Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.06748 v4 pith:DJIQI4VW submitted 2017-03-08 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords attackagentadversarialagentsalgorithmattackingdeepenchanting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce two tactics to attack agents trained by deep reinforcement learning algorithms using adversarial examples, namely the strategically-timed attack and the enchanting attack. In the strategically-timed attack, the adversary aims at minimizing the agent's reward by only attacking the agent at a small subset of time steps in an episode. Limiting the attack activity to this subset helps prevent detection of the attack by the agent. We propose a novel method to determine when an adversarial example should be crafted and applied. In the enchanting attack, the adversary aims at luring the agent to a designated target state. This is achieved by combining a generative model and a planning algorithm: while the generative model predicts the future states, the planning algorithm generates a preferred sequence of actions for luring the agent. A sequence of adversarial examples is then crafted to lure the agent to take the preferred sequence of actions. We apply the two tactics to the agents trained by the state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning algorithm including DQN and A3C. In 5 Atari games, our strategically timed attack reduces as much reward as the uniform attack (i.e., attacking at every time step) does by attacking the agent 4 times less often. Our enchanting attack lures the agent toward designated target states with a more than 70% success rate. Videos are available at http://yenchenlin.me/adversarial_attack_RL/

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gimitest: A Comprehensive Tool for Testing Reinforcement Learning Policies

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Gimitest is an open-source tool that decorates RL environment APIs to enable search-based, metamorphic, and adversarial testing of single- and multi-agent policies.

  2. Adversarial Attacks on Reinforcement Learning-based Medical Questionnaire Systems: Input-level Perturbation Strategies and Medical Constraint Validation

    cs.CR 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    On the NHIS mortality task, standard white-box attacks flip the final prediction of the AdaptiveFS RL questionnaire model in 33.1% (FGSM) to 64.7% (AutoAttack) of tested correctly classified cases.

Pith tools