pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18638 · v1 · pith:D7AQY7Z3new · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.other· physics.atom-ph· physics.comp-ph· physics.optics

Electronic mechanism of sub-100-fs demagnetization induced by a femtosecond light pulse

Konrad J. Kapcia , Victor Tkachenko , Flavio Capotondi , Alexander Lichtenstein , Serguei Molodtsov , Przemys{\l}aw Piekarz , Beata Ziaja This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.otherphysics.atom-phphysics.comp-phphysics.optics
keywords ultrafast demagnetizationfemtosecond light pulseselectronic excitationmagneto-sensitive bandnon-equilibrium conditionsradiation-induced magnetismsub-100 fs dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Light pulses demagnetize magnetic domains in under 100 fs by exciting and redistributing electrons in the magneto-sensitive band.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates demagnetization in a single magnetic domain triggered by light pulses lasting a few to tens of femtoseconds with photon energies from optical to X-ray regimes under strongly non-equilibrium conditions. It establishes that magnetization decreases in the sub-100 fs range primarily because the pulse excites the electronic system and electrons redistribute within the magneto-sensitive band. A sympathetic reader would care because the short timescales rule out slower phonon or exchange processes, isolating an electronic route for ultrafast magnetic control. This matters for next-generation storage devices and switches that need radiation-driven response without thermal delays.

Core claim

We predicted a loss of magnetization in the sub-100-fs range in all cases, primarily due to the excitation of the electronic system and the subsequent redistribution of electrons within the magneto-sensitive band. The considered timescales were too short for phonon-mediated processes or inter-site Heisenberg exchange processes to contribute significantly.

What carries the argument

Electronic excitation of the system followed by redistribution of electrons within the magneto-sensitive band

If this is right

  • Demagnetization occurs on sub-100 fs timescales for light pulses across optical and X-ray energies.
  • Phonon-mediated processes are irrelevant for this rapid loss of magnetization.
  • Inter-site Heisenberg exchange processes cannot contribute on these timescales.
  • Radiation-driven magnetization control is possible with high accuracy at sub-100 fs scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same electronic redistribution may control ultrafast dynamics in a wider set of ferromagnetic materials.
  • Adjusting pulse length and photon energy could enable selective magnetization changes without lattice heating.
  • Time-resolved probes of the magneto-sensitive band could test the redistribution step directly.

Load-bearing premise

Phonon-mediated processes and inter-site Heisenberg exchange processes do not contribute significantly on sub-100 fs timescales.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that sub-100 fs demagnetization fails to occur when electronic redistribution is blocked or when only phonon contributions are allowed would settle whether the electronic mechanism is correct.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18638 by Alexander Lichtenstein, Beata Ziaja, Flavio Capotondi, Konrad J. Kapcia, Przemys{\l}aw Piekarz, Serguei Molodtsov, Victor Tkachenko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Transient electronic and magnetic properties of Co predicted by XSPIN in an single magnetic domain under optical irradiation with 2 eV pulse or X-ray irradiation with 1000 eV pulse (as labeled), both of 70 fs FWHM duration. (a) number of deep-shell holes produced (per atom; spin-resolved), (b) number of low-energy electrons per atom (with energy below the cutoff of 15 eV, spin-resolved), (c) electronic tem… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Transient electronic and magnetic properties of Co predicted by XSPIN in a single magnetic domain under optical irradiation with 2 eV pulse or X-ray irradiation with 1000 eV pulse (as labeled), both of 2 fs FWHM duration. Other simulation parameters are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Transient electronic and magnetic properties of Ni predicted by XSPIN in a single magnetic domain under optical irradiation with 2 eV pulse or X-ray irradiation with 1000 eV pulse (as labeled), both of 70 fs FWHM duration. Other simulation parameters are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Transient electronic and magnetic properties of Ni predicted by XSPIN in a single magnetic domain under optical irradiation with 2 eV pulse or X-ray irradiation with 1000 eV pulse (as labeled), both of 2 fs FWHM duration. Other simulation parameters are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A quantitative understanding of the processes that trigger light-induced demagnetization on ultrashort timescales is crucial for achieving an ultrafast, radiation-controlled magnetic response in materials. This milestone is essential for developing next-generation magnetic storage devices and ultrafast magnetic switches. In this theoretical study, we investigated demagnetization triggered in a single magnetic domain by light pulses ranging from a few to a few tens of femtoseconds in duration, with photon energies spanning the optical and X-ray regimes, under strongly non-equilibrium conditions. We predicted a loss of magnetization in the sub-100-fs range in all cases, primarily due to the excitation of the electronic system and the subsequent redistribution of electrons within the magneto-sensitive band. The considered timescales were too short for phonon-mediated processes or inter-site Heisenberg exchange processes to contribute significantly. These findings pave the way for highly accurate, radiation-driven magnetization control in magnetic materials at sub-100-femtosecond timescales with potential practical applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a theoretical investigation of light-induced demagnetization in a single magnetic domain using femtosecond pulses (few to tens of fs duration) spanning optical to X-ray photon energies under strongly non-equilibrium conditions. The central claim is a predicted magnetization loss on sub-100 fs timescales arising primarily from electronic excitation followed by intra-band electron redistribution in the magneto-sensitive band; the authors state that the timescales are too short for phonon-mediated processes or inter-site Heisenberg exchange to contribute significantly.

