Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Enhancement of quantum coherence in solid-state qubits via interface engineering

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Patching graphene onto an oxygen-terminated diamond surface suppresses surface spin noise, extending shallow nitrogen-vacancy coherence beyond 1 ms.

desk verdict Real, reproducible coherence enhancement for shallow NVs via graphene patching, but the charge-pairing mechanism is overreached and the 'quantitative agreement' is contradicted by the paper's own numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02312 v1 pith:DJEXICFQ submitted 2025-07-03 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Wing Ki Lo , Yaowen Zhang , Ho Yin Chow , Jiahao Wu , Man Yin Leung , Kin On Ho , Xuliang Du , Yifan Chen
show 3 more authors
Yang Shen Ding Pan Sen Yang
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersdiamondquantumsensinggrapheneinterfaceengineeringsurfacespinnoisecoherencetimechargetransferdoubleelectron-electronresonancenanoscalenuclearmagnetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the main obstacle to shallow nitrogen-vacancy (NV) qubits in diamond—surface electron spin noise—can be removed by a two-step surface treatment rather than by purifying the crystal or burying the sensor. Oxygen-terminating the diamond and then patching it with a single graphene layer drives electron transfer from graphene into the surface, pairing the unpaired electrons that would otherwise create magnetic fluctuations. The result, measured on twenty single shallow NVs, is a coherence-time improvement of 1.2- to 3.3-fold, with Hahn-echo times up to 522 µs and CPMG times above 1 ms, near the NV's $T_1$ limit. The paper also demonstrates that these coherence-enhanced shallow NVs can detect single weakly coupled $^{13}$C nuclear spins and external $^{11}$B spins in a hexagonal boron nitride layer, opening a route to nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance in ordinary diamond.

What carries the argument

The central object is the graphene/O-terminated diamond heterojunction. The mechanism is Fermi-level-aligned charge transfer: spin-polarized DFT calculations place the heterojunction Fermi level below graphene's Dirac point, so electrons leave the graphene and pair with unpaired carbon electrons on the diamond surface. Raman spectroscopy supplies the doping signature: a G-band blue shift of about 3.8 cm$^{-1}$ and a blue-shifted 2D band imply hole doping near $10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$, and the OH-terminated control shows almost no shift, matching the DFT prediction. Double electron-electron resonance (DEER) at 286 G measures the consequence for the spin bath: the 798 MHz unpaired-electron resonance visible on the O-terminated surface disappears after graphene patching, and the estimated surface spin concentration drops below $0.72 \times 10^{11}$ cm$^{-2}$. The combination of spectroscopy, calculation, and single-spin coherence measurements is what carries the argument that the interface, not the bulk, was the limiting noise source.

