Gaining (Mutual) Information about Quark/Gluon Discrimination,JHEP11(2014) 129, [arXiv:1408.3122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Reichelt, S

    D. Reichelt, S. Caletti, O. Fedkevych, S. Marzani, S. Schumann, and G. Soyez,Phenomenology of jet angularities at the LHC,JHEP03(2022) 131, [arXiv:2112.09545]. [38]CMSCollaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Study of quark and gluon jet substructure in Z+jet and dijet events from pp collisions,JHEP01(2022) 188, [arXiv:2109.03340]

    arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi,Infrared safe definition of jet flavor,Eur. Phys. J. C47(2006) 113–124, [hep-ph/0601139]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    Caletti, A

    S. Caletti, A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, and D. Reichelt,Practical jet flavour through NNLO, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 7 632, [arXiv:2205.01109]

    arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. Mitov, and R. Poncelet,Infrared-safe flavoured anti-k T jets,JHEP04(2023) 138, [arXiv:2205.11879]

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Gauld, A

    R. Gauld, A. Huss, and G. Stagnitto,Flavor Identification of Reconstructed Hadronic Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 16 161901, [arXiv:2208.11138]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 132, 159901 (2024)]

    arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Caola, R

    F. Caola, R. Grabarczyk, M. L. Hutt, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, and J. Thaler,Flavored jets with exact anti-kt kinematics and tests of infrared and collinear safety,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 9 094010, [arXiv:2306.07314]

    arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Aglietti, L

    U. Aglietti, L. Di Giustino, G. Ferrera, and L. Trentadue,Resummed Mass Distribution for Jets Initiated by Massive Quarks,Phys. Lett. B651(2007) 275–292, [hep-ph/0612073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  35. [35]

    Aglietti, L

    U. Aglietti, L. Di Giustino, G. Ferrera, A. Renzaglia, G. Ricciardi, and L. Trentadue, Threshold Resummation in B —>X(c) l nu(l) Decays,Phys. Lett. B653(2007) 38–52, [arXiv:0707.2010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    Aglietti, L

    U. Aglietti, L. Di Giustino, G. Ferrera, and L. Trentadue,Comment on Resummation of Mass Distribution for Jets Initiated by Massive Quarks,Phys. Lett. B670(2009) 367–368, [arXiv:0804.3922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    U. G. Aglietti and G. Ferrera,Improved factorization for threshold resummation in heavy quark to heavy quark decays,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023), no. 4 335, [arXiv:2211.14397]

    arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Ghira, S

    A. Ghira, S. Marzani, and G. Ridolfi,A consistent resummation of mass and soft logarithms in processes with heavy flavours,JHEP11(2023) 120, [arXiv:2309.06139]

    arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Fleming, A

    S. Fleming, A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, and I. W. Stewart,Jets from massive unstable particles: Top-mass determination,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 074010, [hep-ph/0703207]. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Fleming, A

    S. Fleming, A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, and I. W. Stewart,Top Jets in the Peak Region: Factorization Analysis with NLL Resummation,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 114003, [arXiv:0711.2079]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Bachu, A

    B. Bachu, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, A. Pathak, and I. W. Stewart,Boosted top quarks in the peak region with NL3L resummation,Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 1 014026, [arXiv:2012.12304]

    arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    A. Jain, I. Scimemi, and I. W. Stewart,Two-loop Jet-Function and Jet-Mass for Top Quarks, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 094008, [arXiv:0801.0743]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    A. H. Hoang, C. Lepenik, and M. Stahlhofen,Two-Loop Massive Quark Jet Functions in SCET,JHEP08(2019) 112, [arXiv:1904.12839]

    arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    A. Bris, V. Mateu, and M. Preisser,Massive event-shape distributions at N 2LL,JHEP09 (2020) 132, [arXiv:2006.06383]

    arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Maltoni, M

    F. Maltoni, M. Selvaggi, and J. Thaler,Exposing the dead cone effect with jet substructure techniques,Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 5 054015, [arXiv:1606.03449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    C. Lee, P. Shrivastava, and V. Vaidya,Predictions for energy correlators probing substructure of groomed heavy quark jets,JHEP09(2019) 045, [arXiv:1901.09095]

    arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Llorente and J

    J. Llorente and J. Cantero,Determination of theb-quark massm b from the angular screening effects in the ATLASb-jet shape data,Nucl. Phys. B889(2014) 401–418, [arXiv:1407.8001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    H. T. Li and I. Vitev,Inverting the mass hierarchy of jet quenching effects with promptb-jet substructure,Phys. Lett. B793(2019) 259–264, [arXiv:1801.00008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    H. T. Li, Z. L. Liu, and I. Vitev,Heavy flavor jet production and substructure in electron-nucleus collisions,Phys. Lett. B827(2022) 137007, [arXiv:2108.07809]

    arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Craft, K

    E. Craft, K. Lee, B. Me¸ caj, and I. Moult,Beautiful and Charming Energy Correlators, arXiv:2210.09311

    arXiv

  51. [51]

    Cunqueiro, D

    L. Cunqueiro, D. Napoletano, and A. Soto-Ontoso,Dead-cone searches in heavy-ion collisions using the jet tree,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 9 094008, [arXiv:2211.11789]

    arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Fedkevych, C

    O. Fedkevych, C. K. Khosa, S. Marzani, and F. Sforza,Identification of b jets using QCD-inspired observables,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 3 034032, [arXiv:2202.05082]

    arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Caletti, A

    S. Caletti, A. Ghira, and S. Marzani,On heavy-flavour jets with Soft Drop,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024), no. 2 212, [arXiv:2312.11623]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Blok and C

