Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 54 references

StemVLA claims that a robot policy improves on long-horizon tasks when the language model is trained to forecast future 3D scene geometry and to encode past frames as a 4D history, achieving state-of-the-art LIBERO and CALVIN results.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 20:12 UTC pith:DGBAVAN3

load-bearing objection A genuinely new recipe, but as submitted it is unverifiable: missing equations, placeholder CALVIN numbers, no code, and an ablation that cannot separate future-geometry supervision from any auxiliary loss. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2602.23721 v2 pith:DGBAVAN3 submitted 2026-02-27 cs.RO cs.CV

StemVLA:An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model with Future 3D Spatial Geometry Knowledge and 4D Historical Representation

Jiasong Xiao , Yutao She , Kai Li , Yuyang Sha , Ziang Cheng This is my paper
classification cs.RO cs.CV
keywords vision-language-actionrobot manipulation3D spatial geometry4D spatiotemporal representationfuture predictionlong-horizon planningdiffusion policyworld model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper is trying to establish that a vision-language-action model becomes a better long-horizon robot policy when it is explicitly trained to represent the 3D geometry of what comes next, not just the pixels of the present. StemVLA adds a future-oriented prediction head that regresses geometry features extracted from future frames, and a temporal aggregation module that fuses 3D features from past frames into a 4D historical representation. On the LIBERO benchmark the full model reports 92.0% average success and 86.0% on LIBERO-Long, with an ablation attributing a 19-point jump on LIBERO-Long (67.0% to 86.0%) to the future-geometry module alone. A sympathetic reader would care because this points to world-knowledge supervision in latent 3D space as an alternative to pixel-level video prediction for improving manipulation.

Core claim

StemVLA's central claim is that explicit future spatial-geometric supervision is the missing ingredient in current VLA models. The model uses a pretrained visual-geometry transformer to extract latent 3D features from both historical and future observation frames; the future features act as regression targets, and the model is trained with an L2 loss to predict those future geometry features from current observations, language, and history. The same geometry encoder, followed by a temporal attention aggregator, builds a 4D historical representation of past motion. The paper reports that this combination yields state-of-the-art average completed sequence length on CALVIN ABC-D and 92.0% avera

What carries the argument

The central object is the 3D Future Spatial-Geometric World Knowledge Predictor (FSGWP), a training-time head driven by a learned <spatial-geometric> query through the GPT-2-based language backbone; it predicts VGGT features of future frames and is trained with an L2 loss. The supporting object is the Historical Spatio-Temporal Encoder: VGGT, a pretrained visual-geometry transformer that produces depth-aware latent 3D features, plus VideoFormer, a temporal attention module that aggregates those features over time into a 4D historical representation. The <action> query then feeds a diffusion transformer that generates action sequences. The division of labor is concrete: the future-geometry he

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that matching an L2 prediction target to VGGT features of future frames teaches the model genuinely geometric future knowledge, and that the 19-point LIBERO-Long gain comes from that geometry rather than from any auxiliary prediction signal.

