Schwarzian quantum corrections to shear correlators of the near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black hole

Blaise Gout\'eraux; Cl\'ement Supiot; David M. Ramirez

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Schwarzian quantum corrections to shear correlators of the near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black hole

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum fluctuations of the near-horizon Schwarzian mode increase the shear viscosity of near-extremal charged anti-de Sitter black holes away from s/(4π) while preserving the viscosity/entropy bound, and lift the classical zero-temperature

desk verdict New Δ=0 identification and a clean Schwarzian averaging calculation, but the final step inserts ⟨G0⟩ into the classical matching formula by hand; the pole position and η depend on that unproven factorization. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.19642 v2 pith:D7JWPH65 submitted 2025-12-22 hep-th

Blaise Goutéraux , David M. Ramirez , Clément Supiot This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords Schwarzianeffectivetheorynear-extremalblackholesshearviscosityholographichydrodynamicsAdS2/CFT1quantumfluctuationsviscosity/entropyboundgaplessmodes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the classic holographic result that shear viscosity equals s/(4π) survives once quantum fluctuations of a black hole's near-horizon degrees of freedom are included. For near-extremal charged black holes, it argues that quantum corrections push the viscosity upward, away from s/(4π), with a correction that grows as temperature drops, so the conjectured lower bound remains intact rather than violated. Outside the hydrodynamic regime, the same corrections eliminate the classical zero-temperature gapless mode, addressing a longstanding puzzle. The argument turns on identifying the relevant infrared operator as dimension Δ=0 and taking a careful logarithmic limit of exact Schwarzian quantum correlators.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a matching calculation that splits the bulk into an inner near-horizon AdS2×T² region and an outer asymptotically AdS4 region. The inner dynamics is a massless scalar in AdS2; the outer region selects the alternative Δ=0 quantization (Neumann boundary conditions), so the classical inner retarded Green's function is G_R0(ω)=1/(iω). Quantum corrections are included by replacing this classical correlator with its expectation value in the exactly-solvable Schwarzian path integral, evaluated in a saddle-point expansion of the integral (5.5) as Δ→0. The result is a pure overall multiplicative factor e^λ = 1 + (3/64π⁴) β²/C² + O(β³/C³). Substituting this averaged inner corr

What would settle it

Compute the next order in the near-extremal expansion of the shear master-field equation (the O(ε) matching) and check whether the Schwarzian correction still factors out of the full Green's function. If a term of order 1/(CT) appears, or if the factor multiplies numerator and denominator differently, the specific prediction (1.9) fails. A simpler check: measure the temperature dependence of the shear pole at fixed small k; the deviation from D⊥ = r_e/12 must scale as T^{-2} with coefficient 3/(64π⁴) in units of r_e/C².

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, for a near-extremal charged AdS4 black hole with a compact flat horizon, the shear retarded Green's function keeps its hydrodynamic form after including bulk quantum fluctuations: G_R = ⟨η⟩ ω² / (iω − ⟨D⊥⟩ k²), where ⟨η⟩ and ⟨D⊥⟩ both acquire the same multiplicative factor 1 + 3/(64π⁴) · 1/(CT)² + O(1/(CT)³). Here C is the coefficient of the Schwarzian effective action (essentially the near-extremal heat capacity) and T is temperature. The calculation hinges on showing that the outer region imposes Neumann boundary conditions on the inner AdS2 dynamics, selecting a Δ=0 operator whose quantum-averaged retarded correlator is obtained through a controlled Δ→0 limit o

