pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04142 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV

Joshua N. Benabou , Giulio Alvise Dainelli , Mario Reig , Benjamin R. Safdi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords QCD axionheterotic string theorystring axiverseGUT scaleaxion massCalabi-Yau compactificationsleptogenesis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heterotic string theory fixes the QCD axion mass at or above 0.5 neV via the model-independent axion whose decay constant equals the GUT scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that in heterotic string theory the QCD axion cannot be lighter than about 0.5 neV. This lower bound follows directly from identifying the universal, model-independent axion with the QCD axion and fixing its decay constant solely by the grand-unification gauge coupling. Computations across large ensembles of Calabi-Yau compactifications show the mass almost always sits in the narrow interval 0.5–0.8 neV once unification is imposed. A reader should care because this range lies within reach of next-generation lumped-element axion searches and because the same heavy axions can decay early enough to allow leptogenesis.

Core claim

In heterotic string theory the model-independent axion has a decay constant fixed by the GUT gauge coupling, so that the QCD axion mass satisfies m_a ≳ 0.5 neV. Explicit evaluation over Kreuzer-Skarke hypersurfaces and complete-intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds shows that, after scanning the Kähler moduli space for vacua consistent with unification, all but a handful of models yield masses lying in [0.5, 0.8] neV. The same ensemble produces heavy axions that decay before big-bang nucleosynthesis and can support leptogenesis.

What carries the argument

The model-independent axion whose decay constant is set by the GUT gauge coupling in heterotic (and Type I) compactifications.

If this is right

  • Future detectors such as DMRadio-GUT should target the narrow mass window [0.5, 0.8] neV as a high-priority search region.
  • The heavy axion population generically decays before big-bang nucleosynthesis.
  • Heterotic models can accommodate leptogenesis without additional tuning.
  • The same lower bound on the axion mass applies to dual Type I constructions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If upcoming experiments exclude the entire 0.5–0.8 neV window, standard heterotic compactifications with unification would be strongly disfavored.
  • The result supplies a concrete, parameter-free target that can be used to compare heterotic predictions with other string constructions such as Type IIB axiverses.
  • Detection of an axion in this mass range would simultaneously test both the QCD axion solution and the existence of a GUT-scale string scale.

Load-bearing premise

The model-independent axion must be identified with the QCD axion and must receive no extra contributions to its decay constant from Kähler moduli or other sectors.

