Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 54 references

For nonsingular black holes in two-dimensional dilaton gravity, the correct Hamiltonian energy is E=-c/2, and with it the first law of thermodynamics holds for the entire solution class.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 05:43 UTC pith:D3EG6SE7

load-bearing objection The paper's central variational step treats A∞ as fixed while varying c, but A∞=f∞+c; the proposed first law is not established. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.21186 v2 pith:D3EG6SE7 submitted 2026-03-22 gr-qc

First Law for Nonsingular Black Holes in 2D Dilaton Gravity

Peng Yu , Yuan Zhong This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C80 PACS 04.70.-s04.20.-q
keywords 2D dilaton gravitynonsingular black holesfirst law of black hole thermodynamicscovariant phase space formalismHamiltonian energyCasimir functionregular black holesblack hole entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

An earlier study of a regular black hole in two-dimensional dilaton gravity found that its entropy, temperature, and energy did not obey the first law of thermodynamics. This paper argues that the failure was not in the geometry but in the energy definition: the energy used there was not the charge conjugate to a properly normalized time-translation symmetry. Using the covariant phase-space formalism, the authors derive the Hamiltonian energy E=-c/(2√A∞) for every static solution with metric function A(x)=f(x)+c, and show that with this energy the first law δE=T_H δS is satisfied. The same charge equals the conserved Casimir function of two-dimensional dilaton gravity, identifying it as the physical black hole mass. Because this class includes several explicit nonsingular black hole solutions, the result gives a consistent thermodynamics for all of them and a template for studying regular black holes in higher dimensions.

Core claim

The central claim is that the apparent violation of the first law for the nonsingular 2D black hole is an artifact of using the wrong energy. In the correctly normalized covariant phase-space formalism, the Hamiltonian energy of the entire solution family A(x)=f(x)+c is E=-c/(2√A∞), reducing to E=-c/2 when the asymptotic metric value is set to unity. Under this definition, the variation of energy equals the Hawking temperature times the entropy variation, δE=T_H δS, so the first law holds exactly. The same energy coincides with the Casimir function, confirming that the Casimir mass is the physical energy associated with asymptotic time translations.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on the conserved Hamiltonian charge associated with a fixed asymptotic time-translation generator. The generator is normalized to unit norm at infinity by a factor 1/√A∞, and is kept fixed under variations of the solution, so that only the metric and dilaton vary. Evaluating the charge and its variation at spatial infinity yields δE=-δc/(2√A∞), which combines with the entropy S=2πφ_h and the correspondingly normalized temperature T_H=A'(x_h)/(4π√A∞) to give the first law. The same construction identifies the charge with the conserved Casimir function, the invariant mass parameter of two-dimensional dilaton gravity, which for these solutions is simply -c/2.

Load-bearing premise

The proof treats the asymptotic value A∞ as a fixed constant under variations of c, even though A∞=f(∞)+c changes when c does; if that variation is not dropped, the energy variation gains an extra term and the first law no longer follows.

What would settle it

For the sine-Gordon solution A(x)=arctan(e^x)+c, compute δE - T_H δS while keeping δA∞=δc (since A∞=π/2+c). The energy variation then contains the extra term cδc/(4A∞^{3/2}); for c=-π/4 this is nonzero, so the first law fails under that natural variation, demonstrating that the result depends crucially on the fixed-normalization assumption.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The earlier regular black hole solution satisfies the first law once its energy is taken to be E=-c/2, resolving the apparent violation.
  • Every static solution of the form A=f+c, including the sine-Gordon and arctan kink examples, has the same thermodynamic relation with no extra corrections.
  • The Hawking temperature is rescaled by 1/√A∞ compared with the naive A'(x_h)/(4π), so temperature and entropy stay consistent with the standard first law.
  • The Casimir function is confirmed as the physical black hole energy, giving a direct link between conserved charges and thermodynamics in dilaton gravity.
  • The same fixed-generator normalization provides a template for checking first laws of regular black holes in higher-dimensional theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The derivation holds only if the asymptotic value A∞ is treated as a fixed reference parameter; including its variation δA∞=δc would add a term to δE and break the first law, so the result is really about a specific normalization convention.
  • The same normalization strategy could be tried on regular black holes in higher dimensions, where the metric function also approaches a constant different from 1 and the ADM mass may not be the correct Hamiltonian charge.
  • One could test the integrated Smarr relation for these solutions under the same fixed generator; the paper states the relation but does not compute it for the new examples.
  • The construction suggests a general recipe: for any one-parameter family of static black holes, fixing the asymptotic clock determines the physical energy up to a constant, so apparent first-law violations can be traced to a missing normalization factor.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonsingular black hole solutions in Weyl-fixed 2D dilaton gravity, constructing a family A(x)=f(x)+c by specifying the dilaton potential W(φ)=A'(x). Using the Iyer–Wald covariant phase space formalism, it proposes that the Hamiltonian energy is E=-c/(2√A∞) (or E=-c/2 after setting A∞=1), with the Hawking temperature renormalized as T_H=A'(x_h)/(4π√A∞), and claims that this restores the first law δE=T_H δS for all such solutions. It also identifies the energy with the Casimir function C=-c/2. The paper attributes the first-law violation reported by Ai (Ref. [29]) to an incorrect choice of energy.

