Determination of fundamental properties of nitrogen from first principles. III. Temperature and frequency dependence of the molecular polarizability and magnetic susceptibility

Giovanni Garberoglio; Jakub Lang; Micha{\l} Lesiuk; Micha{\l} Przybytek

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Determination of fundamental properties of nitrogen from first principles. III. Temperature and frequency dependence of the molecular polarizability and magnetic susceptibility

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First-principles calculations fix the temperature and frequency dependence of nitrogen's polarizability and deliver static values accurate to 10 ppm.

desk verdict Solid, honest computation paper worth refereeing; the semi-empirical alpha0 values are plausible but the claimed 10 ppm accuracy is unquantified, especially for the 303 to 273.16 K shift. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21261 v1 pith:CU62C2RS submitted 2026-07-23 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jakub Lang , Giovanni Garberoglio , Micha{l} Przybytek , Micha{l} Lesiuk This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords nitrogenmoleculepolarizabilitymagneticsusceptibilityCauchycoefficientsrefractiveindexgasthermometrypathintegralMonteCarlorovibrationalaveragingcoupledcluster

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to give thermometry a theoretical backbone: the temperature and frequency dependence of the polarizability and magnetic susceptibility of the nitrogen molecule, computed from first principles over 50–2000 K. Because the theory is still two orders of magnitude less accurate than the best refractive-index measurements, the authors' main move is hybrid: they combine their computed higher-order Cauchy coefficients and magnetic susceptibility with precision molar-refractivity data to extract the static polarizability at two reference temperatures, 303 K and 273.16 K, with an expected uncertainty no worse than 10 ppm. The paper also provides the first systematic first-principles temperature-dependent values for the magnetic susceptibility, and reports an unexplained 30% disagreement with the century-old experimental value. If the hybrid extraction is sound, nitrogen becomes a calibrant for refractive-index gas thermometry across a wide temperature range without new measurements at every frequency.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a two-stage pipeline. First, composite coupled-cluster electronic-structure calculations (CCSD, CC3, CCSDT, CCSDTQ with core, relativistic, and basis-set corrections) produce the static polarizability, Cauchy coefficients up to sixth order, and isotropic magnetic susceptibility as functions of internuclear distance R near equilibrium. Second, two independent quantum thermal averages—exact rovibrational Boltzmann averaging and path integral Monte Carlo—convert those R-dependent curves into temperature-dependent quantities over 50–2000 K. The Cauchy expansion α(ω,R)=α0(R)+α2(R)ω2+α4(R)ω4+α6(R)ω6 is the bridge between theory and the frequency-dependent molar refractivi

What would settle it

A new measurement of the magnetic susceptibility of N2: if it confirms the old value (≈−1.34×10−4 a.u.) rather than the theoretical value (≈−1.75×10−4 a.u.), the hybrid extraction in Eq. (54) and the resulting α0 values are systematically biased. Alternatively, a direct independent calculation of α0 at 303 K from a different electronic-structure method, or a measurement of the static polarizability, would settle the 10 ppm claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that quantum-chemical composite coupled-cluster calculations, averaged over nuclear motion by two independent methods (rovibrational summation and path integral Monte Carlo), give reliable functions α0(T), α2(T), α4(T), α6(T), and χ0(T) for N2 from 50 to 2000 K. Combining those functions with two high-precision molar refractivity measurements yields the static polarizability α0(303 K)=11.735962 a.u. and α0(273.16 K)=11.735585 a.u., with claimed accuracy no worse than 10 ppm. It also claims the paramagnetic term in the magnetic susceptibility is substantial and that the theoretical χ0=−1.75(9)×10−4 a.u. at 303 K disagrees with the sole experimental value by

