Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Hydrogen-induced magnetic hysteresis in CoPd is not universal: it contracts loops in Pd-rich films and expands them in Co-rich ones, with a crossover near 38–46% Co and a polarity reversal of the extraordinary Hall effect nearby.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:43 UTC pith:CWIWWZVN

load-bearing objection Credible empirical crossover map in CoPd hydrogen response; mechanism unverified but authors say so. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23053 v1 pith:CWIWWZVN submitted 2026-07-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hydrogen-Induced Sign Reversal in Magnetic Hysteresis Evolution of CoPd Alloys and Co/Pd Multilayers

S. S. Das , A. Gerber This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hydrogen absorptionCoPd alloysCo/Pd multilayersextraordinary Hall effectmagnetic hysteresisperpendicular magnetic anisotropymagnetoelastic couplingmagnetostriction sign crossover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that hydrogen absorption in CoPd alloys and Co/Pd multilayers does not produce a single, universal magnetic response. Instead, the sign of the hydrogen-induced hysteresis change is controlled by cobalt concentration and layer thickness: Pd-rich films show loop contraction (coercivity and squareness decrease), while Co-rich films show loop expansion (coercivity and squareness increase). The crossover occurs near x≈38–46% Co and coincides with the composition at which the magnetostriction coefficient λ111 changes sign. The paper explains this as a competition between hydrogen filling Pd-4d states (electronic suppression of Pd-induced magnetism) and hydrogen-driven in-plane compressive stress that, through magnetoelastic coupling with λ111, strengthens perpendicular anisotropy in Co-rich samples. In ultrathin Co(0.1 nm) multilayers the response is weak and mostly expanding, and near the crossover hydrogen can reverse the sign of the extraordinary Hall loop, providing an additional tunability knob.

Core claim

The central discovery is a sign reversal: measured via extraordinary Hall effect at room temperature in 4% H2/N2, the hydrogen-induced change in coercive field ΔBc and loop squareness ΔS is strongly negative in Pd-rich CoxPd100-x alloys (down to −15 mT at x≈28%, a ~56% reduction), becomes weakly positive above x≈40%, and returns near zero at high Co content. The crossover composition x≈38% matches the reported sign change of the (111) magnetostriction coefficient λ111. The same crossover appears in [Co(0.2 nm)/Pd]15 multilayers, shifted to higher x, while in [Co(0.1 nm)/Pd]15 multilayers hydrogen produces only a weak, non-monotonic expansion across x=15–60%. At intermediate compositions, hyd

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the competition between two hydrogen effects: (1) electronic filling of the Pd 4d band, which suppresses the Pd-induced magnetic moment and weakens perpendicular anisotropy; and (2) hydrogen-induced anisotropic lattice expansion in substrate-clamped films, which generates in-plane compressive stress σ. The magnetoelastic energy term E_MEC = (3/2)λ111 σ sin²θ then modulates anisotropy, with the sign of the (111) magnetostriction coefficient λ111 deciding whether compressive stress favors in-plane magnetization (λ111<0, Pd-rich, loop contraction) or out-of-plane magnetization (λ111>0, Co-rich, loop expansion). The paper uses extraordinary Hall effect (EHE) resisti

Load-bearing premise

The sign-reversal argument assumes that hydrogen actually creates an in-plane compressive stress in these clamped polycrystalline films and that the literature value of λ111 changes sign at the same composition in these sputtered samples; the paper states explicitly that no direct measurement of hydrogen concentration or lattice parameter change is available.

