pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17286 · v1 · pith:DPYZBSZMnew · submitted 2026-06-15 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI

From Democracies to Autocracies: How AI Systems Enable Authoritarianism by Design

Jeba Sania , Marta Ziosi , Fazl Barez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 02:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AI
keywords AI systemsauthoritarianismpolitical regimesdata centralizationregulatory gapshuman oversightAI governancedemocracy
0
0 comments X

The pith

AI systems enable authoritarian practices through shared technical features found in both democratic and autocratic countries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the development and operation of six AI systems used in countries from the US to China. It identifies technical and operational features such as centralizing administrative data for law enforcement, regulatory gaps, weak oversight, and encoding of group traits that allow authoritarian control. These features appear across regimes in different combinations. A sympathetic reader would care because it shows that authoritarianism via AI is not just a problem of 'bad' regimes but arises from design choices that can be addressed by developers and policymakers everywhere.

Core claim

The paper claims that AI-enabled authoritarianism results from specific features in AI systems—centralization of data, regulatory gaps, weak user compliance nullifying oversight, and encoding of protected traits—that are present in systems deployed in both autocratic and democratic regimes, though in varying configurations. Both centralized systems under executive control and fragmented systems that diffuse accountability can contribute by exploiting governance gaps. This reveals that such authoritarianism is distributed across developers, administrators, and users.

What carries the argument

The qualitative comparison of AI system lifecycles across political regimes to identify enabling features for authoritarianism.

If this is right

  • Developers must consider how their systems can be co-opted for political punishment.
  • Policymakers need regulations that apply across regime types to close gaps.
  • Both centralized and decentralized AI architectures require different oversight approaches.
  • User compliance mechanisms need strengthening to prevent nullification of oversight.
  • The distribution of responsibility means multi-stakeholder approaches are necessary.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This implies that open AI models could be adapted for authoritarian uses in various contexts.
  • International cooperation on AI standards might be needed to prevent feature proliferation.
  • Future research could examine if removing specific features reduces authoritarian potential in practice.

Load-bearing premise

That the six chosen systems and publicly available sources provide an accurate picture of how these AI systems actually operate without access to their internal code or data.

What would settle it

Internal documentation or whistleblower evidence from one of the studied systems showing that the identified features do not function as described for enabling control.

read the original abstract

AI-enabled authoritarianism is not confined to autocracies. In this paper, we provide greater transparency by investigating and mapping the lifecycles of six AI systems deployed in different political regimes, ranging from the US to China. By drawing on an extensive range of sources (academic publications, investigative research reports, third-party evaluations, media interviews, government procurement notices), we conduct a systematic, qualitative comparison across systems to identify the critical technical and operational features that enable authoritarianism within their respective political contexts. We find that enabling features include the centralization and co-optation of administrative data for law enforcement and political punishment, regulatory gaps that fail to deter misuse, weak user compliance that nullifies human oversight mechanisms, and the encoding of protected group traits that identify members of vulnerable populations. We find that these features are present across systems deployed in autocratic and democratic regimes, albeit in varying configurations. We also find that both centralized and fragmented AI systems can contribute to authoritarianism by exploiting governance gaps: centralized systems directed by executive authorities, particularly within security and military institutions, are often not subjected to formal oversight mechanisms, while fragmented systems diffuse accountability between stakeholders, paving the way for entrenchment. These findings reveal that AI-enabled authoritarianism is distributed, resulting from design and operational choices made by developers, administrators, and users alike. We conclude with recommendations for developers and policymakers to mitigate these risks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper maps the lifecycles of six AI systems deployed across regimes from the US to China, drawing on academic publications, investigative reports, third-party evaluations, media, and government procurement notices. Through systematic qualitative comparison it identifies four enabling features—centralization and co-optation of administrative data for law enforcement and political punishment, regulatory gaps, weak user compliance that nullifies oversight, and encoding of protected group traits—and reports that these features appear in both autocratic and democratic contexts, albeit in varying configurations. It further argues that both centralized and fragmented architectures can enable authoritarian outcomes by exploiting governance gaps, concluding that AI-enabled authoritarianism is distributed across developers, administrators, and users.

