Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Semantic Relation Classification via Convolutional Neural Networks with Simple Negative Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1506.07650 v1 pith:CWIUEZWS submitted 2015-06-25 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords neuralnegativenetworkobjectsproposerelationsamplingsubjects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Syntactic features play an essential role in identifying relationship in a sentence. Previous neural network models often suffer from irrelevant information introduced when subjects and objects are in a long distance. In this paper, we propose to learn more robust relation representations from the shortest dependency path through a convolution neural network. We further propose a straightforward negative sampling strategy to improve the assignment of subjects and objects. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on the SemEval-2010 Task 8 dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BERT-Based Multi-Head Selection for Joint Entity-Relation Extraction

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A BERT-powered multi-head selection model with soft label embedding and weak-supervision NER pretraining reaches F1 0.876 single and 0.892 ensembled on the SKE Chinese information extraction benchmark.

  2. Graph Representation Learning: A Survey

    cs.LG 2019-09 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of graph embedding methods with a small benchmark comparison of seven methods on citation and social network data, and an advertised code library that is not provided.

Pith tools