What would settle it

Train StemVLA under identical conditions but replace the future-geometry target with a non-geometric future feature target—say, features from the same visual encoder with geometry information scrambled or a 2D future-frame feature target—while keeping the loss weight and setup fixed. If LIBERO-Long still improves from 67.0% to roughly 86.0%, the geometry interpretation fails; if it does not, the geometric content of the target is the active ingredient.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the future-geometry mechanism is what drives the gains, then other VLA architectures can adopt the same training-time regression target without changing their inference-time policy.
  • The largest ablation jump appears on LIBERO-Long, suggesting explicit 3D forecasting matters most as task horizon grows.
  • Because the prediction heads are dropped at inference, the model gets the benefit of world-knowledge supervision at no extra deployment cost.
  • The 4D history encoder offers a reusable way to inject temporal structure into language-model-based policies beyond frame-stacking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests a broader design principle: latent 3D geometry is a better auxiliary training signal than raw pixels. A testable extension is to compare the same loss against future-frame feature targets from a 2D encoder; if the geometry target wins, the 3D content is doing the work.
  • One implicit consequence is that future-geometry supervision could be applied to non-language policies or even perception-only models, decoupling the representation benefit from the language backbone.
  • The paper leaves open how far ahead the 'n steps' horizon should reach; the +19-point result hints that horizon length itself is a knob worth sweeping, especially on longer benchmarks.
  • The design also implies that a purely RGB-based VLA can acquire depth-like spatial awareness without ever seeing depth labels at training time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. StemVLA proposes a GPT-2-based vision-language-action model that augments 2D image and language inputs with (i) a 4D historical spatiotemporal representation obtained by feeding past frames through VGGT and a VideoFormer temporal aggregator, and (ii) a 3D future spatial-geometric world-knowledge prediction head (FSGWP) supervised by an L2 loss against VGGT features extracted from future frames. Actions are produced by a diffusion transformer conditioned on an action query. The paper claims state-of-the-art CALVIN ABC-D performance and strong LIBERO results, with ablations attributing large gains to the FSGWP module. The manuscript as submitted, however, is incomplete: the key equations are missing, the StemVLA CALVIN row and abstract numbers are placeholders, and the ablation design does not isolate geometric content from auxiliary supervision.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the core idea is timely and potentially useful: using a pretrained 3D reconstruction model as a target for latent future-geometry prediction, rather than pixel-level future-frame prediction, is a plausible way to inject spatial structure into a VLA. The paper also builds on externally validated components (VGGT, VideoFormer/VPP, DiT) and evaluates on standard benchmarks, so the empirical claims are in principle checkable rather than circular. The current manuscript, however, does not yet provide the evidence needed to assess these claims: the equation for the central FSGWP loss is absent, the authors' own CALVIN numbers are missing, and the ablation that carries the mechanistic story lacks the control necessary to distinguish geometric supervision from any auxiliary prediction loss.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, §3.4, §3.5, Eqs. (1)–(7)] Equations (1)–(7) are referenced in the text but none are actually printed. In particular, Eq. (6), the 3D Future Spatial-Geometric World Knowledge loss, and Eq. (7), the action diffusion loss, are central to the method, yet their functional forms, notation (o_t, H, z, feature dimensions), and loss weighting are undefined. Without these equations the FSGWP mechanism and the training objective are not checkable. The section must be rewritten with complete mathematical definitions.
  2. [§4.2, Table 2, Abstract] The central CALVIN claim is unsupported by the manuscript as written. Table 2's StemVLA row consists entirely of 'xx.x' placeholders, and the Abstract and Introduction report the average sequence length as 'XXX' and improvement as 'XX.X% to XX.X%'. A state-of-the-art claim requires the actual numbers, the number of rollouts, and a description of the evaluation protocol. These placeholders are load-bearing and must be filled before the paper can be evaluated.
  3. [§4.3, Table 4, Q2] The FSGWP ablation does not control for the type of auxiliary supervision. Removing FSGWP changes both the prediction target (VGGT features of future frames) and the presence of an auxiliary loss/decoder/query. A generic non-geometric or non-future target — e.g., current-frame VGGT features, future-frame CLIP/MAE features, or a random feature target — could plausibly produce the same regularization benefit. The +19-point LIBERO-Long gain is therefore not attributable to 'future 3D spatial-geometric world knowledge' without such a control. Please add at least one control target or substantially weaken the mechanistic interpretation.
  4. [§4.2, Table 3] The table contains arithmetic inconsistencies that undermine confidence in the reported magnitudes. The CoT-VLA row (Spatial 81.1, Object 87.5, Goal 91.6, Long 87.6) averages to 87.0, not the reported 69.0. The StemVLA row (96.0, 96.0, 92.0, 86.0) averages to 92.5, not the reported 92.0. These are not cosmetic issues: they affect the headline average-accuracy claim in the Abstract. Recompute and correct all averages, or state explicitly if the 'Average' column is computed over a different subset.
  5. [§5, §6, and general manuscript readiness] The manuscript is not in a reviewable state: the Conclusion contains 'XXXX success rate', the Abstract/Introduction contain 'XXX' placeholders, and the title promises 'Open-Source' but no code or checkpoints are provided anywhere in the text. Please complete all numeric entries, include a reproducibility statement/code link, and remove or resolve all placeholder tokens.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, Table 1] The 'Pixel-wise Loss: 0.1' hyperparameter is not connected to any equation or described in the method. Clarify what it applies to and where it enters the total loss.
  2. [§4.3] No standard deviations, number of seeds, or significance tests are reported for the LIBERO ablations. Given the magnitude of the claimed differences, at least multiple-seed results or error bars should be provided.
  3. [References and notation] The paper uses inconsistent names for the same ideas ('Spatial-Geometry' vs. 'Spatial-Geometric'; 'History Aggregator' vs. 'VideoFormer'), and some references are cited only by arXiv preprint numbers without version dates. Also, reference [20] is listed as the VPP paper but is also used as the source of VideoFormer; clarify the relationship.
  4. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and grammatical errors (e.g., 'integartes', 'benifical', 'secion', 'extend the world state n steps into the future' without defining n). A full language edit is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the pipeline is an empirical combination of externally cited modules evaluated on external benchmarks; the noted ablation confound and missing equation are correctness/completeness concerns, not definitional reductions.

