Renormalization of meson susceptibilities and RG-invariant symmetry ratios in QCD

Ting-Wai Chiu

Renormalization of meson susceptibilities and RG-invariant symmetry ratios in QCD

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that $\kappa_{AB}$, built from temperature-subtracted meson susceptibilities of symmetry partners, is exactly renormalization-group invariant and scheme-independent.

desk verdict A solid formal paper: the kappa_AB ratio really is RG invariant, the Z_A=Z_B proof for DWF/overlap is the real content, and the two soft spots are survivable. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17816 v2 pith:CYJZ2MO2 submitted 2026-07-20 hep-lat hep-phhep-th

Ting-Wai Chiu This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lathep-phhep-th MSC 81T2581T2881V05 PACS 11.15.Ha12.38.Gc11.30.Rd

keywords mesonsusceptibilitiesrenormalization-groupinvariancechiralsymmetryrestorationU(1)_AanomalyGinsparg-Wilsonfermionsdomain-walltemperaturesubtractionlatticeQCD

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the symmetry ratio $\kappa_{AB}$ of two meson susceptibilities in symmetry-related channels is exactly renormalization-group invariant and scheme-independent. The bare susceptibility carries a power divergence $\alpha_\Gamma/(2a^2)$ from the identity operator and a mass-dependent logarithm $c^m_\Gamma m^2\ln(1/(am))$, together with a multiplicative factor $Z_\Gamma^2$ controlled by the operator anomalous dimension. The paper shows the additive pieces are temperature-independent and cancel in the difference $\chi(T)-\chi(T_r)$, while for symmetry partners the equality $Z_A=Z_B$ cancels the multiplicative factor in the ratio. This yields a finite probe of chiral and $U(1)_A$ restoration that needs no nonperturbative renormalization constant, and it also gives reference-temperature-independent definitions of characteristic temperatures from single-channel susceptibilities.

What carries the argument

The central object is the symmetry ratio $\kappa_{AB} = (\chi_A^{\rm reg}-\chi_B^{\rm reg})/(\chi_A^{\rm reg}+\chi_B^{\rm reg})$ with $\chi^{\rm reg}_\Gamma(T;T_r) = \chi_\Gamma(T) - \chi_\Gamma(T_r)$. Its invariance rests on two mechanisms: the temperature subtraction, which removes the additive power divergence $\alpha_\Gamma/(2a^2)$ and the mass-dependent logarithm $c^m_\Gamma m^2\ln(1/(am))$ because both are short-distance and temperature-independent; and the partner equality $Z_A=Z_B$, which cancels the multiplicative operator renormalization. The equality is enforced by the exact chiral symmetry of Ginsparg-Wilson fermions, realized by domain-wall or overlap fermions, through the $Z$-factor chains $Z_S^{\rm ns}=Z_P^{\rm ns}=Z_S^{\rm s}=Z_P^{\rm s}=Z_{SP}$, $Z_T^{\rm ns}=Z_X^{\rm ns}=Z_T^{\rm s}=Z_X^{\rm s}=Z_{TX}$, and $Z_V^{\rm ns}=Z_A^{\rm ns}=Z_{VA}$.