What would settle it

Measure the out-of-plane and in-plane lattice parameters in situ during H2 exposure for a Co-rich alloy (e.g., Co41Pd59, 7 nm on glass). If the film does not develop the assumed in-plane compressive stress, or if λ111 for that texture is not positive, the predicted magnetoelastic-driven loop expansion would not occur, and the expansion would need another explanation. Alternatively, apply a known uniaxial compressive stress to an unhydrogenated Co-rich CoPd film: if the magnetoelastic picture is correct, the stress alone should expand the hysteresis loop in the same way hydrogen does.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Hydrogen can selectively soften or harden CoPd magnets by choosing composition: a ~28% Co film loses ~56% of its coercivity under 4% H2, while Co-rich films slightly gain coercivity and squareness.
  • Films thicker than ~14 nm lose the sign reversal; Pd-driven electronic suppression dominates over magnetoelastic effects at larger thickness.
  • The crossover is structural as well as compositional: thickening Co layers from 0.1 to 0.2 nm in multilayers shifts the crossover to higher effective Co fraction and flips the sign of ΔBc in the Pd-rich regime.
  • Near the crossover, hydrogen can reverse the EHE loop polarity, providing a binary, hydrogen-switchable Hall signal in addition to hysteresis modulation.
  • Conventional EHE scaling (single power law) fails under hydrogen; the non-monotonic Δρh–Δρ relationship indicates simultaneous modification of multiple scattering mechanisms, so the hydrogen response is not a simple resistivity effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the magnetoelastic mechanism is right, the same composition-controlled crossover should appear as a sign change in hydrogen-induced strain response: in situ XRD or curvature measurements under H2 should show compressive in-plane strain with a sign change in the magnetostrictive contribution near x≈40%.
  • The EHE polarity reversal near the crossover suggests that hydrogen could be used as a switch for the sign of the anomalous Hall coefficient in CoPd-based spintronic devices, but the irreversibility seen in the 'air-last' loop warns that residual hydrogen creates a memory effect that would need to be engineered out for cyclic operation.
  • Because the model relies on λ111 sign change in (111)-textured polycrystalline films, samples with different texture (e.g., (100) orientation) should weaken or invert the magnetoelastic contribution, a testable prediction.
  • A quantitative test would compare hydrogen response against externally applied strain: if the magnetoelastic term dominates, the sign of ΔBc under known uniaxial strain should mirror the hydrogen-induced change.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports extraordinary Hall effect (EHE) hysteresis measurements in air and under a fixed 4% H2/N2 mixture for three Co-Pd systems: CoxPd100-x alloy films (7 nm on glass and GaAs, plus 14 nm films), [Co(0.1 nm)/Pd(d)]15 multilayers, and [Co(0.2 nm)/Pd(d)]15 multilayers. The central claim is that the hydrogen-induced magnetic response is not universal but changes sign with composition and Co-layer thickness: Pd-rich alloys and Co(0.2 nm)/Pd multilayers show loop contraction (negative ΔBc and ΔS), whereas Co-rich compositions show loop expansion, with a crossover near x ≈ 38–46% effective Co; Co(0.1 nm)/Pd multilayers instead show weak, mostly expanding behavior. The paper also reports hydrogen-induced EHE polarity reversal near the crossover. The authors interpret this as competition between Pd-4d band filling (electronic suppression of Pd polarization) and hydrogen-induced in-plane compressive stress acting through the composition-dependent magnetostriction coefficient λ111, which changes sign near the observed crossover.