What would settle it

A decisive test would measure the surface unpaired-spin population with a probe that does not depend on the NV's coupling to those spins—for example, scanning NV magnetometry, surface ESR, or a transport measurement of surface conductivity—before and after graphene transfer. If the spins are still present after patching but merely detuned or hidden, or if the coherence improvement persists when graphene is separated from the diamond by a thin insulating spacer that blocks charge transfer, the proposed electron-pairing mechanism would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers in ordinary diamond can be made nearly as quiet as deep NV centers in isotopically purified diamond by engineering the surface: oxygen-terminate the (100) surface and then transfer a single layer of graphene onto it. In this heterostructure, graphene's gapless band structure and the lower Fermi level of the O-terminated surface drive electrons from graphene into the diamond surface, where they pair with unpaired carbon electrons that would otherwise form a fluctuating spin bath. The evidence chain is that all twenty measured shallow NVs improve their Hahn-echo coherence time (up to 3.3-fold, maximum 522 µs); the electron-spin DEER resonance at 798 MHz effectively disappears after patching; Raman spectroscopy shows hole doping of graphene near $10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$; and spin-polarized DFT calculations find the Fermi level below the Dirac point, consistent with electron transfer. With CPMG decoupling the coherence time exceeds 1 ms, close to the NV's $T_1$ limit of $1.6 \pm 0.3$ ms, and the resulting sensitivity lets a single $\sim$17-nm-deep NV detect weakly coupled $^{13}$C nuclei at 17 kHz and 28 kHz and $^{11}$B nuclei in an h-BN capping layer with the expected gyromagnetic ratio. The paper's conclusion is that interface engineering, not isotopic purification or deep implantation, is the decisive step for making shallow NV sensors practical.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the disappearance of the 798 MHz DEER signal after graphene patching means graphene's electrons have paired with the diamond's unpaired surface electrons, rather than screening or detuning those spins so the NV can no longer sense them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Shallow NV sensors made from standard implanted diamond can reach coherence times above 1 ms with CPMG decoupling, approaching the best deep-NV values and the NV $T_1$ limit.
  • AC magnetic-field sensitivity roughly doubles, from about 50 to 23 nT per square-root hertz (16 nT per square-root hertz with CPMG-64), without isotopically enriched $^{12}$C diamond.
  • Weakly coupled nuclear spins, such as $^{13}$C at hyperfine couplings of 17 kHz and 28 kHz, can be resolved at room temperature in shallow NVs.
  • External spins outside the diamond, such as $^{11}$B in an h-BN layer, can be detected with the expected gyromagnetic ratio (1.35 ± 0.01 kHz/G), enabling nanoscale NMR of target materials placed on the sensor.
  • An h-BN capping layer protects the graphene from acid cleaning, so the sensor can be reused and reloaded with new samples without degrading the enhancement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the electron-pairing mechanism is correct, the same interface recipe should transfer to other surface-noise-limited spin qubits, with the same requirement: a semi-metallic patch whose Fermi level sits below the surface's unoccupied states.
  • A sharper test of the mechanism would look for the paired-electron state directly—for example, a change in surface conductivity, a diamagnetic susceptibility signature, or a new vibrational mode after patching—rather than only the absence of the unpaired-spin resonance.
  • The h-BN-graphene-diamond stack hints at reusable quantum sensing chips for biological or chemical NMR, where repeated acid cleaning and sample reloading are essential.
  • Because all 20 measured NVs improved without selection, the approach may scale to large areas, which would make shallow-NV arrays practical for imaging.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a surface-engineering method for shallow nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond: transferring graphene onto an oxygen-terminated diamond surface. The authors measure Hahn-echo coherence times on the same 20 shallow NVs before and after graphene transfer, observe enhancement in all cases (with one NV improving from 41.2 µs to 120.0 µs and the longest reaching 522 µs), and show that a CPMG sequence extends one NV to about 1.06 ms. Raman spectroscopy shows graphene G- and 2D-band blue shifts consistent with hole doping of order 10^12 cm^-2, DFT calculations find electron transfer from graphene to the O-terminated diamond surface, and DEER measurements show disappearance of the 798 MHz surface-electron resonance after graphene patching. The authors attribute this to charge transfer pairing unpaired surface electrons, and they demonstrate sensing of weakly coupled 13C nuclear spins and of 11B spins in an h-BN capping layer. The paper argues that these results bring shallow NV coherence close to the bulk limit and enable external nuclear spin detection without isotopically purified diamond.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a practically valuable advance: it offers a relatively simple post-treatment route to long coherence times in shallow NV centers in ordinary diamond, and it demonstrates a reusable h-BN-capped graphene-diamond platform for nanoscale NMR. The experimental core is strong: the T2 comparisons are made on the same NV centers, the enhancement is observed across 20 NVs, and the OH-terminated and h-BN control experiments support the specificity of the O-terminated graphene interface. The Raman, DFT, and DEER measurements are independent probes of charge transfer. However, the mechanistic interpretation that DEER signal loss is equivalent to electron pairing is underdetermined, and the paper overstates the quantitative agreement between DFT and experiment; both issues need to be addressed before the mechanism can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, DEER spectroscopy; DFT calculation section] The claim of 'quantitative agreement without any fitting parameters' is contradicted by the paper's own numbers. The DFT O D(100) surface has an unpaired-electron concentration of 2.4 × 10^14 cm^-2, which the authors state is four orders of magnitude larger than the DEER value of 0.72 × 10^11 cm^-2, and the DFT transferred charge density of 3 × 10^13 cm^-2 is more than an order of magnitude larger than the Raman-derived hole doping of about 10^12 cm^-2. The manuscript itself acknowledges that reproducing the experimental concentration would require a much larger cell. The DFT results are therefore qualitative support for charge transfer, not quantitative agreement. Please remove or substantially qualify this claim and explain how the ideal simulated surface relates to the experimentally measured defect density.