What would settle it

Compute the subtracted partner difference $\chi_A^{\rm reg}(T;T_r)-\chi_B^{\rm reg}(T;T_r)$ on a sequence of lattices with decreasing spacing at fixed physical $T$, $T_r$, and quark mass. If the mass-log coefficient is not exactly temperature-independent, a residual $m^2\ln(1/(am))$ piece will make the numerator drift logarithmically as $a\to0$ and $\kappa_{AB}$ will depend on $T_r$; if the paper is right, the drift is absent and two different reference temperatures give the same $\kappa_{AB}$ in the continuum limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the author's account, the bare finite-temperature meson susceptibility decomposes into short-distance additive divergences and a multiplicative operator renormalization: $\chi_\Gamma^{\rm bare}(T,a) = \alpha_\Gamma/(2a^2) + c^m_\Gamma m^2\ln(1/(am)) + Z_\Gamma^2\,\chi_\Gamma^R(\mu,T,m) + O(a)$. The two additive terms come from the coincident-point operator product and are therefore temperature-independent, so the subtraction $\chi^{\rm reg}_\Gamma(T;T_r) = \chi_\Gamma(T) - \chi_\Gamma(T_r)$ removes them exactly without evaluating their coefficients. What remains is $Z_\Gamma^2$ times a finite renormalized difference. For any pair of channels related by an exact symmetry of the regularized action, $Z_A=Z_B$; the paper proves this nonperturbatively for domain-wall and overlap fermions using the ordinary and asymmetric Luescher chiral rotations, including the $U(1)_A$ rotation that connects scalar/pseudoscalar and tensor/axial-tensor partners and the $SU(2)_A$ rotation connecting vector/axial-vector partners. The factor $Z^2$ then cancels in $\kappa_{AB}$, making the ratio exactly scale- and scheme-independent and removing any need to compute nonperturbative renormalization constants.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that every additive ultraviolet divergence of the bare susceptibility, including the mass-dependent logarithm, is exactly temperature-independent to all orders, so that subtracting at a single reference temperature removes all additive divergences with no residual cutoff dependence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A lattice simulation with exact chiral symmetry can extract a continuum, scheme-independent symmetry-restoration observable without determining any nonperturbative renormalization constant.
The zero of $\kappa_{AB}$ as a function of $T$ marks the effective degeneracy of the partner channels and is common to all admissible reference temperatures chosen deep in the restored phase.
The peak position of $m^2[\chi_\sigma(T)-\chi_\sigma(T_r)]$ defines a pseudocritical temperature independent of $T_r$, so no zero-temperature ensemble is needed for the chiral crossover.
In the pseudoscalar singlet channel the same subtraction gives $\chi_t(T)-\chi_t(T_r)$, whose inflection point is a $T_r$-independent characteristic temperature of the anomalous sector.
With Wilson fermions the construction fails: the explicit chiral breaking generates a chiral-odd $m/a$ divergence and splits $Z_P$ from $Z_S$, so the analogous ratio is not RG invariant without additional nonperturbative subtraction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the central claim is right, the same subtraction-plus-ratio architecture should transfer to other composite operators, such as baryonic or gluonic susceptibilities, whenever an exact symmetry pairs the operators and $Z_A=Z_B$ can be proved.
The paper's key assumption is that the mass-log coefficient has no temperature dependence beyond tree level; a two-loop finite-temperature calculation of the bare susceptibility would test that assumption directly, since a $T$-dependent subleading divergence would survive the subtraction.
Because the proof never uses the detailed form of the thermal state, $\kappa_{AB}$ should remain well-defined in other chirally symmetric backgrounds, such as nonzero baryon density or an external magnetic field; this is a testable extension rather than a claim of the paper.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this paper does what it says. The kappa_AB ratio itself came from the companion numerical paper, but the formal content here is new and mostly sound: the complete additive-divergence decomposition, the derivation of the full Z-factor chains for all meson channels, and the nonperturbative Z_A = Z_B proof for domain-wall and overlap fermions. Since the ratio needs no nonperturbative renormalization constants and no fitted parameters, this gives lattice QCD a genuinely useful observable for chiral and U(1)_A restoration.

The tree-level calculation is the strongest part. Closed-form propagators, thermal image sums, and the channel-dependent coefficients are worked out explicitly in the appendices, and the numerical cross-checks reported there give me confidence the algebra is right. The RGE resummation is standard. The cancellation chain in Section V is clean: additive terms die in the temperature subtraction, and Z_A = Z_B kills the multiplicative factor. The proof that Z_A = Z_B follows from the lattice chiral symmetry, not from fitting, is the nontrivial step and it holds up for both DWF and overlap.

Two soft spots, neither fatal. First, the all-orders temperature independence of the mass-dependent logarithm coefficient c_Gamma^m m^2 ln(1/(am)) is argued from short-distance locality and standard thermal-field-theory results rather than exhibited by an explicit all-orders calculation. This is the load-bearing assumption behind the subtraction at one reference temperature, and while I think it is very likely correct, a referee should push for a sharper statement or at least a Ward-identity check. Second, the singlet-sector equalities in the presence of the U(1)_A anomaly are defended physically but not by explicit computation. The claim that the anomaly shifts only the topological sector and not the UV counterterms is plausible, but it is the kind of thing that deserves a more formal treatment before the paper is the last word.

The Wilson-fermion contrast section is fine but a bit prosecutorial, especially the engagement with ref. [23]. The shape-versus-amplitude discussion is sensible, but it is not needed for the main proof and could be trimmed.

