REVIEW 1 cited by
Structured Reasoning for Fairness: A Multi-Agent Approach to Bias Detection in Textual Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
From disinformation spread by AI chatbots to AI recommendations that inadvertently reinforce stereotypes, textual bias poses a significant challenge to the trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we propose a multi-agent framework that systematically identifies biases by disentangling each statement as fact or opinion, assigning a bias intensity score, and providing concise, factual justifications. Evaluated on 1,500 samples from the WikiNPOV dataset, the framework achieves 84.9% accuracy$\unicode{x2014}$an improvement of 13.0% over the zero-shot baseline$\unicode{x2014}$demonstrating the efficacy of explicitly modeling fact versus opinion prior to quantifying bias intensity. By combining enhanced detection accuracy with interpretable explanations, this approach sets a foundation for promoting fairness and accountability in modern language models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CEA-LIST at CheckThat! 2025: Evaluating LLMs as Detectors of Bias and Opinion in Text
Few-shot prompted LLMs rivaled fine-tuned smaller models in multilingual subjectivity detection, winning the Arabic and Polish tracks of CheckThat! 2025.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.