Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Efficient quantum transport in disordered Floquet networks

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two design principles—Floquet antisymmetry and a dominant doublet or triplet of Floquet states—guarantee near-perfect quantum transport in disordered driven networks without fine-tuning.

desk verdict Solid Floquet extension of the dominant-doublet program; the per-realization resonance tuning is the main gap between the ensemble statistics and the 'despite disorder' claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19278 v1 pith:DGKYMYDD submitted 2026-07-21 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.bio-ph

Hlér Kristjánsson , Jonathan Brugger , Gabriel Dufour , Christian Scheppach , Andreas Buchleitner This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.dis-nnphysics.bio-ph
keywords quantumtransportdisorderednetworksFloquettheoryantisymmetrydominantdoubletvibrationaldrivingphotosyntheticcomplexesstatetransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that near-perfect quantum transport through a disordered network with a downhill energy gradient can be achieved by periodic driving, provided the ensemble of network Hamiltonians satisfies two design principles: Floquet antisymmetry (anticommutation with a combined space-time reflection) and the existence of a dominant doublet (or triplet) of Floquet states. When these hold, the transfer probability is essentially a large-amplitude slow oscillation whose maximum is bounded below by the square of the doublet (or triplet) strength—so the only requirement is that random realizations frequently land near this ideal structure. The authors verify numerically that Floquet antisymmetry sharply increases the fraction of realizations with near-unity transfer, and show that static couplings can speed up transfer by an order of magnitude. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a route to robust, fast transport in biological and artificial light-harvesting networks without fine-tuning individual couplings.

What carries the argument

The key object is the Floquet Hamiltonian H_F acting on Floquet-Hilbert space, with the thorn operator Þ = J⊗θ (spatial reflection J times time reversal θ). Floquet antisymmetry is the anticommutation {H_F, Þ}=0, which pairs quasi-energies ε and −ε and maps an ideal doublet state onto its partner. The dominant doublet condition measures the overlap β of the two most relevant Floquet states with the ideal resonant states of a resonantly driven two-site system; the analog triplet condition (γ) applies at two-phonon resonance for odd N. These overlaps directly enter the transfer probability formula, so the argument reduces near-perfect transport to the statistical prevalence of large β (or γ) i

What would settle it

Choose an ensemble of disordered networks, drive all realizations with a single fixed frequency (rather than per-realization resonance), and compute β and P_max; if the high-transfer concentration disappears, the resonance assumption is essential rather than technical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a single-excitation network with random couplings and a strong linear energy gradient, driving the network at resonance with the static input-output gap creates a Floquet structure that supports near-perfect transport. Concretely, if the Floquet Hamiltonian anticommutes with the combined operator that reflects space and reverses time, and if the two (or three) Floquet states that overlap with the ideal resonant states have combined strength β≈1 (or γ≈1), then the transfer probability is dominated by a slow oscillation with P_max ≥ β² (or γ²). Because Floquet antisymmetry pairs quasi-energies and relates the two ideal doublet states, it reduces the two overlap co