Overall: the central argument holds. This deserves serious refereeing and should be accepted after revision. I would cite it if I were working on chiral restoration with Ginsparg-Wilson fermions, and I would bring it to a lattice reading group.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript analyzes the ultraviolet divergence structure of meson susceptibilities in finite-temperature QCD for lattice regularizations with exact chiral symmetry (domain-wall and overlap/Ginsparg-Wilson fermions). It shows that the bare susceptibility has two additive divergent pieces—a channel-dependent 1/a^2 power divergence and a chirally even m^2 ln(1/(am)) term—and argues, using short-distance locality and standard thermal-field-theory results, that both are exactly temperature-independent so that subtracting at a reference temperature T_r removes them. The remaining multiplicative logarithmic renormalization Z_Gamma^2 cancels in the symmetry ratio kappa_AB because symmetry partners have equal renormalization constants. The paper proves these equalities nonperturbatively for DWF and overlap fermions, works out the complete Z-factor chains for scalar/pseudoscalar, tensor/axial-tensor, and vector/axial-vector channels, and contrasts the divergence structure with Wilson fermions, where the Z_A=Z_B equality fails.

Significance. The central claim is significant: if it holds, kappa_AB is an exactly RG-invariant, scheme-independent observable that requires no nonperturbative determination of renormalization constants, which is directly useful for studying chiral and U(1)_A restoration on the lattice. The paper is technically explicit and careful: the tree-level divergence coefficients are derived from closed-form massive propagators and thermal image sums and are cross-checked numerically; the Z_A=Z_B proofs are symmetry-based and do not rely on fitting or on assumed RG invariance; and the limitations of the all-orders temperature-independence statement are identified honestly in Section III F. These strengths make the paper a solid foundation for numerical applications.

minor comments (6)

[I, Eq. (1)] The reference temperature T_r appears in the definition of chi^reg before it is defined; define T_r in the introduction.
[III A, Eq. (25)] The notation c^Gamma_m is introduced with a superscript to distinguish it from the Wilson coefficients c_n, but the meaning of the subscript m is not stated; state explicitly that it labels the coefficient of the quark-mass-dependent logarithm.
[V C / Abstract] The abstract's phrase 'scheme-independent' should be qualified with 'within mass-independent schemes with chirally symmetric regularization,' matching the precise statement in Section V C.
[Table I] The row for kappa_bare_AB (no subtraction), '->0 as a->0', could be misunderstood; clarify that this limit is driven by the divergent denominator and is not a meaningful restoration signal.
[III F] The all-orders temperature independence of the additive divergences, especially the mass-dependent logarithm, is the load-bearing premise; the manuscript justifies it with standard thermal-field-theory references and a tree-level image-sum demonstration, which I find adequate, but one sentence stating explicitly that the Wilson coefficient of the identity is T-independent to all orders would make the argument easier to verify.
[VI] The critique of Ref. [23] would benefit from an explicit caveat that the quoted degeneracy temperature is at a single lattice spacing, which the text notes later but could state earlier to avoid overinterpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the RG invariance of kappa_AB follows from a temperature subtraction and a symmetry-proved equality Z_A = Z_B, not from fitting or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is derived from explicit, independent steps rather than from an input that is renamed as a prediction. The temperature-subtracted susceptibility is defined in eq. (26), and eq. (30) shows that the remaining UV dependence is the multiplicative factor Z_Gamma^2. The proof that this factor cancels in kappa_AB does not assume RG invariance; it uses the Callan-Symanzik equation (33) and the equality Z_A = Z_B, which is established nonperturbatively in Sec. IV B for both domain-wall and overlap fermions via the chiral rotation formulas, e.g. eqs. (61), (74), and (76)-(79). No parameter is fitted to data, and the all-orders temperature independence of the additive divergences is justified by standard thermal-field-theory results [20,21,24-26] together with the explicit image-sum analysis in Sec. III A and Appendix A, not by self-citation. The only self-citation, Ref. [1] by the same author, supplies the definition and numerical context of kappa_AB, but the renormalization proof is self-contained and does not lean on that reference. The cancellation of the common factor Z^2 in eq. (81) is a corollary of the preceding equations, not an assumption smuggled in through the definition of the ratio. Therefore no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. The central claim rests on standard renormalization results and on the assumption that the lattice regulator preserves chiral symmetry exactly. The main axioms are listed above.