Significance. The intended contribution—a first-principles covariant-phase-space derivation of the first law for a broad family of nonsingular 2D black holes, with the energy fixed by the asymptotic normalization—is a timely and useful goal. The construction of explicit nonsingular solutions (sine-Gordon and arctan kinks) and the use of Wald entropy are strengths, as is the explicit computation of the symplectic potential and Noether charge in Appendix A. However, the central claim is not established because the variational normalization of A∞ is inconsistent with the solution family; the first law is effectively imposed by choosing δA∞=0. The Casimir identification also suffers from an integration-constant ambiguity. If corrected, the approach could still be valuable, but in the present form the conclusion is circular.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.C, Eqs. (58)–(68)] The variational treatment of A∞ is inconsistent. In Eq. (58), t^a is normalized by 1/√A∞ and δt^a=0 is imposed by declaring A∞ a fixed parameter. But for the solution family Eq. (9), A∞=lim_{x→∞}f(x)+c, so δA∞=δc. Thus Eq. (67), δE=-δc/(2√A∞)=δ(-c/(2√A∞)), is not the variation of the function E(c). Differentiating E(c) with A∞=A∞(c) gives an additional term cδc/(4A∞^{3/2}). The first-law check Eq. (73) holds only when this term vanishes, e.g. c=0. Alternatively, imposing δA∞=0 with δc≠0 is incompatible with A∞=f∞+c. This is not a derivation but a normalization convention chosen to force Eq. (73).
  2. [§IV, Eqs. (74)–(81)] The identification E=C depends on an unspecified integration constant. In Eq. (76), w(φ)=1/2∫^φ e^Q W dφ~ has no fixed lower limit. In Eq. (80), C=-1/2 A(x)+1/2∫^x A'(x~)dx~ = -c/2 - f(x0)/2 for lower limit x0. Equation (81) obtains -c/2 only by silently setting f(x0)=0. Without fixing this convention, the claimed match E=C is ambiguous.
  3. [§III.D, Eq. (73)] The first-law verification is vacuous under the stated assumptions. If A∞ is strictly fixed as a boundary parameter, then δA∞=0 combined with A∞=f∞+c forces δc=0, so both δE and δS vanish and Eq. (73) is an identity. The paper needs a variational principle in which c varies while the asymptotic normalization remains independent; this is not provided.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§III.C, Eq. (58)] The phrase 'A∞ should be treated as a fixed parameter' conflicts with A∞=lim_{x→∞} f(x)+c. Using different notation for the normalization constant (e.g., A_ref) and the asymptotic limit A∞ would make the two roles explicit.
  2. [§II.B] The ϕ⁴ kink example shown in Fig. 1 is referenced but no explicit potential or metric function is given in the text; add the corresponding formula.
  3. [§IV] The statement 'once the asymptotic time-translation generator is normalized with the reference choice A∞=1' is not justified for the explicit examples, where A∞=π/4 (sine-Gordon, c=-π/4) or π/2+c (arctan). Clarify how this normalization is achieved.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

First-law 'derivation' fixes δA∞=0 even though δA∞=δc, so Eq. (67) and hence the first law are imposed by the normalization convention.

specific steps
  1. other [Sec. III.C, Eq. (58); Sec. III.C, Eq. (67); Sec. III.D, Eq. (73)]
    "ta := 1√A∞ (∂/∂t)^a, δt^a = 0, where A∞ is the asymptotic value of the metric function and should be treated as a fixed parameter such that its variation is zero. ... δE=−δc/(2√A∞)=δ(−c/(2√A∞)). ... δE=−δc/(2√A∞)=THδS= A′(xh)/(4π√A∞) 2πδφh."

