pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02276 · v1 · pith:DFX5HNGInew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

A Comprehensive Analysis of B_s to D_s^(**)ellν_ell Decays Within and Beyond the Standard Model

Karthik Jain , Tarun Kumar , Barilang Mawlong , Shantanu Sahoo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 09:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords B_s semileptonic decayslepton flavor universalityHeavy Quark Effective Theorynew physicsz-expansionform factorsWeak Effective TheoryTwo Higgs Doublet Model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Precise lepton flavor universality ratios are predicted for B_s to D_s** decays, with scalar and tensor new physics operators causing some observables to deviate by more than 2 sigma from the Standard Model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the exclusive semileptonic decays B_s to D_s** l nu_l, where D_s** includes four excited states, within the Standard Model and beyond using form factors from Heavy Quark Effective Theory including corrections up to O(alpha_s, Lambda/m_Q). A data-driven approach extracts the Heavy Quark Effective Theory parameters, and synthetic data from them are used to parameterize the form factors via the z-expansion over the full kinematic region. Observables are computed from the two-fold angular decay distribution, leading to predictions for four lepton flavor universality ratios with uncertainties. The analysis also covers new physics using the Weak Effective Theory and Standard Model Effective Field Theory with real and complex Wilson coefficients, plus the general Two Higgs Doublet Model, highlighting large sensitivity from scalar and tensor operators.

Core claim

Using form factors evaluated in Heavy Quark Effective Theory with corrections up to O(alpha_s, Lambda/m_Q), a data-driven extraction of parameters, and z-expansion parameterization, the paper computes observables for B_s to D_s** l nu_l decays and predicts the lepton flavor universality ratios R_{D_{s0}^*}=0.158(20), R_{D_{s1}^*}=0.045(5), R_{D_{s1}}=0.073(4), R_{D_{s2}^*}=0.066(9). It further shows through global analyses in the Weak Effective Theory, Standard Model Effective Field Theory, and general Two Higgs Doublet Model that scalar and tensor new physics operators induce large sensitivity, with some observables deviating by more than 2 sigma from Standard Model predictions.

What carries the argument

z-expansion parameterization of form factors from data-driven Heavy Quark Effective Theory parameters

If this is right

  • The four lepton flavor universality ratios are predicted as R_{D_{s0}^*}=0.158(20), R_{D_{s1}^*}=0.045(5), R_{D_{s1}}=0.073(4), R_{D_{s2}^*}=0.066(9).
  • Scalar and tensor new physics operators induce large sensitivity in the decay observables.
  • Some observables deviate by more than 2 sigma from Standard Model predictions.
  • These decays have potential to probe deviations from the Standard Model in future measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted ratios could test whether lepton flavor universality violation patterns observed in other B decays appear in the B_s system.
  • Results from the general Two Higgs Doublet Model analysis could constrain charged Higgs parameters.
  • Future lattice inputs might further reduce uncertainties on the form factors and ratios.

Load-bearing premise

The data-driven extraction of Heavy Quark Effective Theory parameters from related measurements can be reliably extrapolated to generate synthetic data for z-expansion form factor parameterization in these B_s channels.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of R_{D_{s0}^*} falling outside the interval from 0.138 to 0.178 would falsify the Standard Model prediction for that ratio.

read the original abstract

We examine the exclusive semileptonic decays $B_s \to D_s^{**} \ell \nu_\ell$, with $D_s^{**} =$ $\bigl\{D_{s0}^*,D_{s1}^*,D_{s1},D_{s2}^*\bigr\}$, within the Standard Model and beyond, using form factors evaluated in the Heavy Quark Effective Theory, including corrections up to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s, \Lambda/{m_Q})$. A data-driven approach is employed to extract Heavy Quark Effective Theory parameters, and the resulting synthetic data are used to parameterize the form factors via the $z$-expansion. With the resulting form factor information across the full kinematic region, we compute various observables derived from the two-fold angular decay distribution, and predict precise lepton flavor universality ratios: $R_{D_{s0}^*}= 0.158(20)$, $R_{D_{s1}^*}= 0.045(5)$, $R_{D_{s1}}= 0.073(4)$, $R_{D_{s2}^*} = 0.066(9)$. We also analyse potential new physics effects using the Weak Effective Theory and the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, performing a global analysis considering both real and complex Wilson coefficients. Furthermore, we investigate new physics contributions arising from the general Two Higgs Doublet Model. We evaluate the sensitivity of decay observables to new physics, highlighting their potential to probe deviations from the Standard Model in future measurements. Notably, the scalar and tensor new physics operators induce large sensitivity, with some observables deviating by more than $2 \sigma$ from Standard Model predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to analyze the exclusive semileptonic decays Bs → Ds** ℓνℓ (Ds** = {Ds0*, Ds1*, Ds1, Ds2*}) in the SM and beyond. Form factors are computed in HQET including O(αs, Λ/mQ) corrections; HQET parameters are extracted via a data-driven approach, synthetic data are generated, and the form factors are parameterized with the z-expansion over the full kinematic range. Observables are derived from the two-fold angular distribution, yielding precise LFU ratios R_{Ds0*}=0.158(20), R_{Ds1*}=0.045(5), R_{Ds1}=0.073(4), R_{Ds2*}=0.066(9). NP effects are studied in the Weak Effective Theory, SMEFT (real and complex Wilson coefficients), and the general Two Higgs Doublet Model, with scalar and tensor operators inducing large sensitivity and some observables deviating by more than 2σ from SM predictions.

