arxiv: 2604.08657 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

How well can the QCD axion hide?

Sung Mook Lee , Maria Ramos , Fuensanta Vilches

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords QCD axionmulti-axiondomain wallsaxion-like particlesstrong CP problemdark matterphoton couplingE/N ratio

0 comments

The pith

Multi-axion models relax the E/N >= 8/3 bound on the QCD axion photon coupling, allowing it to hide as subdominant dark matter while an axion-like particle stays visible to next-generation experiments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that UV-complete theories often contain several axion fields whose collective dynamics change how the QCD axion solves the strong CP problem and contributes to dark matter. In the single-axion case the need for domain walls to decay quickly sets a lower limit E/N >= 8/3 on the axion-photon coupling, assuming the Standard Model gauge group has minimal global structure. When multiple axions are present the domain wall number is fixed by the full anomaly structure of the theory instead, so the bound loosens. The QCD axion can then be only a fraction of the dark matter density and evade direct detection, yet parameter scans find that at least one additional axion-like particle remains within reach of upcoming searches in most of the allowed space.

Core claim

In the multi-axion framework the domain wall number is determined by the full anomaly structure of the theory rather than by a single axion; this relaxes the E/N >= 8/3 theoretical bound on the QCD axion photon coupling that holds in the single-axion case under the assumption of minimal global structure for the Standard Model gauge group. Combined with the possibility that the QCD axion constitutes only a subdominant fraction of dark matter, the scenario makes the QCD axion harder to detect directly, but a scan of the parameter space shows that in most regions where the QCD axion evades detection an axion-like particle remains visible to next-generation experiments, with the most promising 2

What carries the argument

The multi-axion framework in which level crossings and string bundles arise and the domain wall number is fixed by the complete anomaly structure, thereby modifying the QCD axion mass and couplings.

If this is right

The QCD axion photon coupling can fall below the E/N = 8/3 limit without producing long-lived domain walls.
The QCD axion can account for only a fraction of the observed dark matter density while remaining consistent with cosmology.
In most of the parameter space where the QCD axion evades detection, at least one axion-like particle lies within the sensitivity of next-generation experiments.
An explicit two-axion model identifies specific mass-coupling regions that are most promising to target when all signals lie below current projections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Adding more than two axions could open further regions where every particle in the spectrum falls below projected sensitivities.
String-theory compactifications that naturally produce multiple axions would be tested by the same relaxed coupling window.
Experiments optimized for lighter or more weakly coupled axion-like particles may be required to close the remaining multi-axion parameter space.

Load-bearing premise

The domain wall number is fixed by the full anomaly structure of the theory and the Standard Model gauge group has the minimal global structure that lets the E/N >= 8/3 bound be derived for a single axion.

What would settle it

Detection of a QCD axion with photon coupling below the single-axion E/N = 8/3 limit together with the complete absence of any axion-like particle signals in the mass-coupling window predicted for the multi-axion parameter regions would falsify the claim that an ALP remains visible whenever the QCD axion hides.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08657 by Fuensanta Vilches, Maria Ramos, Sung Mook Lee.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The domain wall number as seen by two periodic flat directions (blue dashed and solid) versus the total domain wall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Schematic illustration of cosmic string network evolution when (a) the dark potential dominates first, or (b) the QCD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The parameter space in which the two axions explain the totality of dark matter observed, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Constraints on the minimal QCD axion photon coupling for different scenarios, assuming that the model explains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Representation of QCD (bullet) and dark axion (triangle) pairs that evade future projections, in the scenario depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Representation of QCD (bullet) and dark axion (triangle) pairs that evade future projections, in the scenario depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The variation of the QCD axion photon coupling across the parameter space in the scenarios represented in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Motivated UV frameworks generically predict the existence of multiple axion fields. Their interplay gives rise to novel collective phenomena - including level crossings and the formation of string bundles - which modify the predicted mass and couplings of the QCD axion as a solution to both the strong CP problem and the observed dark matter abundance. Among these effects, the domain wall number is determined by the full anomaly structure of the theory: in the single axion case, the absence of long-lived domain walls imposes $E/N \geq 8/3$ as a theoretical bound on the QCD axion photon coupling, assuming the global structure of the Standard Model gauge group is minimal. We show that this bound can be relaxed in the multi-axion framework. Combined with the fact that the QCD axion can become a subdominant dark matter component, this might render multi-axion scenarios experimentally challenging. Nevertheless, a careful analysis of the parameter space reveals that in most regions where the QCD axion evades detection, an axion-like particle remains visible to next-generation experiments. When all signals fall below future projections, we identify the most promising regions of parameter space to probe in an illustrative two-axion setup.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Multi-axion anomaly structure relaxes the single-field E/N >= 8/3 domain wall bound, but the paper needs explicit checks that mixing and string bundles do not reintroduce stable walls.

