REVIEW 8 cited by
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the remarkable advancements of large language models (LLMs), LLM-based agents have become a research hotspot in human-computer interaction. However, there is a scarcity of benchmarks available for LLM-based mobile agents. Benchmarking these agents generally faces three main challenges: (1) The inefficiency of UI-only operations imposes limitations to task evaluation. (2) Specific instructions within a singular application lack adequacy for assessing the multi-dimensional reasoning and decision-making capacities of LLM mobile agents. (3) Current evaluation metrics are insufficient to accurately assess the process of sequential actions. To this end, we propose Mobile-Bench, a novel benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of LLM-based mobile agents. First, we expand conventional UI operations by incorporating 103 collected APIs to accelerate the efficiency of task completion. Subsequently, we collect evaluation data by combining real user queries with augmentation from LLMs. To better evaluate different levels of planning capabilities for mobile agents, our data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT, reflecting varying levels of task complexity. Mobile-Bench comprises 832 data entries, with more than 200 tasks specifically designed to evaluate multi-APP collaboration scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce a more accurate evaluation metric, named CheckPoint, to assess whether LLM-based mobile agents reach essential points during their planning and reasoning steps.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
MobiBench: Multi-Branch, Modular Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents
MobiBench reaches near-human offline evaluation fidelity for mobile GUI agents by accepting any valid action at each step, and enables modular attribution of performance to agent components.
-
OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 realistic long-horizon computer-use tasks where current agents achieve only 20.6% binary completion, struggling with state inference and constraint tracking.
-
Measuring the Security of Mobile LLM Agents under Adversarial Prompts from Untrusted Third-Party Channels
Indirect prompt injection through ads, webviews, and notifications reliably diverts mobile LLM agents into leaking data and installing malware across eight evaluated agents.
-
SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents
A history-aware guard model with an LLM judge is reported to cut jailbreak success on mobile agent tasks from 86.1% to 8.4% while keeping task completion unchanged at 77.8%.
-
Atomic-to-Compositional Generalization for Mobile Agents with A New Benchmark and Scheduling System
AI phone agents succeed on single-step commands but fail on multi-step compositions; a new benchmark measures this gap and a scheduler that decomposes tasks recovers most of it.
-
VLM-3D:End-to-End Vision-Language Models for Open-World 3D Perception
The paper promises VLM-3D but the body text is entirely the MVISU-Bench mobile-agent benchmark paper, so the stated result is unsupported.
-
Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
A review that proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy for evaluating LLM agents and highlights enterprise-specific evaluation gaps.
-
Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.