What would settle it

Observation of a QCD axion with mass well below 0.5 neV, or a direct measurement of its decay constant substantially larger than the GUT scale, would contradict the central prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04142 by Benjamin R. Safdi, Giulio Alvise Dainelli, Joshua N. Benabou, Mario Reig.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Axion-photon couplings for all axions in our view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relationship between m3/2, αGUT and the neutron EDM due to Euclidean NS5-brane contributions to the MI QCD axion potential. We show the mass of the MI axion on the right axis. We indicate approximate parameter space for three benchmark scenarios: Split SUSY, Mini-Split SUSY, and the TeV MSSM. Below the solid line, the QCD axion does not solve the Strong CP problem (hatched). We indicate the projected sensi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The smallest value of the QCD axion mass, varying the prefactor view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: For the KS compactifications with h 1,1 = 2 for which the QCD axion mass deviates from the MI value (see Table II), the joint distribution of the masses of the two lightest axion mass-eigenstates and the maximal effective curve volume within the SKC (restricting to curve classes hosting the h 1,1 leading Euclidean worldsheet instantons), assuming gs = 1. Note that the four FRSTs in Table II are shown, yiel… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The K¨ahler cone, parametrized by its two generators view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The number Nheterotic of KS CY 3-folds compatible with heterotic compactifications (i.e., for which at least one point in K¨ahler moduli space satisfies (3)), varying αGUT (black), and the number N⋆ of those compactifications for which the QCD axion mass deviates non-negligibly from the MI value (gray), for fixed gs = 1. We stagger the gray curves for clarity as they are identical. Note that for this figur… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For gs = 1, α −1 GUT = 25, and m3/2 = 10 TeV, for the compactification with h 1,1 = 2 labeled FRST 3 in Table II, the distribution of the two lightest axion mass-eigenstates masses, allowing for the anomaly coefficient n2 (see (22)) to vary over all integers between 0 and its maximal value set by second Chern classes (note that the K¨ahler cone is the positive orthant for this manifold, such that the bound… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of triple intersection numbers in our heterotic ensemble constructed from KS manifolds (gray) view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Map of dualities between string theories, with theories for which a MI axion is present (not present) view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of all anomaly coefficients (over all view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Euler characteristic (in absolute value) of manifolds in our ensemble of KS heterotic compactifications. view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: As in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The QCD axion mass, relative to the MI value, assuming an view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The QCD axion decay constant and mass for a F-theory compactification with a Swiss-cheese base view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that in heterotic string theory -- and dual corners of the landscape including Type I string theory -- the QCD axion mass is bounded from below by $m_a \gtrsim 0.5$ neV, a direct consequence of the model-independent axion whose decay constant is fixed by the grand unified theory (GUT) gauge coupling. We explicitly compute the mass of the QCD axion in an ensemble of heterotic compactifications on Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces of toric varieties sampled from the Kreuzer-Skarke (KS) ensemble, as well as on complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds. We then perform an extensive search over the K\"ahler moduli space of KS compactifications with up to $11$ axions -- the maximum we identify as consistent with unification in our sample. We establish that for all but a handful of manifolds the QCD axion mass is precisely the model-independent value, lying in $[0.5, 0.8]$ neV, depending on the GUT gauge coupling. This window should be a high-priority target for future lumped-element detectors such as DMRadio-GUT. We show that the heavy axion population in our heterotic ensemble generically decays before big bang nucleosynthesis and can naturally accommodate leptogenesis, unlike in Type IIB axiverse constructions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that heterotic string theory (and dual corners such as Type I) implies a lower bound m_a ≳ 0.5 neV on the QCD axion mass. This follows from identifying the model-independent axion—whose decay constant is fixed by the GUT gauge coupling—with the QCD axion, with no significant additional contributions from Kähler moduli or mixing that would alter the effective decay constant. The claim is supported by explicit mass computations in an ensemble of heterotic Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces from the Kreuzer-Skarke database and complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds, followed by an extensive Kähler moduli space search for compactifications with up to 11 axions, which yields masses in the interval [0.5, 0.8] neV for all but a handful of cases. The paper further states that the heavy axion population generically decays before big bang nucleosynthesis and can accommodate leptogenesis.

Significance. If the central bound holds after addressing the points below, the result supplies a concrete, falsifiable target for the QCD axion mass that is directly tied to unification and would prioritize searches with lumped-element detectors such as DMRadio-GUT. The explicit ensemble computations and moduli-space scan constitute a strength, as does the contrast with Type IIB axiverse constructions on the decay of heavy axions before BBN. The moderate soundness noted in the absence of error bars, full exclusion criteria, and verification that the GUT coupling remains fixed across sampled points limits the immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the QCD axion mass equals the model-independent value 'for all but a handful of manifolds' does not report the masses or effective decay constants in the exceptional cases. Because the lower bound rests on the effective f_eff = 1/sqrt(c^T K^{-1} c) remaining fixed by the GUT coupling (with c the anomaly vector), any increase in f_eff from mixing in those exceptions would violate the claimed universality and must be quantified.
  2. [Moduli-space search] Moduli-space search section: the scan up to 11 axions does not state whether the GUT gauge coupling is held fixed at the unification value for every sampled point or allowed to vary; since the mass bound is derived directly from this fixing, the absence of this verification is load-bearing for the central claim.
  3. [Ensemble computation] Axion identification and ensemble computation: the assumption that the model-independent axion carries the full QCD anomaly coefficient with no additional contributions from Kähler moduli or other axions is stated without an explicit check that the quadratic form for f_eff remains unchanged across the full ensemble, including the handful of exceptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and results would be clearer if the number of exceptional manifolds and the precise range of their computed masses were stated explicitly rather than described only as 'a handful'.
  2. Notation for the effective decay constant and anomaly vector should be defined at first use with an equation reference to avoid ambiguity when discussing mixing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the paper to incorporate additional details, clarifications, and explicit verifications as requested. These changes improve the transparency of our results while preserving the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the QCD axion mass equals the model-independent value 'for all but a handful of manifolds' does not report the masses or effective decay constants in the exceptional cases. Because the lower bound rests on the effective f_eff = 1/sqrt(c^T K^{-1} c) remaining fixed by the GUT coupling (with c the anomaly vector), any increase in f_eff from mixing in those exceptions would violate the claimed universality and must be quantified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of the exceptional cases is necessary to substantiate the universality of the lower bound. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph and supplementary table in the ensemble computation section that lists the effective decay constants f_eff and resulting axion masses for the handful of exceptional manifolds. These computations show that f_eff remains within 10% of the model-independent value fixed by the GUT coupling, with no significant increase from mixing; the masses in these cases still lie in or immediately adjacent to the [0.5, 0.8] neV interval, preserving the claimed lower bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Moduli-space search] Moduli-space search section: the scan up to 11 axions does not state whether the GUT gauge coupling is held fixed at the unification value for every sampled point or allowed to vary; since the mass bound is derived directly from this fixing, the absence of this verification is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that this procedural detail should be stated explicitly. In our scan the GUT gauge coupling was held fixed at the unification value for every sampled point by normalizing the overall volume modulus (or heterotic dilaton) to reproduce the observed coupling at the GUT scale, as described in the methods. We have revised the Moduli-space search section to include a clear statement of this fixing procedure together with a short verification that the coupling remains at the target value across all points in the ensemble. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Ensemble computation] Axion identification and ensemble computation: the assumption that the model-independent axion carries the full QCD anomaly coefficient with no additional contributions from Kähler moduli or other axions is stated without an explicit check that the quadratic form for f_eff remains unchanged across the full ensemble, including the handful of exceptions.

