Carrollian Dictionary for Massive Particles at Null Infinity

Yu-fan Zheng

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Carrollian Dictionary for Massive Particles at Null Infinity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs a normalized Carrollian dictionary mapping massive one-particle states in 4D Minkowski space onto boundary states at null infinity, via momentum projections on a null frame at every celestial point.

desk verdict A plausible and genuinely novel massive dictionary on null infinity, but the load-bearing isometry check and the target-space structure from the companion paper are asserted rather than shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11945 v1 pith:CUQU27H4 submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th

Yu-fan Zheng This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords Carrollianholographynullinfinitymassiveparticlesframeprojectionisometricembeddingsoftphotontheoremgravitonspectraldensity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Massive particles travel along timelike worldlines and never arrive at null infinity, which has left their Carrollian boundary description open. This paper constructs a dictionary that puts massive one-particle states onto null infinity anyway: the bulk momentum is encoded by its projections onto a null frame attached to every celestial point, so no endpoint on $\mathscr{I}^\pm$ is needed. Matching the Poincaré action on both sides fixes the dictionary kernel, and the reconstruction map is its Hermitian adjoint, making the dictionary an isometric embedding of the bulk Hilbert space into an overcomplete boundary state space. The paper applies this to the spectral representation of the two-point function, fixing the coefficient of the non-contact Carrollian correlator in terms of the bulk spectral density, and to soft photon and graviton theorems, where global boundary modes reproduce ordinary charge and Poincaré conservation while local modes act by integrals over the celestial sphere.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the null frame $\{q_0^\mu(z), q_1^\mu(z), q_2^\mu(z), q_3^\mu(z)\}$ attached to each celestial point $z^a$, together with the complete Carrollian representation whose $\kappa>0$ and $\kappa<0$ orbits carry nonzero quadratic Casimir. The dictionary kernel uses delta functions to read off $\beta^a$ and $\kappa$ as the frame projections of the bulk momentum, while the reconstruction formula inverts those projections; the spin matrix factor $R^{(j)}$ carries all spin dependence and is unitary on the positive-energy mass shell. The work this machinery does is to turn a single timelike momentum into a distribution of data over the whole celestial sphere, so that bulk and boundary Poincaré actions can be matched without sending the massive worldline to null infinity.

What would settle it

Compute the completeness integral (2.13), $\int_{\kappa>0} du\,d^2z\,d^2\beta\,d\kappa\, K(X;p')G(p;X)$, for a generic massive momentum pair and check whether it equals $(2\pi)^2\delta^{(4)}(p-p')$; failure would disprove the isometric embedding. A second direct check is to compute the boundary two-point function (3.2) from an explicit free massive scalar and compare with the bulk spectral form; a mismatch would disprove the claimed fixing of $f(\mu^2,L)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a normalized map from the massive one-particle Hilbert space $H_j^{(+)}$ to the state space $S_O^{>0}$ of the complete Carrollian representation is fixed by requiring the Poincaré generators to act identically on both sides. The scalar dictionary kernel is $G(p;X)=2m\,e^{2iu\,p\cdot q_3(z)}|\kappa|^{1-\Delta}\delta^{(2)}(\beta^a+p\cdot q_a(z))\delta(\kappa+p\cdot q_0(z))$, where $q_0,q_1,q_2,q_3$ are the null frame at celestial point $z^a$; the delta functions set $\beta^a=-p\cdot q_a$ and $\kappa=-p\cdot q_0$, so $\beta^a$ and $\kappa$ are the projections of the massive momentum onto that frame. The momentum is reconstructed from these labels by $p^\mu=\frac{m^2+\vec\beta^2}{2\kappa}q_0^\mu-\beta^a q_a^\mu+\kappa q_3^\mu$. On the unitary line $\Delta=2+i\nu$, the reconstruction kernel is the complex conjugate of the dictionary kernel, hence the adjoint, and the two compositions obey $\hat G^\dagger \hat G = I_{H_j^{(+)}}$ and $\hat G \hat G^\dagger = \Pi_{S_O^{>0}}$ with $\Pi$ a nontrivial projector; the boundary states therefore form a Parseval continuous frame, an overcomplete basis for the bulk Hilbert space. The paper further claims the spectral representation fixes $f(\mu^2,L)=\frac{\mu^2}{2\pi^2}\rho_{KL}(\mu^2)$, and that soft photon and graviton Ward identities imply local large gauge transformations and supertranslations act on massive legs as integrals over the celestial sphere while global modes reproduce the ordinary $U(1)$ and Poincaré actions.