Significance. If the qualitative mapping is robust, the work supplies concrete, cross-regime evidence that authoritarian-enabling design and operational choices are not confined to autocracies. This directly informs ongoing policy debates on AI governance, procurement standards, and oversight mechanisms by showing that the same technical features can be exploited under different political systems. The emphasis on distributed responsibility and the provision of mitigation recommendations for developers and policymakers add practical value beyond purely theoretical treatments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / case selection] The central claim that the four enabling features are present and comparable across regimes rests on the qualitative coding of six systems from secondary public sources. No section details the selection criteria for the systems, the coding protocol, inter-coder reliability checks, or how contradictory evidence was handled; without these the cross-regime equivalence cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Findings on oversight and fragmentation] The abstract and conclusion assert that 'weak user compliance nullifies human oversight mechanisms' and that 'fragmented systems diffuse accountability.' These operational claims are load-bearing for the distributed-authoritarianism thesis yet appear to be inferred from procurement notices and media reports rather than verified deployment data or internal documentation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the range 'from the US to China' but does not name the six systems or their regimes; a table listing each system, regime, and primary data sources would improve transparency.
  2. [Data sources] Several source types (academic papers, procurement notices) are listed but no discussion appears of how potential biases in media or third-party reports were mitigated when coding sensitive features such as 'encoded group traits.'

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below, indicating planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / case selection] The central claim that the four enabling features are present and comparable across regimes rests on the qualitative coding of six systems from secondary public sources. No section details the selection criteria for the systems, the coding protocol, inter-coder reliability checks, or how contradictory evidence was handled; without these the cross-regime equivalence cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that explicit methodological details are needed to evaluate the cross-regime comparison. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated Methods section describing: case selection criteria (prioritizing systems with sufficient public documentation across regime types for comparability); the coding protocol (thematic analysis of sources to identify the four features); handling of contradictory evidence via triangulation across independent reports; and the single-researcher context, where formal inter-coder reliability does not apply but rigor is supported by iterative source review. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Findings on oversight and fragmentation] The abstract and conclusion assert that 'weak user compliance nullifies human oversight mechanisms' and that 'fragmented systems diffuse accountability.' These operational claims are load-bearing for the distributed-authoritarianism thesis yet appear to be inferred from procurement notices and media reports rather than verified deployment data or internal documentation.

    Authors: The operational claims are synthesized from the public secondary sources cited in the paper, which document deployment patterns and outcomes. Direct verified internal data is unavailable for these systems. In revision we will add a limitations subsection explicitly noting the inferential basis from secondary sources, refine phrasing in the abstract and conclusion to reflect this, and retain the distributed-authoritarianism argument as supported by the available evidence. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: qualitative empirical mapping from external public sources

full rationale

The paper performs a systematic qualitative comparison of six AI systems using academic publications, reports, media, and procurement notices. No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, equations, or self-referential definitions appear in the analysis. The central claim—that enabling features like data centralization and regulatory gaps exist across regimes—is an empirical observation drawn from documented sources rather than a quantity defined in terms of itself or a prediction forced by prior fits. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to justify the mapping. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on domain assumptions about what counts as an enabling feature for authoritarianism and on the representativeness of publicly available sources; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Publicly available documents and reports provide a sufficient and unbiased view of operational features of deployed AI systems.
    Invoked when the authors state they draw on academic publications, investigative reports, evaluations, interviews, and procurement notices.
  • domain assumption The listed features (data centralization, regulatory gaps, weak compliance, encoding of group traits) are valid indicators of authoritarian enablement.
    Used to classify systems and draw the cross-regime comparison.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5784 in / 1257 out tokens · 35498 ms · 2026-06-27T02:00:57.152353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/ 03/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai- system_3c815e51/623da898-en.pdf

    2024. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/ 03/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai- system_3c815e51/623da898-en.pdf

    2024

  2. [2]

    Yuval Abraham. 2024. How Israel Used AI to Form Kill Lists and Bomb Pales- tinians in Their Homes. https://www.democracynow.org/2024/4/5/israel_ai

    2024

  3. [3]

    Lavender

    Yuval Abraham. 2024. “Lavender”: the AI Machine Directing Israel’s Bombing Spree in Gaza.+972 Magazine(Apr 2024). https://www.972mag.com/lavender- ai-israeli-army-gaza/

    2024

  4. [4]

    Oluwatomisin Ajayi. 2025. AI-Powered Disinformation and Narrative Warfare: A Global Security Threat. (Jan 2025). doi:10.2139/ssrn.5184687

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.5184687 2025

  5. [5]

    Automation bias

    Saar Alon-Barkat and Madalina Busuioc. 2023. Human-AI interactions in public sector decision-making: “Automation bias” and “selective adherence” to algo- rithmic advice.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory33, 1 (Feb 2023), 153–169. doi:10.1093/jopart/muac007

    work page doi:10.1093/jopart/muac007 2023

  6. [6]