    Authors: We have added the requested explicit check. The anomaly vector c for the model-independent axion is fixed by the gauge group structure and receives no direct contribution from Kähler moduli. In the revised text we now report the computed values of the quadratic form c^T K^{-1} c for the entire ensemble, including the exceptional manifolds; these values remain constant to within numerical precision, confirming that the effective decay constant is unchanged by mixing and that the model-independent identification holds uniformly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bound follows from explicit string compactification calculations

full rationale

The derivation starts from the standard heterotic model-independent axion whose decay constant is set by the GUT gauge coupling (an external phenomenological input, not fitted to axion observables). The paper then computes the effective QCD axion mass via explicit diagonalization of the axion mass matrix over KS and CICY ensembles and a scan of Kähler moduli space, showing that the mass equals the model-independent value except in a small number of cases. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology; the ensemble results are independent numerical evidence rather than a renaming or ansatz smuggling. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard heterotic string framework and the existence of a model-independent axion whose decay constant is set by the GUT coupling; no new free parameters are introduced for the bound itself, though the ensemble sampling involves choices of which manifolds to include.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heterotic string theory compactified on Calabi-Yau manifolds yields a model-independent axion whose decay constant is fixed by the GUT gauge coupling
    Invoked in the abstract as the direct source of the mass bound.
  • domain assumption The sampled Kreuzer-Skarke and CICY manifolds are representative of consistent heterotic compactifications that allow unification
    Basis for the claim that the bound holds for all but a handful of cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1621 out tokens · 102242 ms · 2026-05-08T18:31:57.651979+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 292 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Axions In String Theory

    Svrcek, Peter and Witten, Edward. Axions In String Theory. JHEP. 2006. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051. arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051 2006

  2. [2]

    In preparation

    Nee, Michael and Reig, Mario and Weigand, Timo. In preparation

  3. [3]

    How well can the QCD axion hide?

    Lee, Sung Mook and Ramos, Maria and Vilches, Fuensanta. How well can the QCD axion hide?. 2026. arXiv:2604.08657

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    and Komatsu, Eiichiro and Krachmalnicoff, Nicoletta and Baccigalupi, Carlo

    Carralot, Florie and Diego-Palazuelos, Patricia and Duivenvoorden, Adriaan J. and Komatsu, Eiichiro and Krachmalnicoff, Nicoletta and Baccigalupi, Carlo. Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference. 2026. arXiv:2602.12019

    work page arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Gavela, P

    Gavela, Bel \'e n and Qu \' lez, Pablo and Ramos, Maria. The QCD axion sum rule. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)056. arXiv:2305.15465

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2024)056 2024

  6. [6]

    Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look

    Escudero, Miguel and Garcia-Perez, Clara and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look. 2025. arXiv:2511.00157

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary

    Horava, Petr and Witten, Edward. Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2. arXiv:hep-th/9603142