Load-bearing premise

The dictionary presumes that the complete Carrollian representation defined in the companion paper [25] actually exists with the stated $\kappa>0$ and $\kappa<0$ orbits, target state space, and non-contact two-point function; if that representation is flawed or cannot be extended to null infinity, the massive dictionary has no valid target space and the spectral matching collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Massive and massless external states can be described in a common Carrollian boundary framework on $\mathscr{I}^\pm$, with the standard radiative dictionary covering massless legs and the new dictionary covering massive legs.
The complete Carrollian representation is necessary for massive states because its $\kappa\neq 0$ orbits have nonzero quadratic Casimir; the sector usually used for massless radiation cannot carry them.
Bulk dynamics enters the boundary two-point function only through the spectral density, fixing $f(\mu^2,L)=\frac{\mu^2}{2\pi^2}\rho_{KL}(\mu^2)$; unitary bulk theories then require $f\geq 0$ for $\mu^2>0$, with no independent $L$-dependence.
Soft photon and graviton theorems for massive legs imply that local large gauge transformations and supertranslations act by nonlocal integrals over the celestial sphere, while global modes reproduce charge conservation, momentum conservation, and Lorentz invariance.
The construction extends to arbitrary spin through a unitary spin matrix factor and to a 3D bulk with a 2D boundary, preserving the same isometry and projection identities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the embedding is correct, every massive $S$-matrix element can in principle be rewritten as an integral of Carrollian boundary correlators over $\kappa>0$, so massive scattering becomes boundary data even though massive worldlines never touch null infinity.
The projector $\Pi_{S_O^{>0}}$ suggests a selection rule for any holographic dual: only the image of the dictionary map corresponds to physical massive bulk states, so the boundary Hilbert space is effectively a quotient of the overcomplete Carrollian space.
The same projection mechanism should extend to subleading soft orders and spinning hard legs: local subleading superrotations are expected to act nonlocally on massive scalars, with global modes still reducing to the Lorentz action.
Because the same bulk Hilbert space also admits Carrollian descriptions at timelike infinity, the null-infinity dictionary and the timelike-infinity construction should be related by an integral transform; the paper leaves this connection open.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper fills a real gap: no one had put massive one-particle states on null infinity in the Carrollian dictionary. The idea of encoding the timelike momentum by its projections onto null frames at each celestial point is clean, and the reconstruction formula (2.7) ties it together nicely. The Källén–Lehmann application fixing the non-contact two-point coefficient, and the soft-theorem result that local and global modes act differently on massive legs, are both worth having. The spin matrix construction is explicit enough that it looks right, and the 3D appendix suggests the mechanism is robust.

The soft spots are real but are mostly presentation gaps rather than obvious errors. The completeness identity (2.13)–(2.14) is the heart of the dictionary, and it is simply asserted. The 2m normalization is said to be "fixed" without a displayed Jacobian. A referee will need to see that calculation, and it should be straightforward. The second concern is the dependence on the companion paper [25]: the state space S_O^{>0}, the κ>0 orbit structure, and the Ward-identity two-point function are all imported without re-derivation. If any of those is wrong, the dictionary has no valid target and the spectral matching in Section 3 is void. That is a genuine external-dependency gap, not a minor inconvenience. Finally, the generic-spin unitarity R R† = 1 is stated from formulas in Appendix B without proof; low-spin checks are given, but the general statement is asserted.

I have not redone the algebra, but nothing in the paper makes me think the central claim is false. The setup is standard enough that the missing Jacobian probably works, and the author seems to know exactly what is being claimed. The paper is a letter, so some omission is expected, but the omitted items are load-bearing rather than decorative.