Load-bearing premise

The matched inner/outer calculation is carried over without modification once the classical inner correlator is replaced by its Schwarzian-averaged value; if quantum fluctuations also correct the outer region or mix with the matching coefficients, the extracted viscosity and diffusivity would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The quantum-corrected shear correlator still exhibits a single hydrodynamic pole, so the Kubo formula and the pole location give the same corrected shear viscosity, preserving the hydrodynamic relation D⊥ = η/χ.
The shear viscosity and diffusivity both grow by the same factor as temperature decreases, keeping the ratio η/χ fixed and leaving the conjectured viscosity/entropy bound η/s ≥ 1/4π intact at this order.
In the non-hydrodynamic regime, the coefficient of the k² mode diverges as 1/(CT)² as T→0, so the classical zero-temperature gapless mode is lifted; its precise fate lies beyond the present calculation.
The quantum correction to η is consistent with earlier findings that the quantum absorption cross-section of near-extremal black holes increases relative to the classical horizon-area value.
The correction requires a compact transverse space; for non-compact horizons the Schwarzian contribution vanishes and the effect disappears.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If quantum fluctuations also correct the outer-region matching coefficients, the simple multiplicative factorization could break down, and η and D⊥ would receive different corrections; a next-order computation would directly test this.
The same Δ=0 selection and averaging procedure should apply to the charge-diffusion sector, where the inner solution is also k-independent at leading order, giving a concrete prediction for the quantum-corrected charge diffusivity.
The divergence of the correction as T→0 suggests that the zero-temperature limit of the near-extremal fluid is not a smooth classical state; a quantum critical crossover may take over before the classical gapless mode is reached.
The strong dependence on the boundary-condition choice (Δ=0 versus Δ=1) implies that an independent bulk one-loop computation of the shear correlator would sharply discriminate between the two quantizations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Two things to know. First, the paper has a genuinely new idea: the shear IR operator in near-extremal RN-AdS4 is Δ=0 (Neumann), not the usually assumed Δ=1, and the authors build a careful Δ→0 limit of the exact Schwarzian bilocal correlators to compute its quantum average. Second, the last step—swapping G0 for ⟨G0⟩ inside the classical matching formula—is an assumption, not a derived factorization. The main numbers ride on it.

The stress-test concern is on target. Equation (6.4) is nonlinear in G0 at finite k^2. Replacing G0 by ⟨G0⟩ assumes ⟨G0/(1−c k^2 G0)⟩ = ⟨G0⟩/(1−c k^2 ⟨G0⟩) at the order kept. Expanding in k^2, the first correction to the pole involves ⟨G0^2⟩, not just ⟨G0⟩^2. The paper only computes the one-point function. So the extracted ⟨D⊥⟩ and ⟨η⟩ may acquire additional O(k^2 β^2/C^2) terms. This is not a minor nit; without factorization, the central result is not established. A referee should press on this. The disagreement with [76–78] at O(1/(CT)) also remains unresolved; the authors' explanation (Δ=0 plus subleading saddle-point order) may be right, but it is not independently checked.

What is good: the matching calculation is cleanly reformulated, and the boundary-condition argument in Section 4 is persuasive. The Δ→0 limit is the real technical meat; the saddle-point analysis and analytic continuation are detailed and internally consistent. The result is parameter-free and the O(1/(CT)^2) correction is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. The authors also state the regime of validity clearly and do not oversell.

Who this is for: people working on near-extremal holography and transport. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation is to send it to review with explicit instructions to check the averaging step—ideally at k=0 where (6.4) is linear in G0, then see whether the Kubo formula and the pole give the same correction. If the factorization holds, this is a solid contribution; if not, the Δ=0 identification alone is still worth publishing.

Best, [Your name]

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes the leading Schwarzian (near-AdS2) quantum corrections to the transverse shear response of the boundary state dual to a near-extremal Reissner-Nordström-AdS4 planar black hole. The authors identify the IR operator controlling the shear diffusion mode as a massless scalar in AdS2 with Neumann (Δ=0) boundary conditions, whose classical retarded two-point function is G_R0(ω)=1/(iω). Using the exact Schwarzian bilocal correlators of Mertens–Turiaci–Verlinde, they implement a Δ→0 limit to obtain the Schwarzian-averaged correlator ⟨G_R0(ω)⟩ = [1+3/(64π^4) 1/(CT)^2 + ...] G_R0(ω). Substituting this average into the previous classical matching formula for the shear Green's function gives a hydrodynamic pole with ⟨η⟩ = s0/(4π)(1+3/(64π^4)/(CT)^2+...) and ⟨D⊥⟩ = re/12 times the same factor. They conclude that quantum fluctuations increase η/s above the KSS value and lift the classical T=0 gapless shear mode in the non-hydrodynamic regime.

Significance. If the central factorization assumption were justified, this would be a significant, parameter-free prediction: a concrete O(1/(CT)^2) correction to η/s from a quantized near-AdS2 Schwarzian mode, in a regime where classical Einstein gravity otherwise gives η/s=1/(4π). The paper's derivation of the Δ=0 boundary conditions and the Δ→0 limit of the Schwarzian bilocal is detailed and technically careful, and the result agrees qualitatively with the expectation from quantum absorption cross-sections. However, the quantum average is inserted into a nonlinear matching formula by fiat, and the reported coefficient depends on this unproven step. The disagreement with other recent works at O(1/(CT)) also remains unexplained. The result is therefore not yet established at the level required for publication; the core calculation may be salvageable.

major comments (4)