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid extraction assumes that the theoretical auxiliary quantities entering the two-wavelength solve—the fourth and sixth Cauchy coefficients, the magnetic susceptibility, and the theoretical temperature difference used to shift from 303 K to 273.16 K—are unbiased within their quoted uncertainties; in particular, the magnetic susceptibility, which is used in the same equation, disagrees with the only available experimental value by about 30%.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the hybrid extraction holds, N2's static polarizability at the ITS-90 triple point is known to ~10 ppm, giving a metrological reference value for gas thermometry.
The computed temperature functions make it possible to shift accurate optical measurements at one temperature/frequency to any other within 50–2000 K without additional experiments.
The near-perfect agreement between rovibrational averaging and PIMC validates both thermal treatments; future work on other diatomics can follow the same scheme.
The magnetic susceptibility result, if confirmed by new experiments, would resolve a long-standing inconsistency in the Lorentz-Lorenz input for N2.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The 10 ppm accuracy claim rests on an error budget that is asserted rather than shown step by step; if any auxiliary theoretical quantity (notably χ0) carries a systematic bias, the extracted α0 shifts by more than the claimed uncertainty.
The unexplained ~30% gap between theory and the 1924 measurement of χ0 is a testable anomaly: a modern measurement of N2's magnetic susceptibility would either confirm the theory or expose a flaw in the theoretical treatment (e.g., missing gauge or relativistic effects).
The same hybrid recipe could be reapplied to other gases (e.g., noble gases or CO2) for which high-precision refractivity exists but static polarizabilities at reference temperatures have not been directly measured.
Since the theoretical temperature dependence of α0 is what shifts the 303 K value to 273.16 K, a future direct measurement of α0 at the triple point would independently check the robustness of the hybrid approach.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a solid paper that deserves to be sent to referees. The authors compute the temperature and frequency dependence of N2 polarizability and magnetic susceptibility over 50-2000 K using a composite coupled-cluster scheme and two independent thermal-averaging methods (rovibrational averaging and PIMC) that agree cleanly. The new data products—systematic temperature curves, the paramagnetic-included susceptibility, and the semi-empirical static polarizabilities at 303 and 273.16 K—are genuinely absent from the literature and will be useful for refractive-index gas thermometry.

The paper's strengths are real. The composite electronic-structure protocol is state-of-the-art and the uncertainty treatment for the underlying calculations is transparent; the PIMC/rovibrational cross-check is a good falsification test; the authors are honest about the unresolved 30% discrepancy between their magnetic susceptibility and the only experimental value. They also ship data and fitting code, which makes independent checks possible.

The soft spot is exactly where the reader and the stress-test put it: the headline semi-empirical alpha0 values are quoted without explicit error bars, and the 'no worse than 10 ppm' claim is asserted, not derived. The 303 K value is probably defensible—solving the two experimental A_R equations absorbs alpha2, and the other auxiliary errors map to sub-ppm shifts. But the 303 to 273.16 K temperature shift is a thinner reed. The shift is only ~4e-4 a.u. against a 2-sigma band of 0.013 a.u. on the absolute theoretical alpha0; both thermal-averaging methods share the same electronic-structure alpha0(R) curve, so a bias in its R-dependence could shift the difference by more than the claimed ppm. The authors do not propagate uncertainties through that difference, nor do they state the correlation assumptions between R points. A referee should ask for a covariance-based propagation or a sensitivity test, e.g., recomputing the shift with alpha0(R) endpoints varied within their uncertainties. That is a fixable presentation/quantification gap, not a load-bearing flaw in the underlying calculations.

The magnetic-susceptibility discrepancy is a concern but not a disqualifier; the authors flag it and its direct effect on alpha0 is small, only a few ppm. Still, it is a warning that auxiliary theoretical inputs may carry unquantified bias.

Bottom line: the paper is for the metrology community and for anyone needing reference polarizabilities for N2. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it out with a request to pin down the uncertainty of the temperature-shifted alpha0 and to either derive or soften the 10 ppm claim.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a first-principles study of the frequency- and temperature-dependent polarizability and magnetic susceptibility of N2. A composite coupled-cluster scheme is used to compute the static polarizability, Cauchy coefficients α0, α2, α4, α6, and the isotropic magnetic susceptibility χ0 as functions of internuclear distance. The temperature dependence over 50–2000 K is obtained by two independent methods — rovibrational averaging and path-integral Monte Carlo — which agree within statistical uncertainties. The theoretical data are compared with recent refractive-index gas thermometry (RIGT) measurements, and are then combined with experimental molar refractivity values at two wavelengths to extract semi-empirical static polarizabilities at T=303 K and T=273.16 K. The paper also reports a sizable (about 30%) discrepancy between the calculated χ0 and the only available experimental value.