  2. [Results, DEER spectroscopy; Fig. 2c; Discussion] The disappearance of the 798 MHz DEER peak after graphene transfer is interpreted as direct evidence that unpaired surface electrons are paired by transferred charge, but a loss of DEER contrast can also result from magnetic screening by the graphene layer, detuning of the surface-spin resonance due to local band bending or electric fields, broadening of the surface-spin linewidth from coupling to itinerant carriers, or reduced RF drive efficiency at the NV site. The paper does not report a detection limit or an upper bound on the post-transfer unpaired-spin concentration, nor does it provide an independent observation of a paired diamagnetic surface state. To make the pairing mechanism load-bearing, please provide a control that distinguishes spin elimination from spin hiding; for example, measure the surface-spin contribution to NV T1 or double-quantum coherence before and after graphene transfer, measure the DEER response as a function of graphene carrier density via electrostatic gating, or detect the expected change in surface bonding states with a surface-sensitive spectroscopy.
  3. [Results, DEER spectroscopy; Abstract] The statement that DEER 'exhibits at least an order of reduction in the unpaired electron spin concentration, approximately 10^11 cm^-2, after interface engineering' is ambiguous: the reported 0.72 × 10^11 cm^-2 value appears to be the pre-transfer concentration, and no post-transfer concentration or detection limit is given. Since the DEER decay method is relied on to quantify the spin bath, please state the measurement uncertainty and the sensitivity floor of the DEER decay measurement so that the reader can assess whether the reduction is 'at least an order of magnitude' rather than simply 'below the detection limit.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, first paragraph] The phrase '20 shallow shallow NV centers' contains a duplicated word; it should read '20 shallow NV centers.'
  2. [Fig. 2c and captions] The DEER spectra show the 798 MHz resonance before graphene and its absence after, but the caption does not state whether the red curve is offset or whether any residual signal is below the noise floor; please add the noise floor or confidence interval so the reader can judge the detection limit.
  3. [Sensing demonstration, weakly coupled 13C; Eqs. (7)-(8)] The text alternates between 'A∥ = 17 kHz' and 'A∥ = 17 kHz/G', and 'fB11 = 1.363 kHz/G' is given as a gyromagnetic ratio; please make the units of hyperfine coupling and gyromagnetic ratio consistent throughout, and clarify the definition of ωL in Eq. (7).
  4. [Results, sensitivity analysis] The sensitivity notation is inconsistent: the text uses '23 nTHz^-1/2', '23 nT /Hz^{1/2}', and '16 nTHz^-1/2' in different places; please use one notation throughout.
  5. [Raman spectroscopy, Eq. (3)] The expression for the G-band shift as a function of Fermi level is written with ℏ∆ω on the left and α′|εF| + (α′ℏω0/4) ln(...) on the right; the sign of the logarithmic term should be checked against the cited references, and the reader would benefit from a one-sentence explanation of the physical origin of the two terms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: coherence and sensing results are directly measured and externally benchmarked; the pairing mechanism is underdetermined by DEER, but that is a correctness question, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained on its central claim: the coherence enhancement (Hahn echo T2 rising from 41.2 ± 0.7 µs to 120.0 ± 2.7 µs for NV5, up to 522 µs for NV20, and CPMG-64 T2 = 1063.8 ± 71.2 µs) is a direct single-NV measurement, not an output of any model or fit. The quoted sensitivities (23 nT/Hz^1/2 and 16 nT/Hz^1/2) are computed from the measured T2 through the standard echo-sensitivity formula (Eq. 5) with literature constants, i.e., a re-expression of a measured quantity, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The mechanistic claim (graphene transfers electrons to O-terminated diamond, pairing surface unpaired spins) is supported by three independent probes: DEER (disappearance of the 798 MHz Larmor peak after patching), Raman (G-band blue shift of about 3.8 cm^-1 converted to hole doping of about 10^12 cm^-2 via the independent Pisana/Lazzeri-Mauri calibration of Eqs. 2-4), and DFT (Fermi level below the graphene Dirac point for G/O-D(100) but not for G/OH-D(100)), plus two control experiments (OH-terminated surface and h-BN interlayer) that show the expected absence of the effect. The sensing demonstrations are externally benchmarked: the measured 11B gyromagnetic ratio (1.35 ± 0.01 kHz/G) matches the known value (1.36 kHz/G), and the 13C couplings (17 kHz and 28 kHz) are comparable to independent bulk-NV results. The only partially overlapping work (ref. 20, the USTC graphene-diamond hybrid) is explicitly declared independent in the acknowledgements and is not load-bearing; there is no self-citation chain and no uniqueness theorem is imported. Two concerns a reader or skeptic may raise are real but are not circularity: (i) DEER contrast loss could in principle reflect magnetic screening or resonance detuning rather than electron pairing, so the mechanism is underdetermined, which is a correctness and interpretation risk; and (ii) the claim of 'quantitative agreement without any fitting parameters' overstates the consistency of the three concentration estimates (0.72 x 10^11 cm^-2 from DEER, about 10^12 cm^-2 from Raman, and 3 x 10^13 cm^-2 from DFT). Neither concern involves an equation reducing to its own inputs, so the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two inferred links: the DEER signal loss is caused by spin pairing, and the small-cell DFT represents the low-defect real surface. Both are assumptions the paper partially supports but does not prove.