    For every solution in the family A(x)=f(x)+c, A∞=lim f+c, so any nontrivial variation δc changes A∞ by δA∞=δc. The claimed equality δ(−c/(2√A∞)) = −δc/(2√A∞) requires δA∞=0. If A∞ is allowed to vary, differentiating E(c,A∞(c)) adds the term cδc/(4A∞^{3/2}). The paper suppresses this term by declaring A∞ fixed, but that declaration is incompatible with δA=δc at infinity; alternatively it forces δc=0, making the first-law check vacuous. Thus Eq. (73) reproduces −δc/(2√A∞) only because the normalization convention was chosen to make it do so, rather than as an independent consequence of the Iyer-Wald calculation.

full rationale

The paper is largely self-contained: the Wald entropy S=2πφh follows directly from Eq. (54), the solution construction in Sec. II is explicit, and the Casimir comparison in Sec. IV is an independent computation modulo an integration-constant subtlety. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain. However, the central first-law derivation contains a circular step. Eq. (58) stipulates δA∞=0, but since A∞=lim f+c for the solution family, this condition either contradicts δA=δc or trivializes the variation. Eq. (67) then uses δA∞=0 to identify −δc/(2√A∞) with the exact variation of −c/(2√A∞); once δA∞=δc is included, an extra term appears and the first-law check Eq. (73) fails. The claimed restoration of the first law therefore reduces to the normalization convention rather than following invariantly from the covariant phase space formalism. This is partial circularity in the central claim, warranting a score of 6.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the standard Iyer-Wald formalism plus the ad hoc assumption that A∞ is fixed under variations. No new particles or entities are introduced. The free parameter c is the solution label, not a fitted constant.

free parameters (1)
  • c = not fitted; e.g., c=-π/4 for sine-Gordon example
    Integration constant in A=f(x)+c; it labels the solution and is the thermodynamic variable whose variation drives the first law.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The dilaton gauge φ=x (k=1) is chosen without loss of generality.
    Section II.A, Eq. (7). Assumes k≠0 and fixes the affine coordinate x; k=0 would give different solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper The asymptotic value A∞ is treated as a fixed parameter with δA∞=0 under variations.
    Section III.C, Eq. (58). This is load-bearing: since A∞=f∞+c, δA∞=δc, so the assumption is inconsistent with δA=δc and forces the first law.
  • domain assumption The potential W(φ) is chosen so that W' stays finite and W decays at infinity, giving regular asymptotically flat geometries.
    Section II.A, Eqs. (8)-(9). The entire solution class and its regularity depend on this.
  • standard math The Iyer-Wald formalism applies with the Hamiltonian charge defined by Eq. (59).
    Section III.A. Standard covariant phase space result.
  • standard math The entropy is given by the Wald formula S=2π φh.
    Section III.B. Standard for a φR action in two dimensions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12384 in / 23745 out tokens · 227967 ms · 2026-08-04T05:43:41.095079+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A central issue in the thermodynamics of nonsingular black holes is the apparent violation of the first law. In this work, we use 2D dilaton gravity as a simple theoretical setting to study this issue. We systematically construct a broad class of nonsingular black hole solutions with metric function $A(x)=f(x)+c$, through a procedure that is considerably simpler than in higher-dimensional theories. Using the Iyer-Wald covariant phase space formalism, we derive the correct energy formula and establish a consistent first law for this entire class of solutions. The apparent violation of the first law in a previous work arises because the energy used therein is not the Hamiltonian conjugate to the fixed time-translation generator adopted. Under the boundary conditions and normalization convention specified in the present work, the Iyer-Wald Hamiltonian energy is $E=-\frac{c}{2}$, and the first law is restored. Moreover, the energy formula agrees with the Casimir function in 2D dilaton gravity, thus confirming its interpretation as the physical black hole energy. Our results clarify the correct first law for 2D nonsingular black holes and may provide insights into the first law of nonsingular black holes in higher dimensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.21186 by Peng Yu, Yuan Zhong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Metric functions A(x) (left panel) and Ricci scalars R(x) (right panel) for the nonsingular black hole solutions with φ 4 kink (dotted), sine-Gordon kink (solid), and arctan kink (dashed) metric profiles. The parameters are chosen as c = −π/4 for the sine-Gordon solution and c = 0 for the φ 4 and arctan solutions. 1. Solution with sine-Gordon kink-like metric function Consider first the dilaton potential W… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Penrose diagram of the maximally extended space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 33 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Using Eq