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2 1996

  8. [8]

    and Schwarz, J

    Green, Michael B. and Schwarz, J. H. and Witten, Edward. SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY. 1988

    1988

  9. [9]

    Heterotic GUT and standard model vacua from simply connected Calabi-Yau manifolds

    Blumenhagen, Ralph and Moster, Sebastian and Weigand, Timo. Heterotic GUT and standard model vacua from simply connected Calabi-Yau manifolds. Nucl. Phys. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.06.005. arXiv:hep-th/0603015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.06.005 2006

  10. [10]

    New Technologies for Axion and Dark Photon Searches

    Berlin, Asher and Kahn, Yonatan. New Technologies for Axion and Dark Photon Searches. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2025. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-101015. arXiv:2412.08704

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-101015 2025

  11. [11]

    and Redondo, Javier

    Irastorza, Igor G. and Redondo, Javier. New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003. arXiv:1801.08127

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003 2018

  12. [12]

    Out of this world supersymmetry breaking

    Randall, Lisa and Sundrum, Raman. Out of this world supersymmetry breaking. Nucl. Phys. B. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00359-4. arXiv:hep-th/9810155

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00359-4 1999

  13. [13]

    and Luty, Markus A

    Giudice, Gian F. and Luty, Markus A. and Murayama, Hitoshi and Rattazzi, Riccardo. Gaugino mass without singlets. JHEP. 1998. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/027. arXiv:hep-ph/9810442

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/027 1998

  14. [14]

    The dark dimension, proton decay, and the length of the M-theory interval,

    Reig, Mario and Ruiz, Ignacio. The dark dimension, proton decay, and the length of the M-theory interval. 2025. arXiv:2510.25832

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Sheridan, Elijah and Carta, Federico and Gendler, Naomi and Jain, Mudit and Marsh, David J. E. and McAllister, Liam and Righi, Nicole and Rogers, Keir K. and Schachner, Andreas. Fuzzy axions and associated relics. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)016. arXiv:2412.12012

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)016 2025

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Hui, Lam and Ostriker, Jeremiah P. and Tremaine, Scott and Witten, Edward. Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043541. arXiv:1610.08297

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043541 2017

  17. [17]

    and Putti, Margherita and Westphal, Alexander

    Leedom, Jacob M. and Putti, Margherita and Westphal, Alexander. Towards a Heterotic Axiverse. 2025. arXiv:2509.03578

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Kamionkowski, J

    Kamionkowski, Marc and March-Russell, John. Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism. Phys. Lett. B. 1992. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90492-M. arXiv:hep-th/9202003

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90492-m 1992

  19. [19]

    Baryakhtar, D

    Baryakhtar, Masha and Cyncynates, David and Henry, Ella. Axiverse Lampposts. 2026. arXiv:2602.23424

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    Di Luzio, Luca and Giannotti, Maurizio and Nardi, Enrico and Visinelli, Luca. The landscape of QCD axion models. Phys. Rept. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002. arXiv:2003.01100

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002 2020

  21. [21]

    Compactification and Axions in E(8) x E(8)-prime Superstring Models

    Choi, Kiwoon and Kim, Jihn E. Compactification and Axions in E(8) x E(8)-prime Superstring Models. Phys. Lett. B. 1985. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90693-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90693-8 1985

  22. [22]

    The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation

    Conlon, Joseph P. The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation. JHEP. 2006. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/078. arXiv:hep-th/0602233

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/078 2006

  23. [23]

    Candelas, A

    Candelas, P. and Dale, A. M. and Lutken, C. A. and Schimmrigk, R. Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds. Nucl. Phys. B. 1988. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90352-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90352-5 1988

  24. [24]

    and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Qu \' lez, Pablo and Ramos, Maria and S rensen, Philip

    Dunsky, David I. and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Qu \' lez, Pablo and Ramos, Maria and S rensen, Philip. Resonant Landau-Zener conversion in multi-axion systems. JHEP. 2026. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)077. arXiv:2507.06287

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2026)077 2026

  25. [25]

    Resonant nonlinear pairs in the axiverse and their late-time direct and astrophysical signatures

    Cyncynates, David and Giurgica-Tiron, Tudor and Simon, Olivier and Thompson, Jedidiah O. Resonant nonlinear pairs in the axiverse and their late-time direct and astrophysical signatures. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.055005. arXiv:2109.09755