full rationale

StemVLA is an empirical systems paper rather than a derivation, so self-definitional, fitted-prediction, and uniqueness-import patterns do not apply on their face. The central results are measured against external benchmarks (LIBERO, CALVIN) and the reused components (VGGT [36], VideoFormer [20], DiT [42]) are other authors' work cited normally; there are no self-citations by the present authors and no reliance on a prior uniqueness theorem. The FSGWP loss (Eq. 6, whose displayed form is omitted from the manuscript) uses VGGT features of future frames as the operational target for '3D future spatial-geometric world knowledge'; this is a proxy/operationalization choice, not a definitional reduction of the paper's action-prediction claims, because the future-frame features are not available at inference and the auxiliary L2 loss does not by construction force the reported success rates. The main weaknesses—absence of a non-geometric or non-future auxiliary-loss control in Table 4, the unprinted Eq. 6, the CoT-VLA row average inconsistency in Table 3 (row 81.1/87.5/91.6/87.6 averages to ~87, not 69.0), and the XXX placeholders for CALVIN results—create real correctness/completeness risk in the mechanistic attribution, but none of them makes a claimed result equivalent to its own input. Under the requirement to quote a specific reduction (Eq. X = Eq. Y or fitted parameter renamed as prediction), no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper contributes no derivation; it assembles two borrowed modules (VGGT [36], VideoFormer [20]) around a GPT-2 MLLM and a DiT action head. Everything the central claim rests on is either borrowed trust (VGGT features approximate 3D geometry; VideoFormer approximates temporal dynamics), hand-chosen training weights, or the unstated assumption that the auxiliary future-feature loss transfers to action quality. The only internally validated numbers are the LIBERO ablations, and those lack error bars.