assumptions (6)

standard math Ultraviolet divergences of finite-temperature QCD are identical to zero-temperature divergences; temperature enters only in infrared-finite parts.
Invoked in Section III F and relied on for the temperature subtraction (26); standard thermal field theory result cited as Refs. [20,21,24-26].
domain assumption Ginsparg-Wilson, overlap, and domain-wall fermions provide an exact chiral symmetry of the regularized action, so symmetry-related local bilinears renormalize with equal Z factors.
Used in Section IV B to prove Z_A = Z_B; the entire multiplicative cancellation in kappa_AB depends on this.
domain assumption The renormalized quark bilinear renormalizes multiplicatively with triangular identity mixing, and VEV subtraction removes the additive c-number.
Eqs. (27)-(29) in Section III B; standard operator renormalization for composite operators.
standard math The OPE of two quark bilinears is dominated by the identity operator with strength ~1/x^4, and the massive free propagator has the closed Bessel form (22).
Basis for deriving the additive power divergence and the m^2 ln(1/(am)) divergence in Section III A and Appendix A.
domain assumption The topological charge Q_t is an integer with zero expectation value and RG-invariant chi_t, and the index relation Tr[gamma_5 (D_c + m)^{-1}] = Q_t/m holds.
Used for the disconnected pseudoscalar singlet susceptibility in Section III D.
domain assumption Domain-wall boundary-mode quark fields obey the continuum chiral projection independent of gauge fields, and the valence propagator is (D_c + m)^{-1}.
Section II; needed to identify local operators and to carry continuum chiral rotations onto the lattice.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Renormalization of meson susceptibilities and RG-invariant symmetry ratios in QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CYJZ2MO2

@misc{pith2026260717816,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Renormalization of meson susceptibilities and RG-invariant symmetry ratios in QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CYJZ2MO2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17816}
}

abstract

We analyze the ultraviolet divergence structure of meson susceptibilities in finite-temperature QCD, for lattice formulations with exact chiral symmetry. The bare susceptibility separates into additive divergences and a multiplicative renormalization $Z_\Gamma^{2}$. The additive divergences are temperature-independent, and are removed by the temperature subtraction. They consist of the leading power divergence $\alpha_\Gamma/(2a^2)$ from the identity operator, together with a mass-dependent logarithmic term $\propto m^2\ln(1/(am))$. Exact chiral symmetry forbids all mass-dependent \emph{power} divergences of the susceptibility. The multiplicative factor $Z_\Gamma^{2}$ has a logarithmic dependence on the lattice spacing, controlled by the operator anomalous dimension. We show that the symmetry ratio $\kappa_{AB} = (\chi_A^{\rm reg} - \chi_B^{\rm reg})/ (\chi_A^{\rm reg} + \chi_B^{\rm reg})$, built from temperature-subtracted susceptibilities of symmetry partners, is exactly renormalization-group invariant and scheme-independent. The additive divergence is removed by the subtraction, and the multiplicative factor cancels through the equality $Z_A = Z_B$. This equality holds for any number of flavors and any quark masses in a mass-independent scheme, unaffected by spontaneous symmetry breaking or the $U(1)_A$ anomaly. We derive the complete $Z$-factor chains for all meson channels and contrast the divergence structure with that of Wilson fermions, for which the explicit chiral-symmetry breaking induces a chiral-odd power-divergent mixing and spoils the equality $Z_A = Z_B$ on which the construction relies.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[23]

Collective Phenomena in Gauge Theories. 2. Renormalization in Finite Temper- ature Field Theory,

M. B. Kislinger and P. D. Morley, “Collective Phenomena in Gauge Theories. 2. Renormalization in Finite Temper- ature Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2771

work page 1976
[1]

[11–13], and these fields obey the ordinary continuum chiral projection in- dependent of the gauge field

Domain-wall fermions For domain-wall fermions the quark fieldsqand ¯q are defined through the boundary modes of the five- dimensional theory, as given in Refs. [11–13], and these fields obey the ordinary continuum chiral projection in- dependent of the gauge field. Consequently the bilinear ¯qtaΓqtransforms under chiral rotations exactly as its continuum ...

work page
[2]

Overlap fermion The same result holds for the overlap formulation on the four-dimensional lattice, where the quark action is ¯q(Dc +m)(1 +raD c)−1q. Hereris fixed by the nega- tive mass in the Wilson kernel of the overlap operator, Dc =γ µDµ c is chirally symmetric,D cγ5 +γ 5Dc = 0, andD=D c(1 +raDc)−1 satisfies the Ginsparg–Wilson relationDγ 5 +γ 5D= 2ra...