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the vibrational drive is tuned exactly to the static energy gap of each realization and that all other vibrational modes are irrelevant; because the gap fluctuates across realizations, a fixed drive cannot be resonant with all networks, and the paper provides no analysis of detuning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • No fine-tuning: random realizations from a Floquet-antisymmetric ensemble frequently yield P_max > 0.9, so robust transport can be achieved statistically.
  • Two-phonon resonance (ω = ω0/2) works for odd N and is described by a dominant Floquet triplet, extending the mechanism beyond single-phonon driving.
  • Static couplings, though they rotate the eigenbasis, can accelerate transfer by up to an order of magnitude while keeping transfer probability high.
  • The design principles generalize in principle to multi-phonon transitions with appropriate symmetries.
  • The mechanism is directly relevant to transport in photosynthetic complexes and to quantum state transfer in e.g. ultracold Rydberg gases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper assumes a drive tuned to the instantaneous static gap of each realization; a natural extension is to analyze detuning or finite bandwidth, where the probability of high β may drop.
  • A fixed global drive cannot be resonant with all disorder realizations simultaneously; using an ensemble of drive frequencies (or a frequency comb) may restore the regime statistically.
  • The symmetry-based statistical enhancement suggests that similar space-time reflection symmetries could improve other tasks, such as entanglement distribution or heating suppression in driven many-body systems.
  • A concrete testable extension: measure the distribution of transfer times under Floquet antisymmetry and compare with the prediction that static couplings produce a heavy tail of fast realizations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism for near-perfect quantum state transfer through disordered networks with an energy gradient, using periodic driving by a single vibrational mode. It introduces two design principles: Floquet antisymmetry ({H_F, Þ}=0, with Þ=J⊗θ) and the existence of a dominant doublet (β≈1) or triplet (γ≈1) of Floquet states. The authors derive approximate expressions for the transfer probability P(t) in terms of these overlaps, and support them with numerical histograms for 10^5 realizations of N=7 networks. They find that Floquet-antisymmetric ensembles yield a larger fraction of realizations with high β and Pmax, and that static couplings can reduce transfer time by an order of magnitude compared to a network with no static couplings.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this work provides a statistical, non-fine-tuned route to efficient transport in disordered driven networks, with potential applications to photosynthesis-inspired systems and quantum state transfer. The Floquet-antisymmetry construction is elegant, and the large-scale numerical evidence is a clear strength. However, the claim that transport is efficient 'despite disorder' is weakened by the fact that the drive frequency is set per realization to the static gap; no analysis is given for a fixed global drive or a broad vibrational spectrum. This is the main gap between the demonstrated mechanism and the advertised robustness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model, after Eq. (2)] The resonance condition ω=ω0=e1−eN is imposed separately for each disorder realization. Since σd=σ0 and D=10σ0 for N=7, typical sample-to-sample fluctuations of the static gap are of order σ0, comparable to the coupling scale. A fixed global drive would be detuned for most realizations, and the small vibration amplitude (σv=0.1σ0) would then strongly suppress the doublet overlap. The histograms in Figs. 3 and 4 are generated at exact per-realization resonance, so they do not establish robustness to detuning or to a finite vibrational bandwidth. Please add an analysis for fixed ω (e.g., histograms of β and Pmax versus detuning, or an average over the ensemble distribution of ω0), or clearly reframe the conclusions as applying only when realization-specific frequency tuning is available.
  2. [Design principles, Eqs. (7) and (11)] The expressions for P(t) and the resulting bounds Pmax≥β² and Pmax≥γ² are stated without derivation. These are load-bearing: they turn the overlap parameters β and γ into quantitative predictions. A derivation in an appendix or a detailed reference is needed. In addition, the text says the bound holds 'in the overwhelming number of cases', which leaves the failure cases unspecified; please quantify the fraction of realizations that violate the bound and characterize them.
  3. [Design principles, Figs. 3 and 4] The histograms display only realizations with β,Pmax≥0.5. To support an ensemble-level claim, the full range should be shown or the fraction of realizations above/below thresholds should be reported. In particular, it would be informative to know how many realizations violate Pmax≥β² in the low-β region, where the dominant-doublet assumption is weakest. This does not invalidate the main conclusion but is necessary for a complete statistical statement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Design principles, Eq. (6)] The selection rule for the Floquet states used to define β± is ambiguous: are they the two states with the largest individual overlaps with |δ+⟩ and |δ−⟩, or are they chosen as a pair? For the non-symmetric ensemble in Fig. 3(a), the two selected states need not be orthogonal or form a closed two-state subspace, which would affect Eq. (7). Please clarify the numerical procedure.
  2. [Numerical methods] The paper states that the choice of initial time t0 does not impact transport but provides no quantitative evidence. A brief histogram or statement of the observed variation would be helpful.
  3. [Role of the static couplings] The approximate transfer times τ≈πℏ|⟨e1|Hv|eN⟩|^{-1} and the analogous two-phonon expression are introduced without derivation. Since these are used to define the time-enhancement factor in Fig. 5, a short derivation or reference would improve the presentation.
  4. [Conclusion] The paper mentions that a broader vibrational spectrum, loss, and injection/extraction mechanisms would be needed for a concrete photosynthetic application, but the abstract's 'despite the disorder' phrasing may overstate the result without such analysis. Consider aligning the abstract with the actual assumptions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No constructional circularity: β/γ are independent overlaps, not fitted parameters; the central bound is numerically verified. Minor non-load-bearing self-citation to [41] and an assumed per-realization resonance limit the external robustness but do not make the derivation circular.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not reductions to their inputs. β± (Eq. 6) and γ0,1 (Eq. 10) are computed as overlaps with fixed ideal Floquet states; they are not fitted to Pmax, and the histograms (Figs. 3, 4) compare two independently computed observables. The bound Pmax ≥ β² (and γ²) is asserted as holding 'in the overwhelming number of cases' and is verified numerically; it is not a strict identity, since other Floquet states can interfere with the doublet/triplet. Floquet antisymmetry {HF, Þ}=0 is a symmetry constraint defined independently of the transport target; its effect on the probability of realizing a dominant doublet is checked by comparing constrained and unconstrained ensembles. The main caveats are non-circularity issues: (i) the drive is assumed tuned per realization to ω0=e1−eN (or ω0/2), and the paper concedes that 'many other vibrational modes will typically be present' and that the resonant process is assumed dominant—this concerns experimental access to the Floquet condition, not the internal derivation; (ii) the derivation leading to Eqs. (7) and (11) is stated as 'one can show' without being exhibited, an omitted proof rather than a circular one; (iii) the design principle and the Þ operator are introduced with a self-citation to the first author's master's thesis [41], but the present paper states the definitions and supplies its own numerical verification, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. These do not amount to a constructional circularity, so the score is low rather than zero only to record the minor self-citation and the assumed resonance condition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model is a particular driven random-matrix ensemble: seven sites, GOE static and vibrational couplings, a graded energy ladder with D/σ0=10, and weak driving σv/σ0=0.1 with the frequency matched per realization. The mechanism is not fitted to transport data; rather, the parameters define the regime in which the design principles are claimed to act. The strongest physical axioms are the classical treatment of the vibration, the dominance of the resonant mode, and the absence of decoherence.