Significance. If the electronic mechanism and the exclusion of slower channels can be rigorously demonstrated, the result would provide a concrete route to sub-100 fs radiation-controlled magnetization switching, with direct relevance to ultrafast magnetic storage and spintronic devices. The work correctly identifies the need for a quantitative understanding of trigger processes on these timescales and frames a falsifiable prediction, but the absence of supporting calculations limits its immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the statement that 'the considered timescales were too short for phonon-mediated processes or inter-site Heisenberg exchange processes to contribute significantly' is presented without any rate estimates, Fermi-golden-rule calculations, or control simulations that reintroduce these channels and quantify their magnetization loss within the first 100 fs. This assumption is load-bearing for the attribution of the entire sub-100 fs demagnetization to the electronic redistribution mechanism alone.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and main text: no explicit equations, approximations, or numerical implementation of the electronic dynamics model are supplied, nor is there validation against existing experimental demagnetization traces or extended simulations that would allow independent assessment of the predicted magnetization loss magnitude and its dependence on pulse duration and photon energy.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by a single sentence indicating the type of electronic-structure method or dynamical framework employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the statement that 'the considered timescales were too short for phonon-mediated processes or inter-site Heisenberg exchange processes to contribute significantly' is presented without any rate estimates, Fermi-golden-rule calculations, or control simulations that reintroduce these channels and quantify their magnetization loss within the first 100 fs. This assumption is load-bearing for the attribution of the entire sub-100 fs demagnetization to the electronic redistribution mechanism alone.

    Authors: We agree that the claim would be strengthened by quantitative support. Our statement rests on established literature timescales (phonon-spin relaxation typically 1-10 ps; inter-site exchange dynamics not dominant for intra-band electronic redistribution in a single domain on sub-100 fs). To address the concern directly, we will add order-of-magnitude rate estimates based on Fermi's golden rule for spin-phonon coupling and a short discussion of why Heisenberg exchange does not contribute appreciably in the present electronic-only model. These additions will appear in the revised abstract and a new paragraph in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: no explicit equations, approximations, or numerical implementation of the electronic dynamics model are supplied, nor is there validation against existing experimental demagnetization traces or extended simulations that would allow independent assessment of the predicted magnetization loss magnitude and its dependence on pulse duration and photon energy.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript version does not present the governing equations or numerical details in the main text. In revision we will insert the key equations for the non-equilibrium electron redistribution within the magneto-sensitive band, the approximations employed, and a concise description of the numerical implementation. We will also add a comparison to published optical demagnetization data and additional analysis showing the dependence of the predicted sub-100 fs loss on pulse duration and photon energy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the claimed derivation