free parameters (2)
  • Stretched exponential exponent p = p = 2.1 (example)
    Fitted to Hahn echo and CPMG decays to extract T2; the extracted T2 values underpin the coherence enhancement claim, but p itself is a data-analysis degree of freedom, not a physics parameter.
  • Gyromagnetic ratio of 11B = gamma_B11 = 1.35 +/- 0.01 kHz/G
    Fitted from the slope of measured frequency versus magnetic field; confirms the signal originates from 11B, supporting the external sensing claim.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The DEER resonance at 798 MHz corresponds to unpaired electrons on diamond surface carbon atoms with g=2 and no hyperfine structure.
    The paper uses the free-electron gyromagnetic ratio gamma_e = 2.8 MHz/G and 98.9% 12C spinless to assign the observed peak to surface carbon unpaired electrons; this assigns the spin bath identity.
  • domain assumption Triacid-boiled diamond surface has the O-terminated functional group distribution (C-O-H, C=O, C-O-C) used in the DFT supercell.
    The DFT model uses specific concentrations of these groups; if the real surface deviates, the computed Fermi level and charge transfer may differ.
  • standard math PBE with D3 van der Waals corrections correctly captures the direction and approximate magnitude of charge transfer at graphene-diamond interfaces.
    The DFT conclusion relies on the accuracy of the exchange-correlation functional; this is a standard approximation but not exact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancement of quantum coherence in solid-state qubits via interface engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJEXICFQ

@misc{pith2026250702312,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancement of quantum coherence in solid-state qubits via interface engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJEXICFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02312}
}
read the original abstract

Shallow nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond are promising quantum sensors but suffer from noise-induced short coherence times due to bulk and surface impurities. We present interfacial engineering via oxygen termination and graphene patching, extending shallow NV coherence to over 1 ms, approaching the T1 limit. Raman spectroscopy and density-functional theory reveal surface termination-driven graphene charge transfer reduces spin noise by pairing surface electrons, supported by double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy showing fewer unpaired spins. Enhanced sensitivity enables detection of single weakly coupled 13C nuclear spins and external 11B spins from a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) layer, achieving nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance. A protective h-BN top layer stabilizes the platform, ensuring robustness against harsh treatments and compatibility with target materials. This integrated approach advances practical quantum sensing by combining extended coherence, improved sensitivity, and device durability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lekavicius, I. et al. Magnetometry based on silicon-vacancy centers in isotopically purified 4h-SiC. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 044086 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.044086

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.044086 2023

  2. [2]

