Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Machine learning for complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds: a methodological study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.15706 v2 pith:CWTITZMN submitted 2020-07-30 hep-th cs.LGmath.AG

classification hep-thcs.LGmath.AG
keywords dataaccuracyneuralnetworkbettercalabi-yaucompletedatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We revisit the question of predicting both Hodge numbers $h^{1,1}$ and $h^{2,1}$ of complete intersection Calabi-Yau (CICY) 3-folds using machine learning (ML), considering both the old and new datasets built respectively by Candelas-Dale-Lutken-Schimmrigk / Green-H\"ubsch-Lutken and by Anderson-Gao-Gray-Lee. In real world applications, implementing a ML system rarely reduces to feed the brute data to the algorithm. Instead, the typical workflow starts with an exploratory data analysis (EDA) which aims at understanding better the input data and finding an optimal representation. It is followed by the design of a validation procedure and a baseline model. Finally, several ML models are compared and combined, often involving neural networks with a topology more complicated than the sequential models typically used in physics. By following this procedure, we improve the accuracy of ML computations for Hodge numbers with respect to the existing literature. First, we obtain 97% (resp. 99%) accuracy for $h^{1,1}$ using a neural network inspired by the Inception model for the old dataset, using only 30% (resp. 70%) of the data for training. For the new one, a simple linear regression leads to almost 100% accuracy with 30% of the data for training. The computation of $h^{2,1}$ is less successful as we manage to reach only 50% accuracy for both datasets, but this is still better than the 16% obtained with a simple neural network (SVM with Gaussian kernel and feature engineering and sequential convolutional network reach at best 36%). This serves as a proof of concept that neural networks can be valuable to study the properties of geometries appearing in string theory.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lost in Translation: Moduli Stabilization from EFT to Eleven Dimensions

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Explicit 11D solutions show flux stabilization of T^4/Z2 moduli in EFT does not match the full theory, with non-Lorentz-invariant deformations stabilizing a mix of volume and shape moduli instead.

  2. Machine Learning Free Quotients of CICYs

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Machine-learning classifiers, especially a multi-head attention model, correctly identify almost all free Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z2xZ2 quotients of CICYs on held-out manifolds, with only three missed Z2xZ2 cases.

  3. Pre-Strings Lectures on Artificial Intelligence

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    Lecture notes define neural-network field theory and survey how it recovers known QFT/string results plus applied AI techniques for string problems.

Pith tools