Significance. If the form-factor inputs hold, the work supplies concrete SM benchmarks for LFU ratios in these Bs channels and flags observables with enhanced NP reach, which could inform experimental programs at LHCb and Belle II. The explicit inclusion of O(αs, Λ/mQ) corrections together with the z-expansion over the full kinematic range is a methodological strength that reduces reliance on model assumptions at high recoil.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The quoted LFU ratios and the >2σ NP deviation claims rest on form factors obtained by (i) data-driven extraction of HQET parameters, (ii) generation of synthetic data, and (iii) z-expansion parameterization. No internal cross-check—such as reproduction of known B→D** observables with the identical parameter set—is described, leaving the transferability to Bs channels (where the spectator quark is strange) unverified; SU(3)-breaking differences in the extracted parameters (ρ̄², ρ², τi) are not automatically controlled by the included O(αs, Λ/mQ) terms.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The uncertainties attached to the LFU ratios (e.g., (20) on R_{Ds0*}) are presented as resulting from the data-driven fit, yet the abstract supplies neither the fit details, the error-propagation procedure, nor validation against independent inputs; this directly affects the reliability of the central claim that the ratios are “precise.”
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The listing D_{s0}^*, D_{s1}^*, D_{s1}, D_{s2}^* would benefit from an accompanying statement of the J^P quantum numbers for each state to improve immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below, with clarifications on the methodology and indications of where revisions will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The quoted LFU ratios and the >2σ NP deviation claims rest on form factors obtained by (i) data-driven extraction of HQET parameters, (ii) generation of synthetic data, and (iii) z-expansion parameterization. No internal cross-check—such as reproduction of known B→D** observables with the identical parameter set—is described, leaving the transferability to Bs channels (where the spectator quark is strange) unverified; SU(3)-breaking differences in the extracted parameters (ρ̄², ρ², τi) are not automatically controlled by the included O(αs, Λ/mQ) terms.

    Authors: The HQET framework, including O(αs, Λ/mQ) corrections, is constructed to be universal across B and Bs systems, with the data-driven extraction of parameters (ρ̄², ρ², τi) performed from available inputs that implicitly incorporate relevant breaking effects. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit internal cross-check reproducing established B→D** observables with the same parameter set would provide stronger validation of transferability to the strange spectator case. We will add this cross-check, including a comparison of predicted versus measured quantities for B decays, in a dedicated subsection of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The uncertainties attached to the LFU ratios (e.g., (20) on R_{Ds0*}) are presented as resulting from the data-driven fit, yet the abstract supplies neither the fit details, the error-propagation procedure, nor validation against independent inputs; this directly affects the reliability of the central claim that the ratios are “precise.”

    Authors: The full details of the data-driven fit, including the χ² minimization, covariance matrix construction, error propagation through the z-expansion coefficients, and validation against independent lattice or experimental inputs, are provided in Sections 3 and 4 of the manuscript. The abstract is intended as a concise summary of the final numerical results. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to include a brief clause on the origin of the uncertainties (data-driven HQET fit with synthetic data) while retaining the main text for the complete procedure. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper explicitly employs a data-driven extraction of HQET parameters from (external) measurements to generate synthetic data, which is then used to parameterize form factors via the z-expansion before computing observables and R ratios for the B_s channels. This constitutes a standard phenomenological pipeline with external inputs rather than any self-referential reduction: the quoted R values are downstream calculations from the parameterized form factors, not a refit or renaming of the input data itself. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling are described. The chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce any prediction to its own fitted inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central results rest on HQET with O(alpha_s, Lambda/m_Q) corrections whose parameters are fitted to data, plus standard assumptions of WET/SMEFT operator bases and the 2HDM; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • HQET parameters
    Extracted via data-driven approach and used to generate synthetic data for z-expansion
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heavy Quark Effective Theory valid with corrections up to O(alpha_s, Lambda/m_Q)
    Invoked to evaluate form factors for the decays
  • domain assumption z-expansion provides reliable parameterization across full kinematic range
    Used after synthetic data generation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5864 in / 1548 out tokens · 28849 ms · 2026-07-03T09:48:49.930842+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Albrecht, F

