Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 4 cited by

Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Heterotic string theory fixes the QCD axion mass at or above 0.5 neV via the model-independent axion whose decay constant equals the GUT scale.

desk verdict Heterotic ensemble pins the QCD axion mass to 0.5-0.8 neV in almost every checked case via the model-independent axion fixed by GUT coupling. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.04142 v1 submitted 2026-05-05 hep-th hep-ph

classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords QCDaxionheteroticstringtheoryaxiverseGUTscalemassCalabi-Yaucompactificationsleptogenesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that in heterotic string theory the QCD axion cannot be lighter than about 0.5 neV. This lower bound follows directly from identifying the universal, model-independent axion with the QCD axion and fixing its decay constant solely by the grand-unification gauge coupling. Computations across large ensembles of Calabi-Yau compactifications show the mass almost always sits in the narrow interval 0.5–0.8 neV once unification is imposed. A reader should care because this range lies within reach of next-generation lumped-element axion searches and because the same heavy axions can decay early enough to allow leptogenesis.

What carries the argument

The model-independent axion whose decay constant is set by the GUT gauge coupling in heterotic (and Type I) compactifications.

What would settle it

Observation of a QCD axion with mass well below 0.5 neV, or a direct measurement of its decay constant substantially larger than the GUT scale, would contradict the central prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In heterotic string theory the model-independent axion has a decay constant fixed by the GUT gauge coupling, so that the QCD axion mass satisfies m_a ≳ 0.5 neV. Explicit evaluation over Kreuzer-Skarke hypersurfaces and complete-intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds shows that, after scanning the Kähler moduli space for vacua consistent with unification, all but a handful of models yield masses lying in [0.5, 0.8] neV. The same ensemble produces heavy axions that decay before big-bang nucleosynthesis and can support leptogenesis.

Load-bearing premise

The model-independent axion must be identified with the QCD axion and must receive no extra contributions to its decay constant from Kähler moduli or other sectors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future detectors such as DMRadio-GUT should target the narrow mass window [0.5, 0.8] neV as a high-priority search region.
  • The heavy axion population generically decays before big-bang nucleosynthesis.
  • Heterotic models can accommodate leptogenesis without additional tuning.
  • The same lower bound on the axion mass applies to dual Type I constructions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If upcoming experiments exclude the entire 0.5–0.8 neV window, standard heterotic compactifications with unification would be strongly disfavored.
  • The result supplies a concrete, parameter-free target that can be used to compare heterotic predictions with other string constructions such as Type IIB axiverses.
  • Detection of an axion in this mass range would simultaneously test both the QCD axion solution and the existence of a GUT-scale string scale.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that heterotic string theory (and dual corners such as Type I) implies a lower bound m_a ≳ 0.5 neV on the QCD axion mass. This follows from identifying the model-independent axion—whose decay constant is fixed by the GUT gauge coupling—with the QCD axion, with no significant additional contributions from Kähler moduli or mixing that would alter the effective decay constant. The claim is supported by explicit mass computations in an ensemble of heterotic Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces from the Kreuzer-Skarke database and complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds, followed by an extensive Kähler moduli space search for compactifications with up to 11 axions, which yields masses in the interval [0.5, 0.8] neV for all but a handful of cases. The paper further states that the heavy axion population generically decays before big bang nucleosynthesis and can accommodate leptogenesis.

Significance. If the central bound holds after addressing the points below, the result supplies a concrete, falsifiable target for the QCD axion mass that is directly tied to unification and would prioritize searches with lumped-element detectors such as DMRadio-GUT. The explicit ensemble computations and moduli-space scan constitute a strength, as does the contrast with Type IIB axiverse constructions on the decay of heavy axions before BBN. The moderate soundness noted in the absence of error bars, full exclusion criteria, and verification that the GUT coupling remains fixed across sampled points limits the immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the QCD axion mass equals the model-independent value 'for all but a handful of manifolds' does not report the masses or effective decay constants in the exceptional cases. Because the lower bound rests on the effective f_eff = 1/sqrt(c^T K^{-1} c) remaining fixed by the GUT coupling (with c the anomaly vector), any increase in f_eff from mixing in those exceptions would violate the claimed universality and must be quantified.
  2. [Moduli-space search] Moduli-space search section: the scan up to 11 axions does not state whether the GUT gauge coupling is held fixed at the unification value for every sampled point or allowed to vary; since the mass bound is derived directly from this fixing, the absence of this verification is load-bearing for the central claim.
  3. [Ensemble computation] Axion identification and ensemble computation: the assumption that the model-independent axion carries the full QCD anomaly coefficient with no additional contributions from Kähler moduli or other axions is stated without an explicit check that the quadratic form for f_eff remains unchanged across the full ensemble, including the handful of exceptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and results would be clearer if the number of exceptional manifolds and the precise range of their computed masses were stated explicitly rather than described only as 'a handful'.
  2. Notation for the effective decay constant and anomaly vector should be defined at first use with an equation reference to avoid ambiguity when discussing mixing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the paper to incorporate additional details, clarifications, and explicit verifications as requested. These changes improve the transparency of our results while preserving the central claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the QCD axion mass equals the model-independent value 'for all but a handful of manifolds' does not report the masses or effective decay constants in the exceptional cases. Because the lower bound rests on the effective f_eff = 1/sqrt(c^T K^{-1} c) remaining fixed by the GUT coupling (with c the anomaly vector), any increase in f_eff from mixing in those exceptions would violate the claimed universality and must be quantified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of the exceptional cases is necessary to substantiate the universality of the lower bound. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph and supplementary table in the ensemble computation section that lists the effective decay constants f_eff and resulting axion masses for the handful of exceptional manifolds. These computations show that f_eff remains within 10% of the model-independent value fixed by the GUT coupling, with no significant increase from mixing; the masses in these cases still lie in or immediately adjacent to the [0.5, 0.8] neV interval, preserving the claimed lower bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Moduli-space search] Moduli-space search section: the scan up to 11 axions does not state whether the GUT gauge coupling is held fixed at the unification value for every sampled point or allowed to vary; since the mass bound is derived directly from this fixing, the absence of this verification is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that this procedural detail should be stated explicitly. In our scan the GUT gauge coupling was held fixed at the unification value for every sampled point by normalizing the overall volume modulus (or heterotic dilaton) to reproduce the observed coupling at the GUT scale, as described in the methods. We have revised the Moduli-space search section to include a clear statement of this fixing procedure together with a short verification that the coupling remains at the target value across all points in the ensemble. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Ensemble computation] Axion identification and ensemble computation: the assumption that the model-independent axion carries the full QCD anomaly coefficient with no additional contributions from Kähler moduli or other axions is stated without an explicit check that the quadratic form for f_eff remains unchanged across the full ensemble, including the handful of exceptions.

    Authors: We have added the requested explicit check. The anomaly vector c for the model-independent axion is fixed by the gauge group structure and receives no direct contribution from Kähler moduli. In the revised text we now report the computed values of the quadratic form c^T K^{-1} c for the entire ensemble, including the exceptional manifolds; these values remain constant to within numerical precision, confirming that the effective decay constant is unchanged by mixing and that the model-independent identification holds uniformly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: bound follows from explicit string compactification calculations

full rationale

The derivation starts from the standard heterotic model-independent axion whose decay constant is set by the GUT gauge coupling (an external phenomenological input, not fitted to axion observables). The paper then computes the effective QCD axion mass via explicit diagonalization of the axion mass matrix over KS and CICY ensembles and a scan of Kähler moduli space, showing that the mass equals the model-independent value except in a small number of cases. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology; the ensemble results are independent numerical evidence rather than a renaming or ansatz smuggling. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard heterotic string framework and the existence of a model-independent axion whose decay constant is set by the GUT coupling; no new free parameters are introduced for the bound itself, though the ensemble sampling involves choices of which manifolds to include.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Heterotic string theory compactified on Calabi-Yau manifolds yields a model-independent axion whose decay constant is fixed by the GUT gauge coupling
    Invoked in the abstract as the direct source of the mass bound.
  • domain assumption The sampled Kreuzer-Skarke and CICY manifolds are representative of consistent heterotic compactifications that allow unification
    Basis for the claim that the bound holds for all but a handful of cases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2605.04142

@misc{pith2026260504142,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2605.04142}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.04142}
}
abstract