Significance. The paper is valuable in scope and ambition: it provides the first systematic ab initio temperature- and frequency-dependent polarizability and susceptibility data for N2, directly applicable to RIGT. The composite electronic-structure protocol is state-of-the-art, the PIMC/rovibrational cross-validation is a genuine methodological strength, and the authors have made the data and fitting code available in a Zenodo repository, which enhances reproducibility. The semi-empirical static polarizabilities, if properly quantified, would be a useful metrological reference. However, the central accuracy claim — 'no worse than 10 ppm' for the extracted α0 — is not supported by an explicit uncertainty propagation, and the 273.16 K value inherits an additional unquantified shift. The unexplained 30% discrepancy in χ0 further undermines confidence in the theoretical auxiliary inputs. These issues are fixable but require substantial additional analysis.

major comments (3)

[Sec. VI, Eq. (54) and following paragraph] The statement that the extracted α0(303K)=11.735962 a.u. is 'expected to be no worse than 10 ppm' is not backed by an explicit error propagation. Please provide a full uncertainty budget for Eq. (54): contributions from the experimental A_R uncertainties, theoretical uncertainties of α4, α6, χ0, any covariance between the two wavelength equations, and the coverage factor. Using the errors quoted in Eq. (52) gives roughly 2 ppm from α4, 0.5 ppm from α6, and 0.8 ppm from χ0, but this assumes the aiuxiliary inputs are unbiased. The unexplained 30% χ0 discrepancy alone could shift α0 by about 4.5 ppm, so a sensitivity analysis is essential.
[Sec. VI, 'Additionally, using the temperature dependence...'] The triple-point value α0(273.16K)=11.735585 a.u. is obtained by adding the theoretical temperature difference α0(303K)-α0(273.16K) ≈ 3.77×10^-4 a.u. to the semi-empirical 303 K value. No uncertainty is assigned to this difference. Since the absolute theoretical α0(303K) has a 2-sigma uncertainty of ±0.013 a.u. (Eq. 52), the uncertainty of the temperature difference depends on the correlation of the errors in α0(R) over the R-range sampled at the two temperatures. This correlation is not discussed. If the R-dependent errors are not strongly correlated, the uncertainty in the 32 ppm shift could easily exceed the claimed 10 ppm. A proper propagation, including any systematic bias in the R-dependence of α0(R), is required.
[Sec. IV.B and Sec. VI] The computed χ0 = -1.75(9)×10^-4 a.u. at 303 K differs from the historical experimental value -1.34×10^-4 a.u. by about 30%. The authors state that they cannot explain this discrepancy. Because χ0 enters Eq. (54), the reliability of the extracted α0 depends on the accuracy of χ0, and the quoted 5% uncertainty is contradicted by this external check. Please quantify the effect of the χ0 discrepancy on α0(303K), and discuss whether the same electronic-structure issues that affect χ0 could also bias α4 or α6, whose uncertainties were estimated from the same composite scheme. The comparison of the theoretical A_R values with experiment (2–3σ outside the reported error bars) further underscores the need for a critical reassessment of the theoretical error bars.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (53)] Please specify the units of A_R and α in Eq. (53). With α expressed in atomic units, the factor 4πNA/3 is not dimensionless; a conversion constant is required to obtain A_R in cm^3/mol. The current notation is ambiguous.
[Sec. II] The estimate of the non-adiabatic correction Δα00 ≈ -2×10^-4 a.u. is based on a single excited state. The statement that 'even an increase of Δα00 by a factor of 50... would not change the overall conclusion' is plausible but the factor 50 is arbitrary. Please report the actual computed value in the text and clarify the reasoning behind the safety factor.
[Fig. 2] The caption does not state what the light-blue shaded area represents. It should explicitly say that it is the total uncertainty propagated from the PIMC calculation, and how it is interpolated to the rovibrational curve.
[References] Reference 15 (Hammami et al., J. Chem. Phys. 164, 204304, 2026) is dated 2026; if this is a preprint or an in-press article, please update the citation to include the DOI or publication status.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ab initio α, Cauchy coefficients, and χ are computed independently, and the semi-empirical α0 values are a legitimate inversion of Egan–Yang data rather than a fit of the target.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (32) computes α0(R), α2(R), α4(R), α6(R), and χ0(R) from a composite coupled-cluster scheme, and Eqs. (18)–(19) and (26) convert these into temperature-dependent quantities by rovibrational averaging and PIMC. The resulting theoretical polarizabilities are compared with, not fitted to, the Egan–Yang measurements. In Eq. (54), the two experimental A_R values are solved for α0(T) (with α2(T) as the second unknown) using theoretical α4, α6, and χ0; the target α0 is the output of the inversion, not an input. The 273.16 K value is obtained by adding the theoretical 303→273.16 K difference to the 303 K semi-empirical value; that difference comes from the same ab initio curves but is not derived from the measured A_R values, so no equation reduces to its own input. The manuscript explicitly labels the resulting quantities as semi-empirical estimates rather than predictions. The use of Papers I and II for the PES and rovibrational levels is a normal reliance on prior independent first-principles results, not a circular reduction. The unquantified '10 ppm' accuracy claim and the unexplained χ0 discrepancy are uncertainty and validity limitations, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard quantum-chemical approximations, a self-cited PES, and hand-set uncertainty factors. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are only analytic interpolation coefficients and uncertainty inflation factors; they do not enter the central semi-empirical extraction as fitted physics.

free parameters (3)

Analytic fit coefficients for α_n(R), Eq. (50): c^(1)_in, c^(2)_in, a^(1)_n, a^(2)_n = Table III, e.g. n=0: c^(1)_-1=3973.239843, a^(1)_0=0.72712153, etc.
Least-squares interpolation of ab initio data; fit error ~0.01%, much smaller than the ~0.1% data uncertainty, so these do not drive the central values.
Analytic fit coefficients for χ0(R), Eq. (51): d^(1)_i, d^(2)_i, b^(1), b^(2) = d^(1)_0=-0.0022528, d^(1)_1=0.0012629, d^(2)_0=0.0012288, d^(2)_1=-0.0008785, b^(1)=0.729884, b^(2)=0.195461
Interpolation of χ0(R) data; used only to enable temperature averaging and does not affect the physics.
Flat uncertainty inflation factors for α6, χ0, and δ_fc-CCSDTQ = 10%, 5%, 50%
Set by hand from comparisons with lower-order coefficients and Paper II; they shape the quoted error bars but not the central ab initio values.

assumptions (10)

domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation; neglect of nuclear kinetic energy in the electronic resolvent, Eq. (9)->Eq. (10), with a correction estimated in Section II.
Central to deriving temperature-dependent polarizability via rovibrational averaging; authors estimate Δα≈-2e-4 a.u. using only the lowest dipole-allowed excited state and argue a factor-50 increase is unlikely.
domain assumption Potential energy surface and rovibrational levels from Paper II are accurate enough for thermal averaging.
Used in Eqs. (18)-(21) and in PIMC Eq. (24); this is a self-cited prior result of the same group and is not independently benchmarked in this manuscript.
domain assumption Canonical ensemble with no dissociation for T≤2000 K.
Weights PνJ(T) in Eq. (20) assume constant molecular number; justified by D0=9.76 eV from Paper II.
domain assumption Nuclear spin statistics of 14N2: gνJ=6(2J+1) for even J and 3(2J+1) for odd J.
Eq. (22); required for the rovibrational thermal average over ortho/para species.
domain assumption PIMC exchange term Qxc is negligible for T≳10 K.
Fig. 1 shows Ξ(T)=Qxc/QB becomes negligible; the paper only uses T≥50 K.
domain assumption Frequency dependence of the magnetic susceptibility is negligible (<1%) at optical and microwave frequencies.
Section IV B: no measurement or calculation exists; the estimate is based on the paramagnetic term being about three times smaller than the diamagnetic term.
domain assumption CC3/frozen-core treatment of χ0 is sufficient at the 5% accuracy target; post-CC3, core, and relativistic corrections are collectively below 5%.
Section IV B: the authors explicitly accept this target and argue the combined omitted effects are 'extremely unlikely to exceed 5%.'
domain assumption Ideal-gas Lorentz-Lorenz relation Eq. (1) applies; refractive virial coefficients are neglected.
Introduction states Eq. (1) holds only at sufficiently low densities and defers virial coefficients to future work; the semi-empirical extraction uses this relation.
domain assumption Spin-free DKH2 relativistic correction is equivalent to the Breit-Pauli treatment for nitrogen.
Section IV A: Paper I found differences of order 1/c^4 negligible for light systems.
standard math CBS extrapolation with the Riemann formula and random-walk uncertainty estimation is valid.