    Solution with sine-Gordon kink-like metric function Consider first the dilaton potential W(φ) = 1 2 sechφ.(14) Since W (φ)> 0for all φ, the regularity condition at the horizon discussed in Section II is automatically satisfied. Using Eq. (5) withφ=x, we obtain A(x) = arctan(ex) +c,(15) where c is an integration constant. For the special choice c =−π/4, th...

  2. [2]

    Integrating Eq.(5), we obtain A(x) = arctanx+c.(19) For−π 2 <c< π 2, the metric function admits one horizon at x =−tanc

    Solution with arctan kink-like metric function As a second example, consider the potential W(φ) = 1 1 +φ 2.(18) Again W (φ)is strictly positive, so the horizon regularity condition is satisfied automatically. Integrating Eq.(5), we obtain A(x) = arctanx+c.(19) For−π 2 <c< π 2, the metric function admits one horizon at x =−tanc . For other values ofc, ther...

  3. [3]

    Quantumgravityintwo-dimensions: exact solution of the Jackiw model,

    M.Henneaux,“Quantumgravityintwo-dimensions: exact solution of the Jackiw model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 959– 962 (1985)

    1985

  4. [4]

    Regularizing the Functional Integral in 2D Quantum Gravity,

    N. E. Mavromatos and J. L. Miramontes, “Regularizing the Functional Integral in 2D Quantum Gravity,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 1847 (1989)

    1989

  5. [5]

    Quantization of a theory of 2D dilaton gravity,

    S. P. de Alwis, “Quantization of a theory of 2D dilaton gravity,” Phys. Lett. B289, 278–282 (1992), arXiv:hep- th/9205069

    arXiv 1992

  6. [6]

    Formation and evaporation of a naked singularity in 2D gravity,

    C. Vaz and L. Witten, “Formation and evaporation of a naked singularity in 2D gravity,” Phys. Lett. B325, 27–32 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9311133

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Do naked singularities form?

    C. Vaz and L. Witten, “Do naked singularities form?” Class. Quant. Grav.13, L59–L65 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9511018

    arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Black Holes in Two Space-time Dimensions,

    J. David Brown, M. Henneaux, and C. Teitelboim, “Black Holes in Two Space-time Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D33, 319–323 (1986)

    1986

  9. [9]

    Black hole evaporation in (1+1)-dimensions,

    J. G. Russo, L. Susskind, and L. Thorlacius, “Black hole evaporation in (1+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B292, 13–18 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9201074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  10. [10]

    Evanescent black holes,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. B. Giddings, J. A. Harvey, and A. Strominger, “Evanescent black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 45, R1005 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9111056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  11. [11]

    Liouville models of black hole evaporation,

    A. Bilal and C. G. Callan, Jr., “Liouville models of black hole evaporation,” Nucl. Phys. B394, 73–100 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9205089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  12. [12]

    Cosmic censorship in 2D gravity,

    J. G. Russo, L. Susskind, and L. Thorlacius, “Cosmic censorship in 2D gravity,” Phys. Rev. D47, 533–539 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9209012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  13. [13]

    Quasinormal modes of a two-dimensional black hole,

    S. Estrada-Jiménez, J. R. Gómez-Díaz, and A. López- Ortega, “Quasinormal modes of a two-dimensional black hole,” Gen. Rel. Grav.45, 2239–2250 (2013), arXiv:1308.5943

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Lower- Dimensional Black Hole Chemistry,

    A. M. Frassino, R. B. Mann, and J. R. Mureika, “Lower- Dimensional Black Hole Chemistry,” Phys. Rev. D92, 124069 (2015), arXiv:1509.05481

