Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Low-temperature mean valence of nickel ions in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read High-pressure X-ray absorption shows the mean valence of nickel in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ stays at 2.5+ up to 40 GPa, so the structural transition, not a charge change, triggers superconductivity.

desk verdict Confirmatory XAS null result with a real calibration caveat and a caption that contradicts its own conclusion. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18343 v1 pith:DGPJURU3 submitted 2024-12-24 cond-mat.supr-con

Shu Cai , Yazhou Zhou , Hualei Sun , Kai Zhang , Jinyu Zhao , Mengwu Huo , Lucie Nataf , Yuxin Wang
show 13 more authors
Jie Li Jing Guo Kun Jiang Meng Wang Yang Ding Wenge Yang Yi Lu Qingyu Kong Qi Wu Jiangping Hu Tao Xiang Ho-kwang Mao Liling Sun
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords La3Ni2O7nickelatesuperconductormeanvalenceX-rayabsorptionspectroscopyhighpressurestructuralphasetransitionspindensitywavehigh-Tcsuperconductivity
topics High-Temperature Superconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Does pressure change the charge of nickel ions to switch on superconductivity in the bilayer nickelate La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$? This paper answers no. Ni K-edge X-ray absorption measurements at 20 K and up to 40 GPa show that the mean nickel valence remains essentially pinned at 2.5+. The small shifts of the white-line peak track the contraction of Ni-O bonds, with the same energy-shift-versus-bond-length slope found in NiO and YNiO$_3$, so they carry no valence signal. At about 12.5 GPa, the integrated white-line area changes slope, marking the structural phase transition at which the density-wave and spin-density-wave orders vanish and superconductivity appears. The paper concludes that the pressure-driven structural change, not a change in nickel valence, is what releases the superconducting state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Ni K-edge white line in X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measured in a diamond anvil cell at 20 K. Two features carry the argument: the white-line energy shift, which the paper separates into lattice-contraction and valence contributions by comparing the shift-versus-Ni-O-bond-length slope with YNiO$_3$ (Ni$^{3+}$) and NiO (Ni$^{2+}$); and the integrated white-line area, whose change of slope with pressure locates the structural transition. The nearly identical energy-shift slopes across the three compounds, together with supporting calculations, are what allow the authors to attribute the entire observed shift to bond contraction and thus to infer a constant mean Ni valence.

