Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Cosmic neutrino background can screen the neutrino force between dark matter particles, suppressing self-scattering and annihilation enhancements in a narrow mass window.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 15:13 UTC pith:DPVNNRH7

load-bearing objection A solid, carefully derived extension of neutrino-mediated SIDM to the CnuB case, but the headline claims about screening and Sommerfeld suppression hinge on an unquantified regulator R=1/m_chi. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.20170 v3 pith:DPVNNRH7 submitted 2025-09-24 hep-ph

Effect of Cosmic Neutrino Background on the Dark Matter Self-interaction via Neutrino force

Pawin Ittisamai , Chakrit Pongkitivanichkul , Muhammaddaniya Sutwilai , Nakorn Thongyoi , Patipan Uttayarat This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords dark matter self-interactionneutrino forcecosmic neutrino backgroundSommerfeld enhancementscalar dark matterneutrino portalcore-cusp problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the relic sea of cosmic neutrinos changes the long-range force that neutrino-pair exchange produces between dark matter particles, and finds that it does in a specific mass window. When the dark matter mass lies below the cosmic neutrino background temperature but above the neutrino mass, the repulsive potential induced by the background cancels the attractive vacuum potential, screening the interaction. In that regime the self-scattering cross section drops sharply, the couplings needed to address small-scale structure problems shift upward, and the Sommerfeld enhancement to dark matter annihilation disappears. Outside this window the cosmic neutrino background is negligible and earlier vacuum-only results survive. The quantitative conclusions depend on a hand-chosen short-distance regulator, because the underlying potential is singular.

Core claim

The central claim is that the quantum force between two scalar dark matter particles exchanging a neutrino pair—attractive and behaving as 1/r^5 at short range in vacuum—is modified by the cosmic neutrino background, whose on-shell neutrinos enter through a thermal correction to the propagator. For a relativistic cosmic neutrino background (m_nu < T) and dark matter masses m_chi < T, the background-induced potential is repulsive and has the same 1/r^5 form over the relevant distance range, so it cancels the vacuum attraction. The paper demonstrates this by solving the Schrödinger equation for the regulated potential and shows that the self-scattering cross section is strongly suppressed and

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-neutrino exchange potential V(r) = V_vac(r) + V_bkg(r), where the neutrino propagator gains an on-shell thermal piece proportional to the cosmic neutrino background's Fermi-Dirac distribution. In vacuum, the potential is attractive and behaves as 1/r^5 at short range; the background piece is repulsive in the relativistic long-range regime and also scales as 1/r^5, producing the screening effect. Because a 1/r^5 potential is singular, the Schrödinger equation is regulated by a flat potential below a cutoff R = 1/m_chi, and nonperturbative scattering is computed by integrating the radial equation for phase shifts. The Sommerfeld factor is defined as the ratio of t

Load-bearing premise

The paper's quantitative conclusions—especially the complete disappearance of the Sommerfeld enhancement—rest on the hand-chosen short-distance regulator, a flat potential below R = 1/m_chi that stands in for unknown ultraviolet physics; the paper itself notes that physical observables depend on this single parameter and that the universal cross-section-per-mass behavior is lost.

