REVIEW 2 cited by
Dullahan: Stealthy Backdoor Attack against Without-Label-Sharing Split Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Dullahan: Stealthy Backdoor Attack against Without-Label-Sharing Split Learning
read the original abstract
As a novel privacy-preserving paradigm aimed at reducing client computational costs and achieving data utility, split learning has garnered extensive attention and proliferated widespread applications across various fields, including smart health and smart transportation, among others. While recent studies have primarily concentrated on addressing privacy leakage concerns in split learning, such as inference attacks and data reconstruction, the exploration of security issues (e.g., backdoor attacks) within the framework of split learning has been comparatively limited. Nonetheless, the security vulnerability within the context of split learning is highly posing a threat and can give rise to grave security implications, such as the illegal impersonation in the face recognition model. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a stealthy backdoor attack strategy (namely SBAT) tailored to the without-label-sharing split learning architecture, which unveils the inherent security vulnerability of split learning. We posit the existence of a potential attacker on the server side aiming to introduce a backdoor into the training model, while exploring two scenarios: one with known client network architecture and the other with unknown architecture. Diverging from traditional backdoor attack methods that manipulate the training data and labels, we constructively conduct the backdoor attack by injecting the trigger embedding into the server network. Specifically, our SBAT achieves a higher level of attack stealthiness by refraining from modifying any intermediate parameters (e.g., gradients) during training and instead executing all malicious operations post-training.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Decision-Level Hijacking: Injecting Cognitive Bias into Large Language Models via Bit-Flip Attacks
A handful of weight-bit flips (as few as 12) can bias LLM outputs toward a target entity or stance, with limited effect on non-target tasks and output distributions.
-
A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations
A survey that introduces a unified training pipeline and taxonomizes split learning approaches for LLM fine-tuning across model, system, and privacy dimensions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.