This is a paper for Carrollian and flat-space holographers, and it is worth a serious referee. The right referee will ask for a derivation of (2.13), explicit reconciliation with [25], and a proof of the generic-spin unitarity. If those come through, the paper will be a solid addition. It deserves peer review, not desk rejection.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a Carrollian dictionary for massive one-particle states in 4D Minkowski spacetime, associating to each bulk momentum eigenstate |p> a set of boundary states |O_X> labeled by Carrollian coordinates and representation data. The dictionary kernel (2.5) encodes the bulk momentum through its projections onto a null frame at each celestial point, and the reconstruction kernel (2.9) is claimed to be its Hermitian adjoint. The central claim is that the two maps satisfy G^dagger G = I and G G^dagger = Pi, an isometric embedding of the massive one-particle Hilbert space into the state space S_O^{>0} of the 'complete Carrollian representation'. The paper then applies this dictionary to the Källén-Lehmann representation to fix the coefficient function of a non-contact Carrollian two-point function, and to soft photon and graviton theorems to derive hard actions for massive legs, distinguishing global from local symmetry actions. Appendices give spin matrix factors and a 3D analogue.

Significance. If the central isometry claim is correct, this is a notable step: it provides a concrete, normalized map between massive bulk states and Carrollian boundary data at null infinity, an issue that has remained open despite work at timelike infinity. The construction is explicit, with closed-form kernels, spin matrix factors, and a 3D counterpart, and it yields falsifiable statements, notably the fixing of f(mu^2,L) in terms of the bulk spectral density and the distinction between global and local soft-mode actions. However, the paper is not self-contained: the target state space, its inner product, and the generic two-point function are imported from the author's companion paper [25]. The manuscript also does not display the derivations of the completeness identity (2.13) or the Källén-Lehmann correlator (3.2), so the central claims cannot currently be verified from the text alone. The significance is therefore conditional on filling these gaps.

major comments (4)