What would settle it

Recompute the regulated Schrödinger equation for the same potentials with different cutoff choices, such as R = 0.1/m_chi and R = 10/m_chi; if the Sommerfeld enhancement does not vanish or the screening window shifts outside m_chi < T, then the claimed complete screening is an artifact of the chosen regulator. Observationally, a measured self-scattering cross section at the cm^2/g level for dark matter in the window m_nu < m_chi < T_CnuB would contradict the screening prediction.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the screening is real, in the window m_nu < m_chi < T the neutrino-mediated self-scattering cross section is strongly suppressed, so couplings must be larger than in vacuum to keep the core-cusp solution.
  • For dark matter masses above T, the vacuum 1/r^5 potential dominates and earlier vacuum-only phenomenological results remain unchanged.
  • The Sommerfeld enhancement in dark matter annihilation from neutrino forces is absent once background screening is included, at least for the regulator choice R = 1/m_chi.
  • Massive neutrino effects matter only near m_chi ~ m_nu, where exponential decay of the vacuum potential leaves the repulsive background visible, generating a bump in the required coupling.
  • Among the explicit ultraviolet completions considered, the s-channel mediator scenario is excluded by Z, Higgs, and kaon decay bounds once screening is included, while the t-channel scenario remains viable for m_chi > T.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the screening window is real, its cosmological relevance depends on when small-scale structure forms: earlier epochs have a hotter cosmic neutrino background, so halos forming at higher redshift could experience stronger screening than today's temperature suggests—an epoch-dependent effect the paper does not fold into a halo-formation timeline.
  • The near-total suppression of the Sommerfeld enhancement implies that indirect searches for neutrino-portal dark matter annihilation may see only the Born-level rate; a future annihilation signal with a clear enhancement factor would disfavor the screening picture.
  • Because the regulator R is currently chosen as 1/m_chi by hand, matching R to a specific ultraviolet completion is the natural next step, and a different short-distance behavior could restore or alter the Sommerfeld enhancement and shift the screened mass window.
  • The same background-potential technique could be applied to other Standard-Model-mediated quantum forces, where a thermal relic background would similarly imprint an environment-dependent screening.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies how the cosmic neutrino background (CνB) modifies the long-range force between two scalar dark matter particles mediated by neutrino-pair exchange. Starting from effective scalar and pseudoscalar DM–neutrino interactions, the authors derive the vacuum potential and the CνB-induced background potential, reproducing the known attractive 1/r^5 vacuum asymptotics and obtaining repulsive or attractive background corrections depending on the mass hierarchy. The potentials are then used in a Schrödinger-equation approach to compute DM self-scattering cross sections and the Sommerfeld enhancement factor, with the singular 1/r^5 potential regulated by a flat cutoff below R = 1/m_χ. The paper maps the parameter space relevant to the core-cusp problem, finds that CνB screening shifts the allowed couplings upward for m_χ ≲ T, and reports that the Sommerfeld enhancement vanishes for the parameters shown. UV completions via s-channel and t-channel mediators are discussed, and existing bounds from invisible Z/Higgs decays and kaon decays are applied.

