Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Standardizing AI Bias Exploration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19022 v1 pith:D25H54OK submitted 2024-05-29 cs.LG cs.CYcs.HC

classification cs.LGcs.CYcs.HC
keywords biasconcernsmeasuresframeworkblocksexistingexplorationwide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Creating fair AI systems is a complex problem that involves the assessment of context-dependent bias concerns. Existing research and programming libraries express specific concerns as measures of bias that they aim to constrain or mitigate. In practice, one should explore a wide variety of (sometimes incompatible) measures before deciding which ones warrant corrective action, but their narrow scope means that most new situations can only be examined after devising new measures. In this work, we present a mathematical framework that distils literature measures of bias into building blocks, hereby facilitating new combinations to cover a wide range of fairness concerns, such as classification or recommendation differences across multiple multi-value sensitive attributes (e.g., many genders and races, and their intersections). We show how this framework generalizes existing concepts and present frequently used blocks. We provide an open-source implementation of our framework as a Python library, called FairBench, that facilitates systematic and extensible exploration of potential bias concerns.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMM-fair: An Interactive Toolkit for Exploring and Operationalizing Multi-Fairness Trade-offs

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper presents mmm-fair, a Python toolkit that combines fairness-integrated boosting, Pareto exploration, and a chat interface for exploring multi-fairness trade-offs in classification.

Pith tools