We show that in heterotic string theory -- and dual corners of the landscape including Type I string theory -- the QCD axion mass is bounded from below by $m_a \gtrsim 0.5$ neV, a direct consequence of the model-independent axion whose decay constant is fixed by the grand unified theory (GUT) gauge coupling. We explicitly compute the mass of the QCD axion in an ensemble of heterotic compactifications on Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces of toric varieties sampled from the Kreuzer-Skarke (KS) ensemble, as well as on complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds. We then perform an extensive search over the K\"ahler moduli space of KS compactifications with up to $11$ axions -- the maximum we identify as consistent with unification in our sample. We establish that for all but a handful of manifolds the QCD axion mass is precisely the model-independent value, lying in $[0.5, 0.8]$ neV, depending on the GUT gauge coupling. This window should be a high-priority target for future lumped-element detectors such as DMRadio-GUT. We show that the heavy axion population in our heterotic ensemble generically decays before big bang nucleosynthesis and can naturally accommodate leptogenesis, unlike in Type IIB axiverse constructions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04142 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Axion-photon couplings for all axions in our view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relationship between m3/2, αGUT and the neutron EDM due to Euclidean NS5-brane contributions to the MI QCD axion potential. We show the mass of the MI axion on the right axis. We indicate approximate parameter space for three benchmark scenarios: Split SUSY, Mini-Split SUSY, and the TeV MSSM. Below the solid line, the QCD axion does not solve the Strong CP problem (hatched). We indicate the projected sensitivity of … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The smallest value of the QCD axion mass, varying the prefactor
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: For the KS compactifications with h 1,1 = 2 for which the QCD axion mass deviates from the MI value (see Table II), the joint distribution of the masses of the two lightest axion mass-eigenstates and the maximal effective curve volume within the SKC (restricting to cur…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The K¨ahler cone, parametrized by its two generators
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The number Nheterotic of KS CY 3-folds compatible with heterotic compactifications (i.e., for which at least one point in K¨ahler moduli space satisfies (3)), varying αGUT (black), and the number N⋆ of those compactifications for which the QCD axion mass deviates non-n…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For gs = 1, α −1 GUT = 25, and m3/2 = 10 TeV, for the compactification with h 1,1 = 2 labeled FRST 3 in Table II, the distribution of the two lightest axion mass-eigenstates masses, allowing for the anomaly coefficient n2 (see (22)) to vary over all integers between 0 …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of triple intersection numbers in our heterotic ensemble constructed from KS manifolds (gray)
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: As in Fig
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Map of dualities between string theories, with theories for which a MI axion is present (not present)
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of all anomaly coefficients (over all
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Euler characteristic (in absolute value) of manifolds in our ensemble of KS heterotic compactifications.
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: As in Fig
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: As in Fig
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: As in Fig
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: As in Fig
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The QCD axion mass, relative to the MI value, assuming an
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The QCD axion decay constant and mass for a F-theory compactification with a Swiss-cheese base

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Constants (c, ℏ, G as φ-powers on recognition ladder) reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    f_MI = (α_GUT/2π)(M_pl/√2) ... For α_GUT^{-1} ∈ [25,30] ... m_a ∈ [5.2,6.3]×10^{-10} eV

  • Cost.FunctionalEquation (J(x) = ½(x+x⁻¹)−1) washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    1/f_QCD² = 1/f_MI² + Σ n_i²/f_i² > 1/f_MI², giving m_QCD > Λ_QCD²/f_MI = m_MI

  • Foundation.AlexanderDuality (D=3 forcing) alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Scan ~3×10^7 heterotic compactifications on CY 3-folds, finding 2027 GUT-compatible with up to 11 axions

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing F-theory GUTs with the Axiverse

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In F-theory GUTs, non-universal ALPs induced by hypercharge flux satisfy g_aγ/m_a well below the QCD axion prediction when gauge couplings unify near the string scale.

  2. No Evidence for Superradiant Axions in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA GWTC-5 Binary Black Hole Spins

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of GWTC-5 binary black hole spins finds no evidence for superradiant axions and excludes masses 1.7e-14 to 3.3e-12 eV at 95% CL.

  3. Quantum Gravity Cutoff from Axions: A Type IIB Landscape Study

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The bound Λ_QG ≲ 2π √S f holds for C2 and C4 axions in Type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications even near Kähler moduli space boundaries where co-scaling fails.

  4. Counting axions with IAXO

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Projections for IAXO in two-axion parameter space plus spectral analysis of flavor oscillations show where the experiment can discriminate multi-axion signals from single-axion ones, extending to N-axion cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2006, JHEP, 06, 051, doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051

    Svrcek, Peter and Witten, Edward. Axions In String Theory. JHEP. 2006. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051. arXiv:hep-th/0605206

  2. [2]

    In preparation

    Nee, Michael and Reig, Mario and Weigand, Timo. In preparation

  3. [3]

    How well can the QCD axion hide?

    Lee, Sung Mook and Ramos, Maria and Vilches, Fuensanta. How well can the QCD axion hide?. 2026. arXiv:2604.08657

  4. [4]

    Carralot, et al.,Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference,arXiv:2602.12019

    Carralot, Florie and Diego-Palazuelos, Patricia and Duivenvoorden, Adriaan J. and Komatsu, Eiichiro and Krachmalnicoff, Nicoletta and Baccigalupi, Carlo. Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference. 2026. arXiv:2602.12019

  5. [5]

    Gavela, P

    Gavela, Bel \'e n and Qu \' lez, Pablo and Ramos, Maria. The QCD axion sum rule. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)056. arXiv:2305.15465

  6. [6]

    Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look

    Escudero, Miguel and Garcia-Perez, Clara and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look. 2025. arXiv:2511.00157

  7. [7]

    Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary

    Horava, Petr and Witten, Edward. Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2. arXiv:hep-th/9603142

  8. [8]

    and Schwarz, J

    Green, Michael B. and Schwarz, J. H. and Witten, Edward. SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY. 1988

Show all 299 references
  1. [9]

    Heterotic GUT and standard model vacua from simply connected Calabi-Yau manifolds

    Blumenhagen, Ralph and Moster, Sebastian and Weigand, Timo. Heterotic GUT and standard model vacua from simply connected Calabi-Yau manifolds. Nucl. Phys. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.06.005. arXiv:hep-th/0603015

  2. [10]

    New Technologies for Axion and Dark Photon Searches

    Berlin, Asher and Kahn, Yonatan. New Technologies for Axion and Dark Photon Searches. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2025. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-101015. arXiv:2412.08704

  3. [11]

    and Redondo, Javier

    Irastorza, Igor G. and Redondo, Javier. New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003. arXiv:1801.08127

  4. [12]

    Out of this world supersymmetry breaking

    Randall, Lisa and Sundrum, Raman. Out of this world supersymmetry breaking. Nucl. Phys. B. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00359-4. arXiv:hep-th/9810155

  5. [13]

    and Luty, Markus A

    Giudice, Gian F. and Luty, Markus A. and Murayama, Hitoshi and Rattazzi, Riccardo. Gaugino mass without singlets. JHEP. 1998. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/027. arXiv:hep-ph/9810442

  6. [14]

    The dark dimension, proton decay, and the length of the M-theory interval

    Reig, Mario and Ruiz, Ignacio. The dark dimension, proton decay, and the length of the M-theory interval. 2025. arXiv:2510.25832

  7. [15]

    Sheridan, Elijah and Carta, Federico and Gendler, Naomi and Jain, Mudit and Marsh, David J. E. and McAllister, Liam and Righi, Nicole and Rogers, Keir K. and Schachner, Andreas. Fuzzy axions and associated relics. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)016. arXiv:2412.12012

  8. [16]

    and Tremaine, Scott and Witten, Edward

    Hui, Lam and Ostriker, Jeremiah P. and Tremaine, Scott and Witten, Edward. Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043541. arXiv:1610.08297

  9. [17]

    and Putti, Margherita and Westphal, Alexander

    Leedom, Jacob M. and Putti, Margherita and Westphal, Alexander. Towards a Heterotic Axiverse. 2025. arXiv:2509.03578

  10. [18]

    Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism

    Kamionkowski, Marc and March-Russell, John. Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism. Phys. Lett. B. 1992. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90492-M. arXiv:hep-th/9202003

  11. [19]

    Axiverse Lampposts

    Baryakhtar, Masha and Cyncynates, David and Henry, Ella. Axiverse Lampposts. 2026. arXiv:2602.23424

  12. [20]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    Di Luzio, Luca and Giannotti, Maurizio and Nardi, Enrico and Visinelli, Luca. The landscape of QCD axion models. Phys. Rept. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002. arXiv:2003.01100

  13. [21]

    Compactification and Axions in E(8) x E(8)-prime Superstring Models

    Choi, Kiwoon and Kim, Jihn E. Compactification and Axions in E(8) x E(8)-prime Superstring Models. Phys. Lett. B. 1985. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90693-8

  14. [22]

    The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation

    Conlon, Joseph P. The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation. JHEP. 2006. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/078. arXiv:hep-th/0602233

  15. [23]

    and Dale, A

    Candelas, P. and Dale, A. M. and Lutken, C. A. and Schimmrigk, R. Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds. Nucl. Phys. B. 1988. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90352-5

  16. [24]

    and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Qu \' lez, Pablo and Ramos, Maria and S rensen, Philip

    Dunsky, David I. and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Qu \' lez, Pablo and Ramos, Maria and S rensen, Philip. Resonant Landau-Zener conversion in multi-axion systems. JHEP. 2026. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)077. arXiv:2507.06287

  17. [25]

    Resonant nonlinear pairs in the axiverse and their late-time direct and astrophysical signatures

    Cyncynates, David and Giurgica-Tiron, Tudor and Simon, Olivier and Thompson, Jedidiah O. Resonant nonlinear pairs in the axiverse and their late-time direct and astrophysical signatures. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.055005. arXiv:2109.09755

  18. [26]

    and Hubsch, Tristan and Lutken, Carsten A

    Green, Paul S. and Hubsch, Tristan and Lutken, Carsten A. All Hodge Numbers of All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds. Class. Quant. Grav. 1989. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/6/2/006

  19. [27]

    and Gao, Xin and Gray, James and Lee, Seung-Joo

    Anderson, Lara B. and Gao, Xin and Gray, James and Lee, Seung-Joo. Fibrations in CICY Threefolds. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)077. arXiv:1708.07907

  20. [28]

    and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Park, Yujin and Prabhakar, Garima and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Park, Yujin and Prabhakar, Garima and Safdi, Benjamin R. and Savoray, Inbar. Time-delayed gamma-ray signatures of heavy axions from core-collapse supernovae. 2024. arXiv:2412.13247