Significance. If established, the paper would make an interesting point: the cosmic neutrino background can qualitatively change neutrino-mediated dark-matter self-interactions, including complete screening of the vacuum potential and the disappearance of Sommerfeld enhancement. The formal derivation of the background potentials is a useful extension of previous work, and the explicit asymptotic forms in Sec. 2.3 and Appendix B are consistent with the known 1/r^5 behavior. The paper also makes a commendable effort to connect the effective operator to concrete UV completions and to check the resulting parameter space against laboratory constraints. However, the central phenomenological claims rest on a regulator radius R = 1/m_χ chosen by hand; the manuscript itself acknowledges that physical observables depend on R and that universality is lost. Because no sensitivity scan or UV matching for R is provided, the headline conclusions about the screening window and the complete vanishing of the Sommerfeld enhancement are not yet robust enough for the strength of the abstract claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.9)] The abstract states that CνB screening "completely vanishes the Sommerfeld Enhancement" and that the effect is strong for m_ν ≲ m_χ ≲ T_{CνB}. However, Sec. 3.1 explicitly says that physical observables depend on the single arbitrary parameter R and that the universal σ/m_χ is lost; Sec. 3.3 then only claims complete vanishing "for the parameters shown above" with R = m_χ^{-1}. The abstract therefore overstates the generality of the result. Since the short-distance regulator directly enters the phase shifts (Eq. 3.6) and the Sommerfeld factor (Eq. 3.8) through the flat potential for r ≤ R, the claimed screening and vanishing are regulator-dependent until R is matched to a UV completion.
  2. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 3.3] The choice R = m_χ^{-1} is not derived or matched to the UV models in Sec. 3.4. The UV completions introduce scales M_N or M_ϕ, and a natural cutoff could instead be R ∼ 1/M_N or 1/M_ϕ. The authors do not scan over R or provide any estimate of how σ/m_χ and S vary with R. A concrete test would be to vary R from 1/m_χ down to 1/M_N (or 1/M_ϕ) and show that the screening window and the vanishing of S are robust; absent this, the central phenomenological conclusions are not yet established as physical rather than regulator artifacts.
  3. [Sec. 3.3 and Fig. 10] The statement that the Sommerfeld enhancement "completely vanishes" is only demonstrated for one parameter point, m_χ = 10^{-2} MeV, T = 10^6 T_0, with R = m_χ^{-1}. Since the paper's own text notes that S is non-universal and depends on the UV channel, this single point cannot support the abstract's general claim. A scan over m_χ, T, and G_s (or at least a statement of the region where S ≈ 1) is needed to make the claim quantitative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.3 and Table 1] The caption of Table 1 reads "T able 1"; please fix the typo. Also, in the non-relativistic limit the scalar background potential is listed as −m_ν T^3/r and −m_ν/(T r^5); the sign conventions should be cross-checked against Eqs. (2.17)–(2.20) for consistency in the table.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.6)] Equation (A.6a) is duplicated: the pseudoscalar long-range asymptotic is labeled (A.6a) after the short-range expression already carries that label. Please renumber.
  3. [Appendix A, text after Eq. (A.2)] The text states γ ≈ 0.645; the Euler–Mascheroni constant is γ ≈ 0.5772. Since this constant is not used in the final result, the error is harmless, but it should be corrected.
  4. [Sec. 4, first paragraph] The conclusion says "the repulsive background potential V_bkg completely screens out the attractive vacuum potential V_bkg"; the second instance should read V_vac.
  5. [Sec. 3.1] The sentence "the the scattering amplitude" contains a duplicated article. Also, the notation R^{-1} ∼ m_χ v ≪ G^{-1} in footnote 3 is unclear; if G here means the effective coupling, the inequality should be explained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the vacuum and background potentials are computed from the stated effective Lagrangian using an external formalism, and the regulator dependence is disclosed rather than disguised as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain starts from the effective DM–neutrino interactions in Eq. (2.1). The vacuum potentials in Eqs. (2.5)–(2.6) are obtained by Fourier-transforming the non-relativistic amplitude of the two-neutrino exchange diagram (Appendix A), and the background potentials in Eqs. (2.9)–(2.10) and (2.14) follow the published formalism of Ref. [57], which is not authored by the present authors and