pith. sign in

arxiv: 1701.03219 · v2 · pith:D56WGNVCnew · submitted 2017-01-12 · ⚛️ physics.pop-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Reply to Burridge & Linden: Hot water may freeze sooner than cold

classification ⚛️ physics.pop-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords watereffectburridgecoolinglindenonlyratesignificant
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In a recent paper in Scientific Reports, Burridge \& Linden misinterpret the Mpemba effect as a statement about the rate of cooling of liquid water, when it is in fact a statement about the rate of freezing of water. Debunking an obviously absurd claim about cooling, they miss the significant effect, its only quantitative experimental study and a theoretical argument that explains the effect and predicts that it occurs only for "hard" water (water with significant dissolved Mg and Ca bicarbonates). This prediction remains to be tested.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mpemba effect in a sheared granular gas with velocity-dependent restitution

    cond-mat.soft 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A sheared granular gas with velocity-dependent restitution exhibits the Mpemba effect in temperature and multiple Mpemba effects in viscosity, demonstrated via Grad's moment method analysis of relaxation after shear r...

  2. The Mpemba effect likes to hit a wall

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A hard boundary drives the 1D Mpemba effect for polynomial potentials, not the double-well shape.