Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scaling strategies for on-device low-complexity source separation with Conv-Tasnet

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03005 v1 pith:DKY4ZDVT submitted 2023-03-06 cs.SD cs.LGeess.AS

Scaling strategies for on-device low-complexity source separation with Conv-Tasnet

classification cs.SD cs.LGeess.AS
keywords separationblocksnumberspeechapproachesarchitecturebeenconv-tasnet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, several very effective neural approaches for single-channel speech separation have been presented in the literature. However, due to the size and complexity of these models, their use on low-resource devices, e.g. for hearing aids, and earphones, is still a challenge and established solutions are not available yet. Although approaches based on either pruning or compressing neural models have been proposed, the design of a model architecture suitable for a certain application domain often requires heuristic procedures not easily portable to different low-resource platforms. Given the modular nature of the well-known Conv-Tasnet speech separation architecture, in this paper we consider three parameters that directly control the overall size of the model, namely: the number of residual blocks, the number of repetitions of the separation blocks and the number of channels in the depth-wise convolutions, and experimentally evaluate how they affect the speech separation performance. In particular, experiments carried out on the Libri2Mix show that the number of dilated 1D-Conv blocks is the most critical parameter and that the usage of extra-dilation in the residual blocks allows reducing the performance drop.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.