therefore constitutes independent, external support. The central phenomenology is obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation (3.1) with V = V_vac + V_bkg, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' own previous work is invoked. The most sensitive point is the short-distance regulator: Eq. (3.9) introduces a flat cutoff potential below R, and the text explicitly states that 'physical observables depend on a single parameter R' and that 'the universal character of the cross-section per DM mass is no longer presented.' The choice R = m_chi^{-1} is an assumption, and Sec. 3.3 is carefully restricted: 'for the parameters shown above, the enhancements completely vanish for R = m_chi^{-1}.' The abstract's unqualified phrasing ('the screening completely vanishes the Sommerfeld Enhancement') goes beyond that restricted statement, but this is a soundness/robustness caveat, not a circularity. The parameter space is also checked against independent constraints (invisible Z and Higgs decays, kaon leptonic decays), so the conclusions are externally benchmarked rather than self-referential.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the background-modified neutrino propagator of Ref. [57], the isotropic Fermi-Dirac CnuB, and the Wilsonian renormalization of the singular potential. The main arbitrary input is the cutoff R = 1/m_chi; the couplings and masses are model parameters scanned against constraints. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • R (short-distance cutoff / regulator radius) = R = 1/m_chi
    Regulates the singular 1/r^5 potential as a flat potential below R (Eq. 3.9). Chosen by hand, not matched to a UV completion; cross sections and the Sommerfeld factor depend on it. Authors note non-universality in Sec. 3.1.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic potential description is valid: momentum exchange q << m_chi and two-body scattering is governed by the Schrodinger equation with potential V(r) from the Fourier transform of the amplitude.
    Sec. 2.1, Eq. 2.2; assumes cold DM with v ~ 10^-3 to 10^-5.
  • domain assumption The modified neutrino propagator in the CnuB is the vacuum propagator plus on-shell delta-function terms proportional to n+ and n- (Eq. 2.3), following Ref. [57].
    Sec. 2.1, Eq. 2.3; the background effect is computed from the cross term of S0 and Sbkg only.
  • domain assumption The CnuB is isotropic, Fermi-Dirac with negligible chemical potential, and the chiral projection factor C_L(T) = 1 for Majorana neutrinos.
    Sec. 2.3, Eq. 2.11; BBN implies mu/T << 1, and the Majorana simplification removes the chiral projection factor.
  • ad hoc to paper The singular 1/r^5 potential can be renormalized with a flat cutoff, and one arbitrary parameter R encodes all UV physics.
    Sec. 3.1, Eq. 3.9; R is set to 1/m_chi without UV matching, and central results depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption Only the t-channel double-neutrino-exchange diagram contributes to chi chi* -> chi chi*.
    Sec. 2.1; used for the self-scattering amplitude.
  • domain assumption The effective DM-neutrino operator is generated by integrating out a heavy s-channel fermion or t-channel scalar, with the CP-conserving choice y_p = 0 used for constraints.
    Sec. 3.4; model-building assumptions for the UV completions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20076 in / 16740 out tokens · 119123 ms · 2026-08-04T15:13:36.038499+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Neutrino-pair exchange induces a neutrino force that can drive dark matter (DM) self-interactions and impact small-scale structure formation. In the presence of the cosmic neutrino background (C$\nu$B), this force can be modified, with important consequences for DM phenomenology. We study the effect of the C$\nu$B on neutrino forces, generated by the scalar and pseudoscalar interactions. We explore the significance of the background neutrino force on the scalar DM-neutrino portal model, including DM self-scattering and annihilation. Our results show that the interplay between attractive vacuum potential and repulsive background potential leads to a screening effect that varies across DM mass ($m_\chi$) regimes, strongly affecting DM self-scattering in the DM mass $m_\nu \lesssim m_\chi \lesssim T_{C \nu B}$. Meanwhile, for DM annihilation, the screening completely vanishes the Sommerfeld Enhancement induced by the neutrino force. Overall, the C$\nu$B substantially reshapes the viable coupling range for DM self-interactions while remaining compatible with current constraints, offering a pathway to small-scale structure problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 62 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Rubin and W.K