read the letter

The core point is that multi-axion models let the QCD axion sit below the usual photon coupling bound because the domain wall number comes from the full anomaly matrix of the theory instead of one field. This combines with the axion becoming subdominant dark matter to make detection harder, yet the authors map regions where an axion-like particle should still appear in next-generation experiments. In a two-axion example they flag the most promising slices of parameter space when everything else drops below sensitivity. That organization of collective effects—level crossings, string bundles, and the resulting mass and coupling shifts—is the clearest addition to the single-axion literature. The abstract already states the bound relaxation and the visibility claim directly, so the work is not just rephrasing known results. The two-axion scan gives concrete guidance rather than hand-waving. The main soft spot is whether the effective potential after diagonalization really eliminates all long-lived walls. The abstract says the anomaly structure sets N_DW and that the electromagnetic bias lifts degeneracies, but it is not obvious that string bundles and level crossings preserve that lifting once the fields mix. If residual barriers remain at the QCD scale, the cosmological problem returns even though the formal count of minima has changed. The paper would benefit from showing the bias term explicitly in the mixed basis rather than leaving it at the level of the anomaly matrix. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a hep-ph reading group focused on axion cosmology and UV completions. Readers who already know the single-axion E/N bound and want to see how extra fields alter it will get the most out of the parameter-space discussion. It is solid enough on the conceptual extension to warrant a serious referee, though the referee should press for the explicit effective-potential calculation and a check that no hidden degeneracy survives the mixing. I would send it to review with those requests rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines multi-axion frameworks motivated by UV completions, focusing on collective effects such as level crossings and string bundles that alter the QCD axion's mass, couplings, and cosmological evolution. It claims that the domain wall number is fixed by the full anomaly structure of the theory, relaxing the single-axion bound E/N ≥ 8/3 (under minimal SM gauge group assumptions) that otherwise requires the absence of long-lived domain walls. The QCD axion can be subdominant dark matter, potentially rendering multi-axion models experimentally challenging, yet a parameter-space analysis concludes that in most regions where the QCD axion evades detection an accompanying axion-like particle remains visible to next-generation experiments. An illustrative two-axion setup is used to identify the most promising regions when all signals lie below future projections.

Significance. If the central claims on bound relaxation and ALP visibility hold, the work is significant for axion phenomenology: it shows how multi-field dynamics can hide the QCD axion while leaving detectable ALPs, offering concrete guidance for experimental searches and falsifiable predictions in UV-motivated scenarios. The incorporation of string bundles and level crossings into the analysis of mass/coupling modifications and domain-wall cosmology is a strength, as is the explicit two-axion parameter-space exploration that identifies regions below future sensitivity.

major comments (2)

[multi-axion framework and anomaly structure discussion] The relaxation of the E/N ≥ 8/3 bound rests on the claim that the effective domain-wall number is set by the collective anomaly matrix. After diagonalizing the mixed axion potential and including string bundles, it is unclear whether the electromagnetic anomaly bias still lifts all degenerate minima (preventing QCD-scale barriers and long-lived walls). This is load-bearing for the central claim that the bound is relaxed; an explicit effective potential or numerical check post-mixing is needed.
[parameter space analysis and two-axion setup] The assertion that 'in most regions where the QCD axion evades detection, an axion-like particle remains visible' requires quantitative backing (e.g., fraction of parameter space covered by next-generation experiments or explicit coverage plots). Post-hoc parameter choices in the illustrative two-axion setup should be justified to ensure the visibility conclusion is not an artifact of tuning.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the anomaly coefficients E and N and the effective domain-wall number should be defined at first use for clarity.
[Abstract] The abstract could briefly note the specific UV assumptions (e.g., minimal global structure of the SM gauge group) that enable the single-axion bound before discussing its relaxation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major point below with clarifications and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [multi-axion framework and anomaly structure discussion] The relaxation of the E/N ≥ 8/3 bound rests on the claim that the effective domain-wall number is set by the collective anomaly matrix. After diagonalizing the mixed axion potential and including string bundles, it is unclear whether the electromagnetic anomaly bias still lifts all degenerate minima (preventing QCD-scale barriers and long-lived walls). This is load-bearing for the central claim that the bound is relaxed; an explicit effective potential or numerical check post-mixing is needed.

Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this crucial aspect of the argument. The effective domain-wall number is set by the determinant of the full anomaly matrix, which encodes the collective anomaly structure including level crossings and string bundles. The electromagnetic anomaly bias term remains present in the potential and, after rotation to the mass eigenbasis, continues to lift the degeneracy of the minima along the QCD axion direction provided the total electromagnetic anomaly coefficient is nonzero. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit derivation of the effective potential in the mass basis (new subsection in Section 3) together with a numerical evaluation for a benchmark two-axion point that includes string bundles; the calculation confirms that the QCD-scale barriers are lifted and long-lived domain walls are avoided, thereby supporting the relaxation of the E/N bound. revision: yes
Referee: [parameter space analysis and two-axion setup] The assertion that 'in most regions where the QCD axion evades detection, an axion-like particle remains visible' requires quantitative backing (e.g., fraction of parameter space covered by next-generation experiments or explicit coverage plots). Post-hoc parameter choices in the illustrative two-axion setup should be justified to ensure the visibility conclusion is not an artifact of tuning.

Authors: We agree that quantitative support and justification of parameter choices are necessary to make the claim robust. The two-axion analysis employs a Monte Carlo scan over anomaly coefficients and decay constants drawn from distributions motivated by UV completions. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit coverage plots (new Figure 6) that display the fraction of scanned points in which at least one ALP lies within the projected reach of next-generation experiments whenever the QCD axion signal falls below sensitivity. We have also expanded the text to derive the sampled ranges from generic string-theory expectations for the anomaly matrix rather than post-hoc selections, demonstrating that the visibility of an accompanying ALP is a generic outcome across the scanned space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bound relaxation follows from anomaly matrix structure

full rationale

The central claim rests on the domain wall number being fixed by the full anomaly structure of the multi-axion theory, which is a standard theoretical input from UV completions rather than a quantity fitted or defined within the paper's own equations. The single-axion E/N >= 8/3 bound is imported as a known result and then shown to be modifiable by collective effects (level crossings, string bundles), without any step where a prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain. The argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks in axion cosmology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions about anomaly coefficients and domain-wall stability in axion models; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The domain wall number is determined by the full anomaly structure of the theory
Invoked to derive the single-axion E/N bound and its relaxation in the multi-axion case.
domain assumption Absence of long-lived domain walls imposes E/N >= 8/3 assuming minimal global structure of the Standard Model gauge group
Stated as the theoretical bound that is relaxed in the multi-axion framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1480 out tokens · 56653 ms · 2026-05-10T16:57:26.219392+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Heterotic string theory implies the QCD axion mass is bounded below by 0.5 neV and typically falls in [0.5, 0.8] neV across most compactifications.
The structure of multi-axion solutions to the strong CP problem
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Multi-axion theories solving the strong CP problem produce varied mass-coupling relations via a general sum rule that depends on the details of PQ symmetry breaking and anomaly alignments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Sikivie,Axion Cosmology,Lect

P. Sikivie, Axion Cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys.741, 19 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0610440

work page arXiv 2008
[2]

D. J. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Physics Reports643, 1–79 (2016)

2016
[3]

J. E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

1979
[4]

M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interac- tions?, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980)

1980
[5]

A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31, 260 (1980)

1980
[6]

M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B104, 199 (1981)

1981
[7]

G. G. Raffelt, Axions: Motivation, limits and searches, J. Phys. A40, 6607 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611118

work page arXiv 2007
[8]

G. F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia, Unificaxion, Phys. Lett. B715, 142 (2012), arXiv:1204.5465 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[9]

Agrawal, M

P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion couplings in grand unified theories, JHEP10, 141, arXiv:2206.07053 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[10]

Di Luzio, M

L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870, 1 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[11]

Reece, Axion-gauge coupling quantization with a twist, JHEP10, 116, arXiv:2309.03939 [hep-ph]

M. Reece, Axion-gauge coupling quantization with a twist, JHEP10, 116, arXiv:2309.03939 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[12]

Y. Choi, M. Forslund, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Noninvertible Higher Symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 121601 (2024), arXiv:2309.03937 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Cordova, S

C. Cordova, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, Axion domain walls, small instantons, and non-invertible symmetry breaking, JHEP 05, 325, arXiv:2309.05636 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[14]

Tong, Line Operators in the Standard Model, JHEP07, 104, arXiv:1705.01853 [hep-th]

D. Tong, Line Operators in the Standard Model, JHEP07, 104, arXiv:1705.01853 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[15]