[Section 6, Eqs. (6.4)–(6.5)] The central step is replacing G_R0 by ⟨G_R0⟩ inside the closed matching formula. Eq. (6.4) is nonlinear in G_R0; expanding in k², G_R0/(1-(re/12)k²G_R0) = G_R0 + (re/12)k²G_R0² + ... . The O(k²) correction to the Green's function therefore involves ⟨G_R0²⟩, not ⟨G_R0⟩². Section 5.4 proves only the multiplicative renormalization of the two-point function, Eq. (5.47). Unless one shows that the Schwarzian average factorizes for all powers, or that connected contributions to ⟨G_R0²⟩ are suppressed beyond O(β²/C²), the pole position (6.6) and the values (6.7)–(6.8) are not derived. The outer AdS4 region is treated as a classical spectator, and no single path integral over the Schwarzian mode of the full matched system is given. This is load-bearing: an unpfactorized connected piece would add O(k² β²/C²) terms to the dispersion relation, changing ⟨η⟩ and ⟨D⊥⟩.
[Section 5.2, Eqs. (5.10)–(5.18)] The Δ→0 prescription defines the Schwarzian average of the logarithmic correlator as the linear-in-Δ coefficient of ⟨GE_Δ⟩ = 1 + Δ⟨log GE_1⟩ + ... and then multiplies by 1/(2π) in Eq. (5.18). This is not a direct computation of ⟨log|τE|⟩ from the path integral; it assumes that the Δ→0 limit commutes with the Schwarzian average and that no extra Δ-dependent normalization of the source or contact terms contributes. Since the final O(1/(CT)^2) coefficient and the comparison with [76–78] both hinge on this step, the procedure should be justified from the path integral or by an independent check such as the n=0 Matsubara mode in Appendix C.
[Eq. (5.35)] As written, Eq. (5.35) contains the explicit prefactor β/(2π² C). This is inconsistent with the semi-classical limit: it would make I2 vanish as C→∞, contradicting Eq. (5.25) and the recovery of the classical result (5.27). The subsequent derivation of ⟨G_R0(τ)⟩ = e^λ Θ(τ) also appears to drop this prefactor. Since λ and the reported coefficient 3/(64π^4) are defined through this expression, the prefactor must be corrected and the calculation re-checked. If the prefactor is a typographical error, the authors should state the correct expression.
[Note added (end of Section 1)] The paper's result differs from [76–78] by an O(1/(CT)) correction, an order of magnitude larger than the claimed O(1/(CT)^2) effect. The note lists three possible sources of the difference (Δ=0, subleading saddle point, truncation of thermodynamics) but does not identify which one removes the linear correction, nor does it provide an independent cross-check. Given the factorization issue in Eqs. (6.4)–(6.5), the discrepancy cannot currently be attributed with confidence to the Δ=0 identification. The authors should at least compute a diagnostic quantity, for example the same correction with Δ=1 boundary conditions, to isolate the source.

minor comments (5)