Significance. If the mechanistic interpretation were established, this would be a valuable design rule for hydrogen-responsive magnetic devices and sensors. The empirical dataset has clear strengths: a systematic composition and thickness series, internal consistency between glass and GaAs substrates for the alloy series, and no free parameters fitted to the data; the crossover is compared against independently reported λ111 values. The paper also documents nontrivial EHE scaling behavior and polarity reversal. However, the mechanistic decomposition is not directly supported: neither the hydrogen-induced stress nor the effective film λ111 is measured, and fixed 4% H2 does not guarantee equal hydrogen uptake across compositions. The empirical composition/thickness crossover is credible and useful; the mechanism should be presented as a hypothesis unless additional measurements are supplied.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III(B)–(C)] The magnetoelastic explanation is load-bearing but rests on two unverified assumptions. The paper states in Sec. III(B) that 'no direct measurement of hydrogen concentration or lattice parameter change is available' and in Sec. III(C) that 'direct experimental separation of electronic and magnetoelastic contributions was not performed here.' The sign of the hydrogen-induced stress is assumed to be compressive, and the effective λ111 of these nanocrystalline (111)-textured sputtered films is assumed to follow the bulk sign crossover of Refs. [27,28]. If either assumption fails, the proposed mechanism for loop expansion in Co-rich samples collapses, leaving only the empirical trend. The authors should either add direct measurements (e.g., in-situ XRD or curvature-based stress, composition-resolved magnetostriction) or explicitly recharacterize the mechanism as a hypothesis rather than a de
  2. [Sec. II / Fig. S5] The use of a fixed 4% H2/N2 exposure as a 'near-saturated comparison condition' is validated on a single representative sample (Co36Pd64, Fig. S5). Hydrogen uptake in Pd-Co alloys is known to decrease with increasing Co content, so a fixed gas-phase concentration does not correspond to a fixed H/M ratio. Part of the observed composition dependence in ΔBc and ΔS could therefore track variations in hydrogen loading rather than the invoked electronic-magnetoelastic balance. The authors should measure or estimate hydrogen concentration (e.g., by RBS/NRA, electrochemical loading, or quartz-crystal microbalance) for at least the key crossover compositions, or, failing that, clearly state this as a limitation and avoid attributing the entire trend to the proposed mechanism.
  3. [Figs. 3, 5, 7 and Sec. III(C)] No error bars or repeat-sample statistics are shown. Quantitative statements such as ΔBc = −15 mT, '~56% reduction,' and the precise crossover values (x ≈ 38% for alloys, ~46% for multilayers) appear to be based on single measurements per composition. The glass/GaAs comparison provides some support for the alloy trend, but each substrate still represents one sample per composition. For a claim that rests on a sign reversal and on the location of a crossover, at least a few representative compositions should be measured on multiple samples and presented with error bars or confidence intervals.
  4. [Sec. II(F), Fig. 6(a)] The text calls the hydrogen-induced EHE polarity reversal 'an additional and previously unexplored degree of control,' but Fig. 6(a) is explicitly adapted from the authors' earlier publication, Ref. [11], and the same effect was reported there. The new element appears to be the extension to Co/Pd multilayers and the scaling analysis, not the discovery of polarity reversal. The novelty claim should be revised to avoid overstatement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III(B)] In the paragraph discussing the Co-rich Co41Pd59 film, the text refers to 'Fig. 1(e),' but the hysteresis loops for the alloy films are shown in Fig. 2(d)–(e). Please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption states 'Co26Pd74(7.5 nm),' while the text describes the representative HRTEM sample as '7 nm thick Co32Pd68.' Please reconcile the composition and thickness.
  3. [Sec. III(C)] The crossover is given as 'x ~ 40%' in several places but as 'x ~ 38%' and 'x ~ 38–46' elsewhere. Harmonize the reported crossover values with the actual data and figure markers.
  4. [Sec. III(F)] The polarity reversal is ascribed to a sign change of the anomalous Hall coefficient Rs, but only ρh is measured. A direct extraction of Rs, or at least a caveat about shunting and magnetization contributions, would strengthen the interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the composition/thickness crossover is direct measured data; the only concern is a minor self-citation/novelty inconsistency in the EHE polarity-reversal claim.