free parameters (5)
  • 3D future world-knowledge loss weight (lambda_wk) = 0.1
    Hand-chosen in Table 1; every ablation gain attributed to the FSGWP module depends on this weighting being effective.
  • Pixel-wise loss weight = 0.1
    Listed in Table 1 loss weights, but no pixel-prediction head exists in the method; conflicts with the paper's argument against pixel-level prediction.
  • Diffusion steps = 10
    DiT sampling steps in Table 1; affects action-generation quality and the reported success rates.
  • Query length per modality = 9
    Learned query tokens per modality in Table 1; capacity of the spatial/action queries.
  • Training epochs / checkpoint selection = 40 epochs, best validation SR
    Checkpoint chosen by highest validation success rate (Table 1); optimistic selection without reported variance across seeds.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption VGGT [36] latent features extracted from 2D frames faithfully encode 3D spatial geometry (depth/layout) usable as '3D spatial-geometric world knowledge'.
    Invoked in Secs. 3.1 and 3.3 and used as the ground-truth label source in Sec. 3.4; no verification of the feature semantics is given.
  • domain assumption The temporal attention module VideoFormer [20] aggregates VGGT features into a unified 4D representation that preserves motion dynamics rather than collapsing to an average.
    Sec. 3.3; the whole 4D-history contribution rests on this transfer.
  • domain assumption Supervising the MLLM's spatial embedding to match VGGT features of future frames (Eq. 6) improves downstream action generation.
    Sec. 3.4 and Table 4; the central causal claim of the FSGWP module, with no control target tested.
  • domain assumption Baseline numbers in Tables 2 and 3 are accurate transcriptions from the cited papers.
    Tables 2-3; the CoT-VLA average (69.0) does not match its own row (mean 87.0), so this assumption is already violated somewhere.
  • domain assumption GPT-2-based MLLM, CLIP text encoder, and MAE image encoder provide adequate fusion and representation capacity.
    Sec. 3.2; standard backbone choices taken from prior literature without re-derivation.
invented entities (2)
  • <spatial-geometric> learnable query token no independent evidence
    purpose: Aggregates geometric/spatial information from multimodal tokens to feed the 3D-future geometry prediction head.
    Learned token with no falsifiable handle outside the paper; its predicted output (VGGT features) is never reported or validated against real geometry.
  • <action> learnable query token no independent evidence
    purpose: Aggregates task-relevant information into a latent action embedding for the DiT action head.
    Standard soft prompt; architectural, with no external falsifiable handle.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12337 in / 21372 out tokens · 170277 ms · 2026-08-02T20:12:29.940059+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-language-action (VLA) models integrate visual observations and language instructions to predict robot actions, demonstrating promising generalization in manipulation tasks. However, most existing approaches primarily rely on direct mappings from 2D visual inputs to action sequences, without explicitly modeling the underlying 3D spatial structure or temporal world dynamics. Such representations may limit spatial reasoning and long-horizon decision-making in dynamic environments. To address this limitation, we propose StemVLA, a novel framework that explicitly incorporates both future-oriented 3D spatial knowledge and historical 4D spatiotemporal representations into action prediction. First, instead of relying solely on observed images, StemVLA forecasts structured 3D future spatial-geometric world knowledge, enabling the model to anticipate upcoming scene geometry and object configurations. Second, to capture temporal consistency and motion dynamics, we feed historical image frames into a pretrained video-geometry transformer backbone to extract implicit 3D world representations, and further aggregate them across time using a temporal attention module, termed VideoFormer [20], forming a unified 4D historical spatiotemporal representation. By jointly modeling 2D observations, predicted 3D future structure, and aggregated 4D temporal dynamics, StemVLA enables more comprehensive world understanding for robot manipulation. Extensive experiments in simulation demonstrate that Stem-VLA achieves an average accuracy of 92.0% across the LIBERO subsets, and 86.0% on the long-horizon LIBERO-Long subset.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 30 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Openvla: An open -source vision-language-action model

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open -source vision-language-action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Joshi, Ryan Ju lian, Dmitry Kalashnikov, et al

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Joseph Dabis, Chelsea Finn, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, Alexander Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, Julian Ibarz, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, Tomas Jackson, Sally Jesmonth, Nikhil J. Joshi, Ryan Ju lian, Dmitry Kalashnikov, et al. RT-1: robotics transformer for real-world control at scale. In Ro...