What would settle it

A direct spectroscopic measurement of nickel valence under pressure—for instance, Ni L-edge X-ray absorption or K$\beta$ X-ray emission at 20 K up to 40 GPa—showing a measurable change in Ni $3d$ count, or a high-pressure diffraction measurement showing that the white-line shift cannot be explained by the reported bond contraction alone, would settle whether the mean valence truly stays constant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the mean valence of Ni ions in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ is pressure-independent, staying near 2.5+ from ambient pressure to 40 GPa at 20 K. The observed shift of the Ni K-edge white line is attributed to lattice contraction: the slope of energy shift versus Ni-O bond length is nearly the same for La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$, YNiO$_3$, and NiO, and density-functional calculations support this interpretation. The integrated white-line area changes slope at a critical pressure of about 12.5 GPa, signaling the orthorhombic-to-tetragonal structural transition that coincides with the disappearance of the DW and SDW orders and the onset of superconductivity. The natural reading of the data is that the structural phase transition plays the fundamental role in ceasing the competing orders and triggering superconductivity, while the mean valence of nickel stays constant.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the white-line energy shift is dominated by lattice contraction rests on the transferability of the energy-shift versus Ni-O bond-length slope from YNiO$_3$ and NiO to La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$; if La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$'s intrinsic bond-length sensitivity differs, a pressure-induced valence change could be masked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured constant valence rules out pressure-induced valence change or charge disproportionation of nickel as the mechanism behind superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$.
  • The structural transition at about 12.5 GPa becomes the controlling event: it coincides with the suppression of DW and SDW order and the emergence of the superconducting phase, so the phase diagram can be organized around this boundary.
  • The integrated white-line area provides a bulk structural probe that can track the phase transition under pressure without X-ray diffraction.
  • The fixed mean valence sets a firm electronic-count constraint for theoretical models of pairing in this material.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, the same constant-valence picture could be tested in the related bilayer nickelate La$_2$PrNi$_2$O$_7$, where pressure also induces superconductivity; a match would suggest that collapse of the competing orders through structural change is a general feature of the nickelate family.
  • Going beyond the paper, a direct probe of Ni $3d$ occupancy—such as Ni L-edge XAS or K$\beta$ X-ray emission under pressure—would independently test the constant-valence claim without relying on the transfer of the bond-length calibration from YNiO$_3$ and NiO.
  • Going beyond the paper, if the 12.5 GPa structural change is the sole switch, then epitaxial strain or chemical pressure that reproduces the high-pressure structure might induce superconductivity at much lower applied pressures.
  • Going beyond the paper, the near-identical energy-shift slopes across Ni$^{2+}$, Ni$^{2.5+}$, and Ni$^{3+}$ suggest a universal calibration of Ni-O bond length from K-edge white-line shifts, applicable to other nickelates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports Ni K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements on single-crystal and polycrystalline La3Ni2O7 at 20 K over pressures from 1 atm to 40 GPa. The authors observe a pressure-induced shift of the white-line peak to higher energy, which they attribute predominantly to Ni-O bond contraction rather than to a change in Ni valence, based on a comparison with the energy-shift-versus-bond-contraction slopes of YNiO3 and NiO and on supporting calculations. From the pressure dependence of the white-line integrated area, they infer a structural phase transition at Pc1 = 12.5 GPa, where the ambient-pressure DW/SDW orders are reported to disappear and superconductivity emerges. The central claim is that the mean Ni valence remains almost unchanged over the entire pressure range, so that the pressure-induced structural transition, rather than a valence change, plays the fundamental role in triggering superconductivity.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides an important negative result for the nickelate superconductor community: it would rule out a pressure-driven Ni valence change as the key control parameter for superconductivity in La3Ni2O7, focusing attention on structural and electronic reconstruction instead. The experiment is demanding, combining high pressure, low temperature, and XAS on both single-crystal and polycrystalline samples, and the comparison with YNiO3 and NiO, together with supporting calculations, is a sensible strategy. However, the precision of the null result is currently not quantitatively established: the transferability of the calibration slope is asserted without uncertainties, the valence extraction is deferred to the Supplemental Material, and at least one figure caption states the opposite of the main conclusion. The structural-transition inference also rests on a hand-selected critical pressure and an underspecified integration procedure. The significance of the paper would be substantially strengthened by a quantitative sensitivity analysis bounding the maximum possible pressure-induced valence change.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and the paragraph beginning 'To identify the origin...'] The central null result depends on the claim that the energy shift versus Ni-O bond contraction slope for La3Ni2O7 is 'nearly the same' as for YNiO3 and NiO, but no uncertainties, fit residuals, or sensitivity limits are given. The observed shift of 0.61 eV at 21 GPa is comparable to the stated energy resolution of 0.5 eV, and Fig. 4a shows no error bars, so the statement that the mean valence is 'almost unchanged' is not quantitatively bounded. Please provide a quantitative calibration: for example, give the slope and its uncertainty for each reference compound, state what change in Ni valence would produce a white-line shift comparable to the measurement uncertainty, and demonstrate that a valence change of order 0.1 cannot be accommodated within the observed 0.6 eV shift. Without this, a pressure-induced valence change could be masked by an intrinsic difference in the bond-length sensitivity of La3Ni2O7.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption of Fig. 2 states that the shifts of the white-line peak to higher energies 'illustrate a gradual increase of the valence state of Ni ions with increased pressures,' which directly contradicts the paper's main conclusion that the mean valence remains almost unchanged. This is not a minor wording issue: it makes the interpretation of the central measurement ambiguous. The caption must be corrected and made consistent with the quantitative analysis in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4a, or the authors must explain explicitly why the peak shift should not be read as a valence increase.
  3. [Fig. 4b and the paragraph 'We summarize the pressure dependence...'] The structural phase transition at Pc1 = 12.5 GPa is inferred from a slope change in the white-line integrated area, but Pc1 is estimated simply as the average of 11 GPa and 14 GPa, with no fitting, uncertainty, or statistical test. In addition, the integration window for the white-line area is only indicated by an inset and is not specified in the main text, and the white-line area is used as a structural proxy without a direct calibration against the XRD structural transition. Please provide a well-defined analysis procedure for the area, including the energy integration range, and perform a change-point or linear-segment fit with uncertainties. The structural-transition claim is load-bearing for the paper's causal conclusion, so it needs to be supported by the XAS data themselves rather than by a hand-selected average.
  4. [Main text, 'Details of determining the mean valence ... Ref. [56]'] The actual extraction of the mean valence values shown in Fig. 4a is deferred entirely to the Supplemental Material, and the theoretical calculations supporting the slope comparison are also described only as being in Ref. [56]. Because the paper's main claim is a quantitative null result, the main text should at least summarize the extraction method, the integration energy window, the calibration procedure, and the resulting error bars on the valence values. At present a reader cannot assess whether the 'almost unchanged' statement is consistent with the reported spectral shifts and resolution.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'Single crystaX-ray diffraction patterns' should read 'Single-crystal X-ray diffraction patterns.'
  2. [Conclusion and throughout] The phrase 'while line' appears in the conclusion; it should be 'white line.' Please check the manuscript for this typo throughout.
  3. [Reference [10]] The title of Ref. [10] reads 'La3N2O7' and should be 'La3Ni2O7'.
  4. [Fig. 3 legend] The legend uses 'blue' for both the single-crystal La3Ni2O7 data points and the NiO data points, which is confusing. Please use distinct colors or symbols and define them clearly.
  5. [References [60,61]] References [60] and [61] appear in the bibliography but do not seem to be cited in the text; please either cite them where relevant or remove them.
  6. [Experimental section] The paper states that silicone oil was used as the pressure-transmitting medium but does not discuss possible non-hydrostatic effects on the white-line position or width. A brief comment on hydrostaticity limits at the reported pressures would help the reader assess systematic errors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The central valence-stability claim is an independent XAS null result with external calibration; only minor self-citation, no construction-level circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a direct experimental observation: the Ni K-edge white-line shift under pressure is small (0.61 eV at 21 GPa), and the mean valence is read off spectra rather than fitted to the conclusion. The calibration against YNiO3 (Ni3+) and NiO (Ni2+) is an external benchmark, not an input derived from La3Ni2O7 itself. The inference that the shift is dominated by lattice contraction rests on an empirical comparison of slopes, which involves an unquantified transferability assumption, but that is a correctness risk, not circularity. The structural phase transition at 12.5 GPa is inferred from the white-line peak area and compared with external XRD results, and the superconducting phase diagram is taken from prior work including the authors' own Ref. [48]; this self-citation is present but not load-bearing for the valence conclusion. The Fig. 2 caption's statement that the shifts 'illustrate a gradual increase of the valence state of Ni ions' contradicts the main conclusion, but this is an internal inconsistency, not a circular derivation. No equation or fitted parameter reduces the conclusion to its own input, so no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on domain assumptions about the transferability of XAS energy-shift calibrations and the interpretation of white-line area changes. No new physical entities are introduced. Free parameters are limited to the hand-chosen critical pressure and integration window, but the mean-valence extraction procedure itself is not shown.