[Section 2, Eq. (2.13)] The central completeness identity is asserted without a derivation. The text states that applying <p| to the reconstruction 'gives' Eq. (2.13) and that the factor 2m in (2.5) is fixed by normalization, but no computation of the six-dimensional integral over u, z, beta, kappa is shown. Inserting (2.5) and (2.9) into the left-hand side of (2.13) and integrating over beta and kappa produces delta functions of p·q_a - p'·q_a and p·q_0 - p'·q_0 multiplied by |p'·q_0|^{-2}; the remaining integrals over z and u do not obviously reduce to (2 pi)^2 delta^{(4)}(p-p') with the stated coefficient. A direct evaluation for p=p' leaves a factor proportional to m^2 times the integral of (p·q_0)^{-2} over the celestial sphere, which equals pi for a timelike p along the z-axis. This indicates that the normalization may require a momentum-dependent correction or an additional Jacobian factor. The derivation of (2.13) and the normalization of G must be supplied before the isometry claim (2.14) can be accepted.
[Section 2, second paragraph; Section 3, Eq. (3.4)] The construction is not self-contained: it relies on the 'complete Carrollian representation' of the companion paper [25] for the existence of the kappa>0 and kappa<0 orbits with nonzero quadratic Casimir, the state space S_O^{>0}, and the generic scalar non-contact two-point function used in Section 3. None of these ingredients is re-derived or even summarized in sufficient detail for the present claims. If the inner product on S_O^{>0} is not positive definite, or if the Ward-identity solution in [25] has additional L dependence or contact terms, then Eq. (2.14) does not describe an embedding into a Hilbert space and the fixing of f(mu^2,L) in Eq. (3.4) is void. The paper should either include the relevant results from [25] as an appendix or state clearly which properties of the representation are assumed.
[Section 2, Eqs. (2.4) and (2.8)] The definitions of the dictionary and reconstruction maps are notationally ambiguous. Eq. (2.4) writes |O_X> = G|p> as an integral over bulk momentum states |p>, while Eq. (2.8) writes |p> = K|O_X> as an integral over boundary states |O_X>. If |O_X> are elements of the boundary Hilbert space S_O^{>0} and |p> are elements of the bulk Hilbert space, these equalities cannot hold as literal identities in a single Hilbert space. The reader cannot tell whether |O_X> are states in S, elements of H defined by the integral, or smeared operators. This ambiguity makes it impossible to verify the adjointness relation K = G^dagger and the composition identities (2.14). The maps should be defined precisely, including their domains, targets, and inner products.
[Section 3, Eq. (3.2)] The derivation of the Carrollian correlator from the Källén-Lehmann representation is not shown. The text states that 'applying the massive dictionary to both bulk legs gives' Eq. (3.2), but the evaluation of the delta-function constraints, the conversion of the positivity condition theta(p_1^0) to theta(kappa_1), and the treatment of the kappa_2<0 requirement are all omitted. Since the matching to the generic two-point function and the fixing of f(mu^2,L) in Eq. (3.4) are among the main physical results, this computation should be displayed at least in an appendix. Without it, the claimed relation between the bulk spectral density and the Carrollian two-point function cannot be checked.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2, Eq. (2.3)] The notation for q_3 is unclear: it is written as (1/8) partial^2 q_0, but the derivative symbol and the factor of 1/8 are not defined. Please specify the second derivative with respect to the complex coordinate or z^a.
[Section 2, footnote 1] The variable rho is introduced in the footnote as rho = (m^2 + beta^2)/kappa = -2 p·q_3, but rho is not defined in the main text before Eq. (2.7). Its role as the Fourier conjugate to u should be stated in the main body.
[Section 2, second paragraph] The statement that the kappa>0 and kappa<0 orbits 'have the nonzero quadratic Casimir' should be made more precise: the quadratic Casimir of the representation is a label of the orbit, while the relation C_2 = kappa rho - beta^2 = m^2 in footnote 1 refers to the reconstructed bulk momentum. The distinction between the representation-theoretic Casimir and the bulk mass parameter should be clarified.
[Section 3, Eq. (3.2)] The denominator |beta_1^2 - beta_2^2| in the delta function should be discussed: it vanishes for configurations with beta_1^2 = beta_2^2, and the distributional interpretation of the expression in that limit should be given.
[Throughout] There are several typographical and consistency issues: the abstract contains 'K¨all´en' with a diacritic, the text uses inconsistent spacing in 'K all´ en–Lehmann', and in Eq. (2.3) the expression 'z^a z_a' appears as 'z aza'. These should be corrected during revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the dictionary is constructed by intertwining, the KL matching fixes an otherwise free coefficient, and the companion-paper representation is a separate input rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce any prediction to an input by construction. The dictionary kernel (2.5) is introduced as the definition of the map, with the projection relations (2.6) read off from the delta-function support and the reconstruction (2.7) following from the null-frame completeness relation (A.4); these are consistency statements, not outputs derived from themselves. The isometry (2.14) is a normalization condition, since the text states that the factor 2m is 'fixed by the normalization of the dictionary map,' and (2.13) is a delta-function identity to be checked rather than an assumed result. In the Källén–Lehmann application, the generic two-point function with undetermined coefficient f(μ²,L) is imported from the author's companion paper [25], and matching the bulk-derived correlator fixes f = μ² ρ_KL/(2π²); this is a constraint on an otherwise free coefficient, not a prediction of the bulk spectral density from the boundary. Likewise, in the soft-theorem section, the global U(1) and translation/Poincaré actions are explicitly said to be fixed by the known ordinary symmetries rather than derived from the soft charges, so they are presented as consistency checks. The only notable external input is the 'complete Carrollian representation' of [25], which supplies the target state space S_O^{>0} and the Ward-identity two-point function; that is a separate representation-theoretic/Ward-identity derivation with stated assumptions and does not include the massive dictionary as an assumption. Whether [25] is correct is a correctness risk, not a circularity. No step in this paper is equivalent, by definition or by fit, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the import of a bespoke boundary representation from the author's companion paper [25], on the standard soft-theorem Ward identity dictionary, and on the vanishing of a boundary term in the integration by parts. No parameters are fitted to data; m, Δ, l, ν are state labels or representation labels. The dictionary kernel itself is constructed explicitly from the null-frame projections.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper The complete Carrollian representation of [25] exists with κ>0 and κ<0 orbits, nonzero quadratic Casimir, and the stated generic two-point function.
Imported from the author's own preprint 2607.28400. The dictionary's target space S^{>0}_O and the coefficient function f(μ²,L) fixed in Section 3 depend on it.
domain assumption The leading and subleading soft photon and graviton theorems hold for amplitudes with massive hard legs and are equivalent to the Ward identity (4.2).
The soft factors and the smearing kernels in Section 4 are taken as known results; the dictionary is used to convert the soft factors to hard actions.
domain assumption The boundary term in stereographic coordinates vanishes in the integration by parts leading to (4.7) and (4.9).
The paper states 'Assuming that the boundary term in stereographic coordinates vanishes'; if it does not, the local hard action acquires extra surface contributions.
standard math The bulk Wightman two-point function admits the Källén-Lehmann spectral representation (3.1) with spectral density ρ_KL(μ²).
The spectral representation is standard and is used as the bulk input; the dictionary is then applied to both legs.
standard math The null-frame completeness relation (A.4) gives a complete basis for Minkowski vectors, and the boundary generators (A.6) are the correct null-infinity limits of the bulk Poincaré generators.
The momentum reconstruction (2.7) and the intertwining equations rely on this frame completeness and the generator dictionary (A.7).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carrollian Dictionary for Massive Particles at Null Infinity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CUQU27H4

