pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20319 · v1 · pith:DHBKZFHHnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ✦ hep-ph

Dyonic lattices, θ-angles and axions in the Standard Model

Rodrigo Alonso , Francesca Chadha-Day , Despoina Dimakou , Yunji Ha , Valentin V. Khoze This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords dyonic latticestheta anglesaxionsStandard ModelWitten effectCP invariancemonopolesU(1)em
0
0 comments X

The pith

A discovery of a U(1)em monopole carrying nonzero electric charge would determine the last unknown parameter of the Standard Model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines dyonic spectra in the Standard Model for general global gauge groups and classifies the allowed charge lattices that arise for different values of the three theta parameters. It shows that the electromagnetic U(1) subgroup can be identified before electroweak symmetry breaking by separating out the Witten effect and anomalous B+L transformations, which reduces the physical theta space from a three-torus to a two-torus. This framework determines all CP-invariant points and leads to two main phenomenological results: a charged electromagnetic monopole would fix the final free parameter in the model, and a single axion cannot make the vacuum fully CP invariant.

Core claim

We construct and classify the dyonic charge lattices consistent with the Standard Model gauge structure. The electromagnetic subgroup U(1)em arises prior to electroweak symmetry breaking by factoring out the effect of the anomalous B+L transformations, which reduces the physical theta-parameter space from a three-torus to a two-torus. This enables re-derivation of the global-group-dependent periodicities of the theta angles and identification of all CP-invariant points. A discovery of a U(1)em monopole carrying non-zero electric charge would determine the last remaining unknown parameter of the Standard Model. A single axion is insufficient to render the Standard Model vacuum fully CP invari

What carries the argument

The dyonic charge lattices consistent with the Standard Model gauge structure, obtained after factoring out the Witten effect and anomalous B+L transformations to isolate the U(1)em subgroup prior to symmetry breaking.

If this is right

  • The three theta angles possess periodicities that depend on the global gauge group structure.
  • All CP-invariant points in the three-dimensional theta space are identified.
  • The physical theta-parameter space reduces to a two-torus.
  • A U(1)em monopole with nonzero electric charge fixes the remaining unknown Standard Model parameter.
  • One axion cannot produce a fully CP-invariant vacuum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Monopole searches could be designed to look for specific charge ratios predicted by the lattices.
  • The two-torus structure of theta space may simplify axion potential calculations in early-universe models.
  • Multi-axion setups would be needed to cancel all CP-violating effects at the identified invariant points.

Load-bearing premise

The Witten effect and anomalous B+L transformations can be factored out to identify U(1)em prior to electroweak symmetry breaking while preserving the full dyonic lattice classification for general global gauge groups.

What would settle it

Observation of a U(1)em monopole whose electric charge does not match any of the charge values allowed by the classified lattices for the permitted theta values.

read the original abstract

We investigate the implications of the Witten effect in the Standard Model with a general global gauge group structure and determine the values of the three $\theta$-parameters that lead to distinct families of allowed spectra of dyons. We construct and classify the corresponding dyonic charge lattices consistent with the Standard Model gauge structure. This approach enables us to re-derive the known global-group--dependent periodicities of the $\theta$ angles and to determine all CP-invariant points in $\theta$-space. The electromagnetic subgroup $U(1)_{\mathrm{em}}$ is shown to arise \emph{prior} to electroweak symmetry breaking by factoring out the effect of the anomalous $B+L$ transformations, which reduces the physical $\theta$-parameter space from a three-torus to a two-torus. Our phenomenological conclusions include an observation that a discovery of a $U(1)_{\mathrm{em}}$ monopole carrying non-zero electric charge would determine the last remaining unknown parameter of the Standard Model. Lastly we study how $\theta$-space shapes axion physics with emphasis on the axion-photon coupling and show that a single axion is insufficient to render the Standard Model vacuum fully CP invariant.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the implications of the Witten effect in the Standard Model with a general global gauge group structure and determines the values of the three θ-parameters that lead to distinct families of allowed spectra of dyons. It constructs and classifies the corresponding dyonic charge lattices consistent with the Standard Model gauge structure. This approach enables re-derivation of the known global-group-dependent periodicities of the θ angles and determination of all CP-invariant points in θ-space. The electromagnetic subgroup U(1)em is shown to arise prior to electroweak symmetry breaking by factoring out the effect of the anomalous B+L transformations, which reduces the physical θ-parameter space from a three-torus to a two-torus. Phenomenological conclusions include that a discovery of a U(1)em monopole carrying non-zero electric charge would determine the last remaining unknown parameter of the Standard Model, and that a single axion is insufficient to render the Standard Model vacuum fully CP invariant.