    V.C. Rubin and W.K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,Astrophys. J.159(1970) 379

    1970

  4. [4]

    Roncadelli,Astrophysical and cosmological evidence for dark matter and dark energy,PoS NEUTEL2015(2015) 018

    M. Roncadelli,Astrophysical and cosmological evidence for dark matter and dark energy,PoS NEUTEL2015(2015) 018. [5]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [6]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.648(2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]. [7]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [8]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [9]

    Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann

    J.L. Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48(2010) 495 [1003.0904]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [10]

    Arbey and F

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi,Dark matter and the early Universe: a review,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.119(2021) 103865 [2104.11488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [11]

    Arg¨ uelles, E.A

    C.R. Arg¨ uelles, E.A. Becerra-Vergara, J.A. Rueda and R. Ruffini,Fermionic Dark Matter: Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology,Universe9(2023) 197 [2304.06329]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [12]

    Matos, L.A

    T. Matos, L.A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez and J.-W. Lee,Short review of the main achievements of the scalar field, fuzzy, ultralight, wave, BEC dark matter model,Front. Astron. Space Sci.11 (2024) 1347518 [2312.00254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [13]

    Sahni and A.A

    V. Sahni and A.A. Starobinsky,The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9(2000) 373 [astro-ph/9904398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  12. [14]

    Dodelson,Modern Cosmology, Academic Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    S. Dodelson,Modern Cosmology, Academic Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    2003

  13. [15]

    Baumann,Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (7, 2022), 10.1017/9781108937092

    D. Baumann,Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (7, 2022), 10.1017/9781108937092

    doi:10.1017/9781108937092 2022

  14. [16]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T.R. Quinn, J. Stadel et al.,Dark matter substructure within galactic halos,Astrophys. J. Lett.524(1999) L19 [astro-ph/9907411]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [17]

    Moore, T.R

    B. Moore, T.R. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel and G. Lake,Cold collapse and the core catastrophe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.310(1999) 1147 [astro-ph/9903164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [18]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J.S

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat,Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.415(2011) L40 [1103.0007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [19]

    Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical Tests of Dark Matter Self-Interactions,2207.10638

    S. Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical Tests of Dark Matter Self-Interactions,2207.10638

    arXiv

  18. [20]

    Tulin and H.-B

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,Phys. Rept. 730(2018) 1 [1705.02358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [21]

    Del Popolo and M

    A. Del Popolo and M. Le Delliou,Small scale problems of theΛCDM model: a short review, Galaxies5(2017) 17 [1606.07790]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [22]

    Navarro, C.S

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The Structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J.462(1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  21. [23]

    Navarro, A

    J.F. Navarro, A. Ludlow, V. Springel, J. Wang, M. Vogelsberger, S.D.M. White et al.,The Diversity and Similarity of Cold Dark Matter Halos,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.402 (2010) 21 [0810.1522]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [24]

    Saburova and A

    A. Saburova and A. Del Popolo,On the surface density of dark matter haloes,MNRAS445 (2014) 3512 [1410.3052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [25]

    Klypin, A.V

    A.A. Klypin, A.V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela and F. Prada,Where are the missing Galactic satellites?,Astrophys. J.522(1999) 82 [astro-ph/9901240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  24. [26]

    Pontzen and F

    A. Pontzen and F. Governato,Cold dark matter heats up,Nature506(2014) 171 [1402.1764]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [27]

    Navarro, V.R

    J.F. Navarro, V.R. Eke and C.S. Frenk,The cores of dwarf galaxy halos,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.283(1996) L72 [astro-ph/9610187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  26. [28]

    Governato et al.,At the heart of the matter: the origin of bulgeless dwarf galaxies and Dark Matter cores,Nature463(2010) 203 [0911.2237]

    F. Governato et al.,At the heart of the matter: the origin of bulgeless dwarf galaxies and Dark Matter cores,Nature463(2010) 203 [0911.2237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [29]

    Lovell, V

    M.R. Lovell, V. Eke, C.S. Frenk, L. Gao, A. Jenkins, T. Theuns et al.,The Haloes of Bright Satellite Galaxies in a Warm Dark Matter Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.420 (2012) 2318 [1104.2929]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [30]

    Lovell, C.S

    M.R. Lovell, C.S. Frenk, V.R. Eke, A. Jenkins, L. Gao and T. Theuns,The properties of warm dark matter haloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.439(2014) 300 [1308.1399]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [31]

    Maccio, S

    A.V. Maccio, S. Paduroiu, D. Anderhalden, A. Schneider and B. Moore,Cores in warm dark matter haloes: a Catch 22 problem,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.424(2012) 1105 [1202.1282]. – 26 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [32]

    Spergel and P.J

    D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt,Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  31. [33]

    Vogelsberger and J

    M. Vogelsberger and J. Zavala,Direct detection of self-interacting dark matter,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430(2013) 1722 [1211.1377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [34]

    Tulin, H.-B

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 115007 [1302.3898]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [35]

    Fichet,Quantum Forces from Dark Matter and Where to Find Them,Phys

    S. Fichet,Quantum Forces from Dark Matter and Where to Find Them,Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(2018) 131801 [1705.10331]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [36]