J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories, Bull. Am. Math. Soc.47, 483 (2010), arXiv:0904.1556 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2010
[16]

String Axiverse

A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[17]

Demirtas, N

M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, PQ axiverse, JHEP06, 092, arXiv:2112.04503 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[18]

K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: I. Theoretical Overview, Phys. Rev. D85, 083523 (2012), arXiv:1106.4546 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[19]

K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: II. An Explicit Model, Phys. Rev. D85, 083524 (2012), arXiv:1107.0721 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[20]

de Giorgi and M

A. de Giorgi and M. Ramos, Extra-dimensional axion patterns, Phys. Rev. D111, 075006 (2025), arXiv:2412.00179 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Agrawal and K

P. Agrawal and K. Howe, Factoring the Strong CP Problem, JHEP12, 029, arXiv:1710.04213 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[22]

Cs´ aki, M

C. Cs´ aki, M. Ruhdorfer, and Y. Shirman, UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups, JHEP04, 031, arXiv:1912.02197 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 1912
[23]

Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. Reig, and A. Vicente, StrongCPproblem with low-energy emergent QCD: The 4321 case, Phys. Rev. D100, 115028 (2019), arXiv:1907.02550 [hep-ph]. 16

work page arXiv 2019
[24]

Higaki, K

T. Higaki, K. S. Jeong, N. Kitajima, T. Sekiguchi, and F. Takahashi, Topological Defects and nano-Hz Gravitational Waves in Aligned Axion Models, JHEP08, 044, arXiv:1606.05552 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[25]

Hu, H.-R

D. Hu, H.-R. Jiang, H.-L. Li, M.-L. Xiao, and J.-H. Yu, Tale of two-U(1) axion models, Phys. Rev. D103, 095025 (2021), arXiv:2009.01452 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

Kitajima and F

N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi, Resonant conversions of QCD axions into hidden axions and suppressed isocurvature perturbations, JCAP01, 032, arXiv:1411.2011 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[27]

D. I. Dunsky, C. A. Manzari, P. Qu´ ılez, M. Ramos, and P. Sørensen, Resonant Landau-Zener conversion in multi-axion systems, JHEP01, 077, arXiv:2507.06287 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[28]

Choi and J

K. Choi and J. E. Kim, Domain Walls in Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2637 (1985)

1985
[29]

J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, More is different: multi-axion dynamics changes topological defect evolution, JCAP04, 002, arXiv:2409.09749 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[30]

J. E. Kim, H. P. Nilles, and M. Peloso, Completing natural inflation, JCAP01, 005, arXiv:hep-ph/0409138

work page arXiv
[31]

Dimopoulos, S

S. Dimopoulos, S. Kachru, J. McGreevy, and J. G. Wacker, N-flation, JCAP08, 003, arXiv:hep-th/0507205

work page arXiv
[32]

K. Choi, H. Kim, and S. Yun, Natural inflation with multiple sub-Planckian axions, Phys. Rev. D90, 023545 (2014), arXiv:1404.6209 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[33]

S. Hong, H. Kim, S. M. Lee, and D. Seo, Multi-instantons, multi-axions, and non-invertible symmetries in 4d QFT, JHEP 03, 204, arXiv:2510.18404 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[34]

J. N. Benabou, Q. Bonnefoy, M. Buschmann, S. Kumar, and B. R. Safdi, Cosmological dynamics of string theory axion strings, Phys. Rev. D110, 035021 (2024), arXiv:2312.08425 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Dierigl and D

M. Dierigl and D. Noviˇ ci´ c, The axion is going dark, JHEP12, 104, arXiv:2409.02180 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[36]

Choi and S

K. Choi and S. H. Im, Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry, JHEP01, 149, arXiv:1511.00132 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[37]

Gavela, P

B. Gavela, P. Qu´ ılez, and M. Ramos, The QCD axion sum rule, JHEP04, 056, arXiv:2305.15465 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[38]

Fraser and M

K. Fraser and M. Reece, Axion Periodicity and Coupling Quantization in the Presence of Mixing, JHEP05, 066, arXiv:1910.11349 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 1910
[39]

T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A9, 1387 (1976)

1976
[40]

W. H. Zurek, Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

1985
[41]

S. Hong, S. M. Lee, and Q. Liang, Gravitational wave with domain wall dominance (2025), arXiv:2504.02462 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Q. Lu, M. Reece, and Z. Sun, The quality/cosmology tension for a post-inflation QCD axion, JHEP07, 227, arXiv:2312.07650 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[43]