    Visiting, Benefiting, and Gathering

    Arelemorgen. 2018. With hearts set on “Visiting, Benefiting, and Gathering” and offering words of comfort, warmth and care are felt. https://web.archive.org/web/20190706170558/http://www.zgtks.gov.cn/ shishixinwen/zwdt/2018-02-05/55504.html

    arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    1968.The origins of totalitarianism

    Hannah Arendt. 1968.The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego. 290–302 pages

    1968

  8. [8]

    ASPI. 2018. How mass surveillance works in Xinjiang | The Xinjiang Data Project. https://xjdp.aspi.org.au/explainers/how-mass-surveillance-works-in- xinjiang/

    2018

  9. [9]

    2014.NeoFace®Watch

    NEC Australia. 2014.NeoFace®Watch. https://www.naffco.com/downloads/ pdf/neoface-watch-brochure.pdf

    2014

  10. [10]

    Yaniv Avital. 2023. IDF: We used AI to thwart Hamas cell leaders. https: //www.geektime.co.il/idf-fights-hamas-with-ai-and-data-science/

    2023

  11. [11]

    Chris Baraniuk. 2017. Police to use facial recognition at Champions League final.BBC News(Apr 2017). https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39735637

    2017

  12. [12]

    Fazl Barez, Isaac Friend, Keir Reid, Igor Krawczuk, Vincent Wang, Jakob Mökan- der, Philip Torr, Julia Morse, and Robert Trager. 2025. Toward Resisting AI- Enabled Authoritarianism. (2025). https://aigi.ox.ac.uk/publications/toward- resisting-ai-enabled-authoritarianism/

    2025

  13. [13]

    BBC. 2014. Attack on Chinese market kills 31.BBC News(May 2014). https: //www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-27502652

    2014

  14. [14]

    Metternich

    Janina Beiser-McGrath and Nils W. Metternich. 2020. Ethnic Coalitions and the Logic of Political Survival in Authoritarian Regimes.Comparative Political Studies54, 1 (Jun 2020), 001041402092065. doi:10.1177/0010414020920656

    work page doi:10.1177/0010414020920656 2020

  15. [15]

    Yoshua Bengio. 2023. AI and Catastrophic Risk. https://www. journalofdemocracy.org/articles/ai-and-catastrophic-risk/

    2023

  16. [16]

    Martin Beraja, Andrew Kao, David Y Yang, and Noam Yuchtman. 2023. AI- TOCRACY.The Quarterly Journal of Economics138, 3 (Mar 2023). doi:10.1093/ qje/qjad012

    2023

  17. [17]

    2001.IBM and the Holocaust : the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s most powerful corporation

    Edwin Black. 2001.IBM and the Holocaust : the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s most powerful corporation. Dialog Press, Washington, D.C

    2001

  18. [18]

    Masha Borak. 2024. Leaked documents reveal details on Russia’s upcom- ing surveillance system. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202404/leaked- documents-reveal-details-on-russias-upcoming-surveillance-system

    2024

  19. [19]

    Masha Borek. 2023. Moscow Metro biometric payment system hits 320,000 users amid surveillance fears | Biometric Update. https: //www.biometricupdate.com/202305/moscow-metro-biometric-payment- system-hits-320000-users-amid-surveillance-fears

    2023

  20. [20]

    2025.How we investigated Amsterdam’s attempt to build a “fair” fraud detection model

    Justin-Casimir Braun, Gabriel Geiger, Eileen Guo, Eva Constantaras, and Amanda Silverman. 2025.How we investigated Amsterdam’s attempt to build a “fair” fraud detection model. https://www.lighthousereports.com/methodology/ amsterdam-fairness/

    2025

  21. [21]

    2016.Biometric state: The global politics of identification and surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the present

    Keith Breckenridge. 2016.Biometric state: The global politics of identification and surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the present. Cambridge University Press

    2016

  22. [22]

    Nathan J Brown, Steven D Schaaf, Samer Anabtawi, and Julian G Waller. 2024. Autocrats Can’t Always Get What They Want. University of Michigan Press. 3 pages

    2024

  23. [23]

    2007.Authoritarianism in an age of democratization

    Jason Brownlee. 2007.Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    2007

  24. [24]

    Justin B Bullock, Samuel Hammond, and Seb Krier. 2025. AGI, Governments, and Free Societies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05710