full rationale

The central result is empirical, not derived from a fitted model. ΔBc, ΔS, Δρh, and loop shapes are measured quantities; the effective Co fraction in multilayers is a nominal thickness ratio defined explicitly as xeff = tCo/(tCo+tPd), not as a parameter fitted to the hysteresis response. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then renamed a prediction, and no equation is shown to reduce to its own input by construction. The crossover near x ≈ 38–46% is read directly from independently repeated measurements on glass and GaAs substrates. The magnetoelastic interpretation relies on an external, independently published sign change of λ111 in Refs [27,28], not on the present paper's fitted values, so it is not circular even though it is incompletely verified. The paper itself flags the main supporting assumptions: in Sec. IIIB, 'no direct measurement of hydrogen concentration or lattice parameter change is available,' and in Sec. IIIC, 'direct experimental separation of electronic and magnetoelastic contributions was not performed here.' These are limitations, not circularity. The self-citations [11,14,38,39,47] provide prior empirical context, sensitivity figures, and kinetic measurements; they are not used as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification of the crossover. The one notable self-citation issue is the alloy EHE polarity-reversal panel: Fig. 6(a) is 'adapted from Ref. [11]' and the text says 'as reported in our earlier work [11],' yet later calls the polarity reversal 'previously unexplored.' This is a novelty overstatement, not a load-bearing circular step, and Fig. 6(b,c) present new multilayer data. The fixed 4% H2/N2 condition is a comparison protocol, not a fitted input, though H uptake likely varies with Co content — again a mechanistic caveat rather than circularity. Overall, no prediction reduces by construction to a fit or to a self-citation chain; score 2 reflects only the minor self-citation/novelty inconsistency.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central causal chain—electronic band filling plus assumed in-plane compressive stress acting through λ111—rests on literature values rather than on measurements in the paper. No free parameters are fitted to data and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Hydrogen absorption fills the Pd 4d minority band and suppresses the Pd-induced magnetic moment (electronic mechanism).
    Invoked in Sec. IIIB/C to explain loop contraction in Pd-rich samples; relies on cited DFT and prior experiments [1,35,36], not measured in this work.
  • domain assumption In films clamped to a rigid substrate, hydrogen-induced lattice expansion creates an in-plane compressive stress (anisotropic strain).
    Sec. IIIB: authors explicitly state no direct measurement of hydrogen concentration or lattice parameter change is available; the stress sign is assumed.
  • domain assumption The (111) magnetostriction coefficient λ111 is negative in Pd-rich CoPd and becomes positive near x≈40–50 at.% Co.
    Taken from refs [27,28]; central to the claimed sign reversal from contraction to expansion; not measured in the present films.
  • standard math Magnetoelastic energy E_MEC = (3/2)λ111 σ sin²θ describes the anisotropy change.
    Standard formula cited [49], used in Sec. IIIB to convert assumed stress into anisotropy preference.
  • domain assumption EHE loop polarity changes reflect a hydrogen-driven sign change of the anomalous Hall coefficient Rs, not a change in magnetization reversal.
    Sec. IIIF; inferred from unchanged loop shape, not from direct scattering-mechanism measurements.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18924 in / 9716 out tokens · 96235 ms · 2026-08-01T03:43:32.753704+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hydrogen absorption in magnetic thin film nanostructures can modulate their electronic, magnetic, and transport properties by modifying the electronic structure and lattice strain. However, the influence of composition and nanostructuring on these two competing effects is not well understood. We systematically investigate hydrogen-induced magnetic hysteresis in Co$_x$Pd$_{100-x}$ alloys, [Co(0.1 nm)/Pd(d)]$_{15}$, and [Co(0.2 nm)/Pd(d)]$_{15}$ multilayers, using extraordinary Hall effect characterizations (EHE) in air and 4% H$_2$/N$_2$ mixture. We show that the hydrogen-induced response is not universal, but depends strongly on composition and layer thickness. This reflects competition between Pd-related electronic effects and magnetoelastic anisotropy. In Pd-rich CoPd alloys and Co(0.2 nm)/Pd multilayers, hydrogen initially contracts the hysteresis loops at low Co fractions, followed by loop expansion above x ~ 40%. This contrast results from competition between suppression of Pd-induced magnetization through Pd-4d band filling and hydrogen-driven anisotropic strain that strengthens magnetoelastic anisotropy in Co-rich samples. In contrast, in ultrathin [Co(0.1 nm)/Pd(d)]$_{15}$ multilayers, hydrogen induces a weak, non-monotonic but generally expanding loop behaviour across x = 15-60%, indicating a dominant role of interfacial magnetic connectivity and strain-mediated magnetoelastic anisotropy in the ultrathin limit. Furthermore, we observe a hydrogen-induced reversal of the EHE loop polarity near the crossover regime, reflecting a change in the dominant EHE scattering mechanisms, thus providing an additional degree of magnetic tunability by hydrogen. These results demonstrate that hydrogen can selectively tune the magnetism of CoPd nanostructures via composition-controlled electronic and magnetoelastic effects, offering insights for hydrogen-responsive spintronic and sensing devices.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fukai, The Metal-Hydrogen System: Basic Bulk Properties, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005

    Y . Fukai, The Metal-Hydrogen System: Basic Bulk Properties, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28883-X

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-28883-x 2005

  2. [2]

    Lewis, The Hydrides of Palladium and Palladium Alloys, Platin

    F.A. Lewis, The Hydrides of Palladium and Palladium Alloys, Platin. Met. Rev. 4 (1960) 132–137

    1960

  3. [3]

    Pundt, R

    A. Pundt, R. Kirchheim, HYDROGEN IN METALS: Microstructural Aspects, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 36 (2006) 555–608. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.090804.094451

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Flanagan, W.A

    T.B. Flanagan, W.A. Oates, The Palladium -Hydrogen System, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 21 (1991) 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.001413

    arXiv 1991

  5. [5]

    Alefeld, J

    G. Alefeld, J. Völkl, Hydrogen in Metals I: Basic Properties, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978

    1978

  6. [6]

    Adams, A

    B.D. Adams, A. Chen, The role of palladium in a hydrogen economy, Mater. Today 14 (2011) 282–

