REVIEW 2 cited by
Detecting and Correcting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memes with Large Visual Language Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, large language models (LLMs) have taken the spotlight in natural language processing. Further, integrating LLMs with vision enables the users to explore more emergent abilities in multimodality. Visual language models (VLMs), such as LLaVA, Flamingo, or GPT-4, have demonstrated impressive performance on various visio-linguistic tasks. Consequently, there are enormous applications of large models that could be potentially used on social media platforms. Despite that, there is a lack of related work on detecting or correcting hateful memes with VLMs. In this work, we study the ability of VLMs on hateful meme detection and hateful meme correction tasks with zero-shot prompting. From our empirical experiments, we show the effectiveness of the pretrained LLaVA model and discuss its strengths and weaknesses in these tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SocialDF: Benchmark Dataset and Detection Model for Mitigating Harmful Deepfake Content on Social Media Platforms
A benchmark of 2,126 Instagram videos labeled real or deepfake by uploader disclosure, evaluated with an LLM fact-checking pipeline that reaches 90.4% accuracy but conflates authenticity with factualness.
-
LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion
This paper proposes a taxonomy of LLM harms in five categories and suggests mitigation strategies plus a dynamic auditing system for responsible development.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.