free parameters (2)
  • Pc1 (critical pressure) = 12.5 GPa
    Estimated as the average of the two measured pressure points (11 and 14 GPa) bracketing the slope change in white-line area; the averaging is a hand-chosen convention, not a fit.
  • White-line integration energy window = not specified
    The integrated area of the white-line peak depends on the manually selected energy bounds shown in the Figure 4b insets; the exact bounds are not stated in the text.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The energy shift versus Ni-O bond contraction rate is transferable from YNiO3 and NiO to La3Ni2O7.
    Used to separate lattice-contraction and valence contributions to the white-line shift; asserted as 'nearly the same' in Fig. 3 without uncertainty quantification.
  • domain assumption The integrated white-line peak area is a reliable proxy for local structural/coordination changes.
    Basis for extracting the structural phase transition at Pc1; supported by citations [57,58] but not independently validated here.
  • domain assumption The DW, SDW, and SC transitions from the literature occur at the same pressures as the structural transition inferred from the white-line area.
    The paper does not measure these orders in this work; it combines its area data with published phase boundaries (Refs. [1,6,48]) to construct Fig. 4c.
  • domain assumption Silicone oil provides a quasi-hydrostatic environment and ruby fluorescence gives the true sample pressure at 20 K.
    Standard high-pressure technique; silicone oil may solidify at low temperature, but the authors rely on the ruby gauge.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low-temperature mean valence of nickel ions in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DGPJURU3

@misc{pith2026241218343,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low-temperature mean valence of nickel ions in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DGPJURU3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18343}
}
abstract