[Section 5.1, Eq. (5.2)] The Euclidean Schwarzian action should be S0 - C∫{tan(πu/β),τ} with a minus sign to reproduce the standard partition function (5.3); please check the sign convention.
[General] There are frequent OCR-type typos: 'Ads2' for AdS2, 'Reisner-Nordström' for Reissner-Nordström, and several garbled characters such as '⣨ GE ⟩'. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
[Section 5.2, Eq. (5.18)] The 1/(2π) prefactor in the definition of ⟨GE_0⟩ is introduced without comment; specify the normalization of the bilocal operator and the Euclidean correlator so this factor is unambiguous.
[References] Ref. [69] is cited as 'To appear' and is used to justify claims about the next order in matching. Please provide the status of this reference or remove the dependence on it.
[Figures 3 and 4] The analytic-continuation argument crossing the branch cuts is dense. The sign conventions in the figures and the text should be made more explicit, especially the relation between the two jumps and the factor of e^λ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the O(1/(CT)^2) correction is computed from independent Schwarzian bilocal results and an external matching framework; self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained modulo independent external inputs. Section 3 uses the matching framework of Davison-Parnachev [38] to obtain the classical shear correlator (3.40)/(6.4) with inner Green's function G0(ω)=1/(iω). Section 4 derives, rather than assumes, the ∆=0 Neumann boundary conditions from the outer-region variational principle, giving (4.1). Section 5 starts from the exact Schwarzian bilocal result (5.5) of Mertens-Turiaci-Verlinde [64] and takes a new ∆→0 limit to compute the averaged inner correlator, obtaining the parameter-free multiplicative factor 1+3/(64π^4)(β/C)^2+O(β^3/C^3). No parameter is fitted to the final shear viscosity; the numerical coefficient follows from the saddle-point expansion. Self-citations [34,35,69] are used for context—gapless modes, keq, and future next-order matching—and are not load-bearing for the claimed quantum correction. The potential concern raised by the skeptic is that substituting the averaged G0 into the nonlinear denominator of (6.4) assumes factorization such as <G0^2>=<G0>^2 at the order needed for the k^2 pole, and the paper does not derive this from a single path integral over the full matched system. That is a real validity/approximation issue, but it is not circular: the averaged inner correlator is computed independently and is not defined in terms of the final viscosity correction. The disagreement with [76-78] noted in the paper is a physical discrepancy, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation uses existing near-AdS2/Schwarzian machinery and holographic matching. No new particles, forces, or symmetries are introduced. There are no fitted free parameters: C, re, and s0 are fixed by the RN-AdS4 background, and the O(1/(CT)^2) coefficient is generated by the saddle-point evaluation of exact Schwarzian integrals. The main structural assumptions are the reduction to the pure Schwarzian sector and the factorization of quantum averaging from the classical matching procedure.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The near-extremal near-horizon RN-AdS4×T2 dynamics is described by the 0+1-dimensional Schwarzian action (1.4) after Kaluza-Klein reduction.
Invoked in §1 and the opening of §5 to import exact Schwarzian correlators into the 4D black hole problem; standard near-AdS2 paradigm [48,55].
domain assumption Kaluza-Klein reduction to the Schwarzian sector is valid: massive torus modes decouple because the O(ε^0) inner Green's function is k-independent; massless modes decouple only for re L ≲ 1.
Stated in §5 first paragraph; if not satisfied, the pure Schwarzian correlator (5.5) does not apply to the 4D shear sector.
ad hoc to paper The outer AdS4 region is treated classically and its matching coefficients (e.g. cI1 = iω re c0) are unaffected by Schwarzian quantum fluctuations.
Used in §6 (6.4)–(6.5) to insert the quantum-averaged inner Green's function into the classical matching formula; not derived from a single path integral.
domain assumption The exact Schwarzian bilocal two-point functions (5.5) from ref. [64] are correct and can be analytically continued via the Wick-rotation prescription of §5.1.
Central input for ⟨G_R0⟩; taken from prior literature [64–66] and not rederived in this paper.
standard math The saddle-point approximation in the large-C limit is controlled, and subleading corrections are captured by expanding λ(x) to O(x^3).
Used in §5.4 to obtain e^λ; relies on M0≫ω and on neglecting exponentially suppressed terms.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Schwarzian quantum corrections to shear correlators of the near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D7JWPH65

@misc{pith2026251219642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Schwarzian quantum corrections to shear correlators of the near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D7JWPH65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.19642}
}

abstract

Near-AdS$_2$ spacetimes are controlled by a Schwarzian effective dual theory. The Kaluza-Klein reduction of higher-dimensional black holes shows that the Schwarzian generates a logarithmic contribution to the entropy, thereby resolving a long-standing puzzle in near-extremal black hole thermodynamics. Here, we leverage exact results for quantum-corrected, Schwarzian scalar correlation functions in order to evaluate the impact of bulk quantum fluctuations on the low-temperature shear correlators of the state dual to Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS$_4$ black holes with a flat, compact horizon. In the hydrodynamic regime, we find that quantum fluctuations tend to increase the shear viscosity away from $s/(4\pi)$, thereby preserving the Kovtun-Son-Starinets bound. Outside the hydrodynamic regime, quantum fluctuations lift the zero temperature, classical gapless modes reported in previous literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Exact Schwarzian Metric Factor and Holographic Wilson-Loop Screening
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

Exact Schwarzian averaging yields a completely monotone metric factor with no confining minimum, so the Wilson-loop potential screens as E(L) ~ -κ_IR/L² rather than confining.
Flavour current correlators and the non-Abelian hydrodynamic approximation: the charged sector
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Isospin-imbalanced strongly coupled dense matter is shown, via holography, to obey non-Abelian hydrodynamic predictions for current correlators up to the chemical-potential scale, beyond the standard ω,k ≪ T regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 84 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Forster,Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions, CRC Press (2018)

D. Forster,Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions, CRC Press (2018)

2018
[2]

Chaikin and T.C

P.M. Chaikin and T.C. Lubensky,Principles of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (1995), 10.1017/CBO9780511813467