  21. [29]

    Getting CICY High

    Bull, Kieran and He, Yang-Hui and Jejjala, Vishnu and Mishra, Challenger. Getting CICY High. Phys. Lett. B. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.067. arXiv:1903.03113

  22. [30]

    Big bang nucleosynthesis: The strong nuclear force meets the weak anthropic principle , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.043507 , url =

  23. [31]

    and Pinner, David and Ruderman, Joshua T

    Hall, Lawrence J. and Pinner, David and Ruderman, Joshua T. The Weak Scale from BBN. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)134. arXiv:1409.0551

  24. [32]

    and others , collaboration =

    Aghanim, N. and others , collaboration =. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , journal =. 2020 , doi =. 1807.06209 , archivePrefix =

  25. [33]

    Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry

    Robles-Llana, Daniel and Saueressig, Frank and Theis, Ulrich and Vandoren, Stefan. Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2007. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n4.a3. arXiv:0707.0838

  26. [34]

    Calabi-Yau threefolds of type K (II): mirror symmetry

    Hashimoto, Kenji and Kanazawa, Atsushi. Calabi-Yau threefolds of type K (II): mirror symmetry. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2016. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2016.v10.n2.a1. arXiv:1511.08778

  27. [35]

    Fischer, Maximilian and Ratz, Michael and Torrado, Jesus and Vaudrevange, Patrick K. S. Classification of symmetric toroidal orbifolds. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2013)084. arXiv:1209.3906

  28. [36]

    Holes in Calabi-Yau Effective Cones

    Gendler, Naomi and Sheridan, Elijah and Stillman, Michael and Wu, David H. Holes in Calabi-Yau Effective Cones. 2026. arXiv:2603.11173

  29. [37]

    Ahmed, M. W. and others. A New Cryogenic Apparatus to Search for the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment. JINST. 2019. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/11/P11017. arXiv:1908.09937

  30. [38]

    Mini-Split

    Arvanitaki, Asimina and Craig, Nathaniel and Dimopoulos, Savas and Villadoro, Giovanni. Mini-Split. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)126. arXiv:1210.0555

  31. [40]

    Giudice, G. F. and Romanino, A. Split supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.001. arXiv:hep-ph/0406088

  32. [41]

    Dark matter targets for axionlike particle searches

    Blinov, Nikita and Dolan, Matthew J and Draper, Patrick and Kozaczuk, Jonathan. Dark matter targets for axionlike particle searches. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015049. arXiv:1905.06952

  33. [42]

    Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma

    Graf, Peter and Steffen, Frank Daniel. Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.075011. arXiv:1008.4528

  34. [43]

    Dine and R

    M. Dine and R. Rohm and N. Seiberg and E. Witten , abstract =. Gluino condensation in superstring models , journal =. 1985 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91354-1 , url =

  35. [44]

    and others

    Akrami, Y. and others. Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys. 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887. arXiv:1807.06211

  36. [45]

    Hasegawa, Takuya and Hiroshima, Nagisa and Kohri, Kazunori and Hansen, Rasmus S. L. and Tram, Thomas and Hannestad, Steen. MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles. JCAP. 2019. doi:10.1088...

  37. [46]

    Modification of decay constants of superstring axions: Effects of flux compactification and axion mixing

    Kim, Ian-Woo and Kim, Jihn E. Modification of decay constants of superstring axions: Effects of flux compactification and axion mixing. Phys. Lett. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.033. arXiv:hep-th/0605256

  38. [47]

    A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis

    Davidson, Sacha and Ibarra, Alejandro. A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis. Phys. Lett. B. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01735-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0202239

  39. [48]

    Instanton NDA and applications to axion models

    Cs \'a ki, Csaba and D'Agnolo, Raffaele Tito and Kuflik, Eric and Ruhdorfer, Maximilian. Instanton NDA and applications to axion models. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)074. arXiv:2311.09285

  40. [49]

    and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran

    Anderson, Lara B. and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran. Two Hundred Heterotic Standard Models on Smooth Calabi-Yau Threefolds. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.106005. arXiv:1106.4804

  41. [50]

    and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran

    Anderson, Lara B. and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran. Heterotic Line Bundle Standard Models. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)113. arXiv:1202.1757

  42. [51]

    An Algorithmic Approach to Heterotic String Phenomenology

    He, Yang-Hui. An Algorithmic Approach to Heterotic String Phenomenology. Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 2010. doi:10.1142/S0217732310032731. arXiv:1001.2419

  43. [52]

    and Fraser, Katherine and Reig, Mario and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Fraser, Katherine and Reig, Mario and Safdi, Benjamin R. String Theory and Grand Unification Suggest a Sub-Microelectronvolt QCD Axion. 2025. arXiv:2505.15884

  44. [53]

    and Hook, Anson and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Murayama, Hitoshi and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Hook, Anson and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Murayama, Hitoshi and Safdi, Benjamin R. Clearing up the Strong CP problem. 2025. arXiv:2510.18951

  45. [54]

    To appear

    Reece, Matt and Rudelius, Tom and Tudball, Christopher. To appear

  46. [55]

    Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers

    Reece, Matthew and Rudelius, Tom and Tudball, Christopher. Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)146. arXiv:2505.22713

  47. [56]

    Computational Mirror Symmetry

    Demirtas, Mehmet and Kim, Manki and McAllister, Liam and Moritz, Jakob and Rios-Tascon, Andres. Computational Mirror Symmetry. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)184. arXiv:2303.00757

  48. [57]

    Residues and world sheet instantons

    Beasley, Chris and Witten, Edward. Residues and world sheet instantons. JHEP. 2003. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/10/065. arXiv:hep-th/0304115

  49. [58]

    M theory and topological strings

    Gopakumar, Rajesh and Vafa, Cumrun. M theory and topological strings. 1. 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9809187

  50. [59]

    M theory and topological strings

    Gopakumar, Rajesh and Vafa, Cumrun. M theory and topological strings. 2. 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9812127

  51. [60]

    Differential Evolution A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces

    Storn, Rainer and Price, Kenneth. Differential Evolution A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. J. Global Optim. 1997. doi:10.1023/A:1008202821328

  52. [61]

    Wormholes and masses for Goldstone bosons

    Alonso, Rodrigo and Urbano, Alfredo. Wormholes and masses for Goldstone bosons. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)136. arXiv:1706.07415

  53. [62]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Particles

    Alim, Murad and Heidenreich, Ben and Rudelius, Tom. The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Particles. Fortsch. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1002/prop.202100125. arXiv:2108.08309

  54. [63]

    Advancing the phenomenology of GeV-scale axion-like particles

    Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Zaporozhchenko, Andrii. Advancing the phenomenology of GeV-scale axion-like particles. 2025. arXiv:2501.04525

  55. [64]

    and Bonnefoy, Quentin and Buschmann, Malte and Kumar, Soubhik and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Bonnefoy, Quentin and Buschmann, Malte and Kumar, Soubhik and Safdi, Benjamin R. Cosmological dynamics of string theory axion strings. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.035021. arXiv:2312.08425

  56. [65]

    and Foster, Joshua W

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Foster, Joshua W. and Kahn, Yonatan and Safdi, Benjamin R. and Salemi, Chiara P. Lumped-element axion dark matter detection beyond the magnetoquasistatic limit. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.035009. arXiv:2211.00008

  57. [66]

    Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification

    Fukugita, Masataka and Yanagida, Tsutomu. Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification. Phys. Lett. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3

  58. [67]

    Leptogenesis

    Davidson, Sacha and Nardi, Enrico and Nir, Yosef. Leptogenesis. Phys. Rept. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.06.002

  59. [68]

    Leptogenesis for Pedestrians

    Buchmuller, Wilfried and Di Bari, Pasquale and Pluemacher, Michael. Leptogenesis for Pedestrians. Ann. Phys. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.02.003. hep-ph/0401240

  60. [69]

    New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background

    Komatsu, Eiichiro. New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background. Nature Rev. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4. arXiv:2202.13919

  61. [70]

    and Dessert, Christopher and Patra, Kishore C

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Dessert, Christopher and Patra, Kishore C. and Brink, Thomas G. and Zheng, WeiKang and Filippenko, Alexei V. and Safdi, Benjamin R. Search for Axions in Magnetic White Dwarf Polarization at Lick and Keck Observatories. 2025. arXiv:2504.12377

  62. [71]

    Axions in string theory slaying the Hydra of dark radiation

    Cicoli, Michele and Hebecker, Arthur and Jaeckel, Joerg and Wittner, Manuel. Axions in string theory slaying the Hydra of dark radiation. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)198. arXiv:2203.08833

  63. [72]

    Cosmological Constant and Axions in String Theory

    Svrcek, Peter. Cosmological Constant and Axions in String Theory. 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0607086

  64. [73]

    and Palti, Eran

    Conlon, Joseph P. and Palti, Eran. On Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local IIB/F-theory GUTs. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.106004. arXiv:0907.1362

  65. [74]

    Axion Periodicity and Coupling Quantization in the Presence of Mixing

    Fraser, Katherine and Reece, Matthew. Axion Periodicity and Coupling Quantization in the Presence of Mixing. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)066. arXiv:1910.11349

  66. [75]

    The Weinberg Operator and a Lower String Scale in Orientifold Compactifications

    Cvetic, Mirjam and Halverson, James and Langacker, Paul and Richter, Robert. The Weinberg Operator and a Lower String Scale in Orientifold Compactifications. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)094. arXiv:1001.3148