@misc{pith2026260811945,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carrollian Dictionary for Massive Particles at Null Infinity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CUQU27H4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11945}
}

abstract

Massive particles reach timelike rather than null infinity, leaving their Carrollian boundary description unresolved. We construct a Carrollian dictionary for massive one-particle states on $\mathscr I^\pm$ without requiring their worldlines to reach null infinity. The dictionary encodes the bulk momentum through its projections onto the null frame associated with each celestial point. The Poincar\'e intertwining equations require the complete Carrollian representation to describe massive states. We apply the dictionary to the K\"all\'en--Lehmann representation and to soft photon and graviton theorems. The K\"all\'en--Lehmann application fixes the coefficient function of the non-contact two-point function in terms of the bulk spectral density. Soft theorems show that global modes reproduce the ordinary $U(1)$ and Poincar\'e actions, whereas local actions remain integrals over celestial directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[25]

Missing Descendants in the Carrollian Conformal Family

Y.-f. Zheng,Missing Descendants in the Carrollian Conformal Family,2607.28400

work page Pith review arXiv
[1]

Bondi, M.G.J

H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269(1962) 21

work page 1962
[2]

Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity

R.K. Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103

1962
[3]

Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

A. Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

arXiv 2014
[4]

Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

arXiv 2018
[5]

Ashtekar and M

A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel,Symplectic Geometry of Radiative Modes and Conserved Quantities at Null Infinity,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(1981) 585

1981
[6]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 065026 [1701.00049]

arXiv 2017
[7]

Pasterski and S.-H

S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao,Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 065022 [1705.01027]. 20

arXiv 2017

Show all 64 references

[8]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 071602 [2202.04702]

2022 arXiv
[9]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126027 [2212.12553]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Nguyen and P

K. Nguyen and P. West,Carrollian Conformal Fields and Flat Holography,Universe 9(2023) 385 [2305.02884]

2023 arXiv
[11]

Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes, JHEP01(2024) 076 [2311.09869]

K. Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes, JHEP01(2024) 076 [2311.09869]

2024 arXiv
[12]

Saha,Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,JHEP06(2023) 051 [2304.02696]

A. Saha,Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,JHEP06(2023) 051 [2304.02696]

2023 arXiv
[13]

Ruzziconi,Carrollian physics and holography,Phys

R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian physics and holography,Phys. Rept.1182(2026) 1 [2602.02644]

2026
[14]

Zhu,Topics in Celestial holography: A bottom-up perspective,Phys

B. Zhu,Topics in Celestial holography: A bottom-up perspective,Phys. Rept.1200 (2026) 1 [2606.24285]

2026 arXiv
[15]

Bagchi, S

A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta,Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 241601 [2202.08438]

2022 arXiv
[16]

Liu and J

W.-B. Liu and J. Long,Holographic dictionary from bulk reduction,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) L061901 [2401.11223]

2024 arXiv
[17]

Bekaert, A

X. Bekaert, A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar,Holographic Carrollian conformal scalars, JHEP05(2024) 242 [2404.02533]

2024 arXiv
[18]

E. Have, K. Nguyen, S. Prohazka and J. Salzer,Massive carrollian fields at timelike infinity,JHEP07(2024) 054 [2402.05190]

2024 arXiv
[19]

Borthwick, M

J. Borthwick, M. Chantreau and Y. Herfray,Ti and Spi, Carrollian extended boundaries at timelike and spatial infinity,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) 205012 [2412.15996]. 21

2025 arXiv
[20]

Liu and J

W.-B. Liu and J. Long,Extrapolating the massive fields to future timelike infinity, JHEP12(2025) 042 [2508.15619]

2025
[21]