The discovery of high critical temperature (Tc) superconductivity in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ has ignited renewed excitement in the search of novel high-Tc superconducting compounds with 3d transition metals. Compared to other ambient-pressure superconductors, such as copper-oxide and iron-oxypnictides, unraveling the mechanisms of the pressure-induced superconductivity poses significant and unique challenges. A critical factor in this phenomenon seems to be related to the electronic configuration of 3d orbitals, which may play a fundamental role in driving high-Tc superconductivity. However, the pressure effects on the mixed-valence states of 3d-orbital cations and their influence on the emergence of high-Tc superconductivity remain poorly understood. Here, we use high-pressure (P) and low-temperature synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy to investigate the influence of pressure on the mean valence change of Ni ions in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$. Our results demonstrate that at a low-temperature of 20 K, the mean valence remains relatively stable across the pressures range from 1 atm to 40 GPa. Based on analyzing the absorption data, we find that, at a critical pressure, the ambient-pressure ordered phases disappear and both the structural and the superconducting phase transition occur. The pressure-induced structural phase transition revealed by our absorption results is consistent with that determined by X-ray diffraction, offering new information for a comprehensive understanding on the pressure-induced superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. In-Plane Ni-O-Ni Bond Angles as Structural Fingerprints of Superconductivity in Layered Nickelates: Effects of Pressure, Strain, Layering, and Correlations

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle in layered nickelates tracks the experimental superconducting Tc dome under pressure and strain, suggesting it as a structural fingerprint.

  2. Correlated electronic structures and unconventional superconductivity in bilayer nickelate heterostructures

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DFT+cRPA+CDMFT calculation for bilayer nickelate thin films reproduces ARPES Fermi surfaces and predicts s±-wave pairing from spin fluctuations.

  3. Interlayer interactions in $\text{La}_3\text{Ni}_2\text{O}_7$ under pressure: from $s^{\pm}$ to $d_{xy}$-wave superconductivity

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Interlayer Coulomb interactions in a bilayer model of La3Ni2O7 suppress charge fluctuations and switch the leading pairing symmetry from s± to dxy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [29]

    Mijit, P

    E. Mijit, P. Ma, C.J. Sahle, A.D. Rosa, Z. Hu, F. De Angelis, A. Lopez, S. Amatori, G. Tchoudinov, Y . Joly, T. Irifune, J.E.F.S. Rodrigues, G. Garbarino, S. Gallego Parra, M. Wang, R. Yu, and O. Mathon, Local electronic properties of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, arXiv:2412.08269 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [56]

    See Supplemental Material

  3. [1]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y . Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.X. Yao, G.M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature 621, 493-498 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [2]

    M.K. Wu, J.R. Ashburn, C.J. Torng, P.H. Hor, R.L. Meng, L. Gao, Z.J. Huang, Y .Q. Wang, and C.W. Chu, Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed -phase Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at ambient pressure, Physical Review Letters 58, 908-910 (1987)

    work page 1987

  5. [3]

    Chu, L.Z

    C.W. Chu, L.Z. Deng, and B. Lv, Hole -doped cuprate high temperature superconductors, Phys. C. Supercond. 514, 290-313 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [4]

    Kamihara, T

    Y . Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Iron -Based Layered Superconductor La[O 1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K, Journal of the American Chemical Society 130, 3296-3297 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [5]

    Rotter, M

    M. Rotter, M. Pangerl, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt, Superconductivity and Crystal Structures of (Ba1−K)Fe2As2 (x=0–1), Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47, 7949-7952 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [6]

    M. Xu, G.C. Jose, A. Rutherford, H. Wang, S. Zhang, R.J. Cava, H. Zhou, W. Bi, and W. Xie, Pressure -Induced Phase Transitions in Bilayer La 3Ni2O7, arXiv:2410.18840 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 61 references
  1. [7]

    H. Wang, L. Chen, A. Rutherford, H. Zhou, and W. Xie, Long -Range Structural Order in a Hidden Phase of Ruddlesden –Popper Bilayer Nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Inorganic Chemistry 63, 5020-5026 (2024)

    2024

  2. [8]