  67. [76]

    Mass Hierarchies versus proton Decay in MSSM Orientifold Compactifications

    Cvetic, Mirjam and Halverson, James and Richter, Robert. Mass Hierarchies versus proton Decay in MSSM Orientifold Compactifications. 2009. arXiv:0910.2239

  68. [77]

    and others

    Calderon, R. and others. DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data. JCAP. 2024. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/048. arXiv:2405.04216

  69. [78]

    Towards natural inflation from weakly coupled heterotic string theory

    Abe, Hiroyuki and Kobayashi, Tatsuo and Otsuka, Hajime. Towards natural inflation from weakly coupled heterotic string theory. PTEP. 2015. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv075. arXiv:1409.8436

  70. [79]

    and Long, Cody and McAllister, Liam

    Bachlechner, Thomas C. and Long, Cody and McAllister, Liam. Planckian Axions in String Theory. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)042. arXiv:1412.1093

  71. [80]

    Large Field Inflation from Axion Mixing

    Shiu, Gary and Staessens, Wieland and Ye, Fang. Large Field Inflation from Axion Mixing. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)026. arXiv:1503.02965

  72. [81]

    and Gorbatov, Elie

    Banks, Tom and Dine, Michael and Fox, Patrick J. and Gorbatov, Elie. On the possibility of large axion decay constants. JCAP. 2003. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001. arXiv:hep-th/0303252

  73. [82]

    and Mummery, Andrew

    Witte, Samuel J. and Mummery, Andrew. Stepping up superradiance constraints on axions. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083044. arXiv:2412.03655

  74. [83]

    Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields

    Baryakhtar, Masha and Galanis, Marios and Lasenby, Robert and Simon, Olivier. Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.095019. arXiv:2011.11646

  75. [84]

    Strong CP problem with low-energy emergent QCD: The 4321 case

    Fuentes-Mart\' n, Javier and Reig, Mario and Vicente, Avelino. Strong CP problem with low-energy emergent QCD: The 4321 case. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.115028. arXiv:1907.02550

  76. [85]

    UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups

    Cs\'aki, Csaba and Ruhdorfer, Maximilian and Shirman, Yuri. UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)031. arXiv:1912.02197

  77. [86]

    Gaillard, M. K. and Gavela, M. B. and Houtz, R. and Quilez, P. and Del Rey, R. Color unified dynamical axion. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2018. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6396-6. arXiv:1805.06465

  78. [87]

    and others

    Lodha, K. and others. DESI 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023532. arXiv:2405.13588

  79. [88]

    and others

    Abdul Karim, M. and others. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints. 2025. arXiv:2503.14738

  80. [89]

    and Witten, Edward

    Klebanov, Igor R. and Witten, Edward. Proton decay in intersecting D-brane models. Nucl. Phys. B. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00410-3. arXiv:hep-th/0304079

  81. [90]

    Grand Unified Theories and Proton Decay

    Langacker, Paul. Grand Unified Theories and Proton Decay. Phys. Rept. 1981. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90059-4

  82. [91]

    Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Schmaltz, Martin. Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.033005. arXiv:hep-ph/9903417

  83. [92]

    Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS

    Gherghetta, Tony and Pomarol, Alex. Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS. Nucl. Phys. B. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00392-8. arXiv:hep-ph/0003129

  84. [93]

    and Franco, S

    Aldazabal, G. and Franco, S. and Ibanez, Luis E. and Rabadan, R. and Uranga, A. M. Intersecting brane worlds. JHEP. 2001. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/02/047. arXiv:hep-ph/0011132

  85. [94]

    Proton decay in SUSY GUTs

    Hisano, Junji. Proton decay in SUSY GUTs. PTEP. 2022. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac017. arXiv:2202.01404

  86. [95]

    Proton decay

    Ohlsson, Tommy. Proton decay. Nucl. Phys. B. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116268. arXiv:2306.02401

  87. [96]

    Proton decay and grand unification

    Senjanovic, Goran. Proton decay and grand unification. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010. doi:10.1063/1.3327552. arXiv:0912.5375

  88. [97]

    The UV fate of anomalous U(1)s and the Swampland

    Craig, Nathaniel and Garcia Garcia, Isabel and Kribs, Graham D. The UV fate of anomalous U(1)s and the Swampland. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)063. arXiv:1912.10054

  89. [98]

    Drew, Amelia and Shellard, E. P. S. Radiation from Global Topological Strings using Adaptive Mesh Refinement: Methodology and Massless Modes. 2019. arXiv:1910.01718

  90. [99]

    Drew, Amelia and Kinowski, Tomasz and Shellard, E. P. S. Axion string source modeling. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043513. arXiv:2312.07701

  91. [100]

    Gravitational waves from domain wall collapse, and application to nanohertz signals with QCD-coupled axions

    Kitajima, Naoya and Lee, Junseok and Murai, Kai and Takahashi, Fuminobu and Yin, Wen. Gravitational waves from domain wall collapse, and application to nanohertz signals with QCD-coupled axions. Phys. Lett. B. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138586. arXiv:2306.17146

  92. [101]

    and Glashow, S

    Georgi, H. and Glashow, S. L. Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1974. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.438

  93. [102]

    Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons

    Fritzsch, Harald and Minkowski, Peter. Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons. Annals Phys. 1975. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(75)90211-0

  94. [103]

    Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC

    Dvali, Gia and Redi, Michele. Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC. Phys. Rev. D. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.045027. arXiv:0710.4344

  95. [104]

    Gauge unification in extra dimensions: Power corrections vs

    Hebecker, Arthur and Westphal, Alexander. Gauge unification in extra dimensions: Power corrections vs. higher-dimension operators. Nucl. Phys. B. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.09.008. arXiv:hep-th/0407014

  96. [105]

    Symmetry breaking patterns in superstring models

    Witten, Edward. Symmetry breaking patterns in superstring models. Nucl. Phys. B. 1985. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90603-0

  97. [106]

    Power - like threshold corrections to gauge unification in extra dimensions

    Hebecker, Arthur and Westphal, Alexander. Power - like threshold corrections to gauge unification in extra dimensions. Annals Phys. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(03)00069-1. arXiv:hep-ph/0212175

  98. [107]

    A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension

    Randall, Lisa and Sundrum, Raman. A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370. arXiv:hep-ph/9905221

  99. [108]

    Warped axions

    Flacke, Thomas and Gripaios, Ben and March-Russell, John and Maybury, David. Warped axions. JHEP. 2007. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/061. arXiv:hep-ph/0611278

  100. [109]

    Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model

    Manohar, Aneesh and Georgi, Howard. Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model. Nucl. Phys. B. 1984. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90231-1

  101. [110]

    Phenomenological Lagrangians

    Weinberg, Steven. Phenomenological Lagrangians. Physica A. 1979. doi:10.1016/0378-4371(79)90223-1

  102. [111]

    and \'Eboli, O

    Brivio, I. and \'Eboli, O. J. P. and Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C. Unitarity constraints on ALP interactions. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.035027. arXiv:2106.05977

  103. [112]

    and others

    Takenaka, A. and others. Search for proton decay via p e^+ ^0 and p ^+ ^0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.112011. arXiv:2010.16098

  104. [113]

    The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Motl, Lubos and Nicolis, Alberto and Vafa, Cumrun. The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force. JHEP. 2007. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/060. arXiv:hep-th/0601001

  105. [114]

    Of pngb quintessence

    Kaloper, Nemanja and Sorbo, Lorenzo. Of pngb quintessence. JCAP. 2006. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/04/007. arXiv:astro-ph/0511543

  106. [115]

    The stochastic axiverse

    Reig, Mario. The stochastic axiverse. JHEP. 2021. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)207. arXiv:2104.09923

  107. [116]

    Axion Predictions in SO(10) U(1)_ PQ Models

    Ernst, Anne and Ringwald, Andreas and Tamarit, Carlos. Axion Predictions in SO(10) U(1)_ PQ Models. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2018)103. arXiv:1801.04906

  108. [117]

    The QCD Axion and Unification

    Fileviez P\'erez, Pavel and Murgui, Clara and Plascencia, Alexis D. The QCD Axion and Unification. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)093. arXiv:1908.01772

  109. [118]

    Axion mass prediction from minimal grand unification

    Di Luzio, Luca and Ringwald, Andreas and Tamarit, Carlos. Axion mass prediction from minimal grand unification. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.095011. arXiv:1807.09769

  110. [119]

    and Georgi, Howard and Glashow, Sheldon L

    Wise, Mark B. and Georgi, Howard and Glashow, Sheldon L. SU(5) and the Invisible Axion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.402

  111. [120]

    More axions from strings

    Gorghetto, Marco and Hardy, Edward and Villadoro, Giovanni. More axions from strings. SciPost Phys. 2021. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.050. arXiv:2007.04990

  112. [121]

    Axion dark matter from cosmic string network

    Kim, Heejoo and Park, Junghyeon and Son, Minho. Axion dark matter from cosmic string network. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)150. arXiv:2402.00741

  113. [122]

    Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass

    Saikawa, Ken'ichi and Redondo, Javier and Vaquero, Alejandro and Kaltschmidt, Mathieu. Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass. 2024. arXiv:2401.17253

  114. [123]

    More Scalings from Cosmic Strings

    Kim, Heejoo and Son, Minho. More Scalings from Cosmic Strings. 2024. arXiv:2411.08455