Chen and Z

B. Chen and Z. Hu,Bulk reconstruction in flat holography,JHEP03(2024) 064 [2312.13574]

2024 arXiv
[22]

P.-X. Hao, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki, S. Takahashi and T. Takayanagi,Bulk reconstruction of scalar excitations in Flat 3/CCFT2 and the flat limit from (A)dS3/CFT2,JHEP11(2025) 054 [2505.20084]

2025
[23]

P.-X. Hao, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki and S. Takahashi,More on Bulk Local State Reconstruction in Flat/Carr CFT,2603.11993

arXiv
[24]

Melton, K

W. Melton, K. Michaelsen and R. Ruzziconi,Observing Massive Scattering from Null Infinity,2606.27421

arXiv
[26]

Chen, P.-X

B. Chen, P.-X. Hao, R. Liu and Z.-F. Yu,On Galilean conformal bootstrap,JHEP 06(2021) 112 [2011.11092]

2021 arXiv
[27]

B. Chen, R. Liu and Y.-f. Zheng,On Higher-dimensional Carrollian and Galilean Conformal Field Theories,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 088 [2112.10514]

2023 arXiv
[28]

Chen and R

B. Chen and R. Liu,The shadow formalism of Galilean CFT 2,JHEP05(2023) 224 [2203.10490]

2023 arXiv
[29]

B. Chen, R. Liu, H. Sun and Y.-f. Zheng,Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction,JHEP11(2023) 170 [2301.06011]

2023 arXiv
[30]

Iacobacci and K

L. Iacobacci and K. Nguyen,Celestial decomposition of Wigner’s particles,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 125010 [2411.19219]

2025 arXiv
[31]

Liu and D.A

C. Liu and D.A. Lowe,Conformal wave expansions for flat space amplitudes,JHEP 07(2021) 102 [2105.01026]

2021 arXiv
[32]

Kallen,On the definition of the Renormalization Constants in Quantum Electrodynamics,Helv

G. Kallen,On the definition of the Renormalization Constants in Quantum Electrodynamics,Helv. Phys. Acta25(1952) 417. 22

1952
[33]

Lehmann,On the Properties of propagation functions and renormalization contants of quantized fields,Nuovo Cim.11(1954) 342

H. Lehmann,On the Properties of propagation functions and renormalization contants of quantized fields,Nuovo Cim.11(1954) 342

1954
[34]

Sleight and M

C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Celestial Holography Revisited,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 241601 [2301.01810]

2024 arXiv
[35]

Iacobacci, C

L. Iacobacci, C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Celestial holography revisited. Part II. Correlators and K¨ all´ en-Lehmann,JHEP08(2024) 033 [2401.16591]

2024 arXiv
[36]

Pacifico, P

F. Pacifico, P. Pergola and C. Sleight,Celestial Mellin amplitudes,JHEP09(2025) 124 [2412.11992]

2025 arXiv
[37]

Agrawal and K

S. Agrawal and K. Nguyen,Soft theorems and spontaneous symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L021903 [2504.10577]

2025 arXiv
[38]

J. Isen, P. Kraus, R. Monten and R.M. Myers,The gravitational S-matrix from the path integral: asymptotic symmetries and soft theorems,2603.17045

arXiv
[39]

Campiglia,Null to time-like infinity Green’s functions for asymptotic symmetries in Minkowski spacetime,JHEP11(2015) 160 [1509.01408]

M. Campiglia,Null to time-like infinity Green’s functions for asymptotic symmetries in Minkowski spacetime,JHEP11(2015) 160 [1509.01408]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons,Phys

S. Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons,Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516

1965
[41]

Campiglia and A

M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,JHEP07(2015) 115 [1505.05346]

2015 arXiv
[42]

T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger,BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,JHEP05(2015) 151 [1401.7026]

2015 arXiv
[43]

Campiglia and A

M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries of gravity and soft theorems for massive particles,JHEP12(2015) 094 [1509.01406]

2015 arXiv
[44]

Cachazo and A

F. Cachazo and A. Strominger,Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem, 1404.4091

arXiv
[45]

Campiglia and A

M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries and subleading soft graviton theorem,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 124028 [1408.2228]. 23

2014 arXiv
[46]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Puhm and A. Strominger,Conformally Soft Photons and Gravitons, JHEP01(2019) 184 [1810.05219]

2019 arXiv
[47]