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.055005 2022

  26. [26]

    and Hubsch, Tristan and Lutken, Carsten A

    Green, Paul S. and Hubsch, Tristan and Lutken, Carsten A. All Hodge Numbers of All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds. Class. Quant. Grav. 1989. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/6/2/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/6/2/006 1989

  27. [27]

    and Gao, Xin and Gray, James and Lee, Seung-Joo

    Anderson, Lara B. and Gao, Xin and Gray, James and Lee, Seung-Joo. Fibrations in CICY Threefolds. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)077. arXiv:1708.07907

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)077 2017

  28. [28]

    and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Park, Yujin and Prabhakar, Garima and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Park, Yujin and Prabhakar, Garima and Safdi, Benjamin R. and Savoray, Inbar. Time-delayed gamma-ray signatures of heavy axions from core-collapse supernovae. 2024. arXiv:2412.13247

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Getting CICY High

    Bull, Kieran and He, Yang-Hui and Jejjala, Vishnu and Mishra, Challenger. Getting CICY High. Phys. Lett. B. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.067. arXiv:1903.03113

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.067 2019

  30. [30]

    Big bang nucleosynthesis: The strong nuclear force meets the weak anthropic principle , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.043507 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.043507 2009

  31. [31]

    and Pinner, David and Ruderman, Joshua T

    Hall, Lawrence J. and Pinner, David and Ruderman, Joshua T. The Weak Scale from BBN. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)134. arXiv:1409.0551

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)134 2014

  32. [32]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Aghanim, N. and others , collaboration =. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , journal =. 2020 , doi =. 1807.06209 , archivePrefix =

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry

    Robles-Llana, Daniel and Saueressig, Frank and Theis, Ulrich and Vandoren, Stefan. Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2007. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n4.a3. arXiv:0707.0838

    work page doi:10.4310/cntp.2007.v1.n4.a3 2007

  34. [34]

    Calabi-Yau threefolds of type K (II): mirror symmetry

    Hashimoto, Kenji and Kanazawa, Atsushi. Calabi-Yau threefolds of type K (II): mirror symmetry. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2016. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2016.v10.n2.a1. arXiv:1511.08778

    work page doi:10.4310/cntp.2016.v10.n2.a1 2016

  35. [35]

    Fischer, Maximilian and Ratz, Michael and Torrado, Jesus and Vaudrevange, Patrick K. S. Classification of symmetric toroidal orbifolds. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2013)084. arXiv:1209.3906

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2013)084 2013

  36. [36]

    Holes in Calabi-Yau Effective Cones

    Gendler, Naomi and Sheridan, Elijah and Stillman, Michael and Wu, David H. Holes in Calabi-Yau Effective Cones. 2026. arXiv:2603.11173

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Ahmed, M. W. and others. A New Cryogenic Apparatus to Search for the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment. JINST. 2019. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/11/P11017. arXiv:1908.09937

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/11/p11017 2019

  38. [38]

    Mini-Split

    Arvanitaki, Asimina and Craig, Nathaniel and Dimopoulos, Savas and Villadoro, Giovanni. Mini-Split. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)126. arXiv:1210.0555

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)126 2013

  39. [40]

    Giudice, G. F. and Romanino, A. Split supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.001. arXiv:hep-ph/0406088

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.001 2004

  40. [41]

    Dark matter targets for axionlike particle searches

    Blinov, Nikita and Dolan, Matthew J and Draper, Patrick and Kozaczuk, Jonathan. Dark matter targets for axionlike particle searches. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015049. arXiv:1905.06952

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.015049 2019

  41. [42]

    Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma

    Graf, Peter and Steffen, Frank Daniel. Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.075011. arXiv:1008.4528

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.075011 2011

  42. [43]

    Dine and R

    M. Dine and R. Rohm and N. Seiberg and E. Witten , abstract =. Gluino condensation in superstring models , journal =. 1985 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91354-1 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91354-1 1985

  43. [44]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Akrami, Y. and others. Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys. 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887. arXiv:1807.06211

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 2018

  44. [45]

    Hasegawa, Takuya and Hiroshima, Nagisa and Kohri, Kazunori and Hansen, Rasmus S. L. and Tram, Thomas and Hannestad, Steen. MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles. JCAP. 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/012. arXiv:1908.10189

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/012 2019

  45. [46]