  115. [124]

    and Hook, Anson and Peterson, Adam and Willcox, Don E

    Buschmann, Malte and Foster, Joshua W. and Hook, Anson and Peterson, Adam and Willcox, Don E. and Zhang, Weiqun and Safdi, Benjamin R. Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement. Nature Commun. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28669-y. arXiv:2108.05368

  116. [125]

    Comments on axions, domain walls, and cosmic strings

    Dine, Michael and Fernandez, Nicolas and Ghalsasi, Akshay and Patel, Hiren H. Comments on axions, domain walls, and cosmic strings. JCAP. 2021. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/041. arXiv:2012.13065

  117. [126]

    Drew, Amelia and Shellard, E. P. S. Radiation from global topological strings using adaptive mesh refinement: Massive modes. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043507. arXiv:2211.10184

  118. [127]

    Early seeds of axion miniclusters

    Vaquero, Alejandro and Redondo, Javier and Stadler, Julia. Early seeds of axion miniclusters. JCAP. 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/012. arXiv:1809.09241

  119. [128]

    Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution

    Gorghetto, Marco and Hardy, Edward and Villadoro, Giovanni. Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)151. arXiv:1806.04677

  120. [129]

    Higher Axion Strings

    Loladze, Vazha and Platschorre, Arthur and Reig, Mario. Higher Axion Strings. 2025. arXiv:2503.18707

  121. [130]

    Open String Axiverse

    Petrossian-Byrne, Rudin and Villadoro, Giovanni. Open String Axiverse. 2025. arXiv:2503.16387

  122. [131]

    and others

    Millar, Alexander J. and others. Searching for dark matter with plasma haloscopes. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.055013. arXiv:2210.00017

  123. [132]

    and van Bibber, Karl

    Wooten, Mackenzie and Droster, Alex and Kenany, Al and Sun, Dajie and Lewis, Samantha M. and van Bibber, Karl. Exploration of Wire Array Metamaterials for the Plasma Axion Haloscope. Annalen Phys. 2024. doi:10.1002/andp.202200479. arXiv:2203.13945

  124. [133]

    Axion clockworks from heterotic M-theory: the QCD-axion and its ultra-light companion

    Im, Sang Hui and Nilles, Hans Peter and Olechowski, Marek. Axion clockworks from heterotic M-theory: the QCD-axion and its ultra-light companion. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)159. arXiv:1906.11851

  125. [134]

    and Vainshtein, A

    Shifman, Mikhail A. and Vainshtein, A. I. and Zakharov, Valentin I. Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?. Nucl. Phys. B. 1980. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90209-6

  126. [135]

    Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance

    Kim, Jihn E. Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.103

  127. [136]

    and Moore, Guy D

    Klaer, Vincent B. . and Moore, Guy D. The dark-matter axion mass. JCAP. 2017. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/11/049. arXiv:1708.07521

  128. [137]

    Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter

    Cicoli, Michele and Klevers, Denis and Krippendorf, Sven and Mayrhofer, Christoph and Quevedo, Fernando and Valandro, Roberto. Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)001. arXiv:1312.0014

  129. [138]

    and Witten, Edward

    Dine, Michael and Seiberg, N. and Witten, Edward. Fayet-Iliopoulos Terms in String Theory. Nucl. Phys. B. 1987. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90395-6

  130. [139]

    Correlation between Dark Matter and Dark Radiation in String Compactifications

    Allahverdi, Rouzbeh and Cicoli, Michele and Dutta, Bhaskar and Sinha, Kuver. Correlation between Dark Matter and Dark Radiation in String Compactifications. JCAP. 2014. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/002. arXiv:1401.4364

  131. [140]

    Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications

    Cicoli, Michele. Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications. 9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs. 2013. doi:10.3204/DESY-PROC-2013-04/cicoli_michele. arXiv:1309.6988

  132. [141]

    Mixed Mediation of Supersymmetry Breaking with Anomalous U(1) Gauge Symmetry

    Choi, Kiwoon and Jeong, Kwang Sik and Okumura, Ken-Ichi and Yamaguchi, Masahiro. Mixed Mediation of Supersymmetry Breaking with Anomalous U(1) Gauge Symmetry. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)049. arXiv:1104.3274

  133. [142]

    String theoretic QCD axions in the light of PLANCK and BICEP2

    Choi, Kiwoon and Jeong, Kwang Sik and Seo, Min-Seok. String theoretic QCD axions in the light of PLANCK and BICEP2. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)092. arXiv:1404.3880

  134. [143]

    and Vafa, Cumrun and Weigand, Timo and Xu, Fengjun

    Heckman, Jonathan J. and Vafa, Cumrun and Weigand, Timo and Xu, Fengjun. Dark dimension and the grand unification of forces. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.046014. arXiv:2409.01405

  135. [144]

    The dark dimension and the Swampland

    Montero, Miguel and Vafa, Cumrun and Valenzuela, Irene. The dark dimension and the Swampland. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)022. arXiv:2205.12293

  136. [145]

    D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds

    Blumenhagen, Ralph and Cvetic, Mirjam and Kachru, Shamit and Weigand, Timo. D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2009. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083113. arXiv:0902.3251

  137. [146]

    and Nomura, Yasunori

    Hall, Lawrence J. and Nomura, Yasunori. A Complete theory of grand unification in five-dimensions. Phys. Rev. D. 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.075004. arXiv:hep-ph/0205067

  138. [147]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report. 2018. arXiv:1805.04163

  139. [148]

    and Pancaldi, Matteo and Vitagliano, Edoardo and Wilczek, Frank

    Lawson, Matthew and Millar, Alexander J. and Pancaldi, Matteo and Vitagliano, Edoardo and Wilczek, Frank. Tunable axion plasma haloscopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.141802. arXiv:1904.11872

  140. [149]

    Dielectric Haloscopes: A New Way to Detect Axion Dark Matter

    Caldwell, Allen and Dvali, Gia and Majorovits, B\'ela and Millar, Alexander and Raffelt, Georg and Redondo, Javier and Reimann, Olaf and Simon, Frank and Steffen, Frank. Dielectric Haloscopes: A New Way to Detect Axion Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLet...

  141. [150]

    and Hern\'andez-Su\'arez, Elvio and Joven-\'Alvarez, Enrique and Otani, Chiko and Rubi\ no-Mart\' n, J

    De Miguel, Javier and Hern\'andez-Cabrera, Juan F. and Hern\'andez-Su\'arez, Elvio and Joven-\'Alvarez, Enrique and Otani, Chiko and Rubi\ no-Mart\' n, J. Alberto. Discovery prospects with the Dark-photons & Axion-like particles Interferometer. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/...

  142. [151]

    First Results from a Broadband Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter in the 44 to 52\,\, eV Range with a Coaxial Dish Antenna

    Knirck, Stefan and others. First Results from a Broadband Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter in the 44 to 52\,\, eV Range with a Coaxial Dish Antenna. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.131004. arXiv:2310.13891

  143. [152]

    Adams, C. B. and others. Axion Dark Matter. Snowmass 2021. 2022. arXiv:2203.14923

  144. [153]

    Broadband Solenoidal Haloscope for Terahertz Axion Detection

    Liu, Jesse and others. Broadband Solenoidal Haloscope for Terahertz Axion Detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.131801. arXiv:2111.12103

  145. [154]

    and Budker, Dmitry and Centers, Gary P

    Aybas, Deniz and Bekker, Hendrik and Blanchard, John W. and Budker, Dmitry and Centers, Gary P. and Figueroa, Nataniel L. and Gramolin, Alexander V. and Kimball, Derek F. Jackson and Wickenbrock, Arne and Sushkov, Alexander O. Quantum sensitivity limits of nuclear magnetic res...

  146. [155]

    and others

    Jackson Kimball, Derek F. and others. Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr). Springer Proc. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43761-9_13. arXiv:1711.08999

  147. [156]

    and Ledbetter, Micah and Rajendran, Surjeet and Sushkov, Alex

    Budker, Dmitry and Graham, Peter W. and Ledbetter, Micah and Rajendran, Surjeet and Sushkov, Alex. Proposal for a Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr). Phys. Rev. X. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021030. arXiv:1306.6089

  148. [157]

    and Rajendran, Surjeet

    Graham, Peter W. and Rajendran, Surjeet. New Observables for Direct Detection of Axion Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.035023. arXiv:1306.6088

  149. [158]

    and Gori, Stefania and Leedom, Jacob M

    Dror, Jeff A. and Gori, Stefania and Leedom, Jacob M. and Rodd, Nicholas L. Sensitivity of Spin-Precession Axion Experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.181801. arXiv:2210.06481

  150. [159]

    and others

    AlShirawi, A. and others. Electromagnetic modeling and science reach of DMRadio-m ^3. 2023. arXiv:2302.14084

  151. [160]

    and others

    Brouwer, L. and others. Proposal for a definitive search for GUT-scale QCD axions. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.112003. arXiv:2203.11246

  152. [161]

    and others

    Brouwer, L. and others. Projected sensitivity of DMRadio-m3: A search for the QCD axion below 1\,\, eV. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103008. arXiv:2204.13781

  153. [162]

    and Thaler, Jesse

    Kahn, Yonatan and Safdi, Benjamin R. and Thaler, Jesse. Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.141801. arXiv:1602.01086

  154. [163]

    and Girdhar, Aarti

    Aulakh, Charanjit S. and Girdhar, Aarti. SO(10) MSGUT: Spectra, couplings and threshold effects. Nucl. Phys. B. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.008. arXiv:hep-ph/0405074

