Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Large Language Models on Generative Graph Analytics: Query, Learning, and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14809 v2 pith:DLZEQE7X submitted 2024-04-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.DB

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.DB
keywords graphmodelsanalyticslearningllmstasksdatagraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A graph is a fundamental data model to represent various entities and their complex relationships in society and nature, such as social networks, transportation networks, and financial networks. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have showcased a strong generalization ability to handle various natural language processing tasks to answer users' arbitrary questions and generate specific-domain content. Compared with graph learning models, LLMs enjoy superior advantages in addressing the challenges of generalizing graph tasks by eliminating the need for training graph learning models and reducing the cost of manual annotation. However, LLMs are sequential models for textual data, but graphs are non-sequential topological data. It is challenging to adapt LLMs to tackle graph analytics tasks. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive investigation of existing LLM studies on graph data, which summarizes the relevant graph analytics tasks solved by advanced LLM models and points out the existing challenges and future directions. Specifically, we study the key problems of LLM-based generative graph analytics (LLM-GGA) in terms of three categories: LLM-based graph query processing (LLM-GQP), LLM-based graph inference and learning (LLM-GIL), and graph-LLM-based applications. LLM-GQP focuses on an integration of graph analytics techniques and LLM prompts, including graph understanding and knowledge graphs and LLMs, while LLM-GIL focuses on learning and reasoning over graphs, including graph learning, graph-formed reasoning, and graph representation. We summarize the useful prompts incorporated into LLM to handle different graph downstream tasks. Moreover, we give a summary of LLM model evaluation, benchmark datasets/tasks, and a deep pro and cons analysis of the discussed LLM-GGA models. We also explore open problems and future directions in the research area of LLMs and graph analytics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CausalAbstain: Enhancing Multilingual LLMs with Causal Reasoning for Trustworthy Abstention

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CausalAbstain filters multilingual self-feedback by comparing how much it changes the model's abstention decision, improving abstention accuracy over baselines on two benchmarks.

  2. Multilevel Analysis of Cryptocurrency News using RAG Approach with Fine-Tuned Mistral Large Language Model

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned Mistral 7B model produces graph and text summaries, sentiment scores, and stacked meta-summaries of crypto news, but the paper reports no quantitative evaluation.

Pith tools