work page
[3]

The value ofZV depends on which current is used

The value ofZ V A. The value ofZV depends on which current is used. The conserved vector current of the lattice action satisfies its Ward identity exactly and hasZ V = 1 at finitea; it is point-split for DWF [11, 13], the splitting being required by the gauge links of the one-link hopping, and nonlocal for the four-dimensional Ginsparg–Wilson fermion [2],...

work page
[4]

RG-Invariant Symmetry Ratio for QCD: A Study ofU(1) A and Chiral Symmetry Restoration,

T. W. Chiu and T. H. Hsieh, “RG-Invariant Symmetry Ratio for QCD: A Study ofU(1) A and Chiral Symmetry Restoration,” [arXiv:2602.14811 [hep-lat]]

arXiv
[5]

A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,” Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 2649

1982
[6]

Exactly massless quarks on the lattice

H. Neuberger, “Exactly massless quarks on the lattice”, Phys. Lett. B417, 141-144 (1998) [hep-lat/9707022 [hep- lat]]

arXiv 1998
[7]

More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,

H. Neuberger, “More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Phys. Lett. B427(1998) 353 [hep- lat/9801031]

arXiv 1998

Show all 32 references

[8]

A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice

D. B. Kaplan, “A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice”, Phys. Lett. B288, 342-347 (1992) [arXiv:hep-lat/9206013 [hep-lat]]

1992 arXiv
[9]

Chiral fermions on the lattice

D. B. Kaplan, “Chiral fermions on the lattice”, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.30, 597-600 (1993)

1993
[10]

Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries,

Y. Shamir, “Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries,” Nucl. Phys. B406(1993) 90 [hep-lat/9303005]

1993 arXiv
[11]

Truncated overlap fermions,

A. Borici, “Truncated overlap fermions,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.83(2000), 771-773 [arXiv:hep-lat/9909057 [hep-lat]]

2000 arXiv
[12]

Optimal lattice domain wall fermions

T. W. Chiu, “Optimal lattice domain wall fermions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 071601 (2003) [hep-lat/0209153]

2003 arXiv
[13]

The M¨ obius do- main wall fermion algorithm,

R. C. Brower, H. Neff and K. Orginos, “The M¨ obius do- main wall fermion algorithm,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 220(2017), 1-19 [arXiv:1206.5214 [hep-lat]]

2017 arXiv
[14]

Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions,

V. Furman and Y. Shamir, “Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions,” Nucl. Phys. B439(1995), 54-78 [arXiv:hep-lat/9405004 [hep-lat]]

1995 arXiv
[15]

Aspects of domain-wall fermion on the lat- tice

T. W. Chiu, “Aspects of domain-wall fermion on the lat- tice”, Phys. Lett. B716, 461 (2012) [hep-lat/0303008]

2012 arXiv
[16]

Chiral symmetry and the residual mass in lattice QCD with the optimal domain-wall fermion

Y. C. Chen and T. W. Chiu [TWQCD Collaboration], “Chiral symmetry and the residual mass in lattice QCD with the optimal domain-wall fermion”, Phys. Rev. D86, 094508 (2012) [arXiv:1205.6151 [hep-lat]]

2012 arXiv
[17]

Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and 19 the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,

M. L¨ uscher, “Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and 19 the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,” Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 342 [hep-lat/9802011]

1998 arXiv
[18]

Ginsparg-Wilson fermion propagators and chiral condensate

T. W. Chiu, “Ginsparg-Wilson fermion propagators and chiral condensate”, Phys. Rev. D60, 034503 (1999) [hep- lat/9810052]

1999
[19]

On solutions of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,

T. W. Chiu and S. V. Zenkin, “On solutions of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,” Phys. Rev. D59(1999), 074501 [arXiv:hep-lat/9806019 [hep-lat]]

1999 arXiv
[20]

Y. Aoki, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B643(2006), 46-54 [arXiv:hep-lat/0609068 [hep- lat]]

2006 arXiv
[21]

Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice with Wilson Fermions,

M. Bochicchio, L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, G. C. Rossi and M. Testa, “Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice with Wilson Fermions,” Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) 331

1985
[22]

M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

1995
[24]

Real and Imagi- nary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Den- sity,

N. P. Landsman and C. G. van Weert, “Real and Imagi- nary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Den- sity,” Phys. Rept.145(1987) 141