  155. [164]

    Multiple Scales in Pati-Salam Unification Models

    Hartmann, Florian and Kilian, Wolfgang and Schnitter, Karsten. Multiple Scales in Pati-Salam Unification Models. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)064. arXiv:1401.7891

  156. [165]

    Intermediate mass scales in the non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification: A Reappraisal

    Bertolini, Stefano and Di Luzio, Luca and Malinsky, Michal. Intermediate mass scales in the non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification: A Reappraisal. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.015013. arXiv:0903.4049

  157. [166]

    and others

    Salemi, Chiara P. and others. Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.081801. arXiv:2102.06722

  158. [167]

    and others

    Ankel, V. and others. DMRadio-Core: A new approach for GUT-scale axion searches. 2026. arXiv:2604.16602

  159. [168]

    and others

    Ouellet, Jonathan L. and others. Design and implementation of the ABRACADABRA-10 cm axion dark matter search. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.052012. arXiv:1901.10652

  160. [169]

    and others

    Ouellet, Jonathan L. and others. First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub- eV Axion Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.121802. arXiv:1810.12257

  161. [170]

    and others

    Bartram, C. and others. Axion dark matter experiment: Run 1B analysis details. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.032002. arXiv:2010.06183

  162. [171]

    and others

    Braine, T. and others. Extended Search for the Invisible Axion with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.101303. arXiv:1910.08638

  163. [172]

    and others

    Du, N. and others. A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.151301. arXiv:1804.05750

  164. [173]

    Backes, K. M. and others. A quantum-enhanced search for dark matter axions. Nature. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03226-7. arXiv:2008.01853

  165. [174]

    and others

    Zhong, L. and others. Results from phase 1 of the HAYSTAC microwave cavity axion experiment. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.092001. arXiv:1803.03690

  166. [175]

    Ary dos Santos and others

    Garcia, B. Ary dos Santos and others. First search for axion dark matter with a Madmax prototype. 2024. arXiv:2409.11777

  167. [176]

    and others

    Brun, P. and others. A new experimental approach to probe QCD axion dark matter in the mass range above 40 eV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6683-x. arXiv:1901.07401

  168. [177]

    A dark matter telescope probing the 6 to 60 GHz band

    De Miguel, Javier. A dark matter telescope probing the 6 to 60 GHz band. JCAP. 2021. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/075. arXiv:2003.06874

  169. [178]

    Gauge bosons in a five-dimensional theory with localized gravity

    Pomarol, Alex. Gauge bosons in a five-dimensional theory with localized gravity. Phys. Lett. B. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00737-1. arXiv:hep-ph/9911294

  170. [179]

    Grand unified theories without the desert

    Pomarol, Alex. Grand unified theories without the desert. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4004. arXiv:hep-ph/0005293

  171. [180]

    and others

    Majorovits, B. and others. MADMAX: A new road to axion dark matter detection. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1342/1/012098. arXiv:1712.01062

  172. [181]

    and others

    Giaccone, B. and others. Design of axion and axion dark matter searches based on ultra high Q SRF cavities. 2022. arXiv:2207.11346

  173. [182]

    Berlin, Asher and D'Agnolo, Raffaele Tito and Ellis, Sebastian A. R. and Nantista, Christopher and Neilson, Jeffrey and Schuster, Philip and Tantawi, Sami and Toro, Natalia and Zhou, Kevin. Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion. JHEP. 202...

  174. [183]

    and Constantin, Andrei and Lukas, Andre

    Buchbinder, Evgeny I. and Constantin, Andrei and Lukas, Andre. Heterotic QCD axion. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.046010. arXiv:1412.8696

  175. [184]

    A Minimal S**1 / (Z(2) x Z-prime (2)) orbifold GUT

    Hebecker, Arthur and March-Russell, John. A Minimal S**1 / (Z(2) x Z-prime (2)) orbifold GUT. Nucl. Phys. B. 2001. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00374-1. arXiv:hep-ph/0106166

  176. [185]

    TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions

    Hook, Anson. TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions. PoS. 2019. arXiv:1812.02669

  177. [186]

    Gauge symmetry breaking from extra space S**1 / Z(2)

    Kawamura, Yoshiharu. Gauge symmetry breaking from extra space S**1 / Z(2). Prog. Theor. Phys. 2000. doi:10.1143/PTP.103.613. arXiv:hep-ph/9902423

  178. [187]

    SU(5) grand unification in extra dimensions and proton decay

    Altarelli, Guido and Feruglio, Ferruccio. SU(5) grand unification in extra dimensions and proton decay. Phys. Lett. B. 2001. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00650-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0102301

  179. [188]

    Axions in the dark dimension

    Gendler, Naomi and Vafa, Cumrun. Axions in the dark dimension. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)127. arXiv:2404.15414

  180. [189]

    A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field

    Choi, Ki-woon. A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.101602. arXiv:hep-ph/0308024

  181. [190]

    and Nomura, Yasunori

    Hall, Lawrence J. and Nomura, Yasunori. Gauge unification in higher dimensions. Phys. Rev. D. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.055003. arXiv:hep-ph/0103125

  182. [191]

    O'Hare, Ciaran A. J. Cosmology of axion dark matter. PoS. 2024. doi:10.22323/1.454.0040. arXiv:2403.17697

  183. [192]

    Rubakov, V. A. Grand unification and heavy axion. JETP Lett. 1997. doi:10.1134/1.567390. arXiv:hep-ph/9703409

  184. [193]

    High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions

    Craig, Nathaniel and Kongsore, Marius. High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.015047. arXiv:2408.10295

  185. [194]

    and Georgi, Howard

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Cohen, Andrew G. and Georgi, Howard. Accelerated unification. 2001. arXiv:hep-th/0108089

  186. [195]

    and Quevedo, Fernando

    Cicoli, Michele and Conlon, Joseph P. and Quevedo, Fernando. General Analysis of LARGE Volume Scenarios with String Loop Moduli Stabilisation. JHEP. 2008. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/105. arXiv:0805.1029

  187. [196]

    and Dudas, Emilian and Gherghetta, Tony

    Dienes, Keith R. and Dudas, Emilian and Gherghetta, Tony. Grand unification at intermediate mass scales through extra dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00669-5. arXiv:hep-ph/9806292

  188. [197]

    Cosmological bounds on pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons

    Cadamuro, Davide and Redondo, Javier. Cosmological bounds on pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons. JCAP. 2012. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/032. arXiv:1110.2895

  189. [198]

    and Uranga, Angel M

    Ibanez, Luis E. and Uranga, Angel M. String theory and particle physics: An introduction to string phenomenology. 2012

  190. [199]

    Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle

    't Hooft, Gerard. Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle. Phys. Rev. D. 1976. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432

  191. [200]

    Wen, X. G. and Witten, Edward. World Sheet Instantons and the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry. Phys. Lett. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91587-X

  192. [201]

    On Constrained Instantons

    Affleck, Ian. On Constrained Instantons. Nucl. Phys. B. 1981. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90307-2

  193. [202]

    Efficient Algorithm for Generating Homotopy Inequivalent Calabi-Yaus

    MacFadden, Nate. Efficient Algorithm for Generating Homotopy Inequivalent Calabi-Yaus. 2023. arXiv:2309.10855

  194. [203]

    F-theory Axiverse

    Fallon, Sebastian Vander Ploeg and Halverson, James and McAllister, Liam and Zhu, Yunhao. F-theory Axiverse. 2025. arXiv:2511.20458

  195. [204]

    Testing the Heterotic String with the Axion-Photon Coupling

    Reig, Mario and Weigand, Timo. Testing the Heterotic String with the Axion-Photon Coupling. 2025. arXiv:2509.08042

  196. [205]

    Small instanton contribution to the axion potential in supersymmetric models

    Choi, Kiwoon and Kim, Hyung Do. Small instanton contribution to the axion potential in supersymmetric models. Phys. Rev. D. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.072001. arXiv:hep-ph/9809286

  197. [206]

    and Randall, Lisa

    Flynn, Jonathan M. and Randall, Lisa. A Computation of the Small Instanton Contribution to the Axion Potential. Nucl. Phys. B. 1987. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90089-7

  198. [207]

    Raising the Axion Mass

    Holdom, Bob and Peskin, Michael E. Raising the Axion Mass. Nucl. Phys. B. 1982. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90228-0

  199. [208]

    The QCD axion, precisely

    Grilli di Cortona, Giovanni and Hardy, Edward and Pardo Vega, Javier and Villadoro, Giovanni. The QCD axion, precisely. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)034. arXiv:1511.02867

  200. [209]

    and Dudas, Emilian and Gherghetta, Tony

    Dienes, Keith R. and Dudas, Emilian and Gherghetta, Tony. Extra space-time dimensions and unification. Phys. Lett. B. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00977-0. arXiv:hep-ph/9803466

  201. [210]

    Factoring the Strong CP Problem

    Agrawal, Prateek and Howe, Kiel. Factoring the Strong CP Problem. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)029. arXiv:1710.04213

  202. [211]

    Enhanced photon coupling of ALP dark matter adiabatically converted from the QCD axion

    Ho, Shu-Yu and Saikawa, Ken'ichi and Takahashi, Fuminobu. Enhanced photon coupling of ALP dark matter adiabatically converted from the QCD axion. JCAP. 2018. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/042. arXiv:1806.09551

