Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.13461 v2 pith:DGXIENQA submitted 2023-06-23 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascs.LGstat.ML

classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascs.LGstat.ML
keywords quantumgeneralizationdatalearningmachinemodelsrandomunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum machine learning models have shown successful generalization performance even when trained with few data. In this work, through systematic randomization experiments, we show that traditional approaches to understanding generalization fail to explain the behavior of such quantum models. Our experiments reveal that state-of-the-art quantum neural networks accurately fit random states and random labeling of training data. This ability to memorize random data defies current notions of small generalization error, problematizing approaches that build on complexity measures such as the VC dimension, the Rademacher complexity, and all their uniform relatives. We complement our empirical results with a theoretical construction showing that quantum neural networks can fit arbitrary labels to quantum states, hinting at their memorization ability. Our results do not preclude the possibility of good generalization with few training data but rather rule out any possible guarantees based only on the properties of the model family. These findings expose a fundamental challenge in the conventional understanding of generalization in quantum machine learning and highlight the need for a paradigm shift in the study of quantum models for machine learning tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Addressing the Readout Problem in Quantum Differential Equation Algorithms with Quantum Scientific Machine Learning

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quantum neural networks can classify shock and turbulent flow solutions encoded as quantum states, with accuracy strongly dependent on Fourier versus real-space basis choice.

  2. Provably Robust Training of Quantum Circuit Classifiers Against Parameter Noise

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Randomized smoothing of quantum circuit parameters yields certified robustness against gate-angle noise, and evolutionary strategies can train the smoothed classifier to enlarge the certified region.

  3. Data-Dependent Generalization Bounds for Parameterized Quantum Models Under Noise

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A generalization bound for noisy parameterized quantum classifiers is derived from quantum Fisher information, parameter-space volume, and sample size, with local refinements claimed to tighten it.

Pith tools