    Costantino, S

    A. Costantino, S. Fichet and P. Tanedo,Exotic Spin-Dependent Forces from a Hidden Sector,JHEP03(2020) 148 [1910.02972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [37]

    Costantino and S

    A. Costantino and S. Fichet,The Neutrino Casimir Force,JHEP09(2020) 122 [2003.11032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [38]

    Feinberg and J

    G. Feinberg and J. Sucher,Long-Range Forces from Neutrino-Pair Exchange,Phys. Rev.166 (1968) 1638

    1968

  37. [39]

    Grifols, E

    J.A. Grifols, E. Masso and R. Toldra,Majorana neutrinos and long range forces,Phys. Lett. B389(1996) 563 [hep-ph/9606377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  38. [40]

    Hsu and P

    S.D.H. Hsu and P. Sikivie,Long range forces from two neutrino exchange revisited,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 4951 [hep-ph/9211301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  39. [41]

    Gonz´ alez-Mac ´ ıas, J.I

    V. Gonz´ alez-Mac ´ ıas, J.I. Illana and J. Wudka,A realistic model for Dark Matter interactions in the neutrino portal paradigm,JHEP05(2016) 171 [1601.05051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [42]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, A. Olivares-Del Campo, S. Pascoli, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and A.V. Titov,Neutrino Portals to Dark Matter,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 555 [1903.00006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [43]

    Orlofsky and Y

    N. Orlofsky and Y. Zhang,Neutrino as the dark force,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 075010 [2106.08339]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [44]

    Zhang,On dark matter self-interaction via single neutrino exchange potential,Phys

    Y. Zhang,On dark matter self-interaction via single neutrino exchange potential,Phys. Dark Univ.44(2024) 101434 [2310.10743]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [45]

    Wilkinson, C

    R.J. Wilkinson, C. Boehm and J. Lesgourgues,Constraining Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions using the CMB and Large-Scale Structure,JCAP05(2014) 011 [1401.7597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [46]

    Bertoni, S

    B. Bertoni, S. Ipek, D. McKeen and A.E. Nelson,Constraints and consequences of reducing small scale structure via large dark matter-neutrino interactions,JHEP04(2015) 170 [1412.3113]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [47]

    Olivares-Del Campo, C

    A. Olivares-Del Campo, C. Bœhm, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli,Dark matter-neutrino interactions through the lens of their cosmological implications,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075039 [1711.05283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [48]

    Ko and Y

    P. Ko and Y. Tang,νΛMDM: A model for sterile neutrino and dark matter reconciles cosmological and neutrino oscillation data after BICEP2,Phys. Lett. B739(2014) 62 [1404.0236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [49]

    Batell, T

    B. Batell, T. Han and B. Shams Es Haghi,Indirect Detection of Neutrino Portal Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 095020 [1704.08708]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [50]

    Boehm, A

    C. Boehm, A. Olivares-Del Campo, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli,Phenomenology of a Neutrino-DM Coupling: The Scalar Case, inProspects in Neutrino Physics, 5, 2017 [1705.03692]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [51]

    Becker,Dark Matter from Freeze-In via the Neutrino Portal,Eur

    M. Becker,Dark Matter from Freeze-In via the Neutrino Portal,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 611 [1806.08579]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [52]

    Coy, X.-J

    R. Coy, X.-J. Xu and B. Yu,Neutrino forces and the Sommerfeld enhancement,JHEP06 (2022) 093 [2203.05455]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [53]

    Horowitz and J.T

    C.J. Horowitz and J.T. Pantaleone,Long range forces from the cosmological neutrinos background,Phys. Lett. B319(1993) 186 [hep-ph/9306222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  52. [54]

    Ferrer, J.A

    F. Ferrer, J.A. Grifols and M. Nowakowski,Long range forces induced by neutrinos at finite temperature,Phys. Lett. B446(1999) 111 [hep-ph/9806438]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  53. [55]