    2023

  3. [3]

    Embodiedgpt: Vision -language pre -training via embodied chain of thought

    Yao Mu, Qinglong Zhang, Mengkang Hu, Wenhai Wang, Mingyu Ding, Jun Jin, Bin Wang, Jifeng Dai, Yu Qiao, and Ping Luo. Embodiedgpt: Vision -language pre -training via embodied chain of thought. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Learning man ipulation skills 17 through robot chain -of-thought with sparse failure guidance

    Kaifeng Zhang, Zhao -Heng Yin, Weirui Ye, and Yang Gao. Learning man ipulation skills 17 through robot chain -of-thought with sparse failure guidance. 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , Hangzhou, China, 2025, pp. 8012-8018, doi: 10.1109/IROS60139.2025.11247602

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Robotwin: Dual -arm robot benchmark with generative digital twins

    YaoMu,TianxingChen, Shijia Peng, Zanxin Chen, Zeyu Gao, Y ude Zou, Lunkai Lin, Zhiqiang Xie, and Ping Luo. Robotwin: Dual -arm robot benchmark with generative digital twins. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 264–273. Springer, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Scissorbot: Learning generalizable scissor skill for paper cutting via simulation, imitation, and sim2real

    Jiangran Lyu, Yuxing Chen, Tao Du, Feng Zhu, Huiquan Liu, Yizhou Wang, and He Wang. Scissorbot: Learning generalizable scissor skill for paper cutting via simulation, imitation, and sim2real. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13966, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhinav Gupta, Abhiram Maddukuri, Abhishek Gupta, Ab hishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Pooley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , Yokohama, Japan, 2024, pp. 6892 -6903, doi: 10.1109/ICRA57147.2...

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Octo: An open -source generalist robot policy

    Octo Model Team, Dibya Ghosh, Homer Walke, Karl Pertsch, Kevin Black, Oier Mees, Sudeep Dasari, Joey Hejna, Tobias Kreiman, Ch arles Xu, et al. Octo: An open -source generalist robot policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213, 2024. 1, 3, 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation

    Hongtao Wu, Ya Jing, Chilam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Jiafeng Xu, Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hang Li, and Tao Kong. Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation. In The 12th International Conference on Learning Representations. 3, 7, 8, 25

  10. [10]

    Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation

    Mohit Shridhar, Lucas Manuelli, and Dieter Fox. Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation. In Conference on robot learning, pages 894–906. PMLR, 2022. 3

    2022

  11. [11]

    Gr-2: A generative video-language-action model with web-scale knowledge for robot manipulation

    Chi -Lam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Ya Jing, Tao Kong, Hang Li, Yifeng Li, Yuxiao Liu, Hongtao Wu, Jiafeng Xu, Yichu Yang, et al. Gr-2: A generative video-language-action model with web-scale knowledge for robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06158, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Prismatic vlms: Investigating the design space of visually -conditioned language models

    Siddharth Karamcheti, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Balakrishna, Percy Liang, Thomas Kollar, and Dorsa Sadigh. Prismatic vlms: Investigating the design space of visually -conditioned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07865, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Paligemma: A versatile 3b vlm for transfer

    Lucas Beyer , Andreas Steiner, André Susano Pinto, Alexander Kolesnikov, Xiao Wang, Daniel Salz, Maxim Neumann, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Michael Tschannen, Emanuele 18 Bugliarello, et al. Paligemma: A versatile 3b vlm for transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07726,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators

    Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hanbo Zhang, Cunjun Yu, Jie Xu, Hongtao Wu, Chilam Cheang, Ya Jing, Weinan Zhang, Huaping Liu, et al. Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. 1, 3, 7, 8, 28

  15. [15]

    pi0: A vision -language-action flow model for general robot control

    Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et al. pi0: A vision -language-action flow model for general robot control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024. 1, 3, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Tinyvla: Towards fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation

    Junjie Wen, Yichen Zhu, Jinming Li, Minjie Zhu, Zhibin Tang, Kun Wu, Zhiyuan Xu, Ning Liu, Ran Cheng, Chaomin Shen, et al. Tinyvla: Towards fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025. 3

    2025

  17. [17]

    Spatialvla: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language-action model, 2025

    Delin Qu, Haoming Song, Qizhi Chen, Yuanqi Yao, Xinyi Ye, Yan Ding, Zhigang Wang, JiaYuan Gu, Bin Zhao, Dong Wang, and Xuelong Li. Spatialvla: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language-action model, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15830.8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Towards generalist robot policies: What matters in building vision-language-action models

    Xinghang Li, Peiyan Li, Minghuan Liu, Dong Wang, Jirong Liu, Bingyi Kang, Xiao Ma, Tao Kong, Hanbo Zhang, and Huaping Liu. Towards generalist robot policies: What matters in building vision-language-action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14058, 2024. 3, 7, 8, 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Flower: Democratizing generalist robot policies with efficient vision -language action flow policies

    Moritz Reuss, Hongyi Zhou, Marcel Rühle, Ömer Erdinç Ya˘gmurlu, Fabian Otto, and Rudolf Lioutikov. Flower: Democratizing generalist robot policies with efficient vision -language action flow policies. In 7th Robot Learning Workshop: Towards Robots with Human-Level Abilities. 3

  20. [20]

    Video Prediction Policy: A Generalist Robot Pol icy with Predictive Visual Representations

    Yucheng Hu, Yanjiang Guo, Pengchao Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Yen-Jen Wang, Jianke Zhang , Koushil Sreenath , Chaochao Lu , Jianyu Chen . Video Prediction Policy: A Generalist Robot Pol icy with Predictive Visual Representations. arXiv preprint URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2412.14803

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Rt -trajectory: Robotic task generalization via hindsight trajectory sketches

    Jiayuan Gu, Sean Kirmani, Paul Wohlhart, Yao Lu, Montserrat Gonzalez Arenas, Kanishka Rao, Wenhao Yu, Chuyuan Fu, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Zhuo Xu, et al. Rt -trajectory: Robotic task generalization via hindsight trajectory sketches. In The Twelfth Inter national Conference on Learning Representations

  22. [22]

    Pivot -r: Primitive -driven waypoint -aware world model for robotic manipulation

    Kaidong Zhang, Pengzhen Ren, Bingqian Lin, Junfan Lin, Shikui Ma, Hang Xu, and Xiaodan Liang. Pivot -r: Primitive -driven waypoint -aware world model for robotic manipulation. In The 19 Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

  23. [23]

    Any-point trajectory modeling for policy learning

    Chuan Wen, Xingyu Lin, John So, Kai Chen, Qi Dou, Yang Gao, and Pieter Abbeel. Any-point trajectory modeling for policy learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00025, 2023. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Dreamgen: Unlocking generalization in robot learning through neural trajectories

    Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Zongyu Lin, Jiannan Xiang, Johan Bjorck, Y u Fang, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, Kaushil Kundalia, Yen -Chen Lin, et al. Dreamgen: Unlocking generalization in robot learning through neural trajectories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12705, 2025. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Ladiwm: A latent diffusion -based world model for predictive manipulation

    Yuha ng Huang, JIazhao Zhang, Shilong Zou, XInwang Liu, Ruizhen Hu, and Kai Xu. Ladiwm: A latent diffusion -based world model for predictive manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11528, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Up-vla: A unified understanding and prediction model for embodied agent

    Jianke Zhang, Yanjiang Guo, Y ucheng Hu, Xiaoyu Chen, Xiang Zhu , and Jianyu Chen. Up-vla: A unified understanding and prediction model for embodied agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18867, 2025. 7, 8, 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Cot -vla: Visual chain -of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action models

    Qingqing Zhao, Yao Lu, Moo Jin Kim, Zipeng Fu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yecheng Wu, Zhaoshuo Li, Qianli Ma, Song Han, C helsea Finn, et al. Cot -vla: Visual chain -of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22020, 2025. 2, 3, 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Reinbot: Amplifyin g robot visual -language manipulation with reinforcement learning

    Hongyin Zhang, Zifeng Zhuang, Han Zhao, Pengxiang Ding, Hongchao Lu, and Donglin Wang. Reinbot: Amplifyin g robot visual -language manipulation with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07395, 2025. 1, 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Shapellm: Universal 3d object understandi ng for embodied interaction

    Zekun Qi, Runpei Dong, Shaochen Zhang, Haoran Geng, Chunrui Han, Zheng Ge, Li Yi, and Kaisheng Ma. Shapellm: Universal 3d object understandi ng for embodied interaction. In Computer Vision- ECCV 2024-18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29-October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part XLIII, volume 15101 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pages 214–

    2024

  30. [30]

    Navid: Video -based vlm plans the next step for vision-and-language navigation

    Jiazhao Zhang, Kunyu Wang, Rongtao Xu, Gengze Zhou, Yicong Hong, Xiaomeng Fang, Qi Wu, Zhizheng Zhang, and He Wang. Navid: Video -based vlm plans the next step for vision-and-language navigation. Robotics: Science and Systems, 2024. 3

    2024

  31. [31]

    Uni -navid: A video -based vision-language-action model for unifying embodied navigation tasks

    Jiazhao Zhang, KunyuWang, ShaoanWang, MinghanLi, HaoranLiu, SonglinWei, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, and He Wang. Uni -navid: A video -based vision-language-action model for unifying embodied navigation tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06224, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models

    Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timo 20 thée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Openaio3ando4 -minisystem card, 2025

    Op enAI. Openaio3ando4 -minisystem card, 2025. URL https://openai.com/research/o3-o4-mini-system-card. 3

    2025

  34. [34]

    DreamLLM: Synergistic multimodal comprehension and creation

    Runpei Dong, Chunrui Han, Yuang Peng, Zekun Qi, Zheng Ge, Jinrong Yang, Liang Zhao, Jianjian Sun, Hongyu Zhou, Haoran Wei, Xiangwen Kong, Xiangyu Zhang, Kaisheng Ma, and Li Yi. DreamLLM: Synergistic multimodal comprehension and creation. In Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2024. 3, 4

    2024

  35. [35]

    Bridge data: Boosting generalization of robotic skills with cross-domain datasets

    Frederik Ebert, Yanlai Yang, Karl Schmeckpeper, Bernadette Bucher, Georgios Georgakis, Kostas Daniilidis, Chelse a Finn, and Sergey Levine. Bridge data: Boosting generalization of robotic skills with cross-domain datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13396, 2021. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformer

    Jianyuan Wang, Minghao Chen , Nikita Karaev, Andrea Vedaldi, Christian Rupprecht and David Novotny . VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11651

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Graspvla: a grasping foundation model pre-trained on billion-scale synthetic action data

    Shengliang Deng, Mi Yan, Songlin Wei, Haixin Ma, Yuxin Yang, Jiayi Chen, Zhiqi Zhang, Taoyu Yang, Xuheng Zhang, Heming Cui, et al. Graspvla: a grasping foundation model pre-trained on billion-scale synthetic action data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03233, 2025. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Tran, RaduSoricut, Anikait Singh, Jaspia r Singh, Pierre Sermanet, Pannag R

    Brianna Zitkovich, Tianhe Yu, Sichun Xu, Peng Xu, Ted Xiao, Fei Xia, Jialin Wu, Paul Wohlhart, Stefan Welker, Ayzaan Wahid, Quan Vuong, Vincent Vanhoucke, Huong T. Tran, RaduSoricut, Anikait Singh, Jaspia r Singh, Pierre Sermanet, Pannag R. Sanketi, Grecia Salazar, Michael S. Ryoo, Krista Reymann, Kanishka Rao, Karl Pertsch, Igor Mordatch, Henryk Michalew...

