REVIEW 2 cited by
Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mature industrial sectors (e.g., aviation) collect their real world failures in incident databases to inform safety improvements. Intelligent systems currently cause real world harms without a collective memory of their failings. As a result, companies repeatedly make the same mistakes in the design, development, and deployment of intelligent systems. A collection of intelligent system failures experienced in the real world (i.e., incidents) is needed to ensure intelligent systems benefit people and society. The AI Incident Database is an incident collection initiated by an industrial/non-profit cooperative to enable AI incident avoidance and mitigation. The database supports a variety of research and development use cases with faceted and full text search on more than 1,000 incident reports archived to date.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stakeholder Participation for Responsible AI Development: Disconnects Between Guidance and Current Practice
Industry stakeholder involvement in AI development is driven by customer value and compliance, and currently contributes little to the responsible AI benefits that guidance documents promise.
-
Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AI
AI safety is a systems-governance problem: six recurring organizational failure patterns from past disasters remain unlearned in AI development, so component-level fixes like benchmarks and alignment cannot deliver safety.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.