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813467 1995
[3]

Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J

P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J. Phys. A 45(2012) 473001 [1205.5040]

arXiv 2012
[4]

Liu and P

H. Liu and P. Glorioso,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,PoST ASI2017(2018) 008 [1805.09331]

arXiv 2018
[5]

Berges, M.P

J. Berges, M.P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas and R. Venugopalan,QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035003 [2005.12299]

arXiv 2021
[6]

Policastro, D.T

G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

arXiv 2001
[7]

Kovtun, D.T

P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Holography and hydrodynamics: Diffusion on stretched horizons,JHEP10(2003) 064 [hep-th/0309213]

arXiv 2003
[8]

Cremonini,The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report,Mod

S. Cremonini,The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report,Mod. Phys. Lett. B25(2011) 1867 [1108.0677]

arXiv 2011

Show all 100 references

[9]

Kovtun, D.T

P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

2005 arXiv
[10]

Son and A.O

D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity, Black Holes, and Quantum Field Theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57(2007) 95 [0704.0240]

2007 arXiv
[11]

Hartnoll,Theory of universal incoherent metallic transport,Nature Phys.11 (2015) 54 [1405.3651]

S.A. Hartnoll,Theory of universal incoherent metallic transport,Nature Phys.11 (2015) 54 [1405.3651]

2015 arXiv
[12]

Grozdanov,Bounds on transport from univalence and pole-skipping,Phys

S. Grozdanov,Bounds on transport from univalence and pole-skipping,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 051601 [2008.00888]

2021 arXiv
[13]

Heller, A

M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński and B. Withers,Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 261601 [2212.07434]

2023 arXiv
[14]

Heller, A

M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński and B. Withers,The space of transport coefficients allowed by causality,Nature Phys.20(2024) 1948 [2305.07703]. – 41 –

2024 arXiv
[15]

Chowdhury, S.A

S.D. Chowdhury, S.A. Hartnoll, A. Hebbar and R. Khondaker,Bootstrapping transport in the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model,2509.18255

arXiv
[16]

Chowdhury, S.A

S.D. Chowdhury, S.A. Hartnoll and A. Hebbar,Lieb-Robinson causality and non-Fermi liquids,2510.18950
[17]

Chowdhury,Planckian Bounds via Spectral Moments of Optical Conductivity, 2512.09979

D. Chowdhury,Planckian Bounds via Spectral Moments of Optical Conductivity, 2512.09979
[18]

Rebhan and D

A. Rebhan and D. Steineder,Violation of the Holographic Viscosity Bound in a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 021601 [1110.6825]

2012 arXiv
[19]

Davison and B

R.A. Davison and B. Goutéraux,Momentum dissipation and effective theories of coherent and incoherent transport,JHEP01(2015) 039 [1411.1062]

2015 arXiv
[20]

S. Jain, N. Kundu, K. Sen, A. Sinha and S.P. Trivedi,A Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Fluid From Dilaton Driven Holography,JHEP01(2015) 005 [1406.4874]

2015 arXiv
[21]

Hartnoll, D.M

S.A. Hartnoll, D.M. Ramirez and J.E. Santos,Entropy production, viscosity bounds and bumpy black holes,JHEP03(2016) 170 [1601.02757]

2016 arXiv
[22]

Alberte, M

L. Alberte, M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas,Viscosity bound violation in holographic solids and the viscoelastic response,JHEP07(2016) 074 [1601.03384]

2016 arXiv
[23]

Policastro, D.T

G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics,JHEP09(2002) 043 [hep-th/0205052]

2002 arXiv
[24]

Policastro, D.T

G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics. 2. Sound waves,JHEP12(2002) 054 [hep-th/0210220]

2002 arXiv
[25]

Herzog,The Hydrodynamics of M theory,JHEP12(2002) 026 [hep-th/0210126]

C.P. Herzog,The Hydrodynamics of M theory,JHEP12(2002) 026 [hep-th/0210126]

2002 arXiv
[26]

Kovtun and A.O

P.K. Kovtun and A.O. Starinets,Quasinormal modes and holography,Phys. Rev. D 72(2005) 086009 [hep-th/0506184]

2005 arXiv
[27]

Bhattacharyya, V.E

S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani,Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity,JHEP02(2008) 045 [0712.2456]

2008 arXiv
[28]

Banerjee, J

N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam and P. Surowka,Hydrodynamics from charged black branes,JHEP01(2011) 094 [0809.2596]

2011 arXiv
[29]