Used in Section IV A for basis-set limits; this is the established protocol from Papers I and II.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Determination of fundamental properties of nitrogen from first principles. III. Temperature and frequency dependence of the molecular polarizability and magnetic susceptibility." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CU62C2RS

@misc{pith2026260721261,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Determination of fundamental properties of nitrogen from first principles. III. Temperature and frequency dependence of the molecular polarizability and magnetic susceptibility},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CU62C2RS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21261}
}

abstract

This work is the third part of the series of papers that focus on the theoretical determination of the properties of nitrogen that are relevant in metrology. Here we present first-principles calculations of the temperature and frequency dependence of the molecular polarizability and magnetic susceptibility of the nitrogen molecule (N$_2$). The purely electronic contributions to the static polarizability, Cauchy coefficients (up to sixth order), and isotropic magnetic susceptibility are computed over a range of internuclear distances using a robust composite scheme combining several electronic structure methods. The temperature dependence, evaluated from $50$~K to $2000$~K, is determined using two independent methods: rovibrational averaging and path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC). The polarizabilities obtained from theory agree with the recent high-precision thermometry measurements, wherever the latter are available, but are significantly less accurate. However, the main usefulness of the theoretical data revolves around combining it with the available experimental results to generate semi-empirical estimates of various quantities that have never been measured thus far. As an example, we determine highly accurate semi-empirical estimates of the static polarizability at key reference temperatures, $\alpha_0(T)=11.735\,962$~a.u.\ at $T=303$~K and $\alpha_0(T)=11.735\,585$~a.u.\ at $T=273.16$~K. Furthermore, we report theoretical values for the magnetic susceptibility, highlighting the importance of the paramagnetic contribution, and address a significant discrepancy with the experimental data for this quantity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21261 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Static polarizability (upper panel), second Cauchy coeffi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Recommended Second Virial Coefficients for Nitrogen and Oxygen
physics.chem-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Recommended B(T) for N2 (20-3000 K) and O2 (20-2000 K) are derived from ab initio pair potentials tuned to reanalyzed experimental data, with quantum effects included via path-integral Monte Carlo.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Feynman, R. P. and Hibbs, A. R. , date-added =. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , year =
[2]

Ceperley, D. M. , journal = RMP, title =. 1995 , number =

1995
[3]

Garberoglio and A

G. Garberoglio and A. H. Harvey , Journal =. First-principles calculation of the third virial coefficient of. 2009 , Pages =

2009
[4]

Path-integral calculation of the second virial coefficient including intramolecular flexibility effects , Author =. J. Chem. Phys. , Year =. doi:10.1063/1.4890440 , Owner =

work page doi:10.1063/1.4890440
[5]