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Because There Were Cameras, I Didn’t Ask Any Questions

    Darren Byler. 2020.“Because There Were Cameras, I Didn’t Ask Any Questions”. https://www.chinafile.com/extensive-surveillance-china

    2020

  26. [26]

    Lars-Erik Cederman, Andreas Wimmer, and Brian Min. 2010. Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis.World Politics62, 1 (Dec 2010), 87–119

    2010

  27. [27]

    1993.The nation and its fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories

    Partha Chatterjee. 1993.The nation and its fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton University Press

    1993

  28. [28]

    2015.Democracy in Africa : success, failures, and the struggle for political reform

    Nic Cheeseman. 2015.Democracy in Africa : success, failures, and the struggle for political reform. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. 155–180 pages

    2015

  29. [29]

    Jidong Chen and Yiqing Xu. 2015. Information Manipulation and Reform in Authoritarian Regimes.Political Science Research and Methods5, 1 (Jun 2015), 163–178. doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.21

    work page doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.21 2015

  30. [30]

    Andy Clarno. 2024. Israel’s Lavender Kill List: A Joint Imperial Production. Spectre Journal5, 10 (Nov 2024). doi:10.63478/ls2n6v2d

    work page doi:10.63478/ls2n6v2d 2024

  31. [31]

    Devin Coldewey. 2016. NTechlab aims new FindFace.Pro facial recognition ser- vice at businesses | TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/18/ntechlab- aims-new-findface-pro-facial-recognition-service-at-businesses/

    2016

  32. [32]

    Rob Corp. 2025. BBC Verify Live: How UK police use live facial recognition and videos show typhoon hitting Taiwan.BBC News(2025). https://www.bbc.com/ news/live/cdxyqd0k07vt

    2025

  33. [33]

    2025.A Texas Cop Searched Li- cense Plate Cameras Nationwide for a Woman Who Got an Abortion

    Joseph Cox and Jason Koebler. 2025.A Texas Cop Searched Li- cense Plate Cameras Nationwide for a Woman Who Got an Abortion. https://www.404media.co/a-texas-cop-searched-license-plate-cameras- nationwide-for-a-woman-who-got-an-abortion/

    2025

  34. [34]

    2024.Can Democracy Survive the Disruptive Power of AI? Technical Report

    Raluca Csernatoni. 2024.Can Democracy Survive the Disruptive Power of AI? Technical Report. Carnegie Endowment

    2024

  35. [35]

    Tim Cushing. 2024. California HOAs Are Buying Up Flock Li- cense Plate Readers; Giving Cops Open Access To Them. https: //www.techdirt.com/2024/04/03/california-hoas-are-buying-up-flock- license-plate-readers-giving-cops-open-access-to-them/

    2024

  36. [36]

    Christian Davenport. 2007. State Repression and Political Order.Annual Review of Political Science10, 1 (Jun 2007), 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405. 143216

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405 2007

  37. [37]

    Tom Davidson, Lukas Finnveden, and Rose Hadshar. 2025. AI-Enabled Coups: How a Small Group Could Use AI to Seize Power. https://www.forethought.org/ research/ai-enabled-coups-how-a-small-group-could-use-ai-to-seize-power

    2025

  38. [38]

    A million calls an hour

    Harry Davies and Yuval Abraham. 2025. “A million calls an hour”: Israel relying on Microsoft cloud for expansive surveillance of Palestinians.the Guardian(Aug 2025). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/06/microsoft-israeli- military-palestinian-phone-calls-cloud

    2025

  39. [39]

    Sam Dean. 2019. Flock Safety makes license plate cameras that track every car in a neighborhood. https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-09-12/flock- safety-license-plate-readers-los-angeles

    2019

  40. [40]

    Mount Prospect Police Department. 2023. Police Department Response to Flock License Plate Reader Investigation | News | Village of Mount Prospect, IL. https://www.mountprospect.org/Home/Components/News/News/10311/1042

    2023

  41. [41]

    Garrison Douglas. 2025. Gov. Kemp: Georgia-based Flock Safety Opens New 97,000-Square-Foot Manufacturing Facility. https://gov.georgia.gov/press- releases/2025-04-02/gov-kemp-georgia-based-flock-safety-opens-new- 97000-square-foot

    2025

  42. [42]

    Maher, and Jennifer Pan

    Jennifer Earl, Thomas V. Maher, and Jennifer Pan. 2022. The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review.Science Advances 8, 10 (Mar 2022), 1–15. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8198

