Answering Ambiguous Questions with a Database of Questions, Answers, and Revisions
read the original abstract
Many open-domain questions are under-specified and thus have multiple possible answers, each of which is correct under a different interpretation of the question. Answering such ambiguous questions is challenging, as it requires retrieving and then reasoning about diverse information from multiple passages. We present a new state-of-the-art for answering ambiguous questions that exploits a database of unambiguous questions generated from Wikipedia. On the challenging ASQA benchmark, which requires generating long-form answers that summarize the multiple answers to an ambiguous question, our method improves performance by 15% (relative improvement) on recall measures and 10% on measures which evaluate disambiguating questions from predicted outputs. Retrieving from the database of generated questions also gives large improvements in diverse passage retrieval (by matching user questions q to passages p indirectly, via questions q' generated from p).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Diverse LLMs or Diverse Question Interpretations? That is the Ensembling Question
Question interpretation diversity outperforms model diversity for LLM ensembling on binary QA tasks using majority voting.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.