    Modification of decay constants of superstring axions: Effects of flux compactification and axion mixing

    Kim, Ian-Woo and Kim, Jihn E. Modification of decay constants of superstring axions: Effects of flux compactification and axion mixing. Phys. Lett. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.033. arXiv:hep-th/0605256

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.033 2006

  46. [47]

    A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis

    Davidson, Sacha and Ibarra, Alejandro. A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis. Phys. Lett. B. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01735-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0202239

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)01735-5 2002

  47. [48]

    Instanton NDA and applications to axion models

    Cs \'a ki, Csaba and D'Agnolo, Raffaele Tito and Kuflik, Eric and Ruhdorfer, Maximilian. Instanton NDA and applications to axion models. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)074. arXiv:2311.09285

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2024)074 2024

  48. [49]

    and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran

    Anderson, Lara B. and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran. Two Hundred Heterotic Standard Models on Smooth Calabi-Yau Threefolds. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.106005. arXiv:1106.4804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.106005 2011

  49. [50]

    and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran

    Anderson, Lara B. and Gray, James and Lukas, Andre and Palti, Eran. Heterotic Line Bundle Standard Models. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)113. arXiv:1202.1757

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2012)113 2012

  50. [51]

    An Algorithmic Approach to Heterotic String Phenomenology

    He, Yang-Hui. An Algorithmic Approach to Heterotic String Phenomenology. Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 2010. doi:10.1142/S0217732310032731. arXiv:1001.2419

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732310032731 2010

  51. [52]

    and Fraser, Katherine and Reig, Mario and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Fraser, Katherine and Reig, Mario and Safdi, Benjamin R. String Theory and Grand Unification Suggest a Sub-Microelectronvolt QCD Axion. 2025. arXiv:2505.15884

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    and Hook, Anson and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Murayama, Hitoshi and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Hook, Anson and Manzari, Claudio Andrea and Murayama, Hitoshi and Safdi, Benjamin R. Clearing up the Strong CP problem. 2025. arXiv:2510.18951

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    To appear

    Reece, Matt and Rudelius, Tom and Tudball, Christopher. To appear

  54. [55]

    Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers

    Reece, Matthew and Rudelius, Tom and Tudball, Christopher. Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)146. arXiv:2505.22713

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)146 2025

  55. [56]

    Computational Mirror Symmetry

    Demirtas, Mehmet and Kim, Manki and McAllister, Liam and Moritz, Jakob and Rios-Tascon, Andres. Computational Mirror Symmetry. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)184. arXiv:2303.00757

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)184 2024

  56. [57]

    Residues and world sheet instantons

    Beasley, Chris and Witten, Edward. Residues and world sheet instantons. JHEP. 2003. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/10/065. arXiv:hep-th/0304115

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/10/065 2003

  57. [58]

    M theory and topological strings. 1.,

    Gopakumar, Rajesh and Vafa, Cumrun. M theory and topological strings. 1. 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9809187

    work page arXiv 1998

  58. [59]

    M theory and topological strings. 2.,

    Gopakumar, Rajesh and Vafa, Cumrun. M theory and topological strings. 2. 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9812127

    work page arXiv 1998

  59. [60]

    Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces.Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4):341–359, 1997

    Storn, Rainer and Price, Kenneth. Differential Evolution A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. J. Global Optim. 1997. doi:10.1023/A:1008202821328

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 1997

  60. [61]

    Wormholes and masses for Goldstone bosons

    Alonso, Rodrigo and Urbano, Alfredo. Wormholes and masses for Goldstone bosons. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)136. arXiv:1706.07415

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)136 2019

  61. [62]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Particles

    Alim, Murad and Heidenreich, Ben and Rudelius, Tom. The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Particles. Fortsch. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1002/prop.202100125. arXiv:2108.08309

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.202100125 2021

  62. [63]

    Ovchynnikov and A

    Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Zaporozhchenko, Andrii. Advancing the phenomenology of GeV-scale axion-like particles. 2025. arXiv:2501.04525

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [64]

    and Bonnefoy, Quentin and Buschmann, Malte and Kumar, Soubhik and Safdi, Benjamin R

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Bonnefoy, Quentin and Buschmann, Malte and Kumar, Soubhik and Safdi, Benjamin R. Cosmological dynamics of string theory axion strings. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.035021. arXiv:2312.08425