    2011

  7. [7]

    Manchester, A

    F.D. Manchester, A. San-Martin, J.M. Pitre, The H-Pd (hydrogen-palladium) System, JPE 15 (1994) 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02667685

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02667685 1994

  8. [8]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. Nakanishi, K. Kato, R. Shimizu, T. Hitosugi, K. Fukutani, Observation of resonant tunneling of proton from octahedral to tetrahedral sites in Pd, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 185 (2024) 111741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2023.111741

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Burger, S

    J.P. Burger, S. Senoussi, B. Soufaché, Electrical and magnetic properties of palladium hydrides compared with those of pure palladium, J. Less -Common Met. 49 (1976) 213 –222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(76)90036-9. 38

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-5088(76)90036-9 1976

  10. [10]

    Maksymov, M

    I.S. Maksymov, M. Kostylev, Magneto -Electronic Hydrogen Gas Sensors: A Critical Review, Chemosensors 10 (2022) 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020049

    work page doi:10.3390/chemosensors10020049 2022

  11. [11]

    S.S. Das, G. Kopnov, A. Gerber, Detection of hydrogen by the extraordinary Hall effect in CoPd alloys, J. Appl. Phys. 124 (2018) 104502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049647

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5049647 2018

  12. [12]

    Y.-R. Chu, X. -W. Lu, C. -T. Hsieh, C. -Y . Huang, P.-H. Hsu, L. -J. Liaw, C. -M. Liu, W. -C. Lin, Hydrogen-mediated control of magnetic anisotropy and magnetic domain structure in Co/Pd multilayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126 (2025) 012404. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0242410

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0242410 2025

  13. [13]

    Causer, M

    G.L. Causer, M. Kostylev, D.L. Cortie, C. Lueng, S.J. Callori, X.L. Wang, F. Klose, In Operando Study of the Hydrogen -Induced Switching of Magnetic Anisotropy at the Co/Pd Interface for Magnetic Hydrogen Gas Sensing, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (2019) 3 5420–35428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b10535

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.9b10535 2019

  14. [14]

    Gerber, G

    A. Gerber, G. Kopnov, M. Karpovski, Hall effect spintronics for gas detection, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 (2017) 143505. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985241

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4985241 2017

  15. [15]

    Lueng, P.J

    C. Lueng, P.J. Metaxas, M. Sushruth, M. Kostylev, Adjustable sensitivity for hydrogen gas sensing using perpendicular-to-plane ferromagnetic resonance in Pd/Co Bi -layer films, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (2017) 3407–3414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.204

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.204 2017

  16. [16]

    Chang, C.-M

    P.-C. Chang, C.-M. Liu, C.-C. Hsu, W.-C. Lin, Hydrogen-mediated magnetic domain formation and domain wall motion in Co 30Pd70 alloy films, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 6656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25114-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25114-3 2018

  17. [17]

    Chang, Y .-Y

    P.-C. Chang, Y .-Y . Chang, W.-H. Wang, F.-Y . Lo, W.-C. Lin, Visualizing hydrogen diffusion in magnetic film through magneto -optical Kerr effect, Commun . Chem. 2 (2019) 89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0189-1. 39

    work page doi:10.1038/s42004-019-0189-1 2019

  18. [18]

    Hsueh, P

    K.-J. Hsueh, P. -C. Chang, L. -J. Liaw, A. Dhanarajagopal, M. -T. Lin, W. -C. Lin, Hydrogen - Controlled Spin Reorientation Transition in a Nanometer -Thick FePd Layer on Co/[Pt/Co]4/Pt Multilayers for Applications in Spintronics, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6 (2023) 2 784–2790. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c05095

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c05095 2023

  19. [19]

    Akamaru, N

    S. Akamaru, N. Godo, S. Koshimoto, Magnetoresistance in Pd –Co/Cu/Pd–Co trilayer under hydrogen–nitrogen gas mixture, AIP Adv. 13 (2023) 095119. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0161802

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0161802 2023

  20. [20]

    Carcia, A.D

    P.F. Carcia, A.D. Meinhaldt, A. Suna, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pd/Co thin film layered structures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 47 (1985) 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.96254

    work page doi:10.1063/1.96254 1985

  21. [21]