    Van Tilburg,Wake forces in a background of quadratically coupled mediators,Phys

    K. Van Tilburg,Wake forces in a background of quadratically coupled mediators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 096036 [2401.08745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [56]

    Barbosa and S

    S. Barbosa and S. Fichet,Background-induced forces from dark relics,JHEP01(2025) 021 [2403.13894]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [57]

    Ghosh, Y

    M. Ghosh, Y. Grossman, W. Tangarife, X.-J. Xu and B. Yu,Neutrino forces in neutrino backgrounds,JHEP02(2023) 092 [2209.07082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [58]

    Ghosh, Y

    M. Ghosh, Y. Grossman, W. Tangarife, X.-J. Xu and B. Yu,The neutrino force in neutrino backgrounds: Spin dependence and parity-violating effects,JHEP07(2024) 107 [2405.16801]

    arXiv 2024

  57. [59]

    Ghosh, Y

    M. Ghosh, Y. Grossman, C. Sieng and B. Yu,The neutrino force at all length scales, 2410.19059

    arXiv

  58. [60]

    Ferrante, M

    S. Ferrante, M. Perelstein and B. Yu,Sommerfeld Enhancement from Quantum Forces for Dark Matter,2507.12522

    arXiv

  59. [61]

    P. Brax, S. Fichet and G. Pignol,Bounding Quantum Dark Forces,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 115034 [1710.00850]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [62]

    Iengo,Sommerfeld enhancement: General results from field theory diagrams,JHEP05 (2009) 024 [0902.0688]

    R. Iengo,Sommerfeld enhancement: General results from field theory diagrams,JHEP05 (2009) 024 [0902.0688]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  61. [63]

    Petraki, M

    K. Petraki, M. Postma and M. Wiechers,Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams, JHEP06(2015) 128 [1505.00109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [64]

    X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely and H. Murayama,A Practical and Consistent Parametrization of Dark Matter Self-Interactions,JCAP06(2020) 043 [1908.06067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  63. [65]

    Arkani-Hamed, D.P

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner,A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 015014 [0810.0713]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [66]

    Bedaque, M.I

    P.F. Bedaque, M.I. Buchoff and R.K. Mishra,Sommerfeld enhancement from Goldstone pseudo-scalar exchange,JHEP11(2009) 046 [0907.0235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  65. [67]

    Lepage,How to renormalize the Schrodinger equation, in8th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School on Nuclear Physics, pp

    G.P. Lepage,How to renormalize the Schrodinger equation, in8th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School on Nuclear Physics, pp. 135–180, 2, 1997 [nucl-th/9706029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  66. [68]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Cliche and P. Tanedo,Effective theory of self-interacting dark matter,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 083506 [1307.1129]. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [69]

    Beane, P.F

    S.R. Beane, P.F. Bedaque, L. Childress, A. Kryjevski, J. McGuire and U. van Kolck, Singular potentials and limit cycles,Phys. Rev. A64(2001) 042103 [quant-ph/0010073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  68. [70]

    Kaplinghat, S

    M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Halos as Particle Colliders: Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters,Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 041302 [1508.03339]. [71]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [72]

    Xu and B

    X.-j. Xu and B. Yu,On the short-range behavior of neutrino forces beyond the Standard Model: from 1/r 5 to 1/r 4, 1/r 2, and 1/r,JHEP02(2022) 008 [2112.03060]. [73]ATLAScollaboration,Measurement of the Z boson invisible width at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B854(2024) 138705 [2312.02789]. [74]ATLAScollaboration,Combination of searches for ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  70. [76]

    Heintze et al.,An experimental investigation of the radiative structure decayk + →e +γ, Nucl

    J. Heintze et al.,An experimental investigation of the radiative structure decayk + →e +γ, Nucl. Phys. B149(1979) 365. [77]NA62collaboration,Search forK + decays to a muon and invisible particles,Phys. Lett. B 816(2021) 136259 [2101.12304]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979