    J. Albrecht, F. Bernlochner, A. Lenz and A. Rusov,Lifetimes of b-hadrons and mixing of neutral B-mesons: theoretical and experimental status,Eur. Phys. J. ST233(2024) 359 [2402.04224]. [3]Hea vy Fla vor A veraging Group (HFLA V)collaboration,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, andτ-lepton properties as of 2023,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 012008 [2411.18639]

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Semileptonic $B_{(s)}$ decays to excited charmed mesons with $e,\mu,\tau$ and searching for new physics with $R(D^{**})$

    F.U. Bernlochner and Z. Ligeti,SemileptonicB (s) decays to excited charmed mesons with e, µ, τand searching for new physics withR(D∗∗),Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 014022 [1606.09300]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Gubernari, A

    N. Gubernari, A. Khodjamirian, R. Mandal and T. Mannel,B→D∗ 0 andB s →D ∗ s0 form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules,JHEP12(2023) 015 [2309.10165]. [6]HPQCD, (HPQCD Collaboration)‡collaboration,B→D ∗ andB s →D ∗ s vector, axial-vector and tensor form factors for the fullq2 range from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 094515 [2304.03137]. [7]BaBarcolla...

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Proposal to study $B_s \to \bar D_{sJ}$ transitions

    D. Becirevic, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, J.-C. Raynal, P. Roudeau and J. Serrano,Proposal to studyB s → ¯DsJ transitions,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 054007 [1206.5869]. [14]Bellecollaboration,Semi-inclusive studies of semileptonicB s decays at Belle,Phys. Rev. D 92(2015) 072013 [1504.02004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Bernlochner, M.F

    F.U. Bernlochner, M.F. Sevilla, D.J. Robinson and G. Wormser,Semitauonic b-hadron decays: A lepton flavor universality laboratory,Rev. Mod. Phys.94(2022) 015003 [2101.08326]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Exclusive semileptonic B_s decays to excited D_s mesons: Search of D_{sJ}(2317) and D_{sJ}(2460)

    M.-Q. Huang,Exclusive semileptonicB s decays to excitedDs mesons: Search ofDsJ(2317) andD sJ(2460),Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 114015 [hep-ph/0404032]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    Model independent analysis of semileptonic $B$ decays to $D^{**}$ for arbitrary new physics

    F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti and D.J. Robinson,Model independent analysis of semileptonic Bdecays toD ∗∗ for arbitrary new physics,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075011 [1711.03110]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Combined analysis of semileptonic $B$ decays to $D$ and $D^*$: $R(D^{(*)})$, $|V_{cb}|$, and new physics

    F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci and D.J. Robinson,Combined analysis of semileptonicBdecays toDandD ∗:R(D (∗)),|V cb|, and new physics,Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 115008 [1703.05330]. [19]Bellecollaboration,First observation ofB→ ¯D1(→ ¯Dπ+π−)ℓ+νℓ and measurement of the B→ ¯D(∗)πℓ+νℓ andB→D (∗)π+π−ℓ+νℓ branching fractions with hadronic tagging at Belle, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

    G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras and M.E. Lautenbacher,Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys.68(1996) 1125 [hep-ph/9512380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  10. [10]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085 [1008.4884]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J.P. Silva,Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1 [1106.0034]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Baryogenesis in the Two-Higgs Doublet Model

    L. Fromme, S.J. Huber and M. Seniuch,Baryogenesis in the two-Higgs doublet model,JHEP 11(2006) 038 [hep-ph/0605242]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Electroweak Baryogenesis in Two Higgs Doublet Models and B meson anomalies

    J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen and M. Trott,Electroweak Baryogenesis in Two Higgs Doublet Models and B meson anomalies,JHEP11(2011) 089 [1107.3559]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Basler, L

    P. Basler, L. Biermann, M. Mühlleitner and J. Müller,Electroweak baryogenesis in the CP-violating two-Higgs doublet model,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 57 [2108.03580]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Lepton-flavor-violating Higgs decay $h \to \mu\tau$ and muon anomalous magnetic moment in a general two Higgs doublet model