Significance. If the lattice constructions and consistency arguments hold, the work supplies an explicit classification of dyonic spectra and θ-periodicities as functions of the global gauge group, together with concrete implications for monopole searches and axion phenomenology. The explicit construction of the lattices and the re-derivation of the periodicities are clear strengths that could be cited by subsequent studies.

major comments (1)
  1. [electromagnetic subgroup section] Section on the electromagnetic subgroup (abstract and the dedicated paragraph): the procedure of factoring anomalous B+L transformations to identify U(1)em prior to electroweak symmetry breaking and thereby reduce θ-space from T^3 to T^2 must be shown to commute with the full dyonic lattice classification for general global gauge groups. Standard treatments apply the Witten effect and anomaly shifts after breaking; without an explicit check that the pre-breaking reduction preserves the charge-vector quantization and lattice consistency (including how global group elements act on unbroken generators), the claims that a charged U(1)em monopole fixes the last SM parameter and that a single axion cannot achieve full CP invariance rest on an unverified assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the dyonic charge vectors and lattice generators should be illustrated with an explicit SM example (e.g., for SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1)) to make the classification tables or figures immediately usable.
  2. [introduction] The abstract states that the periodicities are re-derived; adding a brief citation to the original derivations of those periodicities in the introduction would clarify the incremental contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [electromagnetic subgroup section] Section on the electromagnetic subgroup (abstract and the dedicated paragraph): the procedure of factoring anomalous B+L transformations to identify U(1)em prior to electroweak symmetry breaking and thereby reduce θ-space from T^3 to T^2 must be shown to commute with the full dyonic lattice classification for general global gauge groups. Standard treatments apply the Witten effect and anomaly shifts after breaking; without an explicit check that the pre-breaking reduction preserves the charge-vector quantization and lattice consistency (including how global group elements act on unbroken generators), the claims that a charged U(1)em monopole fixes the last SM parameter and that a single axion cannot achieve full CP invariance rest on an unverified assumption.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important consistency requirement. The dyonic lattices are constructed on the charge vectors of the full SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y group prior to any breaking, with global group elements acting on those vectors. The anomalous B+L shift is a uniform translation in θ-space that is independent of the specific global identifications; it redefines the basis for the unbroken generator without changing relative quantizations or lattice points. Consequently the reduction to the physical two-torus commutes with the lattice construction for arbitrary global groups. Nevertheless, to make the commutation fully explicit as requested, we will add a short verification paragraph in the electromagnetic-subgroup section of the revised manuscript, confirming preservation of charge-vector quantization and the action on unbroken generators. This addition will also strengthen the supporting arguments for the monopole and axion conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation re-derives known periodicities from standard SM structure

full rationale

The paper's central steps consist of applying the Witten effect and anomalous B+L transformations to classify dyonic lattices for the SM gauge group, then re-deriving already-known θ periodicities and identifying CP-invariant points. These steps follow directly from the input gauge structure and standard anomaly considerations without reducing any claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-definitional loop. The factoring of B+L to define U(1)em prior to EWSB is presented as an explicit methodological choice rather than an output derived from the lattice classification itself. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work, or ansatze smuggled via citation are required for the core claims. The result that a charged U(1)em monopole would fix the last SM parameter follows from the lattice construction rather than being presupposed by it.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard SM gauge group structure, the applicability of the Witten effect to dyons, and the anomalous nature of B+L transformations; no new free parameters beyond the three θ angles are introduced, and no invented entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • three θ-parameters
    The θ angles are the input parameters whose values determine the allowed dyon spectra; they are treated as free within the periodicity constraints derived from the gauge group.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Witten effect applies to the SM with general global gauge group structure
    Invoked to link θ values to dyon charge lattices (abstract).
  • domain assumption B+L transformations are anomalous and can be factored out to identify U(1)em prior to EWSB
    Used to reduce physical θ-space from three-torus to two-torus (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1557 out tokens · 24304 ms · 2026-06-26T16:47:10.898191+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP02(2015) 172, [1412.5148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    T. D. Brennan and S. Hong,Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics, 2306.00912

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki,Generalized charges, part I: Invertible symmetries and higher representations,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 093, [2304.02660]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari and J. Pearson,Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory I,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 015, [2208.05993]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari and J. Pearson,Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory II,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 067, [2212.07393]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Hucks,Global structure of the standard model, anomalies, and charge quantization,Phys

    J. Hucks,Global structure of the standard model, anomalies, and charge quantization,Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 2709–2717

    1991

  7. [7]