    Insulator-Metal-Insulator

    M. Xu, S. Huyan, H. Wang, S.L. Bud'ko, X. Chen, X. Ke, J.F. Mitchell, P.C. Canfield, J. Li, and W. Xie, Pressure -dependent "Insulator-Metal-Insulator" Behavior in Sr - doped La3Ni2O7, arXiv:2312.14251 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, Q. Wang, Y . Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, J. Wu, and Y . Qi, Effects of pressure and doping on Ruddlesden -Popper phases La n+1NinO3n+1, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 185, 147-154 (2024)

    2024

  4. [10]

    Puphal, P

    P. Puphal, P. Reiss, N. Enderlein, Y .M. Wu, G. Khaliullin, V . Sundaramurthy, T. Priessnitz, M. Knauft, A. Suthar, L. Richter, M. Isobe, P.A. van Aken, H. Takagi, B. Keimer, Y .E. Suyolcu, B. Wehinger, P. Hansmann, and M. Hepting, Unconventional Crystal Structure of the High ...

    2024

  5. [11]

    Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, L. Gu, Y . Lu, M. Wang, Y . Wang, and Z. Chen, Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self -doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ, Nature 630, 847-852 (2024)

    2024

  6. [12]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Zou, C. Jiang, X. Li, Y . Luo, Q. Wu, N. Zhang, Y . Guo, and L. Shu, Evidence of Spin Density Waves in La3Ni2O7−δ, Physical Review Letters 132, 256503 (2024)

    2024

  7. [13]

    Khasanov, T.J

    R. Khasanov, T.J. Hicken, D.J. Gawryluk, L.P. Sorel, S. Bötzel, F. Lechermann, I.M. Eremin, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Pressure -Induced Split of the Density Wave Transitions in La3Ni2O7−δ, arXiv:2402.10485 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Z. Liu, M. Huo, J. Li, Q. Li, Y . Liu, Y . Dai, X. Zhou, J. Hao, Y . Lu, M. Wang, and H.-H. Wen, Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Nature Communications 15, 7570 (2024)

    2024

  9. [15]

    M. Li, Y . Wang, C. Pei, M. Zhang, N. Li, J. Guan, M. Amboage, N.-D. Adama, Q. Kong, Y . Qi, and W. Yang, Distinguishing Electronic Band Structure of Single-layer and Bilayer Ruddlesden -Popper Nickelates Probed by in -situ High Pressure X -ray Absorption Near-edge Spectroscop...

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Zhang, D

    Y . Zhang, D. Su, Y . Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y . Xu, Y . Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange -metal behaviour in La 3Ni2O7−δ, Nature Physics 20, 1269-1273 (2024)

    2024

  11. [17]

    Hou, P.-T

    J. Hou, P.-T. Yang, Z.-Y . Liu, J.-Y . Li, P.-F. Shan, L. Ma, G. Wang, N. -N. Wang, H.-Z. Guo, J. -P. Sun, Y . Uwatoko, M. Wang, G.-M. Zhang, B. -S. Wang, and J. -G. Cheng, Emergence of High -Temperature Superconducting Phase in Pressurized La3Ni2O7 Crystals, Chinese Physics L...

    2023

  12. [18]

    Wang, N.N

    G. Wang, N.N. Wang, X.L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L.F. Shi, Z.A. Ren, Y .D. Gu, H.M. Ma, P.T. Yang, Z.Y . Liu, H.Z. Guo, J.P. Sun, G.M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.Q. Yan, B.S. Wang, Y . Uwatoko, and J.G. Cheng, Pressure -Induced Superconductivity In Polycrystalline La3Ni2O7−δ, Physical R...

    2024

  13. [19]

    M. Wang, H. -H. Wen, T. Wu, D. -X. Yao, and T. Xiang, Normal and Superconducting Properties of La3Ni2O7, Chinese Physics Letters 41, 077402 (2024)

    2024

  14. [20]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia - Fernandez, X. Huang, H. Sun, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y . Lu, K.-J. Zhou, and D. Feng, Electronic and magnetic excitations in La3Ni2O7, arXiv:2401.12657 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [21]

    X. Zhou, W. He, Z. Zhou, K. Ni, M. Huo, D. Hu, Y . Zhu, E. Zhang, Z. Jiang, S. Zhang, S. Su, J. Jiang, Y . Yan, Y . Wang, D. Shen, X. Liu, J. Zhao, M. Wang, M. Liu, Z. Du, and D. Feng, Revealing nanoscale structural phase separation in La 3Ni2O7−δ single crystal via scanning n...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [22]

    X. Chen, J. Zhang, A.S. Thind, S. Sharma, H. LaBollita, G. Peterson, H. Zheng, D.P. Phelan, A.S. Botana, R.F. Klie, and J.F. Mitchell, Polymorphism in the Ruddlesden–Popper Nickelate La 3Ni2O7: Discovery of a Hidden Phase with Distinctive Layer Stacking, Journal of the America...