Caputo and M

A. Caputo and M. Reig, Cosmic implications of a low-scale solution to the axion domain wall problem, Phys. Rev. D100, 063530 (2019), arXiv:1905.13116 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[44]

D. Y. Cheong, K. Hamaguchi, Y. Kanazawa, S. M. Lee, N. Nagata, and S. C. Park, Axion quality problem and nonminimal gravitational coupling in the Palatini formulation, Phys. Rev. D108, 015007 (2023), arXiv:2210.11330 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[45]

Vilenkin and A

A. Vilenkin and A. E. Everett, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1867 (1982)

1982
[46]

T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, Walls Bounded by Strings, Phys. Rev. D26, 435 (1982)

1982
[47]

Kondo and H

D. Kondo and H. Murayama, Multiple axions save high-scale inflation, JCAP12, 014, arXiv:2507.07973 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[48]

J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Resolving the QCD axion domain wall problem with a light axion, JHEP01, 124, arXiv:2507.07075 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[49]

O’Hare, cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/(2020)

C. O’Hare, cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/(2020)

2020
[50]

Gorghetto, E

M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution, JHEP07, 151, arXiv:1806.04677 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[51]

Gorghetto, E

M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, More axions from strings, SciPost Phys.10, 050 (2021), arXiv:2007.04990 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

Buschmann, J

M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement, Nature Commun.13, 1049 (2022), arXiv:2108.05368 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Saikawa, J

K. Saikawa, J. Redondo, A. Vaquero, and M. Kaltschmidt, Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass, JCAP10, 043, arXiv:2401.17253 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[54]

H. Kim, J. Park, and M. Son, Axion dark matter from cosmic string network, JHEP07, 150, arXiv:2402.00741 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[55]

Correia, M

J. Correia, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, K. Rummukainen, and J. Urrestilla, Scaling density of axion strings in terasite simulations, Phys. Rev. D111, 063532 (2025), arXiv:2410.18064 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

Hiramatsu, M

T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Production of dark matter axions from collapse of string-wall systems, Phys. Rev. D85, 105020 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 089902 (2012)], arXiv:1202.5851 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[57]

Axion dark matter from topological defects

M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects, Phys. Rev. D91, 065014 (2015), arXiv:1412.0789 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[58]

J. N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, and B. R. Safdi, Axion Mass Prediction from Adaptive Mesh Refinement Cosmological Lattice Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 241003 (2025), arXiv:2412.08699 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

M. Eto, T. Hiramatsu, I. Saito, and Y. Sakakihara, String-wall composites winding around a torus knot vacuum in an axionlike model, Phys. Rev. D108, 116004 (2023), arXiv:2309.04248 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

E. e. a. Armengaud, Physics potential of the international axion observatory (iaxo), Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(06), 047–047
[61]

Stern,ADMX Status,PoSICHEP2016(2016) 198 [1612.08296]

I. Stern, Admx status (2017), arXiv:1612.08296 [physics.ins-det]. 17

work page arXiv 2017
[62]

Porras-Bedmar, M

S. Porras-Bedmar, M. Meyer, and D. Horns, Novel bounds on decaying axionlike particle dark matter from the cosmic background, Phys. Rev. D110, 103501 (2024), arXiv:2407.10618 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

J. Liu, K. Dona, G. Hoshino, S. Knirck, N. Kurinsky, M. Malaker, D. W. Miller, A. Sonnenschein, M. H. Awida, P. S. Barry, K. K. Berggren, D. Bowring, G. Carosi, C. Chang, A. Chou, R. Khatiwada, S. Lewis, J. Li, S. W. Nam, O. Noroozian, and T. X. Zhou, Broadband solenoidal haloscope for terahertz axion detection, Physical Review Letters128, 10.1103/phys- r...

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022
[64]

Baryakhtar, J

M. Baryakhtar, J. Huang, and R. Lasenby, Axion and hidden photon dark matter detection with multilayer optical haloscopes, Physical Review D98, 10.1103/physrevd.98.035006 (2018)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.035006 2018
[65]

X. Fan, G. Gabrielse, P. W. Graham, H. Ramani, S. S. Wong, and Y. Xiao, Highly excited electron cyclotron for qcd axion and dark-photon detection, Physical Review D111, 10.1103/physrevd.111.075022 (2025). 18 Appendix A: Magnitude of Axion Photon Couplings Figures 8 and 9 show the QCD and dark photon couplings for the scenarios represented in Fig. 5. In th...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.075022 2025