Furugori, N

H. Furugori, N. Ogawa, S. Sugishita and T. Waki,Celestial two-point functions and rectified dictionary,JHEP02(2024) 063 [2312.07057]

2024 arXiv
[48]

Law and M

Y.T.A. Law and M. Zlotnikov,Massive Spinning Bosons on the Celestial Sphere, JHEP06(2020) 079 [2004.04309]

2020 arXiv
[49]

Narayanan,Massive Celestial Fermions,JHEP12(2020) 074 [2009.03883]

S.A. Narayanan,Massive Celestial Fermions,JHEP12(2020) 074 [2009.03883]

2020 arXiv
[50]

Hao and M

Z. Hao and M. Taylor,Flat holography and celestial shockwaves,JHEP02(2024) 090 [2309.04307]

2024 arXiv
[51]

Banerjee,Boundary operators in asymptotically flat space-time,JHEP05(2025) 033 [2406.06690]

S. Banerjee,Boundary operators in asymptotically flat space-time,JHEP05(2025) 033 [2406.06690]

2025 arXiv
[52]

Liu, W.-J

R. Liu, W.-J. Ma, H. Zheng and Y.-f. Zheng,Carrollian holography with agentic AI: Real mass is imaginary,2606.05401

arXiv
[53]

Alday, M

L.F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,JHEP03(2025) 158 [2406.19343]

2025 arXiv
[54]

Fredenhagen, S

S. Fredenhagen, S. Prohazka and R. Tiefenbacher,Carrollian quantum states and flat space holography,2604.22745

arXiv
[55]

de Boer and S.N

J. de Boer and S.N. Solodukhin,A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time, Nucl. Phys. B665(2003) 545 [hep-th/0303006]

2003 arXiv
[56]

Marolf,Asymptotic flatness, little string theory, and holography,JHEP03(2007) 122 [hep-th/0612012]

D. Marolf,Asymptotic flatness, little string theory, and holography,JHEP03(2007) 122 [hep-th/0612012]

2007 arXiv
[57]

Hijano,Flat space physics from AdS/CFT,JHEP07(2019) 132 [1905.02729]

E. Hijano,Flat space physics from AdS/CFT,JHEP07(2019) 132 [1905.02729]

2019 arXiv
[58]

Laddha, S.G

A. Laddha, S.G. Prabhu, S. Raju and P. Shrivastava,Squinting at massive fields from infinity,2207.06406

arXiv
[59]

D. Jain, S. Kundu, S. Minwalla, O. Parrikar, S.G. Prabhu and P. Shrivastava,The S-matrix and boundary correlators in flat space,JHEP02(2026) 151 [2311.03443]. 24

2026 arXiv
[60]

A.A. H, P. Athira, V., P. Paul and S. Raju,Interacting fields at spatial infinity, Phys. Rev. D114(2026) 026023 [2405.20326]

2026 arXiv
[61]

Navarro and A.-M

N. Navarro and A.-M. Raclariu,Null quantization, shadows and boost eigenfunctions in Lorentzian AdS,2512.13541
[62]

Melton,Flat Space Physics from AdS Actions,2605.03155

W. Melton,Flat Space Physics from AdS Actions,2605.03155

arXiv
[63]

Navarro and A.-M

N. Navarro and A.-M. Raclariu,On bulk reconstruction in Lorentzian AdS and its flat space limit,2605.16641

arXiv
[64]

Dutta,Massive fields in 3D Minkowski space and boundary correlators, 2606.25803

S. Dutta,Massive fields in 3D Minkowski space and boundary correlators, 2606.25803. 25

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Missing Descendants in the Carrollian Conformal Family

Y.-f. Zheng,Missing Descendants in the Carrollian Conformal Family,2607.28400

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [1]

Bondi, M.G.J

H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269(1962) 21

work page 1962

[3] [2]

Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity

R.K. Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103

1962

[4] [3]

Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

A. Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

arXiv 2014

[5] [4]

Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

arXiv 2018

[6] [5]

Ashtekar and M

A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel,Symplectic Geometry of Radiative Modes and Conserved Quantities at Null Infinity,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(1981) 585

1981

[7] [6]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 065026 [1701.00049]

arXiv 2017

[8] [7]

Pasterski and S.-H

S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao,Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 065022 [1705.01027]. 20

arXiv 2017