    Hashimoto, Y

    S. Hashimoto, Y . Ochiai, K. Aso, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and magnetostriction of sputtered Co/Pd and Co/Pt multilayered films, J. Appl. Phys. 66 (1989) 4909 –4916. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.343760

    work page doi:10.1063/1.343760 1989

  22. [22]

    Daalderop, P.J

    G.H.O. Daalderop, P.J. Kelly, M.F.H. Schuurmans, Magnetic anisotropy of a free -standing Co monolayer and of multilayers which contain Co monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 9989–10003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.9989

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.9989 1994

  23. [23]

    Johnson, P.J.H

    M.T. Johnson, P.J.H. Bloemen, F.J.A. den Broeder, J.J. de Vries, Magnetic anisotropy in metallic multilayers, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59 (1996) 1409. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002 1996

  24. [24]

    Bruno, Tight -binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition -metal monolayers, Phys

    P. Bruno, Tight -binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition -metal monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 865 –868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.39.865 1989

  25. [25]

    Weller, Y

    D. Weller, Y . Wu, J. Stöhr, M.G. Samant, B.D. Hermsmeier, C. Chappert, Orbital magnetic moments of Co in multilayers with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 12888–12896. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12888. 40

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.12888 1994

  26. [26]

    Okabayashi, Y

    J. Okabayashi, Y . Miura, H. Munekata, Anatomy of interfacial spin -orbit coupling in Co/Pd multilayers using X -ray magnetic circular dichroism and first -principles calculations, Sci . Rep. 8 (2018) 8303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26195-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26195-w 2018

  27. [27]

    Tokunaga, M

    T. Tokunaga, M. Kohri, H. Kadomatsu, H. Fujiwara, Magnetostriction of Pd –Co Alloys, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50 (1981) 1411–1412. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.50.1411

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.50.1411 1981

  28. [28]

    Jen, B.L

    S.U. Jen, B.L. Chao, Magnetostriction of polycrystalline Co‐Pd alloys, J. Appl. Phys. 75 (1994) 5667–5669. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.355631

    work page doi:10.1063/1.355631 1994

  29. [29]

    Carrey, A.E

    J. Carrey, A.E. Berkowitz, W.F. Egelhoff Jr., D.J. Smith, Influence of interface alloying on the magnetic properties of Co/Pd multilayers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 (2003) 5259 –5261. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1635660

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1635660 2003

  30. [30]

    Carcia, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pd/Co and Pt/Co thin‐film layered structures, J

    P.F. Carcia, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pd/Co and Pt/Co thin‐film layered structures, J. Appl. Phys. 63 (1988) 5066–5073. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.340404

    work page doi:10.1063/1.340404 1988

  31. [31]

    den Broeder, W

    F.J.A. den Broeder, W. Hoving, P.J.H. Bloemen, Magnetic anisotropy of multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 93 (1991) 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(91)90404-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-8853(91)90404-x 1991

  32. [32]

    Klyukin, G.S.D

    K. Klyukin, G.S.D. Beach, B. Yildiz, Hydrogen tunes magnetic anisotropy by affecting local hybridization at the interface of a ferromagnet with nonmagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 (2020) 104416. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.104416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.104416 2020

  33. [33]

    Daalderop, P.J

    G.H.O. Daalderop, P.J. Kelly, M.F.H. Schuurmans, First -principles calculation of the magnetic anisotropy energy of Coₙ/Xₘ multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 7270 –7273. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.7270

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.42.7270 1990

  34. [34]

    Kim, Y .-M

    S.-K. Kim, Y .-M. Koo, V .A. Chernov, J.B. Kortright, S.-C. Shin, Comparison of atomic structure anisotropy between Co-Pd alloys and Co/Pd multilayer films, Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 3025 –3028. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.3025. 41

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.3025 2000

  35. [35]

    Wicke, H

    E. Wicke, H. Brodowsky, H. Züchner, Hydrogen in palladium and palladium alloys, in: G. Alefeld, J. Völkl (Eds.), Hydrogen in Metals II: Application -Oriented Properties, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978: pp. 73–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-08883-0_19

    doi:10.1007/3-540-08883-0_19 1978

  36. [36]

    Houari, S.F

    A. Houari, S.F. Matar, V . Eyert, Electronic structure and crystal phase stability of palladium hydrides, J. Appl. Phys. 116 (2014) 173706. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4901004

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4901004 2014

  37. [37]

