REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Sparse Neural Networks Better Hard Sample Learners?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While deep learning has demonstrated impressive progress, it remains a daunting challenge to learn from hard samples as these samples are usually noisy and intricate. These hard samples play a crucial role in the optimal performance of deep neural networks. Most research on Sparse Neural Networks (SNNs) has focused on standard training data, leaving gaps in understanding their effectiveness on complex and challenging data. This paper's extensive investigation across scenarios reveals that most SNNs trained on challenging samples can often match or surpass dense models in accuracy at certain sparsity levels, especially with limited data. We observe that layer-wise density ratios tend to play an important role in SNN performance, particularly for methods that train from scratch without pre-trained initialization. These insights enhance our understanding of SNNs' behavior and potential for efficient learning approaches in data-centric AI. Our code is publicly available at: \url{https://github.com/QiaoXiao7282/hard_sample_learners}.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Interplay Between Sparsity and Training in Deep Reinforcement Learning
The best sparse neural architecture for deep RL agents depends on whether hidden-layer weights are fixed or learned, and spatial sparsity is not always best even in spatially-structured games.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.