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical study deriving sub-100-fs demagnetization from modeling of electronic excitation and subsequent intra-band electron redistribution under non-equilibrium conditions induced by light pulses. The assertion that phonon-mediated and inter-site Heisenberg processes are negligible is stated explicitly as following from the ultrashort timescales considered, without any quoted reduction showing the main magnetization-loss prediction to be equivalent to its inputs by construction, a fitted parameter, or a self-citation chain. No self-definitional, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming patterns are exhibited in the provided abstract or claims. The derivation remains self-contained as an output of the electronic dynamics simulation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; model details such as band structure assumptions or non-equilibrium electron dynamics are not stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5743 in / 1104 out tokens · 33146 ms · 2026-05-20T08:56:41.930932+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Bigot, J.-Y

    Beaurepaire, E., Merle, J.-C., Daunois, A. & Bigot, J.-Y . Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel.Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250–4253 (1996). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4250

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4250 1996

  2. [2]

    & Rasing, T

    Kirilyuk, A., Kimel, A. & Rasing, T. Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order.Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2731–2784 (2010). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.2731 2010

  3. [3]

    Mat.9, 259–265 (2010)

    Koopmans, B.et al.Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser-induced demagnetization.Nat. Mat.9, 259–265 (2010). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2593

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2593 2010

  4. [4]

    Commun.3, 1100 (2012)

    Pfau, B.et al.Ultrafast optical demagnetization manipulates nanoscale spin structure in domain walls.Nat. Commun.3, 1100 (2012). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2108

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms2108 2012

  5. [5]

    Sander, D.et al.The 2017 Magnetism Roadmap.J. Phys. D50, 363001 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6463/aa81a1

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the wa- ter window,

    Ackermann, W.et al.Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the water window.Nat. Photonics1, 336–342 (2007). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.76

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.76 2007

  7. [7]

    First lasing and operation of an ˚Angstrom-wavelength free-electron laser,

    Emma, P.et al.First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser.Nat. Photonics4, 641–647 (2010). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.176

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.176 2010

  8. [8]

    First light from SACLA.Nat

    Pile, D. First light from SACLA.Nat. Photonics5, 456–457 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton. 2011.178

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton 2011

  9. [9]

    Allaria, E.et al.Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet. Nat. Photonics6, 699–704 (2012). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.233

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.233 2012

  10. [10]

    Gutt, C.et al.Single-pulse resonant magnetic scattering using a soft X-ray free-electron laser.Phys. Rev. B81, 100401(R) (2010). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.100401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.100401 2010

  11. [11]

    Wang, T.et al.Femtosecond single-shot imaging of nanoscale ferromagnetic order in Co/Pd multilayers using resonant X-ray holography.Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 267403 (2012). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108. 267403. 7/11

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108 2012

  12. [13]

    Wu, B.et al.Elimination of X-ray diffraction through stimulated x-ray transmission.Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 027401 (2016). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.027401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.027401 2016

  13. [14]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976004

    Willems, F.et al.Multi-color imaging of magnetic Co/Pt heterostructures.Structural Dynamics4, 014301 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976004

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4976004 2017

  14. [15]

    Chen, Z.et al.Ultrafast self-induced X-Ray transparency and loss of magnetic diffraction.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 137403 (2018). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.137403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.137403 2018

  15. [16]

    Schneider, M.et al.Ultrafast demagnetization dominates fluence dependence of magnetic scattering at Co M edges.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 127201 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.127201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.127201 2020

  16. [17]

    Stamm, C.et al.Femtosecond modification of electron localization and transfer of angular momentum in nickel.Nat. Mat. 6, 740–743 (2007). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1985

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat1985 2007

  17. [18]