Garberoglio and P

G. Garberoglio and P. Jankowski and K. Szalewicz and A. H. Harvey , title =. Faraday Discuss. , year =
[6]

Levy , title =

P. Levy , title =. 1954 , address =

1954
[7]

L. D. Fosdick and H. F. Jordan , journal = PR, title =. 1966 , pages =

1966
[8]

Garberoglio and A

G. Garberoglio and A. H. Harvey , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , year =

Show all 87 references

[9]

Wheatley and Giovanni Garberoglio and Allan H

Richard J. Wheatley and Giovanni Garberoglio and Allan H. Harvey , title =. J. Chem. Eng. Data , volume =. 2023 , pages =

2023
[10]

Robert Hellmann and Giovanni Garberoglio , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , year =
[11]

, title =

Garberoglio, Giovanni and Lissoni, Chiara and Spagnoli, Luca and Harvey, Allan H. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0187774 , url =

2024 doi
[12]

1974 , doi =

Quantum electrodynamical corrections to the fine structure of helium , journal =. 1974 , doi =

1974
[13]

Relativistic electronic-structure calculations employing a two-component no-pair formalism with external-field projection operators , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1986 , doi =

1986
[14]

Revision of the Douglas-Kroll transformation , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1989 , doi =

1989
[15]

and Helgaker, Trygve , title =

Koch, Henrik and Christiansen, Ove and Jo/rgensen, Poul and Sanchez de Merás, Alfredo M. and Helgaker, Trygve , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1997 , month =

1997
[16]

Lesiuk, Michał and Jeziorski, Bogumił , title =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

2019
[17]

Lang, Jakub and Przybytek, Michał and Lesiuk, Michał , title =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

2025
[18]

Coupled-cluster method truncated at quadruples , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

1991
[19]

The coupled-cluster single, double, triple, and quadruple excitation method , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

1992
[20]

Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291 , url =

2007 doi
[21]

Daniel and Schaefer III, Henry F

Crawford, T. Daniel and Schaefer III, Henry F. , publisher =. An Introduction to Coupled Cluster Theory for Computational Chemists , booktitle =
[22]

Zur quantentheorie der molekeln , author=. Ann. Phys. , volume=. 1927 , publisher=

1927
[23]

The physical background of the Born-Handy ansatz , author=

The adiabatic approximation I. The physical background of the Born-Handy ansatz , author=. Mol. Phys. , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

1997
[24]

The Magnetic Susceptibility of Helium, Neon, Argon, and Nitrogen , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1924 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.24.418 , url =

1924 doi
[25]

CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 88th Edition , url =
[26]

Metrologia , volume=

The International Temperature Scale of 1990(ITS-90) , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

1990
[27]

Optical n (p, T 90) measurement suite 1: He, Ar, and N 2 , author=. Int. J. Thermophys. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[28]

Optical n (p, T 90) Measurement Suite 3: Results at = 1542 nm , author=. Int. J. Thermophys. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[29]

Demonstration of dispersion gas barometry , author=. Phys. Rev. Applied , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

2025
[30]

Constrained anisotropic dipole oscillator strength distribution techniques, and reliable results for anisotropic and isotropic dipole molecular properties, with applications to H2 and N2 , author=. Theor. Chem. Acc. , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

1992
[31]

Polarizabilities of CO, N 2, HF, Ne, BH, and CH+ from ab initio calculations: Systematic studies of electron correlation, basis set errors, and vibrational contributions , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

1998
[32]

and de Jong, Wibe A

Hammond, Jeff R. and de Jong, Wibe A. and Kowalski, Karol , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2008 , doi =

2008
[33]

Frequency-dependent nonlinear optical properties with explicitly correlated coupled-cluster response theory using the CCSD(R12) model , journal =

Neiss, Christian and H. Frequency-dependent nonlinear optical properties with explicitly correlated coupled-cluster response theory using the CCSD(R12) model , journal =. 2007 , doi =

2007
[34]

Many-body calculations of molecular electric polarizabilities in asymptotically complete basis sets , author=. Mol. Phys. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

2011
[35]