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8198 2022

  43. [43]

    2023.Democracy and Authoritarianism in the 21st Century: a Sketch

    Grzegorz Ekiert. 2023.Democracy and Authoritarianism in the 21st Century: a Sketch. Harvard Kennedy School. https://ash.harvard.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2023/12/democracy_and_authoritarianism_in_the_21st_century- _a_sketch.pdf

    2023

  44. [44]

    Fredrik Erixon and Hosuk Lee-Makiyama. 2011. Digital authoritarianism: Hu- man rights, geopolitics and commerce.Handle.net(2011). doi:10419/174715

    2011

  45. [45]

    Essex. 2019. Metropolitan police live facial recognition trial concerns | University of Essex. https://www.essex.ac.uk/news/2019/07/03/met-police-live-facial- recognition-trial-concerns

    2019

  46. [46]

    1963.The Wretched of the Earth

    Frantz Fanon and Jean-Paul Sartre. 1963.The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press

    1963

  47. [47]

    FlockSafety. 2025. Accelerating Innovation: Flock Secures 275 Million to Ad- vance Crime-Solving Technology. https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/flock- safety-secures-major-funding

    2025

  48. [48]

    FlockSafety. 2025. LPR Cameras. https://www.flocksafety.com/products/license- plate-readers

    2025

  49. [49]

    FlockSafety. 2025. National LPR Network. https://www.flocksafety.com/ products/national-lpr-network

    2025

  50. [50]

    FlockSafety. 2025. Privacy and Ethics. https://www.flocksafety.com/privacy- ethics

    2025

  51. [51]

    FlockSafety. 2026. Flock Safety Opens New Boston Office, Plans to Bring 150 Jobs to the City. https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/flock-safety-opens-new- boston-office-plans-to-bring-150-jobs-to-the-city

    2026

  52. [52]

    1977.Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison

    Michel Foucault. 1977.Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Penguin Books

    1977

  53. [53]

    Erica Frantz and Andrea Kendall-Taylor. 2014. A Dictator’s Toolkit: Under- standing How Co-optation Affects Repression in Autocracies.Journal of Peace Research51, 3 (Mar 2014), 332–346. doi:10.1177/0022343313519808

    work page doi:10.1177/0022343313519808 2014

  54. [54]

    2020.Digital Re- pression in Autocracies Users Working Paper SERIES 2020:27 THE V ARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE

    Erica Frantz, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, and Joseph Wright. 2020.Digital Re- pression in Autocracies Users Working Paper SERIES 2020:27 THE V ARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE. https://v-dem.net/media/publications/digital- repression17mar.pdf From Democracies to Autocracies: How AI Systems Enable Authoritarianism by Design Preprint, 2026, Online

    2020

  55. [55]

    1965.Totalitarian dictatorship and autocracy

    Carl J Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski. 1965.Totalitarian dictatorship and autocracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 3–27 pages

    1965

  56. [56]

    2023.The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence

    Allie Funk, Adrian Shahbaz, and Kian Vesteinsson. 2023.The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence

    2023

  57. [57]

    2019.Independent Report on the Lon- don Metropolitan Police Service’s Trial of Live Facial Recognition Technol- ogy

    Pete Fussey and Daragh Murray. 2019.Independent Report on the Lon- don Metropolitan Police Service’s Trial of Live Facial Recognition Technol- ogy. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/24946/1/London-Met-Police-Trial-of-Facial- Recognition-Tech-Report-2.pdf

    2019

  58. [58]

    2008.Political institutions under dictatorship

    Jennifer Gandhi. 2008.Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 73–106 pages

    2008

  59. [59]

    Marlies Glasius. 2018. What Authoritarianism Is . . . and Is not: a Practice Perspective.International Affairs94, 3 (May 2018), 515–533. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy060

    work page doi:10.1093/ia/iiy060 2018

  60. [60]

    2009.Case Study Method

    Roger Gomm, Martyn Hammersley, and Peter Foster. 2009.Case Study Method. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard,55 City Road,London England,EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom. doi:10.4135/9780857024367

    work page doi:10.4135/9780857024367 2009

  61. [61]

    2025.Freedom in the World 2025: The Uphill Battle to Safeguard Rights

    Yana Gorokhovskaia and Cathryn Grothe. 2025.Freedom in the World 2025: The Uphill Battle to Safeguard Rights

    2025

  62. [62]