    Hennes, M.et al.Time-resolved XUV absorption spectroscopy and magnetic circular dichroism at the Ni M 2,3-edges. Appl. Sci.11, 325 (2021). URLhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11010325

    work page doi:10.3390/app11010325 2021

  18. [19]

    Nano Letters22, 4452–4458 (2022)

    Yao, K.et al.All-optical switching on the nanometer scale excited and probed with femtosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses. Nano Letters22, 4452–4458 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01060

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01060 2022

  19. [20]

    Ciuciulkaite, A.et al.Magnetic and all-optical switching properties of amorphous TbxCo100−x alloys.Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 104418 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.104418

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.104418 2020

  20. [21]

    & Oppeneer, P

    Carva, K., Legut, D. & Oppeneer, P. M. Influence of laser-excited electron distributions on the x-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectra: Implications for femtosecond demagnetization in ni.EPL86, 57002 (2009). URL https://doi. org/10.1209/0295-5075/86/57002

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/86/57002 2009

  21. [22]

    Rösner, B.et al.Simultaneous two-color snapshot view on ultrafast charge and spin dynamics in a Fe–Cu–Ni tri-layer. Struct. Dyn.7, 054302 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/4.0000033

    work page doi:10.1063/4.0000033 2020

  22. [23]

    Müller, L.et al.Exploring ultrafast magnetism by single shot x-ray imaging of magnetic quasiparticles.Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 234801 (2013). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.234801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.234801 2013

  23. [24]

    Gutt, C.et al.Resonant magnetic scattering with soft x-ray pulses from a free-electron laser operating at 1.59 nm.Phys. Rev. B79, 212406 (2009). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.212406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.212406 2009

  24. [25]

    & Meier, F

    Vaterlaus, A., Beutler, T. & Meier, F. Spin-lattice relaxation time of ferromagnetic gadolinium determined with time- resolved spin-polarized photoemission.Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 3314–3317 (1991). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.67.3314

    work page 1991

  25. [26]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602094

    Eich, S.et al.Band structure evolution during the ultrafast ferromagnetic-paramagnetic phase transition in cobalt.Science Advances3, e1602094 (2017). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602094

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602094 2017

  26. [27]

    Probst, H.et al.Unraveling femtosecond spin and charge dynamics with extreme ultraviolet transverse moke spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Research6, 013107 (2024). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013107 2024

  27. [28]

    Schellekens, A. J. & Koopmans, B. Comparing ultrafast demagnetization rates between competing models for finite temperature magnetism.Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 217204 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.217204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2013

  28. [29]

    & Scherz, A

    Stöhr, J. & Scherz, A. Creation of X-ray transparency of matter by stimulated elastic forward scattering.Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 107402 (2015). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.107402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.107402 2015

  29. [30]

    & Dallera, C

    Carpene, E., Hedayat, H., Boschini, F. & Dallera, C. Ultrafast demagnetization of metals: Collapsed exchange versus col- lective excitations.Phys. Rev. B91, 174414 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.174414

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.174414 2015

  30. [31]

    & Legut, D

    Korniienko, I., Nieves, P., Fraile, A., Iglesias, R. & Legut, D. Computational study of elastic waves generated by ultrafast demagnetization in fcc Ni.Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023311 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.6.023311

    work page 2024

  31. [32]

    F.et al.Femtosecond x-ray-induced explosion of C60 at extreme intensity.Nat

    Murphy, B. F.et al.Femtosecond x-ray-induced explosion of C60 at extreme intensity.Nat. Commun.5, 4281 (2014). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5281

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5281 2014

  32. [33]

    R.et al.Ultrafast nonthermal heating of water initiated by an x-ray free-electron laser.PNAS115, 5652–5657 (2018)

    Beyerlein, K. R.et al.Ultrafast nonthermal heating of water initiated by an x-ray free-electron laser.PNAS115, 5652–5657 (2018). URLhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1711220115. 8/11