    B. Blok and C. Wu,zg distribution for heavy flavor jets in dense quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 7 074009, [arXiv:2312.15560]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Zhang, Z.-X

    Q. Zhang, Z.-X. Xu, W. Dai, B.-W. Zhang, and E. Wang,Substructures of heavy flavor jets in ppand PbPb collisions at √s= 5.02 TeV,arXiv:2303.08620

    arXiv

  56. [56]

    Ghira, S

    A. Ghira, S. Marzani, and G. Soyez,The Lund b-jet plane,JHEP05(2026) 247, [arXiv:2512.17408]

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, V. A. Khoze, and S. I. Troian,On specific QCD properties of heavy quark fragmentation (’dead cone’),J. Phys. G17(1991) 1602–1604. – 45 –

    1991

  58. [58]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, V. A. Khoze, and S. I. Troian,Specific features of heavy quark production. LPHD approach to heavy particle spectra,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 89–119, [hep-ph/9506425]. [69]ALICECollaboration, S. Acharya et al.,Direct observation of the dead-cone effect in quantum chromodynamics,Nature605(2022), no. 7910 440–446, [arXiv:2106.05713]. [Erratum: N...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  59. [59]

    P. K. Dhani, O. Fedkevych, A. Ghira, S. Marzani, and G. Soyez,Heavy flavour jet substructure,JHEP02(2025) 046, [arXiv:2410.05415]

    arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    P. K. Dhani, O. Fedkevych, and A. Ghira,Heavy flavor jet substructure at lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 5 054004, [arXiv:2502.07894]

    arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi,Principles of general final-state resummation and automated implementation,JHEP03(2005) 073, [hep-ph/0407286]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  62. [62]

    Gerwick, S

    E. Gerwick, S. Hoeche, S. Marzani, and S. Schumann,Soft evolution of multi-jet final states, JHEP02(2015) 106, [arXiv:1411.7325]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    A. J. Larkoski, D. Neill, and J. Thaler,Jet Shapes with the Broadening Axis,JHEP04(2014) 017, [arXiv:1401.2158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm,JHEP04(2008) 063, [arXiv:0802.1189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    J. R. Andersen et al.,Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, in9th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders, 5, 2016. arXiv:1605.04692

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Rubin, G

    M. Rubin, G. P. Salam, and S. Sapeta,Giant QCD K-factors beyond NLO,JHEP09(2010) 084, [arXiv:1006.2144]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [67]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi,Resummed event shapes at hadron - hadron colliders,JHEP08(2004) 062, [hep-ph/0407287]. – 46 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi,Generalized resummation of QCD final state observables,Phys. Lett. B584(2004) 298–305, [hep-ph/0304148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi,Phenomenology of event shapes at hadron colliders, JHEP06(2010) 038, [arXiv:1001.4082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Marzani, D

    S. Marzani, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, G. Soyez, and V. Theeuwes,Fitting the Strong Coupling Constant with Soft-Drop Thrust,JHEP11(2019) 179, [arXiv:1906.10504]

    arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    Baberuxki, C

    N. Baberuxki, C. T. Preuss, D. Reichelt, and S. Schumann,Resummed predictions for jet-resolution scales in multijet production in e +e− annihilation,JHEP04(2020) 112, [arXiv:1912.09396]

    arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Knobbe, D

    M. Knobbe, D. Reichelt, and S. Schumann,(N)NLO+NLL’ accurate predictions for plain and groomed 1-jettiness in neutral current DIS,JHEP09(2023) 194, [arXiv:2306.17736]

    arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, C

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, C. T. Preuss, D. Reichelt, and S. Schumann,NLO+NLL’ accurate predictions for three-jet event shapes in hadronic Higgs decays,JHEP07(2024) 160, [arXiv:2403.06929]. [92]SherpaCollaboration, E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 3,JHEP12(2024) 156, [arXiv:2410.22148]

    arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Krauss, R

    F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, and G. Soff,AMEGIC++ 1.0: A Matrix element generator in C++, JHEP02(2002) 044, [hep-ph/0109036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  75. [75]

    Gleisberg and S

    T. Gleisberg and S. Hoeche,Comix, a new matrix element generator,JHEP12(2008) 039, [arXiv:0808.3674]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Buccioni, J.-N

    F. Buccioni, J.-N. Lang, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierh¨ ofer, S. Pozzorini, H. Zhang, and M. F. Zoller,OpenLoops 2,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 10 866, [arXiv:1907.13071]

    arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and L. Hofer,Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations,Comput. Phys. Commun.212(2017) 220–238, [arXiv:1604.06792]. [97]PDF4LHC Working GroupCollaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,The PDF4LHC21 combination of global PDF fits for the LHC Run III,J. Phys. G49(2022), no. 8 080501, [arXiv:2203.05506]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    Buckley, J

    A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordstr¨ om, B. Page, M. R¨ ufenacht, M. Sch¨ onherr, and G. Watt,LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era,Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 132, [arXiv:1412.7420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    Cacciari and S

    M. Cacciari and S. Catani,Soft gluon resummation for the fragmentation of light and heavy quarks at large x,Nucl. Phys. B617(2001) 253–290, [hep-ph/0107138]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  80. [80]

    Catani, B

    S. Catani, B. R. Webber, and G. Marchesini,QCD coherent branching and semiinclusive processes at large x,Nucl. Phys. B349(1991) 635–654

    1991

Showing first 80 references.