    GOV.UK. 2013. Amended Surveillance Camera Code of Practice (accessible ver- sion). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/update-to-surveillance- camera-code/amended-surveillance-camera-code-of-practice-accessible- version

    2013

  63. [63]

    Significant

    Andrei Grigoryev. 2024. “Significant” Risks As Facial Recognition In Russia’s Subways Goes Regional. https://www.rferl.org/a/facial-recognition-security- civil-rights-subways/33109725.html

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    2026.Face Recognition Technol- ogy Evaluation (FRTE) Part 2: Identification

    Patrick Grother, Mei Ngan, and Kayee Hanaoka. 2026.Face Recognition Technol- ogy Evaluation (FRTE) Part 2: Identification

    2026

  65. [65]

    2025.In- side Amsterdam’s high-stakes experiment to create fair welfare AI

    Eileen Guo, Gabriel Geiger, and Justin-Casimir Braun. 2025.In- side Amsterdam’s high-stakes experiment to create fair welfare AI. https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/06/11/1118233/amsterdam-fair- welfare-ai-discriminatory-algorithms-failure/

    2025

  66. [66]

    Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman. 2020. A theory of informational autocracy. Journal of Public Economics186, 104158 (Jun 2020), 104158. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco. 2020.104158

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco 2020

  67. [67]

    Sarah Hamid and Rindala Alajaji. 2025. Flock Safety’s Feature Up- dates Cannot Make Automated License Plate Readers Safe. https: //www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06/flock-safetys-feature-updates-cannot- make-automated-license-plate-readers-safe

    2025

  68. [68]

    Patrick Hand. 1982. Probable Cause Based on Inaccurate Computer Information: Taking Judicial Notice of NCIC Operating Policies and Procedures.FLASH - Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History (Fordham University)10, 3 (Jan 1982), 497

    1982

  69. [69]

    Uyghur Ethnicity

    Conor Healy. 2024.Shanghai Launches New “Uyghur Ethnicity” Detection. https: //ipvm.com/reports/filtering-for-uyghurs

    2024

  70. [70]

    2023.An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks

    Dan Hendrycks, Thomas Authors, and Mantas Mazeika. 2023.An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.12001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Dan Hendrycks, Dawn Song, Christian Szegedy, Honglak Lee, Yarin Gal, Erik Brynjolfsson, Sharon Li, Andy Zou, Lionel Levine, Bo Han, Jie Fu, Ziwei Liu, Jinwoo Shin, Kimin Lee, Mantas Mazeika, Long Phan, George Ingebretsen, Adam Khoja, Cihang Xie, and Olawale Salaudeen. 2025. A Definition of AGI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Human Rights Committee. 1989. General Comment No. 18: Non- discrimination. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/hrc/1989/6268 UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I), p. 191

    1989

  73. [73]

    Lavender

    IDF. 2024. Israel Defence Forces’ response to claims about use of “Lavender” AI database in Gaza.The Guardian(Apr 2024). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-defence-forces- response-to-claims-about-use-of-lavender-ai-database-in-gaza

    2024

  74. [74]

    Amnesty International. 2012. Urumqi Riots three years on - crackdown on Uighurs grows bolder. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2012/ 07/urumqi-riots-three-years-crackdown-uighurs-grows-bolder/

    2012

  75. [75]

    IPVM. 2021. IPVM Full Testimony at Uyghur Tribunal, September 12, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJQmeskvhvw

    2021

  76. [76]

    Leo Kelion. 2021. Huawei patent mentions use of Uighur-spotting tech. https: //www.bbc.com/news/technology-55634388

    2021

  77. [77]

    Philipp Kernstock, Constantin Harms, Andreas Hein, and Helmut Krcmar. 2025. Establishing and governing data ecosystems at the crossroads of centralization and decentralization.Electronic Markets35, 1 (Jul 2025). doi:10.1007/s12525- 025-00810-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s12525- 2025

  78. [78]

    Gary King, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret Roberts. 2013. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.American Polit- ical Science Review107, 02 (May 2013), 326–343. doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014

    work page doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014 2013

  79. [79]

    Jason Koebler. 2025. Emails Reveal the Casual Surveillance Alliance Between ICE and Local Police. https://www.404media.co/emails-reveal-the-casual- surveillance-alliance-between-ice-and-local-police/

    2025

  80. [80]

    Kommersant. 2021. Moscow authorities have assured that the personal data of mos.ru users will not be shared with the police. https://www.kommersant.ru/ doc/5030021

    arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.