Erdmenger, M

J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski and A. Yarom,Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes,JHEP01(2009) 055 [0809.2488]

2009 arXiv
[30]

Withers,Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,JHEP06 (2018) 059 [1803.08058]

B. Withers,Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,JHEP06 (2018) 059 [1803.08058]

2018 arXiv
[31]

Grozdanov, P.K

S. Grozdanov, P.K. Kovtun, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadić,Convergence of the Gradient Expansion in Hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 251601 [1904.01018]. – 42 –

2019 arXiv
[32]

Grozdanov, P.K

S. Grozdanov, P.K. Kovtun, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadić,The complex life of hydrodynamic modes,JHEP11(2019) 097 [1904.12862]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Jansen and C

A. Jansen and C. Pantelidou,Quasinormal modes in charged fluids at complex momentum,JHEP10(2020) 121 [2007.14418]

2020 arXiv
[34]

Arean, R.A

D. Arean, R.A. Davison, B. Goutéraux and K. Suzuki,Hydrodynamic Diffusion and Its Breakdown near AdS2 Quantum Critical Points,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 031024 [2011.12301]

2021 arXiv
[35]

Goutéraux, D.M

B. Goutéraux, D.M. Ramirez, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and C. Supiot, Near-extremal holographic charge correlators,2506.11974
[36]

Edalati, J.I

M. Edalati, J.I. Jottar and R.G. Leigh,Transport Coefficients at Zero Temperature from Extremal Black Holes,JHEP01(2010) 018 [0910.0645]

2010 arXiv
[37]

Edalati, J.I

M. Edalati, J.I. Jottar and R.G. Leigh,Shear Modes, Criticality and Extremal Black Holes,JHEP04(2010) 075 [1001.0779]

2010 arXiv
[38]

Davison and A

R.A. Davison and A. Parnachev,Hydrodynamics of cold holographic matter,JHEP 06(2013) 100 [1303.6334]

2013 arXiv
[39]

Edalati, J.I

M. Edalati, J.I. Jottar and R.G. Leigh,Holography and the sound of criticality, JHEP10(2010) 058 [1005.4075]

2010 arXiv
[40]

Gushterov, A

N.I. Gushterov, A. O’Bannon and R. Rodgers,Holographic Zero Sound from Spacetime-Filling Branes,JHEP10(2018) 076 [1807.11327]

2018 arXiv
[41]

D.V. Else, R. Thorngren and T. Senthil,Non-fermi liquids as ersatz fermi liquids: General constraints on compressible metals,Physical Review X11(2021)

2021
[42]

Delacrétaz, D.M

L.V. Delacrétaz, D.M. Hofman and G. Mathys,Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 047 [1908.06977]

2020 arXiv
[43]

Chen and A

C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas,Origin of the Drude peak and of zero sound in probe brane holography,Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 569 [1709.01520]

2017 arXiv
[44]

Grozdanov, A

S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas and N. Poovuttikul,Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 086012 [1810.10016]

2019 arXiv
[45]

Davison, B

R.A. Davison, B. Goutéraux and E. Mefford,Zero sound and higher-form symmetries in compressible holographic phases,JHEP12(2023) 040 [2210.14802]

2023 arXiv
[46]

Faulkner, H

T. Faulkner, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh,Emergent quantum criticality, Fermi surfaces, and AdS(2),Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 125002 [0907.2694]

2011 arXiv
[47]

Hartnoll and D.M

S.A. Hartnoll and D.M. Hofman,Locally Critical Resistivities from Umklapp Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 241601 [1201.3917]

2012 arXiv
[48]

Iliesiu and G.J

L.V. Iliesiu and G.J. Turiaci,The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes, JHEP05(2021) 145 [2003.02860]

2021 arXiv
[49]

Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 1), talk at KITP, April, 2015

A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 1), talk at KITP, April, 2015

2015
[50]

Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 2), talk at KITP, May, 2015

A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 2), talk at KITP, May, 2015. – 43 –

2015
[51]

Maldacena and D

J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 106002 [1604.07818]

2016 arXiv
[52]

Maldacena, D

J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,PTEP2016(2016) 12C104 [1606.01857]

2016 arXiv
[53]

Jensen,Chaos in AdS2 Holography,Phys

K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS2 Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 111601 [1605.06098]

2016 arXiv
[54]

Engelsöy, T.G

J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,JHEP07(2016) 139 [1606.03438]

2016 arXiv
[55]

Stanford and E

D. Stanford and E. Witten,Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,JHEP 10(2017) 008 [1703.04612]

2017 arXiv
[56]