    2023

  39. [39]

    Hybridvla: Col laborative diffusion and autoregression in a unified vision-language-action model

    Jiaming Liu, Hao Chen, Pengju An, Zhuoyang Liu, Renrui Zhang, Chenyang Gu, Xiaoqi Li, 21 Ziyu Guo, Sixiang Chen, Mengzhen Liu, et al. Hybridvla: Col laborative diffusion and autoregression in a unified vision-language-action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10631, 2025. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    pi0.5: a vision language-action model with open-world generalization

    Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Che lsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, et al. pi0.5: a vision language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Hume: Introducing system -2 thinking in visual -language action model

    Haoming Song, Delin Qu, Yuanqi Yao, Qizhi Chen, Qi Lv, Yiwen Tang, Modi Shi, Guanghui Ren, Maoqing Yao, Bi n Zhao, et al. Hume: Introducing system -2 thinking in visual -language action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21432, 2025. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion

    Cheng Chi, Zhenjia Xu, Siyuan Feng, Eric Cousineau, Yilun Du, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, and Shuran Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. The International Journal of Robotics Research, page 02783649241273668, 2023. 3, 5, 7, 8, 9

    2023

  43. [43]

    Dita: Scaling diffusion transformer for generalist vision-language-action policy

    Zhi Hou, Tianyi Zhang, Yuwen Xiong, Haonan Duan, Hengjun Pu, Ronglei Tong, Chengyang Zhao, Xizhou Zhu, Yu Qiao, Jifeng Dai, et al. Dita: Scaling diffusion transformer for generalist vision-language-action policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19757, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Rdt -1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Rdt -1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    3d diffusion policy

    Yanjie Ze, Gu Zhang, Kangning Zhang, Chenyuan Hu, Muhan Wang, and Huazhe Xu. 3d diffusion policy. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2403, 2024. 3

    2024

  46. [46]

    Calvin: A benchmark for language -conditioned policy learnin g for long -horizon robot manipulation tasks

    Oier Mees, Lukas Hermann, Erick Rosete-Beas, and Wolfram Burgard. Calvin: A benchmark for language -conditioned policy learnin g for long -horizon robot manipulation tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3):7327–7334, 2022. 7, 11, 24, 25

    2022

  47. [47]

    Zero -shot robotic manip ulation with pretrained image -editing diffusion models

    Kevin Black, Mitsuhiko Nakamoto, Pranav Atreya, Homer Walke, Chelsea Finn, Aviral Kumar, and Sergey Levine. Zero -shot robotic manip ulation with pretrained image -editing diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10639, 2023. 7, 8, 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Towards synergistic, generalized, and efficient dual -system for robotic manipulation

    Qingwen Bu, Hongyang Li, Li Chen, Jisong Cai, Jia Zeng, Heming Cui, Maoqing Yao, and Yu Qiao. Towards synergistic, generalized, and efficient dual -system for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08001, 2024. 7, 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Univla: Learning to act anywhere with task -centric latent actions

    Qingwen Bu, Yanting Yang, Jisong Cai, Shenyuan Gao, Guanghui Ren, Maoqing Yao, Ping 22 Luo, and Hongyang Li. Univla: Learning to act anywhere with task -centric latent actions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06111, 2025. 7, 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Closed -loop visuomotor control with generative expectation for robotic manipulation

    Qingwen Bu, Jia Zeng, Li Chen, Yanchao Yang, Guyue Zhou, Junchi Yan, Ping Luo, Heming Cui, Yi Ma, and Hongyang Li. Closed -loop visuomotor control with generative expectation for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09016, 2024. 7, 8, 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    LIBERO: benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning

    Bo Liu, Yifeng Zhu, Chongkai Gao, Yihao Feng, Qiang Liu, Y uke Zhu, and Peter Stone. LIBERO: benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning. In Alice Oh, Tristan Naumann, Amir Globerson, Kate Saenko, Moritz Hardt, and Sergey Levine, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processi...

    2023

  52. [52]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2019. 7

    2019

  53. [53]

    OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al.Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019. 5, 22

    2019

  54. [238]

    Springer, 2024. 3, 11

    2024