Dipole moment and static dipole polarizability , author=

Influence of vibrations and rotations of diatomic molecules on their physical properties: I. Dipole moment and static dipole polarizability , author=. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

2016
[36]

Coupled-cluster calculation of dispersion contributions to interaction energies and polarizabilities , author=. Theor. Chem. Acc. , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

2001
[37]

Dynamic multipole polarizabilities, reduced spectra, and interaction coefficients for N 2 and CO , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

1999
[38]

Frequency-dependent polarizabilities and second hyperpolarizabilities of N2 , author=. Chem. Phys. Lett. , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

1993
[39]

Correlated polarization propagator calculations of static polarizabilities , author=. Int. J. Quantum Chem. , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

1994
[40]

TDMP2 calculation of dynamic multipole polarizabilities and dispersion coefficients of the triplebonded molecules CO, N2, CN-, and NO+ , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

1996
[41]

Molecular hyperpolarizabilities , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

1993
[42]

Interaction of atoms, molecules, and ions with constant electric and magnetic fields , author=. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

1983
[43]

Nuclear motion and Breit--Pauli corrections to the diamagnetism of atomic helium , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

2002
[44]

Relativistic treatment of the diamagnetic susceptibility of helium , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[45]

Diamagnetic susceptibility of neon and argon including leading relativistic effects , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[46]

First-principles calculation of the frequency-dependent dipole polarizability of argon , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042805 , url =

2023 doi
[47]

Theoretical determination of polarizability and magnetic susceptibility of neon , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.052816 , url =

2020 doi
[48]

On dielectric constants and magnetic susceptibilities in the new quantum mechanics part III—Application to dia-and paramagnetism , author=. Phys. Rev. , volume=. 1928 , publisher=

1928
[49]

Advances in Quantum Chemistry , volume=

Cauchy Moments of Ne, Ar, and Kr Atoms Calculated Using the Approximate Coupled Cluster Triples Model CC3 , author=. Advances in Quantum Chemistry , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

2005
[50]

CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022 , author=. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

2022
[51]

Hammami, Chaima and Kokoouline, Viatcheslav and Ayouz, Mehdi Adrien , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2026 , month =

2026
[52]

Molecular vibrational and rotational motion in static and dynamic electric fields , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 1990 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.62.343 , url =

1990 doi
[53]

Ueber die Beziehung zwischen der Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit des Lichtes und der K

Lorentz, Hendrik Antoon , journal=. Ueber die Beziehung zwischen der Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit des Lichtes und der K. 1880 , publisher=
[54]

Ueber die refractionsconstante , author=. Ann. Phys. , volume=. 1880 , publisher=
[55]

Measurement , volume=

Feasibility of primary thermometry using refractive index measurements at a single pressure , author=. Measurement , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

2017
[56]

Metrologia , volume=

Refractive-index gas thermometry , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

2019
[57]

Metrologia , volume=

Refractive index gas thermometry between 13.8 K and 161.4 K , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[58]

Rourke, Patrick M. C. , title =. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data , volume =. 2021 , doi =

2021
[59]

Perspectives for a new realization of the pascal by optical methods , journal =

Jousten, Karl and Hendricks, Jay and Barker, Daniel and Douglas, Kevin and Eckel, Steve and Egan, Patrick and Fedchak, James and Fl. Perspectives for a new realization of the pascal by optical methods , journal =. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aa8a4d , year =

doi
[60]

Calculation of excited-state properties using general coupled-cluster and configuration-interaction models , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

2004
[61]

Integral-direct coupled cluster calculations of frequency-dependent polarizabilities, transition probabilities and excited-state properties , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

1998
[62]

Cauchy moments and dispersion coefficients using coupled cluster linear response theory , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

1997
[63]

Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

1989
[64]

Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. VI. Sextuple zeta correlation consistent basis sets for boron through neon , author=. J. Mol. Struct. , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

1996
[65]

Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. IV. Calculation of static electrical response properties , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

1994
[66]