    Lueng, F

    C. Lueng, F. Zighem, D. Faurie, M. Kostylev, Ferromagnetic resonance investigation of physical origins of modification of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pd/Co layered films in the presence of hydrogen gas, J. Appl. Phys. 122 (2017) 163901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4996808

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4996808 2017

  38. [38]

    S.S. Das, G. Kopnov, A. Gerber, Positive vs negative resistance response to hydrogenation in palladium and its alloys, AIP Adv. 10 (2020) 065129. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009194

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0009194 2020

  39. [39]

    S.S. Das, G. Kopnov, A. Gerber, Resistivity Testing of Palladium Dilution Limits in CoPd Alloys for Hydrogen Storage, Materials 15 (2022) 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010111

    work page doi:10.3390/ma15010111 2022

  40. [40]

    Akamaru, A

    S. Akamaru, A. Kimura, M. Hara, K. Nishimura, T. Abe, Hydrogenation effect on magnetic properties of Pd –Co alloys, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 484 (2019) 8 –13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.121

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.121 2019

  41. [41]

    W.-C. Lin, B. -Y . Wang, H.-Y . Huang, C.-J. Tsai, V .R. Mudinepalli, Hydrogen absorption-induced reversible change in magnetic properties of Co–Pd alloy films, J. Alloys Compd. 661 (2016) 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.144

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.144 2016

  42. [42]

    Ishida, T

    K. Ishida, T. Nishizawa, The Co -Pd (Cobalt -Palladium) System, JPE 12 (1991) 83 –87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663680

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02663680 1991

  43. [43]

    Morgan, K

    C. Morgan, K. Schmalbuch, F. García -Sánchez, C.M. Schneider, C. Meyer, Structure and magnetization in CoPd thin films and nanocontacts, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 325 (2013) 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.052. 42

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.052 2013

  44. [44]

    Cullity, S.R

    B.D. Cullity, S.R. Stock, Elements of X-ray Diffraction, third ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001

    2001

  45. [45]

    Züttel, Materials for hydrogen storage, Mater

    A. Züttel, Materials for hydrogen storage, Mater. Today 6 (2003) 24 –33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2

    doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(03)00922-2 2003

  46. [46]

    Völkl, G

    J. Völkl, G. Alefeld, Diffusion of hydrogen in metals, in: G. Alefeld, J. Völkl (Eds.), Hydrogen in Metals I: Basic Properties, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978: pp. 321 –348. https://doi.org/10.1007/3540087052_51

    work page doi:10.1007/3540087052_51 1978

  47. [47]

    S.S. Das, G. Kopnov, A. Gerber, Kinetics of the lattice response to hydrogen absorption in thin Pd and CoPd films, Molecules 25 (2020) 3597. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163597

    work page doi:10.3390/molecules25163597 2020

  48. [48]

    Taylor, J.A

    J.W. Taylor, J.A. Duffy, J. Poulter, A.M. Bebb, M.J. Cooper, J.E. McCarthy, D.N. Timms, J.B. Staunton, F. Itoh, H. Sakurai, B.L. Ahuja, Spin-polarized electron momentum density distributions in Pd1-xCox alloys, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2001) 024442. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.024442

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.024442 2001

  49. [49]

    Cullity, C.D

    B.D. Cullity, C.D. Graham, Introduction to Magnetic Materials, John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    2011

  50. [50]

    Chang, Y .-C

    P.-C. Chang, Y .-C. Chen, C. -C. Hsu, V .R. Mudinepalli, H.-C. Chiu, W. -C. Lin, Hydrogenation - induced reversible spin reorientation transition in Co50Pd50 alloy thin films, J. Alloys Compd. 710 (2017) 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.221

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.221 2017

  51. [51]

    Winer, A

    G. Winer, A. Segal, M. Karpovski, V . Shelukhin, A. Gerber, Probing Co/Pd interfacial alloying by the extraordinary Hall effect, J. Appl. Phys. 118 (2015) 173901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935023

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4935023 2015

  52. [52]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A.H. MacDonald, N.P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1539–1592. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1539 2010

  53. [53]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, N. Nagaosa, Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 126602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.126602. 1 Hydrogen-induced sign reversal in magnetic hysteresis evolution of CoPd alloys and Co/Pd multilayers S. S. Das1,* and A. Gerber2,* 1Institute of Industrial Science, The Uni...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.126602 2006

  54. [289]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70143-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70143-2