  203. [212]

    and Wick, G

    Jacob, M. and Wick, G. C. On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin. Annals Phys. 1959. doi:10.1006/aphy.2000.6022

  204. [213]

    and Quigg, C

    Lee, Benjamin W. and Quigg, C. and Thacker, H. B. Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass. Phys. Rev. D. 1977. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1519

  205. [214]

    and Quigg, C

    Lee, Benjamin W. and Quigg, C. and Thacker, H. B. The Strength of Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies and the Higgs Boson Mass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1977. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.883

  206. [215]

    Gendler, Naomi and Marsh, David J. E. and McAllister, Liam and Moritz, Jakob. Glimmers from the Axiverse. 2023. arXiv:2309.13145

  207. [216]

    and Day, Francesca and Jennings, Nicholas and Krippendorf, Sven and Rummel, Markus

    Conlon, Joseph P. and Day, Francesca and Jennings, Nicholas and Krippendorf, Sven and Rummel, Markus. Constraints on Axion-Like Particles from Non-Observation of Spectral Modulations for X-ray Point Sources. JCAP. 2017. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/005. arXiv:1704.05256

  208. [217]

    The storage ring proton EDM experiment

    Alexander, Jim and others. The storage ring proton EDM experiment. 2022. arXiv:2205.00830

  209. [218]

    Wilkins, S. G. and others. Observation of the distribution of nuclear magnetization in a molecule. Science. 2025. doi:10.1126/science.adm7717. arXiv:2311.04121

  210. [219]

    Marsh, M. C. David and Russell, Helen R. and Fabian, Andrew C. and McNamara, Brian P. and Nulsen, Paul and Reynolds, Christopher S. A New Bound on Axion-Like Particles. JCAP. 2017. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/036. arXiv:1703.07354

  211. [220]

    Opportunities for fundamental physics research with radioactive molecules

    Arrowsmith-Kron, Gordon and others. Opportunities for fundamental physics research with radioactive molecules. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2024. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad1e39. arXiv:2302.02165

  212. [221]

    and Dimopoulos, S

    Arkani-Hamed, N. and Dimopoulos, S. Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC. JHEP. 2005. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/06/073. arXiv:hep-th/0405159

  213. [222]

    and Dimopoulos, S

    Arkani-Hamed, N. and Dimopoulos, S. and Giudice, G. F. and Romanino, A. Aspects of split supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.12.026. arXiv:hep-ph/0409232

  214. [223]

    Giudice, G. F. and Strumia, A. Probing High-Scale and Split Supersymmetry with Higgs Mass Measurements. Nucl. Phys. B. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.01.001. arXiv:1108.6077

  215. [224]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    Aad, Georges and others. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020. arXiv:1207.7214

  216. [225]

    Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC

    Chatrchyan, Serguei and others. Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021. arXiv:1207.7235

  217. [226]

    Constraining the photon-axion coupling constant with magnetic white dwarfs

    Gill, Ramandeep and Heyl, Jeremy S. Constraining the photon-axion coupling constant with magnetic white dwarfs. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.085001. arXiv:1105.2083

  218. [227]

    and Intriligator, K

    Bershadsky, M. and Intriligator, K. A. and Kachru, S. and Morrison, D. R. and Sadov, V. and Vafa, C. Geometric singularities and enhanced gauge symmetries. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00491-2. arXiv:hep-th/9605200

  219. [228]

    and Schafer-Nameki, Sakura and Sully, James

    Katz, Sheldon and Morrison, David R. and Schafer-Nameki, Sakura and Sully, James. Tate's algorithm and F-theory. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)094. arXiv:1106.3854

  220. [229]

    and Vafa, Cumrun

    Beasley, Chris and Heckman, Jonathan J. and Vafa, Cumrun. GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory --- I. JHEP. 2009. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/058. arXiv:0802.3391

  221. [230]

    and Vafa, Cumrun

    Beasley, Chris and Heckman, Jonathan J. and Vafa, Cumrun. GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory --- II: Experimental Predictions. JHEP. 2009. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/059. arXiv:0806.0102

  222. [231]

    Model Building with F-Theory

    Donagi, Ron and Wijnholt, Martijn. Model Building with F-Theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2011. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2011.v15.n5.a2. arXiv:0802.2969

  223. [232]

    F-theory

    Weigand, Timo. F-theory. PoS. 2018. doi:10.22323/1.305.0016. arXiv:1806.01854

  224. [233]

    Global SO(10) F-theory GUTs

    Chen, Ching-Ming and Knapp, Johanna and Kreuzer, Maximilian and Mayrhofer, Christoph. Global SO(10) F-theory GUTs. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)057. arXiv:1005.5735

  225. [234]

    and others

    Navas, S. and others. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

  226. [235]

    and Castano, D

    Arason, H. and Castano, D. J. and Keszthelyi, B. and Mikaelian, S. and Piard, E. J. and Ramond, Pierre and Wright, B. D. Renormalization group study of the standard model and its extensions. 1. The Standard model. Phys. Rev. D. 1992. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.3945

  227. [236]

    TASI Lectures on the Particle Physics and Astrophysics of Dark Matter

    Safdi, Benjamin R. TASI Lectures on the Particle Physics and Astrophysics of Dark Matter. PoS. 2024. doi:10.22323/1.439.0009. arXiv:2303.02169

  228. [237]

    String theory

    Polchinski, J. String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond. 2007. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618123

  229. [238]

    Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions

    Horava, Petr and Witten, Edward. Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00621-4. arXiv:hep-th/9510209

  230. [239]

    String theory dynamics in various dimensions

    Witten, Edward. String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00158-O. arXiv:hep-th/9503124

  231. [240]

    Avram, A. C. and Kreuzer, M. and Mandelberg, M. and Skarke, H. Searching for K3 fibrations. Nucl. Phys. B. 1997. hep-th/9610154

  232. [241]

    Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions

    Kreuzer, Maximilian and Skarke, Harald. Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2000. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2000.v4.n6.a2. arXiv:hep-th/0002240

  233. [242]

    and Zaffanella, Enea

    Bagnara, Roberto and Hill, Patricia M. and Zaffanella, Enea. The Parma Polyhedra Library: Toward a complete set of numerical abstractions for the analysis and verification of hardware and software systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 2008

  234. [243]

    Narain, K. S. and Sarmadi, M. H. and Witten, Edward. A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory. Nucl. Phys. B. 1987. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90001-0

  235. [244]

    and Harvey, Jeffrey A

    Gross, David J. and Harvey, Jeffrey A. and Martinec, Emil J. and Rohm, Ryan. The Heterotic String. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.502

  236. [245]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition

    Caputo, Andrea and Raffelt, Georg. Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition. PoS. 2024. doi:10.22323/1.454.0041. arXiv:2401.13728

  237. [246]

    and Komatsu, Eiichiro

    Eskilt, Johannes R. and Komatsu, Eiichiro. Improved constraints on cosmic birefringence from the WMAP and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization data. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063503. arXiv:2205.13962

  238. [247]

    and others

    Diego-Palazuelos, P. and others. Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck Data Release 4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.091302. arXiv:2201.07682

  239. [248]

    Probing Axions with Radiation from Magnetic Stars

    Lai, Dong and Heyl, Jeremy. Probing Axions with Radiation from Magnetic Stars. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123003. arXiv:astro-ph/0609775

  240. [249]

    Upper limit on the axion-photon coupling from magnetic white dwarf polarization

    Dessert, Christopher and Dunsky, David and Safdi, Benjamin R. Upper limit on the axion-photon coupling from magnetic white dwarf polarization. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103034. arXiv:2203.04319

  241. [250]

    and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Dessert, Christopher and Foster, Joshua W. and Safdi, Benjamin R. X-ray Searches for Axions from Super Star Clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.261102. arXiv:2008.03305

  242. [251]

    and Giannotti, Maurizio and Straniero, Oscar and Mirizzi, Alessandro and Grefenstette, Brian W

    Xiao, Mengjiao and Perez, Kerstin M. and Giannotti, Maurizio and Straniero, Oscar and Mirizzi, Alessandro and Grefenstette, Brian W. and Roach, Brandon M. and Nynka, Melania , year=. Constraints on Axionlike Particles from a Hard X-Ray Observation of Betelgeuse , volume=. Phys...

  243. [252]

    Leading Axion-Photon Sensitivity with NuSTAR Observations of M82 and M87

    Ning, Orion and Safdi, Benjamin R. Leading Axion-Photon Sensitivity with NuSTAR Observations of M82 and M87. 2024. arXiv:2404.14476

  244. [253]

    and Marsh, M

    Reynolds, Christopher S. and Marsh, M. C. David and Russell, Helen R. and Fabian, Andrew C. and Smith, Robyn and Tombesi, Francesco and Veilleux, Sylvain. Astrophysical limits on very light axion-like particles from Chandra grating spectroscopy of NGC 1275. 2019. doi:10.3847/1...