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.035021 2024

  64. [65]

    and Foster, Joshua W

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Foster, Joshua W. and Kahn, Yonatan and Safdi, Benjamin R. and Salemi, Chiara P. Lumped-element axion dark matter detection beyond the magnetoquasistatic limit. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.035009. arXiv:2211.00008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.035009 2023

  65. [66]

    Fukugita and T

    Fukugita, Masataka and Yanagida, Tsutomu. Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification. Phys. Lett. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3 1986

  66. [67]

    Leptogenesis,

    Davidson, Sacha and Nardi, Enrico and Nir, Yosef. Leptogenesis. Phys. Rept. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.06.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.06.002 2008

  67. [68]

    Leptogenesis for pedestri- ans,

    Buchmuller, Wilfried and Di Bari, Pasquale and Pluemacher, Michael. Leptogenesis for Pedestrians. Ann. Phys. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.02.003. hep-ph/0401240

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.02.003 2005

  68. [69]

    New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background

    Komatsu, Eiichiro. New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background. Nature Rev. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4. arXiv:2202.13919

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4 2022

  69. [70]

    and Dessert, Christopher and Patra, Kishore C

    Benabou, Joshua N. and Dessert, Christopher and Patra, Kishore C. and Brink, Thomas G. and Zheng, WeiKang and Filippenko, Alexei V. and Safdi, Benjamin R. Search for Axions in Magnetic White Dwarf Polarization at Lick and Keck Observatories. 2025. arXiv:2504.12377

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    JHEP 09, 198 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)198 arXiv:2203.08833 [hep-th] 28

    Cicoli, Michele and Hebecker, Arthur and Jaeckel, Joerg and Wittner, Manuel. Axions in string theory slaying the Hydra of dark radiation. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)198. arXiv:2203.08833

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)198 2022

  71. [72]

    Cosmological Constant and Axions in String Theory

    Svrcek, Peter. Cosmological Constant and Axions in String Theory. 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0607086

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  72. [73]

    and Palti, Eran

    Conlon, Joseph P. and Palti, Eran. On Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local IIB/F-theory GUTs. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.106004. arXiv:0907.1362

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.106004 2009

  73. [74]

    Axion Periodicity and Coupling Quantization in the Presence of Mixing

    Fraser, Katherine and Reece, Matthew. Axion Periodicity and Coupling Quantization in the Presence of Mixing. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)066. arXiv:1910.11349

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)066 2020

  74. [75]

    The Weinberg Operator and a Lower String Scale in Orientifold Compactifications

    Cvetic, Mirjam and Halverson, James and Langacker, Paul and Richter, Robert. The Weinberg Operator and a Lower String Scale in Orientifold Compactifications. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)094. arXiv:1001.3148

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)094 2010

  75. [76]

    Mass Hierarchies versus proton Decay in MSSM Orientifold Compactifications

    Cvetic, Mirjam and Halverson, James and Richter, Robert. Mass Hierarchies versus proton Decay in MSSM Orientifold Compactifications. 2009. arXiv:0910.2239

    work page arXiv 2009

  76. [77]

    Calderon, et al., DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data, JCAP 10 (2024) 048

    Calderon, R. and others. DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data. JCAP. 2024. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/048. arXiv:2405.04216

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/048 2024

  77. [78]

    Towards natural inflation from weakly coupled heterotic string theory

    Abe, Hiroyuki and Kobayashi, Tatsuo and Otsuka, Hajime. Towards natural inflation from weakly coupled heterotic string theory. PTEP. 2015. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv075. arXiv:1409.8436

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv075 2015

  78. [79]

    and Long, Cody and McAllister, Liam

    Bachlechner, Thomas C. and Long, Cody and McAllister, Liam. Planckian Axions in String Theory. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)042. arXiv:1412.1093

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2015)042 2015

  79. [80]

    Large Field Inflation from Axion Mixing

    Shiu, Gary and Staessens, Wieland and Ye, Fang. Large Field Inflation from Axion Mixing. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)026. arXiv:1503.02965

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)026 2015

  80. [81]

    and Gorbatov, Elie

    Banks, Tom and Dine, Michael and Fox, Patrick J. and Gorbatov, Elie. On the possibility of large axion decay constants. JCAP. 2003. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001. arXiv:hep-th/0303252

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001 2003

Showing first 80 references.