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1711220115 2018

  33. [34]

    J.et al.The role of transient resonances for ultra-fast imaging of single sucrose nanoclusters.Nat

    Ho, P. J.et al.The role of transient resonances for ultra-fast imaging of single sucrose nanoclusters.Nat. Commun.11, 167 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13905-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13905-9 2020

  34. [35]

    Hourahine, B.et al.DFTB+, a software package for efficient approximate density functional theory based atomistic simulations.J. Chem. Phys.152, 124101 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143190

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5143190 2020

  35. [36]

    & Fähnle, M

    Steiauf, D. & Fähnle, M. Elliott-Yafet mechanism and the discussion of femtosecond magnetization dynamics.Phys. Rev. B79, 140401 (2009). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.140401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.140401 2009

  36. [37]

    & Oppeneer, P

    Carva, K., Battiato, M. & Oppeneer, P. M. Ab initio investigation of the Elliott-Yafet electron-phonon mechanism in laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization.Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 207201 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.207201

    work page 2011

  37. [38]

    & Schneider, H

    Baral, A., V ollmar, S., Kaltenborn, S. & Schneider, H. C. Re-examination of the Elliott-Yafet spin-relaxation mechanism. New J. Phys.18, 023012 (2016). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023012

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023012 2016

  38. [39]

    Krauß, M.et al.Ultrafast demagnetization of ferromagnetic transition metals: The role of the Coulomb interaction.Phys. Rev. B80, 180407 (2009). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.180407

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.180407 2009

  39. [40]

    K., Elliott, P., Sharma, S

    Krieger, K., Dewhurst, J. K., Elliott, P., Sharma, S. & Gross, E. K. U. Laser-induced demagnetization at ultrashort time scales: Predictions of TDDFT.J. Chem. Theory Comput.11, 4870–4874 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.jctc.5b00621

    work page 2015

  40. [41]

    Turgut, E.et al.Stoner versus Heisenberg: Ultrafast exchange reduction and magnon generation during laser-induced demagnetization.Phys. Rev. B94, 220408 (2016). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.220408

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.220408 2016

  41. [42]

    & Wang, L.-W

    Chen, Z. & Wang, L.-W. Role of initial magnetic disorder: A time-dependent ab initio study of ultrafast demagnetization mechanisms.Sci. Adv.5, eaau8000 (2019). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8000

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau8000 2019

  42. [43]

    R., Turkowski, V ., Zhang, G

    Acharya, S. R., Turkowski, V ., Zhang, G. P. & Rahman, T. S. Ultrafast electron correlations and memory effects at work: Femtosecond demagnetization in Ni.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 017202 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.017202

    work page 2020

  43. [44]

    & Marques, M

    Barros, T., Tancogne-Dejean, N., Berakdar, J. & Marques, M. A. L. Impact of electron correlation on the light-induced demagnetization of elemental ferromagnetic metals.Eur . Phys. J. B95, 175 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjb/s10051-022-00433-7

    work page 2020

  44. [45]

    & Leègue, S

    Scheid, P., Sharma, S., Malinowski, G., Mangin, S. & Leègue, S. Ab initio study of helicity-dependent light-induced demagnetization: From the optical regime to the extreme ultraviolet regime.Nano Letters21, 1943–1947 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04166

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04166 1943

  45. [46]

    I., Dewhurst, J

    Harris-Lee, E. I., Dewhurst, J. K., Shallcross, S. & Sharma, S. Spin vacuum switching.Science Advances10, eado6390 (2024). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado6390

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado6390 2024

  46. [47]

    Mrudul, M. S. & Oppeneer, P. M. Ab initio investigation of laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization of L10 FePt: Intensity dependence and importance of electron coherence.Phys. Rev. B109, 144418 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.109.144418

    work page 2024

  47. [48]