    2024

  17. [23]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y . Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y . Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y . Uwatoko, and ...

    2024

  18. [24]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y . Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y . Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D. -X. Yao, M. Wang, L. Zhao, and X.J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent electron correlation...

    2024

  19. [25]

    R. Gao, L. Jin, S. Huyan, D. Ni, H. Wang, X. Xu, S.L. Bud’ko, P. Canfield, W. Xie, and R.J. Cava, Is La 3Ni2O6.5 a Bulk Superconducting Nickelate?, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 3c, 17376 (2024)

    2024

  20. [26]

    J. Li, P. Ma, H. Zhang, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, C. He, J. Liao, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Sun, and M. Wang, Pressure -driven right-triangle shape superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, arXiv:2404.11369 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  21. [27]

    K. Jiao, R. Niu, H. Xu, W. Zhen, J. Wang, and C. Zhang, Enhanced conductivity in Sr doped La3Ni2O 7-δ with high -pressure oxygen annealing, Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 621, 1354504 (2024)

    2024

  22. [28]

    E.K. Ko, Y . Yu, Y . Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V . Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B.Y . Wang, Y . Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B.H. Goodge, D.A. Muller, and H.Y . Hwang, Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7, Nature in press (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y . Chen, H. Huang, W. Chen, Y . Sun, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Ambient -pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films, arXiv:2412.16622 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. Wú, and D. -X. Yao, Bilayer Two-Orbital Model of La3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Physical Review Letters 131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    Y .-B. Liu, J. -W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, s± -Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical -Oxygen Deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Physical Review Letters 131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interplay of two Eg orbitals in Superconducting La3Ni2O7 Under Pressure, arXiv:2310.02915 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Kaneko, H

    T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Pair correlations in the two - orbital Hubbard ladder: Implications for superconductivity in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Physical Review B 109, 045154 (2024)

    2024

  28. [35]

    J. Chen, F. Yang, and W. Li, Orbital-selective superconductivity in the pressurized bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7: An infinite projected entangled-pair state study, Physical Review B 110, L041111 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    Y .-f. Yang, G. -M. Zhang, and F. -C. Zhang, Interlayer valence bonds and two - component theory for high -Tc superconductivity of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Physical Review B 108, L201108 (2023)

    2023

  30. [37]

    Y .-H. Tian, Y . Chen, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y . Lu, Correlation effects and concomitant two-orbital S±-wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Physical Review B 109, 165154 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. Bötzel, and I.M. Eremin, Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Physical Review B 108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  32. [39]

    Z. Fan, J. -F. Zhang, B. Zhan, D. Lv, X. -Y . Jiang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Superconductivity in nickelate and cuprate superconductors with strong bilayer coupling, Physical Review B 110, 024514 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y . Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure, Physical Review B 108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    Jiang, Z

    K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and F. -C. Zhang, High -Temperature Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7, Chinese Physics Letters 41, 017402 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Jiang, Y .-H

    K.-Y . Jiang, Y .-H. Cao, Q.-G. Yang, H.-Y . Lu, and Q.-H. Wang, Theory of Pressure Dependence of Superconductivity in Bilayer Nickelate La3Ni2O7, arXiv:2409.17861 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    J. Zhan, Y . Gu, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Cooperation between electron-phonon coupling and electronic interaction in bilayer nickelates La3Ni2O7, arXiv:2404.03638 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Jiang, J

    R. Jiang, J. Hou, Z. Fan, Z.-J. Lang, and W. Ku, Pressure Driven Fractionalization of Ionic Spins Results in Cupratelike High -Tc Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Physical Review Letters 132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  38. [45]

    L. Wang, Y . Li, S.-Y . Xie, F. Liu, H. Sun, C. Huang, Y . Gao, T. Nakagawa, B. Fu, B. Dong, Z. Cao, R. Yu, S.I. Kawaguchi, H. Kadobayashi, M. Wang, C. Jin, H. -k. Mao, and H. Liu, Structure Responsible for the Superconducting State in La 3Ni2O7 at High -Pressure and Low -Temp...