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Quantum-corrected 2D Horava-Lifshitz black hole entropy,

    M. A. Anacleto, D. Bazeia, F. A. Brito, and J. C. Mota- Silva, “Quantum-corrected 2D Horava-Lifshitz black hole entropy,” Adv. High Energy Phys.2016, 8465759 (2016), arXiv:1512.07886

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,

    J. Barenboim, A. V. Frolov, and G. Kunstatter, “No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032055 (2024), arXiv:2405.13373. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Revisit on two-dimensional self-gravitating kinks: superpotential formalism and linear stability,

    Y. Zhong, “Revisit on two-dimensional self-gravitating kinks: superpotential formalism and linear stability,” JHEP04, 118 (2021), arXiv:2101.10928

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Singular Pöschl-Teller II potentials and gravi- tating kinks,

    Y. Zhong, “Singular Pöschl-Teller II potentials and gravi- tating kinks,” JHEP09, 165 (2022), arXiv:2207.12681

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Kink solutions in generalized 2D dilaton gravity,

    Y. Zhong, H. Guo, and Y. X. Liu, “Kink solutions in generalized 2D dilaton gravity,” Phys. Lett. B849, 138471 (2024), arXiv:2308.13786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Rosen-Morse po- tential and gravitating kinks,

    H. Wang, Y. Zhong, and Z. Q. Wang, “Rosen-Morse po- tential and gravitating kinks,” Phys. Lett. B858, 139071 (2024), arXiv:2409.14761

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Gravitating kinks with asymptotically flat metrics,

    Z. Q. Wang, Y. Zhong, and H. Wang, “Gravitating kinks with asymptotically flat metrics,” EPL146, 59001 (2024), arXiv:2402.05486

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Shape-invariant potentials and singular spaces,

    P. Yu, Y. Zhong, H. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, and M. Y. Zhang, “Shape-invariant potentials and singular spaces,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1286 (2025), arXiv:2505.16108

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    One-Dimensional Relativistic Self- Gravitating Systems,

    R. B. Mann, “One-Dimensional Relativistic Self- Gravitating Systems,” Entropy26, 612 (2024), arXiv:2504.06515

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Dila- ton gravity in two-dimensions,

    D. Grumiller, W. Kummer, and D. V. Vassilevich, “Dila- ton gravity in two-dimensions,” Phys. Rept.369, 327–430 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0204253

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Les Houches lectures on black holes,

    A. Strominger, “Les Houches lectures on black holes,” inNATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Sum- mer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Sta- tistical Mechanics and Field Theory(1994) arXiv:hep- th/9501071

    arXiv 1994

  26. [26]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity,

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 252, 343–356 (1985)

    1985

  27. [27]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B126, 41–45 (1983)

    1983

  28. [28]

    Semiclassical gravity in (1+1)-dimensions,

    R. B. Mann, S. M. Morsink, A. E. Sikkema, and T. G. Steele, “Semiclassical gravity in (1+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D43, 3948–3957 (1991)

    1991

  29. [29]

    Two-dimensional quantum gravity in Minkowski space,

    T. Banks and M. O’Loughlin, “Two-dimensional quantum gravity in Minkowski space,” Nucl. Phys. B362, 649–664 (1991)

    1991

  30. [30]

    Deformations of JT gravity and phase transi- tions,

    E. Witten, “Deformations of JT gravity and phase transi- tions,” arXiv preprint (2020), arXiv:2006.03494

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Nonsingular black hole in 2D asymptoti- cally flat spacetime,

    W. Y. Ai, “Nonsingular black hole in 2D asymptoti- cally flat spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D104, 044064 (2021), arXiv:2006.07962

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Regular black holes with cosmological constant,

    W. J. Mo, R. G. Cai, and R. K. Su, “Regular black holes with cosmological constant,” Commun. Theor. Phys.46, 453–460 (2006)

    2006

  33. [33]

    Corrected form of the first law of thermodynamics for regular black holes,

    M. S. Ma and R. Zhao, “Corrected form of the first law of thermodynamics for regular black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 245014 (2014), arXiv:1411.0833

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Noncommu- tative Black Hole Thermodynamics,