    Webb, J. L. et al. Nanotesla sensitivity magnetic field sensing using a compact diamond nitrogen-vacancy magnetometer. Applied Physics Letters 114, 231103 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5095241

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5095241 2019

  3. [3]

    J., Blacksberg, J., Anders, M

    Cochrane, C. J., Blacksberg, J., Anders, M. A. & Lenahan, P. M. Vector- ized magnetometer for space applications using electrical readout of atomic scale defects in silicon carbide. Scientific Reports 6, 37077 (2016). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/srep37077

    work page doi:10.1038/srep37077 2016

  4. [4]

    Watanabe, A. et al. Shallow nv centers augmented by exploiting n-type dia- mond. Carbon 178, 294–300 (2021). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0008622321003110

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Neethirajan, J. N. et al. Controlled surface modification to revive shallow nv– centers. Nano Letters 23, 2563–2569 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. nanolett.2c04733. 23

    doi:10.1021/acs 2023

  6. [6]

    Maze, J. R. et al. Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond. Nature 455, 644–647 (2008). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature07279

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Lovchinsky, I. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quantum logic. Science 351, 836–841 (2016). URL https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aad8022

    doi:10.1126/science.aad8022 2016

  8. [8]

    & Santamore, D

    Chrostoski, P., Barrios, B. & Santamore, D. Magnetic field noise analyses gener- ated by the interactions between a nitrogen vacancy center diamond and surface and bulk impurities. Physica B: Condensed Matter 605, 412767 (2021). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921452620307419

    work page 2021

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Itoh, K. M. & Watanabe, H. Isotope engineering of silicon and diamond for quantum computing and sensing applications. MRS Communications 4, 143–157 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2014.32

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Tailoring spin defects in diamond by lattice charg- ing

    F´ avaro de Oliveira, F.et al. Tailoring spin defects in diamond by lattice charg- ing. Nature Communications 8, 15409 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms15409

    2017

  3. [11]

    A., Ariyaratne, A

    Myers, B. A., Ariyaratne, A. & Jayich, A. C. B. Double-quantum spin-relaxation limits to coherence of near-surface nitrogen-vacancy centers.Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 197201 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.197201

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Janitz, E. et al. Diamond surface engineering for molecular sensing with nitrogen vacancy centers. J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 13533–13569 (2022). URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1039/D2TC01258H

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Rosskopf, T. et al. Investigation of surface magnetic noise by shallow spins in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 147602 (2014). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 24 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.147602

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    Ofori-Okai, B. K. et al. Spin properties of very shallow nitrogen vacancy defects in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 86, 081406 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.86.081406

    2012

  7. [15]

    Romach, Y. et al. Spectroscopy of surface-induced noise using shallow spins in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 017601 (2015). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.017601

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    Zheng, W. et al. Coherence enhancement of solid-state qubits by local manip- ulation of the electron spin bath. Nature Physics 18, 1317–1323 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01719-4

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    Kim, M. et al. Decoherence of near-surface nitrogen-vacancy centers due to elec- tric field noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 087602 (2015). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.087602

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    E., Lewis, N

    Li, Y., O’Leary, L. E., Lewis, N. S. & Galli, G. Combined theoretical and experimental study of band-edge control of si through surface functionaliza- tion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117, 5188–5194 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3124583

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Lee, D., Schwegler, E

    Pham, T. A., Lee, D., Schwegler, E. & Galli, G. Interfacial effects on the band edges of functionalized si surfaces in liquid water. Journal of the American Chem- ical Society 136, 17071–17077 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5079865. PMID: 25402590

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    Hao, Y. et al. Coherence enhancement via a diamond-graphene hybrid for nanoscale quantum sensing. National Science Review 12, nwaf076 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaf076. 25

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Herbschleb, E. D. et al. Ultra-long coherence times amongst room-temperature solid-state spins. Nature Communications 10, 3766 (2019). URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-019-11776-8

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Chartier, E., Sweet, E

    Brown, K. J., Chartier, E., Sweet, E. M., Hopper, D. A. & Bassett, L. C. Cleaning diamond surfaces using boiling acid treatment in a standard laboratory chemical hood. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 26, 40–44 (2019). URL https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pi...