Davison, W

R.A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y. Gu, K. Jensen and S. Sachdev,Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography,Phys. Rev. B95(2017) 155131 [1612.00849]

2017 arXiv
[57]

Nayak, A

P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R.M. Soni, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,JHEP09(2018) 048 [1802.09547]

2018 arXiv
[58]

Moitra, S.P

U. Moitra, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,Extremal and near-extremal black holes and near-CFT1,JHEP07(2019) 055 [1808.08239]

2019 arXiv
[59]

Sachdev,Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS2 horizons,J

S. Sachdev,Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS2 horizons,J. Math. Phys.60(2019) 052303 [1902.04078]

2019 arXiv
[60]

Moitra, S.K

U. Moitra, S.K. Sake, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes,JHEP11(2019) 047 [1905.10378]

2019 arXiv
[61]

Heydeman, L.V

M. Heydeman, L.V. Iliesiu, G.J. Turiaci and W. Zhao,The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 014004 [2011.01953]

2022 arXiv
[62]

Iliesiu, S

L.V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy and G.J. Turiaci,Revisiting the logarithmic corrections to the black hole entropy,JHEP07(2025) 058 [2209.13608]

2025 arXiv
[63]

Banerjee and M

N. Banerjee and M. Saha,Revisiting leading quantum corrections to near extremal black hole thermodynamics,JHEP07(2023) 010 [2303.12415]

2023 arXiv
[64]

Mertens, G.J

T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde,Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP08(2017) 136 [1705.08408]

2017 arXiv
[65]

Lam, T.G

H.T. Lam, T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,JHEP11(2018) 182 [1804.09834]

2018 arXiv
[66]

Mertens and G.J

T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci,Defects in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, JHEP08(2019) 127 [1904.05228]

2019 arXiv
[67]

X.-L. Liu, J. Nian and L.A. Pando Zayas,Quantum Corrections to Holographic Strange Metal at Low Temperature,2410.11487

arXiv
[68]

Klebanov and E

I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104]. – 44 –

1999 arXiv
[69]

Goutéraux, D.M

B. Goutéraux, D.M. Ramirez, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and C. Supiot,To appear,
[70]

Klebanov,World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,Nucl

I.R. Klebanov,World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,Nucl. Phys. B496(1997) 231 [hep-th/9702076]

1997 arXiv
[71]

Gubser, I.R

S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin,String theory and classical absorption by three-branes,Nucl. Phys. B499(1997) 217 [hep-th/9703040]

1997 arXiv
[72]

Emparan,Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,JHEP04(2025) 122 [2501.17470]

R. Emparan,Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,JHEP04(2025) 122 [2501.17470]

2025 arXiv
[73]

Biggs,Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,2503.02051

A. Biggs,Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,2503.02051

arXiv
[74]

Emparan and S

R. Emparan and S. Trezzi,Quantum transparency of near-extremal black holes, JHEP10(2025) 023 [2507.03398]

2025
[75]

Betzios, O

P. Betzios, O. Papadoulaki and Y. Zhou,Near-extremal quantum cross-section for charged fields and superradiance,2507.13896
[76]

Pando Zayas and J

L.A. Pando Zayas and J. Zhang,One-loop Corrected Holographic Shear Viscosity to Entropy Density Ratio at Low Temperatures,2510.16100
[77]

Nian, L.A

J. Nian, L.A. Pando Zayas and C.-Y. Yue,Quantum Corrections in the Low-Temperature Fluid/Gravity Correspondence,2510.15411
[78]

Cremonini, L

S. Cremonini, L. Li, X.-L. Liu and J. Nian,Quantum Corrections toη/sfrom JT Gravity,2510.21602
[79]

McGreevy,Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,Adv

J. McGreevy,Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,Adv. High Energy Phys.2010(2010) 723105 [0909.0518]

2010 arXiv
[80]

Nickel and D.T

D. Nickel and D.T. Son,Deconstructing holographic liquids,New J. Phys.13(2011) 075010 [1009.3094]

2011 arXiv
[81]

Mertens and G.J

T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci,Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) 4 [2210.10846]

2023 arXiv
[82]

Simmons-Duffin,TASI lectures on conformal field theory in lorentzian signature, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI, 2019)

D. Simmons-Duffin,TASI lectures on conformal field theory in lorentzian signature, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI, 2019)

2019
[83]

Gu, X.-L

Y. Gu, X.-L. Qi and D. Stanford,Local criticality, diffusion and chaos in generalized Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,JHEP05(2017) 125 [1609.07832]

