pith. sign in

arxiv: 1009.2755 · v3 · pith:D5F7ZVHVnew · submitted 2010-09-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · physics.data-an

Error estimation in astronomy: A guide

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM physics.data-an
keywords errormethodsestimationestimateparameterdiscussederrorsmodel-based
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:D5F7ZVHV Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{D5F7ZVHV}

Prints a linked pith:D5F7ZVHV badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Estimating errors is a crucial part of any scientific analysis. Whenever a parameter is estimated (model-based or not), an error estimate is necessary. Any parameter estimate that is given without an error estimate is meaningless. Nevertheless, many (undergraduate or graduate) students have to teach such methods for error estimation to themselves when working scientifically for the first time. This manuscript presents an easy-to-understand overview of different methods for error estimation that are applicable to both model-based and model-independent parameter estimates. These methods are not discussed in detail, but their basics are briefly outlined and their assumptions carefully noted. In particular, the methods for error estimation discussed are grid search, varying $\chi^2$, the Fisher matrix, Monte-Carlo methods, error propagation, data resampling, and bootstrapping. Finally, a method is outlined how to propagate measurement errors through complex data-reduction pipelines.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A comparison of methods for Poisson regression in the presence of background

    stat.ME 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    Joint parametric fitting of source plus background yields unbiased parameters and valid Cash statistics, while wstat and fixed-background methods introduce significant bias in low-count regimes.

  2. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: stellar mass growth in massive galaxy clusters from DR5 over the past 7 billion years

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Composite cluster stellar mass functions show marginal M* evolution at high z and a factor of 2.5 growth in stellar mass fraction from z=0.8 to 0.2 after accounting for halo mass growth.