    Y. Omura, E. Senaha and K. Tobe,Lepton-flavor-violating Higgs decayh→µτand muon anomalous magnetic moment in a general two Higgs doublet model,JHEP05(2015) 028 [1502.07824]. – 47 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    $\tau$- and $\mu$-physics in a general two Higgs doublet model with $\mu-\tau$ flavor violation

    Y. Omura, E. Senaha and K. Tobe,τ- andµ-physics in a general two Higgs doublet model withµ−τflavor violation,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 055019 [1511.08880]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Michel parameters for $\tau$ decays $\tau \rightarrow l\nu\bar{\nu}~(l=e,~\mu)$ in a general two Higgs doublet model with $\mu-\tau$ flavor violation

    K. Tobe,Michel parameters forτdecaysτ→lν¯ν(l=e, µ)in a general two Higgs doublet model withµ−τflavor violation,JHEP10(2016) 114 [1607.04447]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Status of the semileptonic $B$ decays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos

    S. Iguro and Y. Omura,Status of the semileptonicBdecays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos,JHEP05(2018) 173 [1802.01732]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Iguro,Conclusive probe of the charged Higgs solution ofP′ 5 andR D(∗) discrepancies,Phys

    S. Iguro,Conclusive probe of the charged Higgs solution ofP′ 5 andR D(∗) discrepancies,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 095004 [2302.08935]. [31]BaBarcollaboration,Evidence for an excess of ¯B→D (∗)τ −¯ντ decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 101802 [1205.5442]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Kumar,Interplay of the charged Higgs boson effects inRD(∗),b→sℓ +ℓ−, andWmass, Phys

    G. Kumar,Interplay of the charged Higgs boson effects inRD(∗),b→sℓ +ℓ−, andWmass, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 075016 [2212.07233]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Complete Michel Parameter Analysis of inclusive semileptonic b \to c transition

    B. Dassinger, R. Feger and T. Mannel,Complete Michel Parameter Analysis of inclusive semileptonicb→ctransition,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 075015 [0803.3561]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    New physics in the weak interaction of $\bar B\to D^{(*)}\tau\bar\nu$

    M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe,New physics in the weak interaction of¯B→D (∗)τ¯ν,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 034028 [1212.1878]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Cheng and S.-L

    S. Cheng and S.-L. Zhang,Ds →f 0(980)form factors and the D+ s →(f 0(980)→) [ππ] I=0 S e+νe decay from light-cone sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 379 [2307.02309]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Gubernari, A

    N. Gubernari, A. Khodjamirian, R. Mandal and T. Mannel,B→D1(2420)and B→D ′ 1(2430)form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules,JHEP05(2022) 029 [2203.08493]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Di and Y.-H

    F.-Z. Di and Y.-H. Liu,Next-to-leading-order QCD calculations ofB→Aform factors with higher-twist corrections,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 116003 [2504.13649]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Mandal,Angular analysis of ¯B→D ∗ 2(→Dπ)ℓ¯νdecay and new physics,Phys

    R. Mandal,Angular analysis of ¯B→D ∗ 2(→Dπ)ℓ¯νdecay and new physics,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 033007 [1912.03835]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Testing leptoquark models in $\bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu$

    Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov and R. Watanabe,Testing leptoquark models in ¯B→D (∗)τ¯ν,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 094012 [1309.0301]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Heavy Quark Symmetry

    M. Neubert,Heavy quark symmetry,Phys. Rept.245(1994) 259 [hep-ph/9306320]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  29. [29]

    Di Risi, D

    V. Di Risi, D. Iacobacci and F. Sannino,Λb →Λ ∗ c at1/m 2 c heavy quark mass order,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 036021 [2309.03553]. [42]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001. [43]BaBarcollaboration,Measurement of the Branching Fractions of ¯B→D ∗∗ℓ−¯νℓ Decays in Events Tagged by a Fully ReconstructedBMeson,Phys...

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Semileptonic B decays to excited charmed mesons

    A.K. Leibovich, Z. Ligeti, I.W. Stewart and M.B. Wise,Semileptonic B decays to excited charmed mesons,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 308 [hep-ph/9705467]. – 48 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    Model independent results for $B\to D_1(2420)\ell\bar\nu$ and $B\to D_2^*(2460)\ell\bar\nu$ at order $\Lambda_{QCD}/m_{c,b}$

    A.K. Leibovich, Z. Ligeti, I.W. Stewart and M.B. Wise,Predictions forB→D1(2420)ℓ¯νand B→D ∗ 2(2460)ℓ¯νat orderΛ QCD /mc,b,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 3995 [hep-ph/9703213]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [32]

    $B\to V\ell^+\ell^-$ in the Standard Model from Light-Cone Sum Rules

    A. Bharucha, D.M. Straub and R. Zwicky,B→V ℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules,JHEP08(2016) 098 [1503.05534]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Gubernari, A

    N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu and D. van Dyk,B→PandB→VForm Factors fromB-Meson Light-Cone Sum Rules beyond Leading Twist,JHEP01(2019) 150 [1811.00983]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Model-independent description of $B\to \pi l\nu$ decays and a determination of $|V_{ub}|$

    C. Bourrely, I. Caprini and L. Lellouch,Model-independent description ofB→πℓνdecays and a determination of|Vub|,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013008 [0807.2722]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Study of Form Factors and Observables in $B_c^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^{(*)0}\ell^-\bar{\nu}_{\ell}$ and $B_c^- \rightarrow D^{(*)-}\ell^+\ell^-$ decays

    U. Dey and S. Nandi,Study of form factors and observables inB− c → D (∗)0 ℓ−νℓ andB − c → D(∗)−ℓ+ℓ− decays,JHEP04(2026) 104 [2509.19445]. [51]LHCbcollaboration,Observation of the decayΛ 0 b →Λ + c τ −ντ,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 191803 [2201.03497]. [52]Bellecollaboration,Measurement of theD ∗− polarization in the decayB0 →D ∗−τ +ντ, in 10th International...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    $B \rightarrow D l \nu$ Form Factors at Non-Zero Recoil and Extraction of $|V_{cb}|$

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of the ratio of theB+ c →J/ψτ +ντ andB + c →J/ψµ +νµ branching fractions using three-prongτlepton decays in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV,CMS-PAS-BPH-23-001,(2024) . [57]HPQCDcollaboration,B→Dℓνform factors at nonzero recoil and extraction of|V cb|, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 054510 [1505.03925]. [58]Fermilab Lattice, MILCc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    $\Lambda_b \to p \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ form factors from lattice QCD with relativistic heavy quarks

    W. Detmold, C. Lehner and S. Meinel,Λb →pℓ −¯νℓ andΛ b →Λ cℓ−¯νℓ form factors from lattice QCD with relativistic heavy quarks,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 034503 [1503.01421]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Phenomenology of $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c \tau \bar{\nu}_{\tau}$ using lattice QCD calculations

    A. Datta, S. Kamali, S. Meinel and A. Rashed,Phenomenology ofΛb →Λ cτ¯ντ using lattice QCD calculations,JHEP08(2017) 131 [1702.02243]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Nandi, S

    S. Nandi, S. Sahoo and R. Sain,An imperative study of the angular observables in Λb →Λ + c (→Λπ +)ℓ −νℓ decay and probing the footprint of new physics,JHEP11(2024) 053 [2403.12155]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Renormalization-group evolution of new physics contributions to (semi)leptonic meson decays

    M. González-Alonso, J. Martin Camalich and K. Mimouni,Renormalization-group evolution – 49 – of new physics contributions to (semi)leptonic meson decays,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 777 [1706.00410]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Matching of gauge invariant dimension 6 operators for $b\to s$ and $b\to c$ transitions

    J. Aebischer, A. Crivellin, M. Fael and C. Greub,Matching of gauge invariant dimension-six operators forb→sandb→ctransitions,JHEP05(2016) 037 [1512.02830]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Athron, A

    P. Athron, A. Crivellin, T.E. Gonzalo, S. Iguro and C. Sierra,Global fit to the 2HDM with generic sources of flavour violation using GAMBIT,JHEP11(2024) 133 [2410.10493]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Accumulating Hints for Flavour Violating Higgses at the Electroweak Scale

    A. Crivellin and S. Iguro,Accumulating hints for flavor-violating Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 015014 [2311.03430]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    New Physics effect on $B_c \to J/\psi \tau\bar\nu$ in relation to the $R_{D^{(*)}}$ anomaly

    R. Watanabe,New Physics effect onBc →J/ψτ¯νin relation to theR D(∗) anomaly,Phys. Lett. B776(2018) 5 [1709.08644]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Bečirević, F

    D. Bečirević, F. Jaffredo, A. Peñuelas and O. Sumensari,New Physics effects in leptonic and semileptonic decays,JHEP05(2021) 175 [2012.09872]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Lepton Flavor Universality tests through angular observables of $\overline{B}\to D^{(\ast)}\ell\overline{\nu}$ decay modes

    D. Bečirević, M. Fedele, I. Nišandžić and A. Tayduganov,Lepton Flavor Universality tests through angular observables ofB→D (∗)ℓνdecay modes,1907.02257. – 50 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907