    2019

  15. [23]

    Sangtawesin, S. et al. Origins of diamond surface noise probed by correlating single-spin measurements with surface spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031052 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031052

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    & Takahashi, S

    Wang, Z.-H. & Takahashi, S. Spin decoherence and electron spin bath noise of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115122 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115122

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    & Jayich, A

    Bluvstein, D., Zhang, Z. & Jayich, A. C. B. Identifying and mitigating charge instabilities in shallow diamond nitrogen-vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076101 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.076101

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    Lozovoi, A. et al. Optical activation and detection of charge transport between individual colour centres in diamond. Nature Electronics 4, 717–724 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00656-z

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Dwyer, B. L. et al. Probing spin dynamics on diamond surfaces using a single quantum sensor. PRX Quantum 3, 040328 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040328

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    Grotz, B. et al. Sensing external spins with nitrogen-vacancy diamond. New Jour- nal of Physics 13, 055004 (2011). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ 26 13/5/055004

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Sherwood, M

    Mamin, H. J., Sherwood, M. H. & Rugar, D. Detecting external electron spins using nitrogen-vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. B 86, 195422 (2012). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195422

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    Li, S. et al. Determination of local defect density in diamond by double electron- electron resonance. Phys. Rev. B 104, 094307 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094307

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Degen, M. J. et al. Entanglement of dark electron-nuclear spin defects in dia- mond. Nature Communications 12, 3470 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-021-23454-9

    2021

  24. [32]

    Li, X. et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009). URL https://www.science.org/doi/ abs/10.1126/science.1171245

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nature Nanotechnology 5, 722–726 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano. 2010.172

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    Wang, L. et al. Negligible environmental sensitivity of graphene in a hexagonal boron nitride/graphene/h-bn sandwich structure. ACS nano 6, 9314–9319 (2012). URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/nn304004s

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    C., Custer, J

    Spear, J. C., Custer, J. P. & Batteas, J. D. The influence of nanoscale rough- ness and substrate chemistry on the frictional properties of single and few layer graphene. Nanoscale 7, 10021–10029 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1039/ C5NR01478F. 27

    2015

  28. [36]

    Kalbac, M. et al. The influence of strong electron and hole doping on the raman intensity of chemical vapor-deposition graphene. Acs Nano 4, 6055–6063 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1010914

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    Stampfer, C. et al. Raman imaging of doping domains in graphene on sio2. Applied Physics Letters 91 (2007). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2816262

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    Pisana, S. et al. Breakdown of the adiabatic Born–Oppenheimer approximation in graphene. Nature Materials 6, 198–201 (2007). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nmat1846

    2007

  31. [39]

    & Pinczuk, A

    Yan, J., Zhang, Y., Kim, P. & Pinczuk, A. Electric field effect tuning of electron- phonon coupling in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 166802 (2007). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.166802

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    Ferrari, A. C. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, elec- tron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Communi- cations 143, 47–57 (2007). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0038109807002967. Exploring graphene

    2007

  33. [41]

    Das, A. et al. Monitoring dopants by raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor. Nature Nanotechnology 3, 210–215 (2008). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.67

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    & Kanda, H

    Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Kanda, H. Direct-bandgap properties and evi- dence for ultraviolet lasing of hexagonal boron nitride single crystal. Nature Materials 3, 404–409 (2004). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1134

    2004 doi

  35. [43]

    & Mauri, F

    Lazzeri, M. & Mauri, F. Nonadiabatic Kohn anomaly in a doped graphene mono- layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 266407 (2006). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.97.266407. 28

    2006

  36. [44]

    & Righi, M

    Manelli, O., Corni, S. & Righi, M. C. Water adsorption on native and hydro- genated diamond (001) surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114, 7045–7053 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910971e

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Chakrapani, V. et al. Charge transfer equilibria between diamond and an aqueous oxygen electrochemical redox couple. Science 318, 1424–1430 (2007). URL https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1148841

    2007 doi

  38. [46]

    Stacey, A. et al. Evidence for primal sp2 defects at the diamond surface: Can- didates for electron trapping and noise sources. Advanced Materials Interfaces 6, 1801449 (2019). URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/admi.201801449