    Tong,Line Operators in the Standard Model,JHEP07(2017) 104, [1705.01853]

    D. Tong,Line Operators in the Standard Model,JHEP07(2017) 104, [1705.01853]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Alonso, D

    R. Alonso, D. Dimakou, Y. Ha and V. V. Khoze,Charge quantisation, monopoles and emergent symmetry in the Standard Model and its embeddings,JHEP12(2025) 121, [2507.01777]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Alonso, D

    R. Alonso, D. Dimakou and M. West,Fractional-charge hadrons and leptons to tell the Standard Model group apart,Phys. Lett. B863(2025) 139354, [2404.03438]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys

    E. Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys. Lett. B86(1979) 283–287

    1979

  11. [11]

    Aharony, N

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg and Y. Tachikawa,Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP08(2013) 115, [1305.0318]

    arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Abel et al.,Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,Phys

    C. Abel et al.,Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(2020) 081803, [2001.11966]

    arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  14. [14]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 279–282

    1978

  15. [15]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

    1978

  16. [16]

    Y. Choi, M. Forslund, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Noninvertible Higher Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 121601, [2309.03937]

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    N. M. Davies, T. J. Hollowood, V. V. Khoze and M. P. Mattis,Gluino condensate and magnetic monopoles in supersymmetric gluodynamics,Nucl. Phys. B559(1999) 123–142, [hep-th/9905015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    N. M. Davies, T. J. Hollowood and V. V. Khoze,Monopoles, affine algebras and the gluino condensate,J. Math. Phys.44(2003) 3640–3656, [hep-th/0006011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Unsal,Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions,Phys

    M. Unsal,Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 065001, [0709.3269]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Ruhdorfer and Y. Shirman,UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups,JHEP04(2020) 031, [1912.02197]

    arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    ’t Hooft,Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus,Commun

    G. ’t Hooft,Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus,Commun. Math. Phys.81(1981) 267–275. – 42 –

    1981

  22. [22]

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz,Nonperturbative effects in the Standard Model with gauged 1-form symmetry, JHEP12(2021) 055, [2110.02981]

    arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz,Multi-fractional instantons inSU(N)Yang-Mills theory on the twistedT 4, JHEP09(2023) 095, [2307.04795]

    arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Cordova, S

    C. Cordova, S. Hong and L.-T. Wang,Axion domain walls, small instantons, and non-invertible symmetry breaking,JHEP05(2024) 325, [2309.05636]

    arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V. V. Khoze, A. Pomarol and Y. Shirman,The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons, JHEP03(2020) 063, [2001.05610]

    arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Cs´ aki, R

    C. Cs´ aki, R. Ovadia, O. Telem, J. Terning and S. Yankielowicz,Abelian instantons and monopole scattering,JHEP11(2024) 165, [2406.13738]

    arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    J. Fan, K. Fraser, M. Reece and J. Stout,Axion Mass from Magnetic Monopole Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(2021) 131602, [2105.09950]

    arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Garcia Garcia, M

    I. Garcia Garcia, M. Kongsore and K. Van Tilburg,Dyon Loops and Abelian Instantons,2506.14867

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Agrawal and K

    P. Agrawal and K. Howe,Factoring the Strong CP Problem,JHEP12(2018) 029, [1710.04213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of qcd axion models,Phys. Rept.870 (2020) 1–117, [2003.01100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Witten,Theta dependence in the large n limit of four-dimensional gauge theories,Phys

    E. Witten,Theta dependence in the large n limit of four-dimensional gauge theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998) 2862–2865, [hep-th/9807109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  32. [32]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199–202

    1981

  33. [33]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

    1980

  34. [34]

    G. Choi, S. Hong and S. Koren,Global Structure, Non-Invertible PQ Symmetry, and the DFSZ Domain Wall Problem,2603.26867

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    1979

  36. [36]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506

    1980

  37. [37]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro,The QCD axion, precisely,JHEP01 (2016) 034, [1511.02867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    S. M. Lee, M. Ramos and F. Vilches,How well can the QCD axion hide?,2604.08657

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.”https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July,

  40. [40]

    10.5281/zenodo.3932430

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932430

  41. [41]

    Garcia Garcia and E

    I. Garcia Garcia and E. Maderazo,Black Holes and Abelian Instantons,2512.13833

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Wilczek,Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1799

    1987

  43. [43]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang,Concept of Nonintegrable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 3845–3857

    1975

  44. [44]

    V. V. Khoze,Monopoles and fermions in the Standard Model,JHEP09(2024) 146, [2405.18689]. – 43 –

    arXiv 2024