    R. Banerjee, B. R. Majhi, and S. Samanta, “Noncommu- tative Black Hole Thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D77, 124035 (2008), arXiv:0801.3583

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Thermodynam- ics of the Bardeen regular black hole,

    M. Akbar, N. Salem, and S. A. Hussein, “Thermodynam- ics of the Bardeen regular black hole,” Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 070401 (2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    First law and Smarr formula of black hole mechanics in nonlinear gauge theories,

    Y. Zhang and S. J. Gao, “First law and Smarr formula of black hole mechanics in nonlinear gauge theories,” Class. Quant. Grav.35, 145007 (2018), arXiv:1610.01237

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Thermodynamics of the Bardeen Black Hole in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    C. Li, C. Fang, M. He, J.C. Ding, and J. B. Deng, “Thermodynamics of the Bardeen Black Hole in Anti-de Sitter Space,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A34, 1950336 (2019), arXiv:1812.02567

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Bardeen black hole chemistry,

    A. G. Tzikas, “Bardeen black hole chemistry,” Phys. Lett. B788, 219–224 (2019), arXiv:1811.01104

    arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Black hole thermody- namics in the presence of nonlinear electromagnetic fields,

    A. Bokulić, T. Jurić, and I. Smolić, “Black hole thermody- namics in the presence of nonlinear electromagnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. D103, 124059 (2021), arXiv:2102.06213

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,

    C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo, and Y. G. Miao, “Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62, 202 (2023), arXiv:2303.11696

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Euclidean and Hamiltonian thermodynamics for regular black holes,

    F. Simović and I. Soranidis, “Euclidean and Hamiltonian thermodynamics for regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 044029 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Ther- modynamics of black holes featuring primary scalar hair,

    A. Bakopoulos, N. Chatzifotis, and T. Karakasis, “Ther- modynamics of black holes featuring primary scalar hair,” Phys. Rev. D110, L101502 (2024), arXiv:2404.07522

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Ther- modynamics of four-dimensional regular black holes with an infinite tower of regularized curvature corrections,

    A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, and U. Hernandez-Vera, “Ther- modynamics of four-dimensional regular black holes with an infinite tower of regularized curvature corrections,” Phys. Rev. D112, 064036 (2025), arXiv:2505.23467

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,” Phys. Rev. D50, 846–864 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9403028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  45. [45]

    Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,

    R. M. Wald, “Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,” Phys. Rev. D48, R3427–R3431 (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9307038

    arXiv 1993

  46. [46]

    Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics from Extended Iyer-Wald Formalism,

    Y. Xiao, Y. Tian, and Y. X. Liu, “Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics from Extended Iyer-Wald Formalism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 021401 (2024), arXiv:2308.12630

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Coupling Constants as Con- served Charges in Black Hole Thermodynamics,

    K. Hajian and B. Tekin, “Coupling Constants as Con- served Charges in Black Hole Thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 191401 (2024), arXiv:2309.07634

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Non-singular general relativistic gravita- tional collapse,

    J. Bardeen, “Non-singular general relativistic gravita- tional collapse,” presented at GR5, Tiflis, U.S.S.R., and- published in the conference proceedings in the U.S.S.R. (1968)

    1968

  49. [49]

    Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynam- ics,

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5056–5059 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9911046

    arXiv 1998

  50. [50]

    Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0506126

    arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Regular black holes from analytic f (F 2),

    Z. C. Li and H. Lü, “Regular black holes from analytic f (F 2),” Eur. Phys. J. C83, 755 (2023), arXiv:2303.16924

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Regular electric black holes from Einstein-Maxwell-scalar gravity,

    Z. C. Li and H. Lü, “Regular electric black holes from Einstein-Maxwell-scalar gravity,” Phys. Rev. D110, 104046 (2024), arXiv:2407.07952

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Black hole entropy in scalar-tensor and f (R)gravity: An Overview,

    V. Faraoni, “Black hole entropy in scalar-tensor and f (R)gravity: An Overview,” Entropy12, 1246 (2010), arXiv:1005.2327

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    The First law of black hole mechanics in Einstein-Maxwell and Einstein-Yang-Mills theories,

    S. J. Gao, “The First law of black hole mechanics in Einstein-Maxwell and Einstein-Yang-Mills theories,” Phys. Rev. D68, 044016 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0304094

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003