free parameters (4)
  • Number of sites N = 7
    All numerical histograms and example trajectories use N=7; no scaling tests or analytic arguments for other network sizes.
  • Energy gradient-to-coupling ratio D/σ0 = 10
    Hand-chosen to satisfy D ≫ σ0 while D/N ~ σ0; defines the energy-ladder regime.
  • Vibration amplitude ratio σv/σ0 = 0.1
    Weak-driving regime σv ≪ σ0 assumed for the RWA and Shirley-Floquet perturbation treatment.
  • Resonant drive frequency ω = ω0 = e1-eN, or ω0/2 (set per realization)
    The frequency is tuned to each random realization's instantaneous static gap; robustness to a fixed global drive frequency is not analyzed.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Floquet theorem: T-periodic H(t) yields Floquet states with time-independent quasi-energies (Eq. 4).
    Foundation of the whole treatment; not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption Single-excitation subspace: dynamics restricted to one excitation on N two-level sites.
    Excludes multi-exciton and nonlinear effects; standard for weak excitation.
  • domain assumption H0 and Hv are independent GOE matrices with specified variances; Hd has a graded diagonal.
    Defines the disorder ensemble; no spatial structure or site-to-site correlations are modeled.
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave approximation: for σv ≪ σ0 only resonant Floquet couplings matter (ideal states in Eqs. 5, 8).
    Used to identify the ideal doublet/triplet states; counter-rotating terms are neglected.
  • domain assumption The vibrational mode is a classical sinusoidal modulation sin(ωt)Hv; 'phonon' language is semiclassical.
    The environment is not quantized; no bosonic number states or thermal occupations.
  • domain assumption The resonant vibrational mode dominates all other environmental/vibrational modes.
    Explicitly assumed in the Model; off-resonant modes and multi-mode spectral densities are omitted.
  • domain assumption No decoherence or loss during the transfer.
    Dynamics are unitary; the paper notes decoherence as a future extension.
invented entities (1)
  • Thorn operator Þ = J ⊗ θ (spatial reflection ⊗ time reversal)
    purpose: Defines Floquet antisymmetry {H_F, Þ}=0, the symmetry-based design principle that pairs Floquet eigenstates and enhances dominant-doublet probability.
    A formal mathematical construction, not a new physical particle, force, or dimension.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient quantum transport in disordered Floquet networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DGKYMYDD

@misc{pith2026260719278,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient quantum transport in disordered Floquet networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DGKYMYDD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19278}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a mechanism for fast and efficient quantum transport through disordered networks with variable on-site energies, inspired by photosynthetic complexes. The mechanism relies on an interplay between inter-site couplings of the network and driving by external vibrations. Two design principles are shown to ensure close-to-perfect transport despite the disorder, namely a reflection symmetry in Floquet-Hilbert space and the existence of a dominant doublet or triplet of Floquet states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19278 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Diagram of the energy levels of the diagonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Excitation transfer with a dominant Floquet dou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Density histograms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Two-phonon transfer with a dominant Floquet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Histogram of transfer probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Given that we have fixed the phase of the oscillations in Eq

    The full Hamiltonian is thus given by H(t) =H 0 +H d + sin(ωt)Hv .(2) The system is initialized at timet0 with the excitation localized on the input site, i.e.|ψ(t=t 0)⟩=|in⟩:=|1⟩. Given that we have fixed the phase of the oscillations in Eq. (2), the initial timet 0 needs to be explicitly taken into consideration. However, with our choice of param- eters...

