Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Carbon Responder: Coordinating Demand Response for the Datacenter Fleet

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08589 v1 pith:DNHZB7WT submitted 2023-11-14 cs.DC cs.AR

Carbon Responder: Coordinating Demand Response for the Datacenter Fleet

classification cs.DC cs.AR
keywords carbonresponderworkloadschallengesdatacentersfairfootprintframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing integration of renewable energy sources results in fluctuations in carbon intensity throughout the day. To mitigate their carbon footprint, datacenters can implement demand response (DR) by adjusting their load based on grid signals. However, this presents challenges for private datacenters with diverse workloads and services. One of the key challenges is efficiently and fairly allocating power curtailment across different workloads. In response to these challenges, we propose the Carbon Responder framework. The Carbon Responder framework aims to reduce the carbon footprint of heterogeneous workloads in datacenters by modulating their power usage. Unlike previous studies, Carbon Responder considers both online and batch workloads with different service level objectives and develops accurate performance models to achieve performance-aware power allocation. The framework supports three alternative policies: Efficient DR, Fair and Centralized DR, and Fair and Decentralized DR. We evaluate Carbon Responder polices using production workload traces from a private hyperscale datacenter. Our experimental results demonstrate that the efficient Carbon Responder policy reduces the carbon footprint by around 2x as much compared to baseline approaches adapted from existing methods. The fair Carbon Responder policies distribute the performance penalties and carbon reduction responsibility fairly among workloads.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Coordinating GPU Data Centers and Power Grid Regulation Service for Exogenous Carbon Benefits

    cs.DC 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GPU data centers participating in power grid frequency regulation via the EcoCenter framework can achieve exogenous carbon savings exceeding their operational emissions.

  2. Coordinating GPU Data Centers and Power Grid Regulation Service for Exogenous Carbon Benefits

    cs.DC 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    GPU data centers that track grid frequency-regulation signals can avoid enough fossil-fuel reserve emissions to outweigh the operational carbon of the workloads they modulate, at low-to-medium utilization.

  3. Assessing the Carbon Emissions and Energy Consumption of U.S. Hyperscale Data Centers

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    US hyperscale data centers consumed 68-99 TWh electricity and emitted 37-54 Mt CO2, representing 1.8% of US electricity use with average carbon intensity 48% above the national grid average.

  4. Evaluation of ML Resource Utilization Requires Model Life Cycle Assessment

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper calls for life cycle assessment to capture embodied hardware costs and full pipeline operational costs in AI development and deployment.