  245. [254]

    and Mathur, Smita and Nguyen, Dustin D

    Lopez, Laura A. and Mathur, Smita and Nguyen, Dustin D. and Thompson, Todd A. and Olivier, Grace M. Temperature and Metallicity Gradients in the Hot Gas Outflows of M82. Astrophys. J. 2020. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc010. arXiv:2006.08623

  246. [255]

    Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies

    Dalal, Neal and Kravtsov, Andrey. Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063517. arXiv:2203.05750

  247. [256]

    and Schwarz, J

    Green, Michael B. and Schwarz, J. H. and Witten, Edward. SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION. 1988

  248. [257]

    Subhalo mass function and ultralight bosonic dark matter

    Schutz, Katelin. Subhalo mass function and ultralight bosonic dark matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123026. arXiv:2001.05503

  249. [258]

    and Grin, Daniel and Karwal, Tanvi and Kamionkowski, Marc

    Poulin, Vivian and Smith, Tristan L. and Grin, Daniel and Karwal, Tanvi and Kamionkowski, Marc. Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083525. arXiv:1806.10608

  250. [259]

    Implications of a prereionization 21-cm absorption signal for fuzzy dark matter

    Lidz, Adam and Hui, Lam. Implications of a prereionization 21-cm absorption signal for fuzzy dark matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023011. arXiv:1805.01253

  251. [260]

    Hlozek, Ren\'ee and Marsh, David J. E. and Grin, Daniel. Using the Full Power of the Cosmic Microwave Background to Probe Axion Dark Matter. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty271. arXiv:1708.05681

  252. [261]

    Marsh, David J. E. WarmAndFuzzy: the halo model beyond CDM. 2016. arXiv:1605.05973

  253. [262]

    Marsh, David J. E. Axion Cosmology. Phys. Rept. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005. arXiv:1510.07633

  254. [263]

    Hlozek, Ren\'ee and Grin, Daniel and Marsh, David J. E. and Ferreira, Pedro G. A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.103512. arXiv:1410.2896

  255. [264]

    Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics

    Arvanitaki, Asimina and Dubovsky, Sergei. Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044026. arXiv:1004.3558

  256. [265]

    Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves

    Arvanitaki, Asimina and Baryakhtar, Masha and Huang, Xinlu. Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084011. arXiv:1411.2263

  257. [266]

    Towards string theory expectations for photon couplings to axionlike particles

    Halverson, James and Long, Cody and Nelson, Brent and Salinas, Gustavo. Towards string theory expectations for photon couplings to axionlike particles. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.106010. arXiv:1909.05257

  258. [267]

    PQ axiverse

    Demirtas, Mehmet and Gendler, Naomi and Long, Cody and McAllister, Liam and Moritz, Jakob. PQ axiverse. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)092. arXiv:2112.04503

  259. [268]

    CYTools: A Software Package for Analyzing Calabi-Yau Manifolds

    Demirtas, Mehmet and Rios-Tascon, Andres and McAllister, Liam. CYTools: A Software Package for Analyzing Calabi-Yau Manifolds. 2022. arXiv:2211.03823

  260. [269]

    Gendler, Naomi and Marsh, David J. E. QCD Axion Dark Matter in String Theory: Haloscopes and Helioscopes as Probes of the Landscape. 2024. arXiv:2407.07143

  261. [270]

    Axion couplings in grand unified theories

    Agrawal, Prateek and Nee, Michael and Reig, Mario. Axion couplings in grand unified theories. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)141. arXiv:2206.07053

  262. [271]

    Level crossing between the QCD axion and an axionlike particle

    Daido, Ryuji and Kitajima, Naoya and Takahashi, Fuminobu. Level crossing between the QCD axion and an axionlike particle. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.075027. arXiv:1510.06675

  263. [272]

    Domain Wall Formation from Level Crossing in the Axiverse

    Daido, Ryuji and Kitajima, Naoya and Takahashi, Fuminobu. Domain Wall Formation from Level Crossing in the Axiverse. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063512. arXiv:1505.07670

  264. [273]

    and Weiner, Zachary J

    Cyncynates, David and Simon, Olivier and Thompson, Jedidiah O. and Weiner, Zachary J. Nonperturbative structure in coupled axion sectors and implications for direct detection. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083503. arXiv:2208.05501

  265. [274]

    and Marsh, David J

    Stott, Matthew J. and Marsh, David J. E. Black hole spin constraints on the mass spectrum and number of axionlike fields. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083006. arXiv:1805.02016

  266. [275]

    and Marsh, David J

    Stott, Matthew J. and Marsh, David J. E. and Pongkitivanichkul, Chakrit and Price, Layne C. and Acharya, Bobby S. Spectrum of the axion dark sector. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.083510. arXiv:1706.03236

  267. [276]

    An M Theory Solution to the Strong CP Problem and Constraints on the Axiverse

    Acharya, Bobby Samir and Bobkov, Konstantin and Kumar, Piyush. An M Theory Solution to the Strong CP Problem and Constraints on the Axiverse. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)105. arXiv:1004.5138

  268. [277]

    Irreducible Axion Background

    Langhoff, Kevin and Outmezguine, Nadav Joseph and Rodd, Nicholas L. Irreducible Axion Background. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.241101. arXiv:2209.06216

  269. [278]

    Jain, Mudit and Maggi, Angelo and Ai, Wen-Yuan and Marsh, David J. E. New insights into axion freeze-in. 2024. arXiv:2406.01678

  270. [279]

    Marsh, David J. E. The Axiverse Extended: Vacuum Destabilisation, Early Dark Energy and Cosmological Collapse. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.123526. arXiv:1102.4851

  271. [280]

    Marsh, David J. E. and Tarrant, Ewan R. M. and Copeland, Edmund J. and Ferreira, Pedro G. Cosmology of Axions and Moduli: A Dynamical Systems Approach. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.023508. arXiv:1204.3632

  272. [281]

    Thermal axion production

    Salvio, Alberto and Strumia, Alessandro and Xue, Wei. Thermal axion production. JCAP. 2014. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/011. arXiv:1310.6982

  273. [282]

    Axionphilic cosmological moduli

    Jeong, Kwang Sik and Park, Wan Il. Axionphilic cosmological moduli. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123528. arXiv:2107.13383

  274. [283]

    Cosmological window onto the string axiverse and the supersymmetry breaking scale

    Visinelli, Luca and Vagnozzi, Sunny. Cosmological window onto the string axiverse and the supersymmetry breaking scale. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063517. arXiv:1809.06382

  275. [284]

    The random matrix axiverse & axion cosmology in string theory

    Stott, Matt. The random matrix axiverse & axion cosmology in string theory. 2020

  276. [285]

    The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology

    Cicoli, Michele and Goodsell, Mark and Ringwald, Andreas. The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)146. arXiv:1206.0819

  277. [286]

    The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse

    Demirtas, Mehmet and Long, Cody and McAllister, Liam and Stillman, Mike. The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)138. arXiv:1808.01282

  278. [287]

    String Axiverse

    Arvanitaki, Asimina and Dimopoulos, Savas and Dubovsky, Sergei and Kaloper, Nemanja and March-Russell, John. String Axiverse. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530. arXiv:0905.4720

  279. [288]

    The Axiverse induced Dark Radiation Problem

    Acharya, Bobby Samir and Pongkitivanichkul, Chakrit. The Axiverse induced Dark Radiation Problem. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)009. arXiv:1512.07907

  280. [289]

    Cosmological constraints on decaying axion-like particles: a global analysis

    Bal\'azs, Csaba and others. Cosmological constraints on decaying axion-like particles: a global analysis. JCAP. 2022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/027. arXiv:2205.13549

  281. [290]

    Axion-like particle oscillations

    Chadha-Day, Francesca. Axion-like particle oscillations. JCAP. 2022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/013. arXiv:2107.12813

  282. [291]

    Moduli stabilisation and the statistics of axion physics in the landscape

    Broeckel, Igor and Cicoli, Michele and Maharana, Anshuman and Singh, Kajal and Sinha, Kuver. Moduli stabilisation and the statistics of axion physics in the landscape. JHEP. 2021. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)191. arXiv:2105.02889

  283. [292]

    Axion minima in string theory

    Gendler, Naomi and Janssen, Oliver and Kleban, Matthew and La Madrid, Joan and Mehta, Viraf M. Axion minima in string theory. 2023. arXiv:2309.01831

  284. [293]

    and Putti, Margherita and Westphal, Alexander

    Dimastrogiovanni, Ema and Fasiello, Matteo and Leedom, Jacob M. and Putti, Margherita and Westphal, Alexander. Gravitational axiverse spectroscopy: seeing the forest for the axions. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)072. arXiv:2312.13431

  285. [294]

    and Demirtas, Mehmet and Long, Cody and Marsh, David J

    Mehta, Viraf M. and Demirtas, Mehmet and Long, Cody and Marsh, David J. E. and McAllister, Liam and Stott, Matthew J. Superradiance in string theory. JCAP. 2021. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/033. arXiv:2103.06812

  286. [295]

    Orientifolding Kreuzer-Skarke

    Moritz, Jakob. Orientifolding Kreuzer-Skarke. 2023. arXiv:2305.06363

  287. [296]

    and Hall, Lawrence J

    Georgi, Howard M. and Hall, Lawrence J. and Wise, Mark B. Grand Unified Models With an Automatic Peccei-Quinn Symmetry. Nucl. Phys. B. 1981. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90433-8

  288. [297]

    and Shafi, Q

    Lazarides, George and Panagiotakopoulos, C. and Shafi, Q. Phenomenology and Cosmology With Superstrings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.432

  289. [298]

    Commun. Math. Phys. , Number =. 2021 , Bdsk-Url-1 =. doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04040-y , Eprint =

  290. [299]

    1986 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

    Dine, Michael and Seiberg, Nathan , Date-Added =. 1986 , Bdsk-Url-1 =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90043-X , Journal =

  291. [300]

    1978 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

    Weinberg, Steven , Date-Added =. 1978 , Bdsk-Url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223 , Journal =

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.