    2000

  2. [2]

    If the Hamil- tonian is Floquet-antisymmetric, i.e.{HF,Þ}= 0, then the quasi-energies associated with the triplet states obey ε+ +ε − =ε 0 = 0. For a Floquet-antisymmetric Hamiltonian with a Flo- quet triplet strengthγ:= min(γ 0, γ1)≈1, close-to- perfect transport is achieved, with P(t)≈ 1 4 γ0 −γ 1 cos ε+(t−t 0) ℏ 2 ,(11) Correspondingly,P max ≥γ 2 (in t...

  3. [3]

    Bose, Physical Review Letters91, 207901 (2003)

    S. Bose, Physical Review Letters91, 207901 (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Christandl, N

    M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, and A. J. Landahl, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 187902 (2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    Perez-Leija, R

    A. Perez-Leija, R. Keil, A. Kay, H. Moya-Cessa, S. Nolte, L.-C. Kwek, B. M. Rodríguez-Lara, A. Szameit, and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. A87, 012309 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Wójcik, T

    A. Wójcik, T. Łuczak, P. Kurzyński, A. Grudka, T. Gdala, and M. Bednarska, Phys. Rev. A75, 022330 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  8. [8]

    Chakraborty, L

    S. Chakraborty, L. Novo, A. Ambainis, and Y. Omar, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 100501 (2016)

    2016

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Transport and entanglement,

    T. Scholak, F. Mintert, T. Wellens, and A. Buchleitner, “Transport and entanglement,” inQuantum Efficiency in Complex Systems, Part I: Biomolecular Systems, Vol. 83, edited by E. R. Weber, M. Thorwart, and U. Würfel (Academic Press, San Diego, 2010) pp. 1–38

    2010

  2. [10]

    Scholak, F

    T. Scholak, F. de Melo, T. Wellens, F. Mintert, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. E83, 021912 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Walschaers, J

    M. Walschaers, J. F.-d.-C. Diaz, R. Mulet, and A. Buch- leitner, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 180601 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Walschaers, R

    M. Walschaers, R. Mulet, T. Wellens, and A. Buchleit- ner, Phys. Rev. E91, 042137 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    M.Mohseni, A.Shabani, S.Lloyd, Y.Omar, andH.Rab- itz, The Journal of Chemical Physics138, 204309 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Schmidt am Busch, F

    M. Schmidt am Busch, F. Müh, M. El-Amine Madjet, and T. Renger, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Let- ters2, 93 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    R. E. Blankenship,Molecular mechanisms of photosyn- thesis(Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    G. S. Engel, T. R. Calhoun, E. L. Read, T.-K. Ahn, T. Mancal, Y.-C. Cheng, R. E. Blankenship, and G. R. Fleming, Nature446, 782 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    Christensson, H

    N. Christensson, H. F. Kauffmann, T. Pullerits, and 7 T. Mančal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B116, 7449 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Ishizaki and G

    A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences106, 17255 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    G. D. Scholes, G. R. Fleming, L. X. Chen, A. Aspuru- Guzik, A. Buchleitner, D. F. Coker, G. S. Engel, R. van Grondelle, A. Ishizaki, D. M. Jonas, J. S. Lundeen, J. K. McCusker, S. Mukamel, J. P. Ogilvie, A. Olaya-Castro, M. A. Ratner, F. C. Spano, K. B. Whaley, and X. Zhu, Nat...

