Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Revision of the quasiclassical boundary resistance of the metal/superconductor interface

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/0601212 v1 pith:D6TDEUUT submitted 2006-01-10 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords boundaryinterfacequasiclassicaltransparencyconditionsdiscrepancydiscussedmetal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transparency of the metal/superconductor interface is discussed in a frame of the Kupryanov-Lukichev (K-L) quasiclassical boundary conditions. It is shown that the original K-L boundary transparency is expressed via the single-channel Landauer conductance. It is a source of dramatic discrepancy between the theory and experiments on the superconducting proximity effect. The improved multi-channel derivation is proposed for the boundary conditions, which rehabilitates consistency of the quasiclassical approach to the boundary transparency problem, and eliminates at least an order of magnitude of discrepancy between the theory and the experiment. The influence of the interface roughness and wave function symmetry mismatch at the boundary on the interface transparency is discussed. Warning is made to theories that use the quasiclassical boundary conditions with the interface transparencies close to unity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools