Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

An Introduction to Electrocatalyst Design using Machine Learning for Renewable Energy Storage

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.09435 v1 pith:DG4E6ZPZ submitted 2020-10-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.CEcs.LG

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.CEcs.LG
keywords energyrenewablestorageelectrocatalystsfindinglearningmachinepower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Scalable and cost-effective solutions to renewable energy storage are essential to addressing the world's rising energy needs while reducing climate change. As we increase our reliance on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, which produce intermittent power, storage is needed to transfer power from times of peak generation to peak demand. This may require the storage of power for hours, days, or months. One solution that offers the potential of scaling to nation-sized grids is the conversion of renewable energy to other fuels, such as hydrogen or methane. To be widely adopted, this process requires cost-effective solutions to running electrochemical reactions. An open challenge is finding low-cost electrocatalysts to drive these reactions at high rates. Through the use of quantum mechanical simulations (density functional theory), new catalyst structures can be tested and evaluated. Unfortunately, the high computational cost of these simulations limits the number of structures that may be tested. The use of machine learning may provide a method to efficiently approximate these calculations, leading to new approaches in finding effective electrocatalysts. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the challenges in finding suitable electrocatalysts, how machine learning may be applied to the problem, and the use of the Open Catalyst Project OC20 dataset for model training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Open Catalyst Experiments 2024 (OCx24): Bridging Experiments and Computational Models

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    OCx24 is a new experimental catalyst dataset plus a computational adsorption-energy screen whose HER model generalizes to unseen compositions and recovers platinum as a top candidate.

  2. Understanding Learning Invariance in Deep Linear Networks

    stat.ML 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under MSE training of deep linear networks, data augmentation and hard-wired invariance share global optima and critical points; regularization adds saddles and its solution path limits to the hard-wired optimum.

  3. LAMBench: A Benchmark for Large Atomistic Models

    physics.comp-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LAMBench evaluates ten large atomistic models on out-of-distribution accuracy, property prediction, fine-tuning, speed, and stability, finding a large gap to a universal potential and DPA-3.1-3M at the top.

  4. Energy & Force Regression on DFT Trajectories is Not Enough for Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A perspective arguing that current MLIP training on DFT data is insufficient, and proposing CCSD(T)-quality data, metrology, and efficient inference as research priorities.

Pith tools