Systematic basis sets and wave functions , author=

Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

1992
[67]

The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods , volume=. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. , author=. 1928 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0305004100011919 , number=

1928 doi
[68]

Fock, Vladimir , journal=. N. 1930 , publisher=

1930
[69]

New developments in molecular orbital theory , author=. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume=. 1951 , publisher=

1951
[70]

Calculation of wavefunction components in Ursell-type expansion using quantum-field theoretical methods , author=

On the correlation problem in atomic and molecular systems. Calculation of wavefunction components in Ursell-type expansion using quantum-field theoretical methods , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1966 , publisher=

1966
[71]

On the use of the cluster expansion and the technique of diagrams in calculations of correlation effects in atoms and molecules , author=. Adv. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1969 , publisher=

1969
[72]

A full coupled-cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

1982
[73]

A comparison with configuration interaction (CISD) results , author=

The closed-shell coupled cluster single and double excitation (CCSD) model for the description of electron correlation. A comparison with configuration interaction (CISD) results , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1987 , publisher=

1987
[74]

The CC3 model: An iterative coupled cluster approach including connected triples , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

1997
[75]

The full CCSDT model for molecular electronic structure , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1987 , publisher=

1987
[76]

A new implementation of the full CCSDT model for molecular electronic structure , author=. Chem. Phys. Lett. , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

1988
[77]

Recursive intermediate factorization and complete computational linearization of the coupled-cluster single, double, triple, and quadruple excitation equations , author=. Theor. Chem. Acc. , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

1991
[78]

Higher excitations in coupled-cluster theory , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

2001
[79]

Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. V. Core-valence basis sets for boron through neon , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

1995
[80]

Analytic calculation of the diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction within configuration-interaction and coupled-cluster theory , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

2006
[81]

A complete active space SCF method (CASSCF) using a density matrix formulated super-CI approach , author=. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1980 , publisher=

1980
[82]

Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms , author =
[83]

Long-wavelength quantum electrodynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2004 , doi =

2004
[84]

and Cheng, Lan and Harding, Michael E

Matthews, Devin A. and Cheng, Lan and Harding, Michael E. and Lipparini, Filippo and Stopkowicz, Stella and Jagau, Thomas-C. and Szalay, Péter G. and Gauss, Jürgen and Stanton, John F. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

2020
[85]

Mester, D. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

2025
[86]

and Bylaska,E

Apra,E. and Bylaska,E. J. and de Jong,W. A. and Govind,N. and Kowalski,K. and Straatsma,T. P. and Valiev,M. and van Dam,H. J. J. and Alexeev,Y. and Anchell,J. and Anisimov,V. and Aquino,F. W. and Atta-Fynn,R. and Autschbach,J. and Bauman,N. P. and Becca,J. C. and Bernholdt,D. ...

2020
[87]

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science , volume=

Aidas, Kestutis and Angeli, Celestino and Bak, Keld L and Bakken, Vebj. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Feynman, R. P. and Hibbs, A. R. , date-added =. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , year =

[2] [2]

Ceperley, D. M. , journal = RMP, title =. 1995 , number =

1995

[3] [3]

Garberoglio and A

G. Garberoglio and A. H. Harvey , Journal =. First-principles calculation of the third virial coefficient of. 2009 , Pages =

2009

[4] [4]

Path-integral calculation of the second virial coefficient including intramolecular flexibility effects , Author =. J. Chem. Phys. , Year =. doi:10.1063/1.4890440 , Owner =

work page doi:10.1063/1.4890440

[5] [5]

Garberoglio and P

G. Garberoglio and P. Jankowski and K. Szalewicz and A. H. Harvey , title =. Faraday Discuss. , year =

[6] [6]

Levy , title =

P. Levy , title =. 1954 , address =

1954

[7] [7]

L. D. Fosdick and H. F. Jordan , journal = PR, title =. 1966 , pages =

1966

[8] [8]

Garberoglio and A

G. Garberoglio and A. H. Harvey , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , year =