    2019

  39. [47]

    Li, C. et al. Systematic comparison of various oxidation treatments on diamond surface. Carbon 182, 725–734 (2021). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0008622321006370

    2021

  40. [48]

    On the non-orthogonality problem connected with the use of atomic wave functions in the theory of molecules and crystals

    L¨ owdin, P. On the non-orthogonality problem connected with the use of atomic wave functions in the theory of molecules and crystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics 18, 365–375 (1950). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747632

    1950 doi

  41. [49]

    Broadway, D. A. et al. Spatial mapping of band bending in semiconductor devices using in situ quantum sensors. Nature Electronics 1, 502–507 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0130-0

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Taylor, J. M. et al. High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution. Nature Physics 4, 810–816 (2008). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys1075

    2008

  43. [51]

    Chaste, J. et al. Intrinsic properties of suspended mos2 on sio2/si pillar arrays for nanomechanics and optics. ACS Nano 12, 3235–3242 (2018). URL https: 29 //doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b07689. PMID: 29553713

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    Wang, N. et al. Zero-field magnetometry using hyperfine-biased nitrogen-vacancy centers near diamond surfaces. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013098 (2022). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013098

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    Taminiau, T. H. et al. Detection and control of individual nuclear spins using a weakly coupled electron spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137602 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.137602

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    Abobeih, M. H. et al. One-second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment. Nature Communications 9, 2552 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04916-z

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Sushkov, A. O. et al. Magnetic resonance detection of individual proton spins using quantum reporters. Physical review letters 113, 197601 (2014). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.197601

    2014 doi

  48. [56]

    Lovchinsky, I. et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of an atomically thin material using a single-spin qubit. Science 355, 503–507 (2017). URL https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aal2538

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    Shi, F. et al. Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions. Science 347, 1135–1138 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2253

    2015 doi

  50. [58]

    Shi, F. et al. Single-dna electron spin resonance spectroscopy in aqueous solu- tions. Nature methods 15, 697–699 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41592-018-0084-1

    2018

  51. [59]

    Sushkov, A. O. et al. All-optical sensing of a single-molecule electron spin. Nano Letters 14, 6443–6448 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/nl502988n. PMID: 25333198. 30

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    & Dutt, M

    Zhang, K., Ghosh, S., Saxena, S. & Dutt, M. V. G. Nanoscale spin detection of copper ions using double electron-electron resonance at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 104, 224412 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 104.224412

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Rebuli, D. et al. Oxygen on diamond surfaces. Diamond and Related Materials 8, 1620–1622 (1999). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0925963599000266

    1999

  54. [62]

    & Takagi, H

    Matsumae, T., Kurashima, Y., Umezawa, H. & Takagi, H. Japanese Jour- nal of Applied Physics 59, SBBA01 (2019). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.7567/ 1347-4065/ab4c87

    2019

  55. [63]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 465901 (2017). URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  57. [65]

    & Krieg, H

    Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 154104 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    & Goerigk, L

    Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in disper- sion corrected density functional theory. Journal of Computational Chemistry 32, 1456–1465 (2011). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcc. 21759. 31

    2011 doi

  59. [67]

    Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    & Gygi, F

    Schlipf, M. & Gygi, F. Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials. Computer Physics Communications 196, 36–44 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.05.011

    2015 doi

  61. [69]

    & Payne, M

    Marzari, N., Vanderbilt, D., De Vita, A. & Payne, M. C. Thermal contraction and disordering of the Al(110) surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3296–3299 (1999). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3296

    1999 doi

  62. [70]

    & Fujita, S

    Suzuki, A., Tanabe, M. & Fujita, S. Electronic band structure of graphene based on the rectangular 4-atom unit cell.Journal of Modern Physics 8, 607–621 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.84041

    2017

  63. [71]

    Dipole correction for surface supercell calculations

    Bengtsson, L. Dipole correction for surface supercell calculations. Phys. Rev. B 59, 12301–12304 (1999). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59. 12301. Acknowledgements S.Y. acknowledges financial support from Hong Kong Research Grants Coun- cil (Projects RGC-AOE(AoE...

    1999 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.