2017 arXiv
[84]

C. Choi, M. Mezei and G. Sárosi,Pole skipping away from maximal chaos,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2020) 207 [2010.08558]

2020 arXiv
[85]

Bardoux, M.M

Y. Bardoux, M.M. Caldarelli and C. Charmousis,Shaping black holes with free fields, JHEP05(2012) 054 [1202.4458]

2012 arXiv
[86]

Andrade and B

T. Andrade and B. Withers,A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation, JHEP05(2014) 101 [1311.5157]

2014 arXiv
[87]

Grozdanov and N

S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul,Generalized global symmetries in states with – 45 – dynamical defects: The case of the transverse sound in field theory and holography, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 106005 [1801.03199]

2018 arXiv
[88]

Davison and A.O

R.A. Davison and A.O. Pinheiro,Viscoelastic hydrodynamics of charged black holes, 2512.10905
[89]

Davison, K

R.A. Davison, K. Schalm and J. Zaanen,Holographic duality and the resistivity of strange metals,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 245116 [1311.2451]

2014 arXiv
[90]

Davison, M

R.A. Davison, M. Goykhman and A. Parnachev,AdS/CFT and Landau Fermi liquids,JHEP07(2014) 109 [1312.0463]

2014 arXiv
[91]

Ghosh, R

J.K. Ghosh, R. Loganayagam, S.G. Prabhu, M. Rangamani, A. Sivakumar and V. Vishal,Effective field theory of stochastic diffusion from gravity,JHEP05(2021) 130 [2012.03999]

2021 arXiv
[92]

T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani and J. Virrueta,An effective description of momentum diffusion in a charged plasma from holography,JHEP01(2022) 145 [2108.03244]

2022 arXiv
[93]

T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, A. Sivakumar and J. Virrueta,The timbre of Hawking gravitons: an effective description of energy transport from holography, JHEP09(2022) 092 [2202.04079]

2022 arXiv
[94]

T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani and J. Virrueta,An effective description of charge diffusion and energy transport in a charged plasma from holography,JHEP03 (2023) 161 [2205.03415]

2023 arXiv
[95]

Chen-Lin, L.V

X. Chen-Lin, L.V. Delacrétaz and S.A. Hartnoll,Theory of diffusive fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 091602 [1811.12540]

2019 arXiv
[96]

Jain and P

A. Jain and P. Kovtun,Late Time Correlations in Hydrodynamics: Beyond Constitutive Relations,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 071601 [2009.01356]

2022 arXiv
[97]

Michailidis, D.A

A.A. Michailidis, D.A. Abanin and L.V. Delacrétaz,Corrections to Diffusion in Interacting Quantum Systems,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 031020 [2310.10564]

2024 arXiv
[98]

Mullins, M

N. Mullins, M. Hippert, L. Gavassino and J. Noronha,Relativistic hydrodynamic fluctuations from an effective action: Causality, stability, and the information current,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 116019 [2309.00512]

2023 arXiv
[99]

Jain and P

A. Jain and P. Kovtun,Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for stable and causal relativistic hydrodynamics,JHEP01(2024) 162 [2309.00511]

2024 arXiv
[100]

A. Jain, P. Kovtun, A. Ritz and A. Shukla,Hydrodynamic effective field theory and the analyticity of hydrostatic correlators,JHEP02(2021) 200 [2011.03691]. – 46 –

2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Forster,Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions, CRC Press (2018)

D. Forster,Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions, CRC Press (2018)

2018

[2] [2]

Chaikin and T.C

P.M. Chaikin and T.C. Lubensky,Principles of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (1995), 10.1017/CBO9780511813467

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813467 1995

[3] [3]

Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J

P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J. Phys. A 45(2012) 473001 [1205.5040]

arXiv 2012

[4] [4]

Liu and P

H. Liu and P. Glorioso,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,PoST ASI2017(2018) 008 [1805.09331]

arXiv 2018

[5] [5]

Berges, M.P

J. Berges, M.P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas and R. Venugopalan,QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035003 [2005.12299]

arXiv 2021

[6] [6]

Policastro, D.T

G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

arXiv 2001

[7] [7]

Kovtun, D.T

P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Holography and hydrodynamics: Diffusion on stretched horizons,JHEP10(2003) 064 [hep-th/0309213]

arXiv 2003

[8] [8]

Cremonini,The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report,Mod

S. Cremonini,The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report,Mod. Phys. Lett. B25(2011) 1867 [1108.0677]

arXiv 2011