    & Oppeneer, P

    Battiato, M., Carva, K. & Oppeneer, P. M. Superdiffusive spin transport as a mechanism of ultrafast demagnetization.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 027203 (2010). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.027203 2010

  48. [49]

    J.et al.Modeling of ultrafast x-ray induced magnetization dynamics in magnetic multilayer systems.npj Comput

    Kapcia, K. J.et al.Modeling of ultrafast x-ray induced magnetization dynamics in magnetic multilayer systems.npj Comput. Mater .8, 212 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00895-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00895-4 2022

  49. [51]

    J.et al.Ultrafast demagnetization in bulk nickel induced by x-ray photons tuned to Ni M3 and L3 absorption edges.Sci

    Kapcia, K. J.et al.Ultrafast demagnetization in bulk nickel induced by x-ray photons tuned to Ni M3 and L3 absorption edges.Sci. Rep.14, 473 (2024). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50467-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50467-9 2024

  50. [52]

    J., Lipp, V ., Tkachenko, V

    Kapcia, K. J., Lipp, V ., Tkachenko, V . & Ziaja, B. Theoretical analysis of x-ray free-electron-laser experimental data using Monte-Carlo and molecular-dynamics based computational tools. In Yáñez, M. & Boyd, R. J. (eds.)Comprehensive Computational Chemistry, vol. 3, 858–864 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2024), 1st edn. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-821978...

    work page 2024

  51. [53]

    J., Lipp, V

    Antunes, S., Kapcia, K. J., Lipp, V . & Ziaja, B. Ultrafast transitions in x-ray irradiated solids.Contributions to Plasma Physicsn/a, e70095 (2026). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ctpp.70095. 9/11

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.70095 2026

  52. [54]

    Stoner, E. C. & Wohlfarth, E. P. A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in hereogeneous alloys.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A240, 599 (1948). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0007

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1948.0007 1948

  53. [55]

    & Gieraltowski, J

    Tannous, C. & Gieraltowski, J. The Stoner-Wohlfarth model of ferromagnetism.Eur . J. Phys29, 475 (2008). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/3/008

    work page doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/3/008 2008

  54. [56]

    Medvedev, N., Jeschke, H. O. & Ziaja, B. Nonthermal phase transitions in semiconductors induced by a femtosecond extreme ultraviolet laser pulse.New J. Phys.15, 015016 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ 15/1/015016

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ 2013

  55. [57]

    Medvedev, N., Jeschke, H. O. & Ziaja, B. Nonthermal graphitization of diamond induced by a femtosecond x-ray laser pulse.Phys. Rev. B88, 224304 (2013). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.224304 2013

  56. [58]

    & Ziaja, B

    Medvedev, N., Li, Z., Tkachenko, V . & Ziaja, B. Electron-ion coupling in semiconductors beyond Fermi’s golden rule. Phys. Rev. B95, 014309 (2017). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014309

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.014309 2017

  57. [59]

    & Ziaja, B

    Medvedev, N., Tkachenko, V ., Lipp, V ., Li, Z. & Ziaja, B. Various damage mechanisms in carbon and silicon materials under femtosecond x-ray irradiation.4open1, 3 (2018). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2018003

    work page doi:10.1051/fopen/2018003 2018

  58. [60]

    & Ziaja, B

    Medvedev, N. & Ziaja, B. Multistep transition of diamond to warm dense matter state revealed by femtosecond x-ray diffraction.Sci. Rep.8, 5284 (2018). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23632-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23632-8 2018

  59. [61]

    & Ziaja, B

    Lipp, V ., Medvedev, N. & Ziaja, B. Classical Monte-Carlo simulations of x-ray induced electron cascades in various materials.Proc. SPIE10239, 102360H (2017). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.2267939

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2267939 2017

  60. [62]

    & Ziaja, B

    Tkachenko, V ., Medvedev, N., Li, Z., Piekarz, P. & Ziaja, B. Transient optical properties of semiconductors under femtosecond x-ray irradiation.Phys. Rev. B93, 144101 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 93.144101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2016

