Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Did You Ask a Good Question? A Cross-Domain Question Intention Classification Benchmark for Text-to-SQL

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.12634 v1 pith:DG6H5ZQI submitted 2020-10-23 cs.CL

Did You Ask a Good Question? A Cross-Domain Question Intention Classification Benchmark for Text-to-SQL

classification cs.CL
keywords inputquestionquestionstext-to-sqlbenchmarkclassificationcross-domainintention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural models have achieved significant results on the text-to-SQL task, in which most current work assumes all the input questions are legal and generates a SQL query for any input. However, in the real scenario, users can input any text that may not be able to be answered by a SQL query. In this work, we propose TriageSQL, the first cross-domain text-to-SQL question intention classification benchmark that requires models to distinguish four types of unanswerable questions from answerable questions. The baseline RoBERTa model achieves a 60% F1 score on the test set, demonstrating the need for further improvement on this task. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/chatc/TriageSQL.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ABISS: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Systems Through Agent Interaction

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new benchmark shows that text-to-SQL models detect problematic questions but fail to pinpoint the exact problem type and to resolve the question after a useful clarification.

  2. Natural Language Interfaces for Spatial and Temporal Databases: A Comprehensive Overview of Methods, Taxonomy, and Future Directions

    cs.DB 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A literature survey that taxonomizes methods, datasets, and evaluation practices for natural language interfaces to geospatial and temporal databases while identifying recurring trends and future directions.