    2017

  12. [20]

    Dostál, J

    J. Dostál, J. P˘ sen˘ cík, and D. Zigmantas, Nature Chem- istry8, 705 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    H.-G. Duan, V. I. Prokhorenko, R. J. Cogdell, K. Ashraf, A. L. Stevens, M. Thorwart, and R. D. Miller, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 8493 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    J. Cao, R. J. Cogdell, D. F. Coker, H.-G. Duan, J. Hauer, U. Kleinekathöfer, T. L. Jansen, T. Mančal, R. D. Miller, J. P. Ogilvie,et al., Science Advances6, eaaz4888 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Zerah Harush and Y

    E. Zerah Harush and Y. Dubi, Science Advances7, eabc4631 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    J. S. Higgins, L. T. Lloyd, S. H. Sohail, M. A. Allodi, J. P. Otto, R. G. Saer, R. E. Wood, S. C. Massey, P.- C. Ting, R. E. Blankenship,et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2018240118 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Mattioni, F

    A. Mattioni, F. Caycedo-Soler, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Physical Review X11, 041003 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Lorenzoni, T

    N. Lorenzoni, T. Lacroix, J. Lim, D. Tamascelli, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Science Advances11, eady6751 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Aghtar, J

    M. Aghtar, J. Strümpfer, C. Olbrich, K. Schulten, and U. Kleinekathöfer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters5, 3131 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    E. K. Irish, R. Gómez-Bombarelli, and B. W. Lovett, Phys. Rev. A90, 012510 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Nalbach, C

    P. Nalbach, C. A. Mujica-Martinez, and M. Thorwart, Phys. Rev. E91, 022706 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    D. J. Gorman, B. Hemmerling, E. Megidish, S. A. Moeller, P.Schindler, M.Sarovar, andH.Haeffner,Phys- ical Review X8, 011038 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Z.-Z. Li, L. Ko, Z. Yang, M. Sarovar, and K. B. Whaley, New Journal of Physics24, 033032 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    V. R. Policht, A. Niedringhaus, R. Willow, P. D. Laible, D. F. Bocian, C. Kirmaier, D. Holten, T. Mančal, and J. P. Ogilvie, Science advances8, eabk0953 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Floquet, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure12, 47 (1883)

    G. Floquet, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure12, 47 (1883)

  26. [34]

    J. H. Shirley, Physical Review138, B979 (1965)

    1965

  27. [35]

    Y. A. Zel’dovich, Soviet Physics JETP24, 1006 (1967)

    1967

  28. [36]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    M. L. Mehta,Random matrices(Elsevier, 2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom–Photon Interactions: Basic Process and Applica- tions(Wiley-VCH, 1998)

    1998

  31. [39]

    Walschaers,Efficient quantum transport(Disserta- tion) (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, KU Leuven, 2016)

    M. Walschaers,Efficient quantum transport(Disserta- tion) (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, KU Leuven, 2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    T. Zech, R. Mulet, T. Wellens, and A. Buchleitner, New Journal of Physics16, 055002 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Sauer,Entanglement in periodically driven quan- tum systems(Dissertation) (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 2013)

    S. Sauer,Entanglement in periodically driven quan- tum systems(Dissertation) (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    J. H. Shirley,Interaction of a quantum system with a strong oscillating field(PhD thesis) (California Institute of Technology, 1963)

    1963

  35. [43]

    Kristjánsson,Efficient quantum transport in disor- dered networks with vibrations(Master’s thesis) (Albert- Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg & Imperial College Lon- don, 2017)

    H. Kristjánsson,Efficient quantum transport in disor- dered networks with vibrations(Master’s thesis) (Albert- Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg & Imperial College Lon- don, 2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    M. J. Davis and E. J. Heller, The Journal of Chemical Physics75, 246 (1981)

    1981

  37. [45]

    Lin and L

    W. Lin and L. Ballentine, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 2927 (1990)

    1990

  38. [46]

    Peres, inQuantum Chaos(World Scientific, 1991)

    A. Peres, inQuantum Chaos(World Scientific, 1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    Dyrting, G

    S. Dyrting, G. Milburn, and C. Holmes, Phys. Rev. E 48, 969 (1993)

    1993

  40. [48]

    Tomsovic and D

    S. Tomsovic and D. Ullmo, Phys. Rev. E50, 145 (1994)

    1994

  41. [49]

    Leyvraz and D

    F. Leyvraz and D. Ullmo, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General29, 2529 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    Zakrzewski, D

    J. Zakrzewski, D. Delande, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. E57, 1458 (1998)

    1998

  43. [51]

    Ergün and Y

    G. Ergün and Y. V. Fyodorov, Phys. Rev. E68, 046124 (2003)

    2003

  44. [52]

    Romero, V

    E. Romero, V. I. Novoderezhkin, and R. van Grondelle, Nature543, 355 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Scholak, T

    T. Scholak, T. Wellens, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. A90, 063415 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Browaeys, D

    A. Browaeys, D. Barredo, and T. Lahaye, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 152001 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.