  61. [63]

    Rep.12, 1551 (2022)

    Lipp, V .et al.Density functional tight binding approach utilized to study x-ray-induced transitions in solid materials.Sci. Rep.12, 1551 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04775-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-04775-1 2022

  62. [64]

    Inoue, I.et al.Delayed onset and directionality of x-ray-induced atomic displacements observed on subatomic length scales.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 223203 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.223203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.223203 2022

  63. [65]

    Medvedev, N., Zastrau, U., Förster, E., Gericke, D. O. & Rethfeld, B. Short-time electron dynamics in aluminum excited by femtosecond extreme ultraviolet radiation.Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 165003 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.165003

    work page 2011

  64. [66]

    R.et al.Observation of ultrafast nonequilibrium collective dynamics in warm dense hydrogen.Phys

    Fäustlin, R. R.et al.Observation of ultrafast nonequilibrium collective dynamics in warm dense hydrogen.Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 125002 (2010). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.125002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.125002 2010

  65. [67]

    The Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package: Atomic scale materials modelling from first principles.https://www.vasp.at URLhttps://www.vasp.at

    work page

  66. [68]

    & Hafner, J

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium.Phys. Rev. B49, 14251–14269 (1994). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.14251 1994

  67. [69]

    Kresse and J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B54, 11169–11186 (1996). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996

  68. [70]

    (36) Blöchl, P

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method.Phys. Rev. B59, 1758–1775 (1999). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 1999

  69. [71]

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method.Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979 (1994). URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    work page 1994

  70. [72]

    Perdew, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868 (1996). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  71. [73]

    Coey, J. M. D.Materials for Spin Electronics, vol. 569 ofLecture Notes in Physics, 277–297 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45258-3_12

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-45258-3_12 2001

  72. [74]

    Grechnev, A.et al.Theory of bulk and surface quasiparticle spectra for Fe, Co, and Ni.Phys. Rev. B76, 035107 (2007). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.035107

    work page doi:10.1103/10.1103/physrevb.76.035107 2007

  73. [75]

    Häfner, M.et al.Theoretical study of the conductance of ferromagnetic atomic-sized contacts.Phys. Rev. B77, 104409 (2008). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.104409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.104409 2008

  74. [76]

    Rep.7, 3778 (2017)

    Lizárraga, R.et al.First principles theory of the hcp-fcc phase transition in cobalt.Sci. Rep.7, 3778 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03877-5. 10/11

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03877-5 2017

  75. [77]

    He, G.et al.Multistate magnetoresistance in zigzag-edge trigonal graphene magnetic junctions.J. Mat. Sci.54, 5551–5560 (2019). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03246-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-018-03246-1 2019

  76. [78]

    Zahn, D.et al.Lattice dynamics and ultrafast energy flow between electrons, spins, and phonons in a 3d ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023032 (2021). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023032 2021

  77. [79]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04306-4

    Tauchert, S.et al.Polarized phonons carry angular momentum in ultrafast demagnetization.Nature602, 73 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04306-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04306-4 2022

  78. [80]

    Weißenhofer, M.et al.Rotationally invariant formulation of spin-lattice coupling in multiscale modeling.Phys. Rev. B 108, L060404 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L060404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.l060404 2023

  79. [81]

    Mueller, B. Y . & Rethfeld, B. ThermodynamicµT model of ultrafast magnetization dynamics.Phys. Rev. B90, 144420 (2014). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.144420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.144420 2014

  80. [82]

    & Wurth, W

    Ziaja, B., Medvedev, N., Tkachenko, V ., Maltezopoulos, T. & Wurth, W. Time-resolved observation of band-gap shrinking and electron-lattice thermalization within x-ray excited gallium arsenide.Sci. Rep.5, 18068 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18068

    work page doi:10.1038/srep18068 2016

Showing first 80 references.