1987
[25]

A General method for nonperturba- tive renormalization of lattice operators,

G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C. T. Sachrajda, M. Testa and A. Vladikas, “A General method for nonperturba- tive renormalization of lattice operators,” Nucl. Phys. B 445(1995) 81 [hep-lat/9411010]

1995 arXiv
[26]

On the effective restoration ofU(1) A symmetry at finite temperature,

G. Aarts, C. Allton, R. Bignell, B. J¨ ager, S. Kim, J. I. Skullerud and A. Smecca, “On the effective restoration ofU(1) A symmetry at finite temperature,” [arXiv:2604.11916 [hep-lat]]

arXiv
[27]

Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,

L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, “Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,” Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320

1974
[28]

Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,

S. Weinberg, “Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,” Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3357

1974
[29]

Feynman Rules for Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature,

C. W. Bernard, “Feynman Rules for Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature,” Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3312

1974
[30]

J. C. Collins,Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group, and the Operator-Product Expansion(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984). Appendix A: Free thermal temporal correlator This appendix derives the free temporal meson cor- relato...

1984
[31]

It is obtained from the zero-temperature prop- agatorS 0 by summing over thermal images, ST (⃗ x,t) = ∞X n=−∞ (−1)nS0(⃗ x, t+nβ),(A1) where the sign (−1)n enforces antiperiodicity

Massless power divergence At finite temperature, the free massless quark propa- gator is antiperiodic in Euclidean timex 4 =twith period β≡1/T. It is obtained from the zero-temperature prop- agatorS 0 by summing over thermal images, ST (⃗ x,t) = ∞X n=−∞ (−1)nS0(⃗ x, t+nβ),(A1)...
[32]

Mass-dependent divergence The same image decomposition shows that the mass- dependent divergence is also temperature-independent. The finite-temperature massive propagator is the an- tiperiodic image sum of the closed-form zero-temperature massive propagator (22), S(m) T (⃗ x,...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [23]

Collective Phenomena in Gauge Theories. 2. Renormalization in Finite Temper- ature Field Theory,

M. B. Kislinger and P. D. Morley, “Collective Phenomena in Gauge Theories. 2. Renormalization in Finite Temper- ature Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2771

work page 1976

[2] [1]

[11–13], and these fields obey the ordinary continuum chiral projection in- dependent of the gauge field

Domain-wall fermions For domain-wall fermions the quark fieldsqand ¯q are defined through the boundary modes of the five- dimensional theory, as given in Refs. [11–13], and these fields obey the ordinary continuum chiral projection in- dependent of the gauge field. Consequently the bilinear ¯qtaΓqtransforms under chiral rotations exactly as its continuum ...

work page

[3] [2]

Overlap fermion The same result holds for the overlap formulation on the four-dimensional lattice, where the quark action is ¯q(Dc +m)(1 +raD c)−1q. Hereris fixed by the nega- tive mass in the Wilson kernel of the overlap operator, Dc =γ µDµ c is chirally symmetric,D cγ5 +γ 5Dc = 0, andD=D c(1 +raDc)−1 satisfies the Ginsparg–Wilson relationDγ 5 +γ 5D= 2ra...

work page

[4] [3]

The value ofZV depends on which current is used

The value ofZ V A. The value ofZV depends on which current is used. The conserved vector current of the lattice action satisfies its Ward identity exactly and hasZ V = 1 at finitea; it is point-split for DWF [11, 13], the splitting being required by the gauge links of the one-link hopping, and nonlocal for the four-dimensional Ginsparg–Wilson fermion [2],...

work page

[5] [4]

RG-Invariant Symmetry Ratio for QCD: A Study ofU(1) A and Chiral Symmetry Restoration,

T. W. Chiu and T. H. Hsieh, “RG-Invariant Symmetry Ratio for QCD: A Study ofU(1) A and Chiral Symmetry Restoration,” [arXiv:2602.14811 [hep-lat]]

arXiv

[6] [5]

A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,” Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 2649

1982

[7] [6]

Exactly massless quarks on the lattice

H. Neuberger, “Exactly massless quarks on the lattice”, Phys. Lett. B417, 141-144 (1998) [hep-lat/9707022 [hep- lat]]

arXiv 1998

[8] [7]

More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,

H. Neuberger, “More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Phys. Lett. B427(1998) 353 [hep- lat/9801031]

arXiv 1998