The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2302.14229 · v4 · pith:CWF4B7PL · submitted 2023-02-28 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Summarization via Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:CWF4B7PLrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords llmszero-shotlanguagegpt-4modelsperformancesummarizationchatgpt
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Given a document in a source language, cross-lingual summarization (CLS) aims to generate a summary in a different target language. Recently, the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3.5, ChatGPT and GPT-4, has attracted wide attention from the computational linguistics community. However, it is not yet known the performance of LLMs on CLS. In this report, we empirically use various prompts to guide LLMs to perform zero-shot CLS from different paradigms (i.e., end-to-end and pipeline), and provide a preliminary evaluation on the generated summaries. We find that ChatGPT and GPT-4 originally prefer to produce lengthy summaries with detailed information. These two LLMs can further balance informativeness and conciseness with the help of an interactive prompt, significantly improving their CLS performance. Experimental results on three widely-used CLS datasets show that GPT-4 achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot CLS performance, and performs competitively compared with the fine-tuned mBART-50. Moreover, we also find some multi-lingual and bilingual LLMs (i.e., BLOOMZ, ChatGLM-6B, Vicuna-13B and ChatYuan) have limited zero-shot CLS ability. Due to the composite nature of CLS, which requires models to perform summarization and translation simultaneously, accomplishing this task in a zero-shot manner is even a challenge for LLMs. Therefore, we sincerely hope and recommend future LLM research could use CLS as a testbed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Identifying and Characterizing Semantic Clones of Solidity Functions

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A code-and-comment analysis method detects semantic clones in Solidity functions with 59% overall precision (84% for same-name functions) and 97% recall on 300k contracts, plus LLM summaries for uncommented code.

  2. Exploring Code Analysis: Zero-Shot Insights on Syntax and Semantics with LLMs

    cs.SE 2023-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs achieve strong results on syntax parsing tasks but show limited and variable performance on dynamic reasoning, with a clear performance hierarchy across model scales.

  3. Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A large-scale multilingual evaluation of LLM uncertainty estimation methods across 22 languages and 9 models finds that English reasoning closes the UE gap for low-resource languages and that optimal UE method choice ...