    2024

  39. [46]

    Z. Dan, Y . Zhou, M. Huo, Y . Wang, L. Nie, M. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Spin- density-wave transition in double -layer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, arXiv:2402.03952 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H.C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, L. He, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Neutron Scattering Studies on the High -Tc Superconductor La3Ni2O7−δ at Ambient Pressure, arXiv:2401.12635 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Y . Zhou, J. Guo, S. Cai, H. Sun, P. Wang, J. Zhao, J. Han, X. Chen, Y . Chen, Q. Wu, Y . Ding, T. Xiang, H.-k. Mao, and L. Sun, Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductivity emerging from compressed La 3Ni2O7, arXiv:2311.12361 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Ruddlesden, and P

    S.N. Ruddlesden, and P. Popper, New compounds of the K 2NIF4 type, Acta Crystallographica 10, 538-539 (1957)

    1957

  43. [50]

    Y . Zhou, Q. Wu, P.F.S. Rosa, R. Yu, J. Guo, W. Yi, S. Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Wang, S. Cai, K. Yang, A. Li, Z. Jiang, S. Zhang, X. Wei, Y . Huang, P. Sun, Y .-f. Yang, Z. Fisk, Q. Si, Z. Zhao, and L. Sun, Quantum phase transition and destruction of Kondo effect in pressurized SmB6...

    2017

  44. [51]

    Zhou, D.-J

    Y . Zhou, D.-J. Kim, P.F.S. Rosa, Q. Wu, J. Guo, S. Zhang, Z. Wang, D. Kang, W. Yi, Y . Li, X. Li, J. Liu, P. Duan, M. Zi, X. Wei, Z. Jiang, Y . Huang, Y .-f. Yang, Z. Fisk, L. Sun, and Z. Zhao, Pressure -induced quantum phase transitions in a YbB 6 single crystal, Physical Re...

    2015

  45. [52]

    P. Ding, W. Li, H. Zhao, C. Wu, L. Zhao, B. Dong, and S. Wang, Review on Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites as cathode for solid oxide fuel cells, Journal of Physics: Materials 4, 022002 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    H.K. Mao, J. Xu, and P.M. Bell, Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 91, 4673-4676 (1986)

    1986

  47. [54]

    Bunker, Introduction to XAFS: a practical guide to X -ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy, Cambridge University Press2010

    G. Bunker, Introduction to XAFS: a practical guide to X -ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy, Cambridge University Press2010

  48. [55]

    Trcera, S

    N. Trcera, S. Layek, M. Shulman, A. Polian, T. Irifune, J.P. Itié, and G.K. Rozenberg, XAS studies of pressure -induced structural and electronic transformations in α-FeOOH, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 325401 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Capitani, C

    F. Capitani, C. Marini, S. Caramazza, P. Dore, A. Pisanu, L. Malavasi, L. Nataf, F. Baudelet, J.B. Brubach, P. Roy, and P. Postorino, Locking of Methylammonium by Pressure-Enhanced H-Bonding in (CH 3NH3)PbBr3 Hybrid Perovskite, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, 28125-28...

    2017

  50. [58]

    H. Yan, Investigation on the Electrical Transport Properties and the Structural Evolution of Emerging Energy Materials under High Pressure, Université Paris - Saclay 2022UPASP2047 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Ramos, C

    A.Y . Ramos, C. Piamonteze, H.C.N. Tolentino, N.M. Souza-Neto, O. Bunau, Y . Joly, S. Grenier, J. -P. Itié, N.E. Massa, J.A. Alonso, and M.J. Martinez -Lope, Stability of Ni sites across the pressure -induced insulator -to-metal transition in YNiO3, Physical Review B 85, 045102 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    G. Wu, J.J. Neumeier, and M.F. Hundley, Magnetic susceptibility, heat capacity, and pressure dependence of the electrical resistivity of La 3Ni2O7 and La 4Ni3O10, Physical Review B 63, 245120 (2001)

    2001

  53. [61]

    Hosoya, K

    T. Hosoya, K. Igawa, Y . Takeuchi, K. Yoshida, T. Uryu, H. Hirabayashi, and H. Takahashi, Pressure studies on the electrical properties in R2-xSrxNi1-yCuyO4+δ(R=La, Nd) and La3Ni2O7+δ, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 121, 052013 (2008)

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.